nach oben

Education and Information Technologies

Erschienen in:

11.08.2019

The effects of the flipped classroom model designed according to the ARCS motivation strategies on the students’ motivation and academic achievement levels

verfasst von: Songül Karabatak, Hakan Polat

Erschienen in: Education and Information Technologies | Ausgabe 3/2020

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the effects of the traditional classroom model, distance education model and flipped classroom model designed according to ARCS (attention, relevance, confidence and satisfaction) motivation strategies on motivation and academic achievement levels. For this purpose, the study was conducted by using an experimental pretest-posttest control group design. Purposive sampling was used to determine the participants. Frequency, percentage, mean, dependent groups t-test and ANOVA test were utilized for data analysis. The results indicated that the academic achievement levels of the students in the flipped classroom model using ARCS motivation strategies were significantly higher than those of the students in the distance education classroom model and the traditional classroom model. In addition, the training process did not lead to a significant change in the motivation of the students in the traditional classroom model and distance education classroom model, but did lead to a significant change in the motivation of the students in the flipped classroom model. In response to the results of the study, various suggestions were made.

Vorheriger Artikel Editorial for EAIT issue 3, 2020

Nächster Artikel The effect of the serious game Tempoly on learning arithmetic polynomial operations

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Acar, S. (2009). The effects of ARCS motivation strategies on learners academic succeses, permanances of learning, motivations and attitudes in web supported performance based learning. Unpublished PhD Thesis. Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.

Acar, S., & Uslu, D. (2014). The effect of “e-learning system –virtual class” application on students motivation in web-based instruction. EJOVOC (Electronic Journal of Vocational Colleges), 4(2). https://doi.org/10.1501/OTAM_0000000385.

Al, U., & Madran, R. O. (2004). Web-based distance education systems: Required features and standards. Bilgi Dünyası, 5(2), 259–271.

Arnone, M. P., & Small, R. V. (1999). Evaluating the motivational effectiveness of children's websites. Educational Technology, 39(2), 51–55.

Aşıksoy, G., & Özdamlı, F. (2016). Flipped classroom adapted to the ARCS model of motivation and applied to a physics course. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12, 6.CrossRef

Astleitner, H., & Hufnagl, M. (2003). The effects of situation-outcome-expectancies and of ARCS-strategies on self-regulated learning with web-lectures. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 12(4), 361–376.

Bahar, E., & Kaya, F. (2013). The attitudes of social programs students in vocational high schools towards the use of information technologies. Journal of Higher Education & Science, 3(1), 70–79.CrossRef

Bennett, C. F., & Monds, K. E. (2008). Online courses: The real challenge is “motivation”. College Teaching Methods and Styles Journal, 4(6), 1–6.

Bilgiç, H. G., & Tüzün, H. (2015). Problems in web-based distance education programs of higher education institutions. Açıköğretim Uygulamaları ve Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1(3), 26–50.

Bingöl, A., & Halisdemir, N. (2017). Development of academic achievement test for the university students in basic information technologies course. International Journal of Social Science, 54, 541–554.

Bonk, C. (2001). Online teaching in an online world. http://www.publicationshare.com/docs/faculty_survey_report.pdf Accessed 25 December 2018.

Can, A. (2013). SPSS ile bilimsel araştırma sürecince nicel veri analizi. Ankara: Pegem Publishing.

Cabı, E., & Ergün, E. (2016). The impact of instructional technologies and material development course on the teacher candidates’ concern about using educational technologies. Başkent University Journal of Education, 3(1), 37–43.

Carswell, A. D., & Venkatesh, V. (2002). Learner outcomes in an asynchronous distance education environment. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 56(5), 475–494.CrossRef

Çelik, V. (2009). Sınıf yönetimi. Ankara: Nobel Publishing.

Çetin, U. (2007). The effect of the computer assisted education software based on ARCS motivation model on students achievement and permanance of learning. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.

