Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
The Challenges in Implementing E-Democracy in the United States Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2018 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

11. The ‘engage’ System: Using Real-Time Digital Technologies to Support Citizen-Centred Design in Government

verfasst von : Brian Cleland, Jonathan Wallace, Michaela Black

Erschienen in: User Centric E-Government

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Much of the literature on citizen-centric e-government focuses on the evaluation and classification of systems, while relatively little research exists on methods to ensure that such systems are designed around unmet user needs. This chapter focuses on the use of a specific ICT-based tool for citizen-centred service design within Northern Ireland. The ‘engage’ system is a novel technology for user research developed by Ulster University and commissioned by a variety of public sector clients to support the development of new policies and services. The ‘engage’ platform is examined in the context of the wider trend towards user-centred design and digital transformation in government. The relative advantages and disadvantages of the system are analysed in light of alternative user research methods and tools currently in use in the public sector. Lessons from real-world trials over a period of approximately 5 years are discussed, and implications for the future adoption of user research technologies in the public sector are explored.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Enacting Digital Government Services for Noncitizens: The Case of Migration Services
Nächstes Kapitel Play It to Plan It? The Impact of Game Elements on Usage of a Urban Planning App
Literatur
1.
Zhang H, Xu X, Xiao J (2014) Diffusion of e-government: a literature review and directions for future directions. Gov Inf Q 31(4):631–636CrossRef
2.
Belanger F, Carter L (2012) Digitizing government interactions with constituents: an historical review of E-Government research in information systems. J Assoc Inf Syst 13(5):1
3.
Osman IH, Anouze AL, Irani Z, Al-Ayoubi B, Lee H, Balcı A et al (2014) COBRA framework to evaluate e-government services: a citizen-centric perspective. Gov Inf Q 31(2):243–256CrossRef
4.
Mahmood Z (ed) (2013) E-government implementation and practice in developing countries. IGI Global, Hershey
5.
Chen Y-C (2010) Citizen-centric E-government services: understanding integrated citizen service information systems. Soc Sci Comput Rev 28(4):427–442CrossRef
6.
Edmiston KD (2003) State and local e-government: prospects and challenges. Am Rev Public Adm 33(1):20–45CrossRef
7.
Irani Z, Weerakkody V, Kamal M, Mohammed Hindi N, Osman IH, Latef Anouze A, Al-Ayoubi B (2012) An analysis of methodologies utilised in e-government research: a user satisfaction perspective. J Enterprise Inf Manag 25(3):298–313CrossRef
8.
Dwivedi YK (2009) Viewpoint: an analysis of e-government research published in Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy (TGPPP). Transform Gov People Process Policy 3(1):7–15
9.
Irani Z, Dwivedi YK (2008) Editorial. Transf Gov People Process Policy 2(4):221–224
10.
Welch EW, Hinnant CC, Moon MJ (2004) Linking citizen satisfaction with e-government and trust in government. J Public Adm Res Theory 15(3):371–391CrossRef
11.
Riley TB (2003) Defining e-government and E-governance: staying the course (The Riley Report), eGov Monitor, London
12.
Irani Z, Elliman T, Jackson P (2007) Electronic transformation of government in the UK: a research agenda. Eur J Inf Syst 16(4):327–335CrossRef
13.
Hazlett S, Hill F (2003) e-government: the realities of using IT to transform the public sector. Manag Serv Qual 13(6):445–452CrossRef
14.
Sharif A, Irani Z, Weerakkody V (2010) Evaluating and modelling constructs for decision making in e-government. J Oper Res Soc 61(6):929–952CrossRef
15.
Carter L, Weerakkody V (2008) e-government adoption: a cultural comparison. Inf Syst Front 10(4):473–482CrossRef
16.
Layne K, Lee J (2001) Developing fully functional E-government: a four stage model. Gov Inf Q 18(2):122–136CrossRef
17.
Gant J, Chen Y (2001) Transforming local e-government services: the use of application service providers. Gov Inf Q 18(2):343–355
18.