ChanLin, L. J. (2009). Applying motivational analysis in a web-based course. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 46(1), 91–103.CrossRef

Chen, Y., Wang, Y., Kinshuk, & Chen, N. S. (2014). Is FLIP enough? or should we use the FLIPPED model instead? Computers and Education, 79, 16–27.CrossRef

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2005). Research methods in education (5th ed.). London: Routledge Falmer.

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative. Fourth edition. New Jersey: Upper Saddle River.

Dede, Y. (2003). The effect of the ARCS motivation model upon the students’ motivation towards mathematics. Pamukkale University Journal of Education, 14(14), 173–182.

Deslauriers, L., Schelew, E., & Wieman, C. (2011). Improved learning in a large-enrollment physics class. Science (New York, N.Y.), 332(6031), 862–864. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1201783.CrossRef

Eşgi, N. (2006). The effect of the printed material and face to face teaching on students’ success on web based teaching. The Journal of Turkish Educational Sciences, 4(4), 459–475.

Frydenberg, M. (2012). Flipping Excel. 2012 Proceedings of the Information Systems Educators Conference, 1–1, New Orleans: EDSIG.

Gabrielle, D. M. (2003). The effects of technology-mediated instructional strategies on motivation, performance and self-directed learning. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. USA: Florida State University.

Gençer, B. G., Gürbulak, N., & Adıgüzel, T. (2014). Eğitimde yeni bir süreç: Ters-yüz sınıf sistemi. In International teacher education conference (ITEC).

Gilboy, M. B., Heinerichs, S., & Pazzaglia, G. (2015). Enhancing student engagement using the flipped classroom. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 47(1), 109–114.CrossRef

Gokcul, M. (2007). The effects of computer software based on Keller's ARCS motivational model on the academic achievement and retention at teaching of mathematics. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Çukurova University, Adana, Turkey.

Goodwin, B., & Miller, K. (2013). Evidence on flipped classrooms is still coming in. Educational Leadership, 70(6), 78–80.

Huett, J. B. (2006). The effects of ARCS-based confidence strategies on learner confidence and performance in distance education (pp. 1–142). University of North Texas.

Hung, H. (2014). Flipping the classroom for English language learners to foster active learning, (October), 37–41, https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2014.967701.

Karabatak, S., & Turhan, M. (2017). Effectiveness of web-based problem-based school administrator training program and its effect on participants’ attitudes towards web-based learning. PEGEGOG, 7(4), 663–712. https://doi.org/10.14527/pegegog.2017.024.

Keller, J. M. (1983). Motivational design of instruction. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: An overview of their current status (pp. 383–403). Hilldale: New Jersey, Lawrance Erlbaum Associates Inc..

Keller, J. M. (1987). Development and use of ARCS model in instructional design. Journal of Instructional Development, 10(3), 2–10.CrossRef

Keller, J. M. (2006). Development of two measures of learner motivation: CIS and IMMS, version: 060222. Unpublished manuscript in progress. Florida State University.

Keller, J. M. (2010). Motivational design for learning and performance: The ARCS model approach. New York: Springer Science+Business Media.CrossRef

Keller, J. M., & Subhiyah, R. (1987). Manual for course interest survey (CIS). Tallahassee, FL, USA.

Kelly, D., & Weibelzahl, S. (2005). Raising confidence levels using motivational contingency design techniques. Dublin: National College of Ireland.

Kong, S. C. (2014). Developing information literacy and critical thinking skills through domain knowledge learning in digital classrooms: An experience of practicing flipped classroom strategy. Computers & Education, 78, 160–173.CrossRef

Kostaris, C., Sergis, S., Sampson, D. G., Giannakos, M. N., & Pelliccione, L. (2017). Investigating the potential of the flipped classroom model in K-12 ICT teaching and learning: An action research study. Educational Technology & Society, 20(1), 261–273.

Larcara, M. (2014). Benefits of the flipped classroom model. Advances in educational technologies and instructional design: Promoting active learning through the flipped classroom model, 132–144.

Li, K., & Keller, J. M. (2018). Use of the ARCS model in education: A literature review. Computers & Education, 122, 54–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.03.019.