Fang Z (2002) e-government in digital era: concept, practice and development. Int J Comput Internet Inf 20:193–213
19.
Brandtzæg PB, Heim J, Karahasanovic A (2011) Understanding the new digital divide – a typology of internet users in Europe. Int J Hum Comput Stud 69(3):123–138CrossRef
20.
Saebo O, Rose J, Skiftenes Flak L (2008) The shape of eparticipation: characterizing an emerging research area. Gov Inf Q 25(3):400–428CrossRef
21.
Al Shafi S, Weerakkody V (2007) Implementing and managing e-government in the state of Qatar: a citizens’ perspective. Electron Gov 4(4):436–450CrossRef
22.
Coursey D, Norris D (2008) Models of e-government: are they correct? An empirical assessment. Public Adm Rev 48:523–536CrossRef
23.
Norris D, Moon MJ (2005) Advancing e-government at the grassroots: tortoise or Hare? Public Adm Rev 65:64–74CrossRef
24.
West D (2004) E-government and transformation of service delivery and citizen attitudes. Public Adm Rev 64:15–27CrossRef
25.
Scott J (2006) “E” the people: Do U.S. municipal government web sites support public involvement? Public Adm Rev 66:341–353CrossRef
26.
Hiller JS, Belanger F (2001) Privacy strategies for electronic government. IBM Center for the Business of Government, Washington, DC
27.
United Nations (2008) UN e-government survey 2008: from e-government to connected governance. United Nations, New York
28.
Pardo TA, Tayi GK (2007) Interorganizational information integration: a key enabler for digital government. Gov Inf Q 24:691–715CrossRef
29.
Janowski T (2015) Digital government evolution: from transformation to contextualization. Gov Inf Q 32(3):221–236CrossRef
30.
Teerling ML, Pieterson W (2010) Multichannel marketing: an experiment on guiding citizens to the electronic channels. Gov Inf Q 27(1):98–107CrossRef
31.
Cegarra-Navarro J-G, Garcia-Perez A, Moreno-Cegarra JL (2014) Technology knowledge and governance: empowering citizen engagement and participation. Gov Inf Q 31(4):660–668CrossRef
32.
Pieterson W, Ebbers W, van Dijk J (2007) Personalization in the public sector. Gov Inf Q 24(1):148–164CrossRef
33.
Linders D (2012) From e-government to we-government: defining a typology for citizen coproduction in the age of social media. Gov Inf Q 29(4):446–454CrossRef
34.
Carlitz RD, Gunn RW (2002) Online rulemaking: a step toward E-governance. Gov Inf Q 19(4):389–405CrossRef
35.
Bertot JC, Jaeger PT, Hansen D (2012) The impact of polices on government social media usage: issues, challenges, and recommendations. Gov Inf Q 29(1):30–40CrossRef
36.
37.
Missingham R (2011) E-parliament: opening the door. Gov Inf Q 28(3):426–434CrossRef
38.
Bannister F, Connolly R (2011) The trouble with transparency: a critical review of openness in e-Government. Policy Internet 3(1):1–30CrossRef
39.
Brown MM (2007) Understanding e-government benefits. Am Rev Public Adm 37:178–197CrossRef
40.
41.
42.
Farmer JP, Panchadsaram R (2016) Designing American government. Des Manage Rev 27(1):6–11
43.
44.
Dunleavy P, Margetts H, Bastow S, Tinkler J (2006) New public management is dead—long live digital-era governance. J Public Adm Res Theory 16(3):467–494CrossRef
45.
Von Hippel E (1986) Lead users: a source of novel product concepts. Manage Sci 32(7):791–805CrossRef
46.
Galbraith B, Cleland B, Martin S, Wallace J, Mulvenna M, McAdam R (2013) Engaging user communities with eParticipation technology: findings from a European project. Technol Anal Strateg Manage 25(3):281–294CrossRef
47.
48.
Daae J, Boks C (2015) A classification of user research methods for design for sustainable behaviour. J Clean Prod 106:680–689CrossRef
49.
Preece J, Rogers Y, Sharp H (2002) Interaction design: beyond human-computer interaction. Wiley, New York
50.
Cleland B, Mulvenna M, Galbraith B, Wallace JG, Martin S (2012) Innovation of eParticipation strategies using living labs as intermediaries. Electron J E-Gov 10(2):120–132
51.
52.
53.
Metadaten
Titel
The ‘engage’ System: Using Real-Time Digital Technologies to Support Citizen-Centred Design in Government
verfasst von
Brian Cleland
Jonathan Wallace
Michaela Black
Copyright-Jahr
2018
Buch
User Centric E-Government

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-59441-5

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-59442-2

Copyright-Jahr: 2018

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59442-2_11