Li, K., & Moore, D. R. (2018). Motivating students in massive open online courses (MOOCs) using the attention, r, confidence, satisfaction (ARCS) model. Journal of Formative Design in Learning, 2(2), 102–113.CrossRef

Love, B., Hodge, A., Grandgenett, N., & Swift, A. W. (2013). Student learning and perceptions in a flipped linear algebra course. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 45(3), 317–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2013.822582.

MacDonald, C. J., Stodel, E. J., Farres, L. G., Breithaupt, K., & Gabriel, M. A. (2001). The demand-driven learning model: A framework for web-based learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 4(1), 9–30.CrossRef

Malik, S. (2014). Effectiveness of ARCS model of motivational design to overcome non completion rate of students in distance education. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 15(2), 194–200.CrossRef

Mills, R. J., & Sorensen, N. (2004). Kids college 2004: An implementation of the ARCS model of motivational design. USA: Utah University.

Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (2011). Distance education: A systems view of online learning. Cengage Learning.

Morrison, D. (2003). E-learning strategies: How to get implementation and delivery right first time. England: John Wiley and Sons Inc.

Naime-Diefenbach, B. (1991). Validation of attention and confidence as independent components of the ARCS motivational model. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Florida State University, Tallahassee.

Roach, T. (2014). Student perceptions toward flipped learning: New methods to increase interaction and active learning in economics. International Review of Economics Education, 17, 74–84.CrossRef

Schultz, D., Duffield, S., Rasmussen, S. C., & Wageman, J. (2014). Effects of the flipped classroom model on student performance for advanced placement high school chemistry students. Journal of Chemical Education, 91(9), 1334–1339.CrossRef

Silverman, D. (2006). Interpreting qualitative data (3rd ed.). London: Sage.

Thalheimer, W., Cook, S. (2002). How to calculate effect sizes from published research articles: A simplified methodology. Work-Learning Research, 1–9.

Turel, Y. K., & Sanal, S. O. (2018). The effects of an ARCS based e-book on student's achievement, motivation and anxiety. Computers & Education, 127, 130–140.CrossRef

Ünsal, H. (2007). Evaluation of blended learning acticity on multiple levels. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.

Ünsal, N Ö. (2014). Research conducted on determinatıon the interest level of learners in lessons and teaching materials who learn ten-finger f keyboard according to Acar method. Unpublished Master's thesis, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.

Usta, E. (2007). The effects of blended learning and online learning on academic achievement and student satisfaction. Gazi Üniversitesi, Ankara, Turkey: Unpublished PhD Thesis.

Verleger, M. A., & Bishop, L. J. (2013). The flipped classrom: A survey of the research. 120th ASEE Conference & Exposition. American Society for Engineering Education., 20–26.

Winter, J. B. (2013). The effect of the flipped classroom model on achievement in an introductory college physics course. Unpublished Master's Thesis, Mississippi State University.

Yolcu, H. (2015). Blended learning and its applications basics. The Journal of Academic Social Science Studies, International Journal of Social Science, 33, 255–260.CrossRef

Zownorega, J. S. (2013). Effectiveness of flipping the classroom in a honors level, mechanics-based physics class. Unpublished Master’s Thesis. Eastern Illinois University.

Titel: The effects of the flipped classroom model designed according to the ARCS motivation strategies on the students’ motivation and academic achievement levels
verfasst von: Songül Karabatak
Hakan Polat
Publikationsdatum: 11.08.2019
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Education and Information Technologies / Ausgabe 3/2020
Print ISSN: 1360-2357
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7608
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09985-1

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2020

Successful transition to synchronous learning environments in distance education: A research on entry-level synchronous facilitator competencies

Investigating the impact of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) to help improve reading comprehension in low performing urban elementary schools

Sprego: case study on the effectiveness of teaching spreadsheet management with schema construction

What leads to social learning? Students’ attitudes towards using social media applications in Omani higher education

Learning by coding: A sociocultural approach to teaching web development in higher education

Predicting student final performance using artificial neural networks in online learning environments