nach oben

Erschienen in:

2018 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

1. The First Geometric POD of LEO Satellites—A Piece of History

verfasst von : Dr.-Ing. Drazen Svehla

Erschienen in: Geometrical Theory of Satellite Orbits and Gravity Field

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The very first precise geometric (i.e., kinematic) orbit determination of a LEO satellite was presented in Švehla and Rothacher (2002), where for the first time double-difference ambiguity resolution was demonstrated using the CHAMP satellite in LEO orbit and the ground IGS network. In Švehla and Rothacher (2003a, b) and later in Švehla and Rothacher (2005a, b) geometric precise orbit determination (POD) was demonstrated to cm-level accuracy and presented as an established technique and as very attractive for gravity field determination. Here we give a chronological overview of the development of the method.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nächstes Kapitel Reference Frame from the Combination of a LEO Satellite with GPS Constellation and Ground Network of GPS Stations

Altamimi Z, Collilieux X, Métivier L (2011) J Geod 85:457. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-011-0444-4CrossRef

Bauersima I (1983) NAVSTAR global positioning system (GPS) I. Berne, Switzerland

Baur O (2013) Greenland mass variation from time-variable gravity in the absence of GRACE. Geophys Res Lett 40:4289–4293. https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50881CrossRef

Baur O, Bock H, Ditmar P et al (2013) Comparison of GOCE-GPS gravity fields derived by different approaches. EGU 2013, Vienna, Austria

Baur O, Grafarend EW (2006) High-performance GOCE gravity field recovery from gravity gradient tensor invariants and kinematic orbit information. In: Flury J, Rummel R, Reigber C et al (eds) Observation of the earth system from space. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 239–253CrossRef

Beutler G (1977) Integrale Auswertung von Satellitenbeobachtungen. SGK, Band 33, Zurich, Schwitzerland

Bock H (2003) Efficient Methods for Determining Precise Orbits of Low Earth Orbiters Using the Global Positioning System. PhD Thesis, Universität Bern, Schwitzerland

Bock H, Jäggi A, Meyer U et al (2011) GPS-derived orbits for the GOCE satellite. J Geod. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-011-0484-9CrossRef

Bock H, Jäggi A, Svehla D, Beutler G, Hugentobler U, Visser P (2007) Precise orbit determination for the GOCE satellite using GPS. Adv Space Res 39(10):1638–1647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2007.02.053,2007CrossRef

Bock H, Jäggi A, Beutler G, Meyer U (2014) GOCE: precise orbit determination for the entire mission. J Geod 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-014-0742-8

Byun SH (2003) Satellite orbit determination using triple-differene GPS carrier phase in pure kinematic mode. J. Geodesy 76:569–585CrossRef

Colombo OL (1986) Ephemeris errors of GPS satellites. Bull Géodésique 60:64–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02519355CrossRef

Ditmar P, Kuznetsov V, van der Sluijs A et al (2006) “DEOS_CHAMP-01C_70”: a model of the Earth’s gravity field computed from accelerations of the CHAMP satellite. J Geodesy 79:586–601. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-005-0008-6CrossRef

Dow JM, Neilan RE, Gendt G (2005) The international GPS service: celebrating the 10th anniversary and looking to the next decade. Adv Space Res 36:320–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2005.05.125CrossRef

Fengler MJ, Freeden W, Michel V (2004) The Kaiserslautern multiscale geopotential model SWITCH-03 from orbit perturbations of the satellite CHAMP and its comparison to the models EGM96, UCPH2002_02_0.5, EIGEN-1s and EIGEN-2. Geophys J Int 157:499–514. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2004.02209.xCrossRef

Földváry L, Svehla D, Gerlach C, Wermuth M, Gruber T, Rummel R, Rothacher M, Frommknecht B, Peters T, Steigenberger P (2005) Gravity model TUM-2Sp based on the energy balance approach and kinematic CHAMP orbits. In: Earth observation with CHAMP, Results from three years in orbit. Springer, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-26800-6_2

Gerlach C, Sneeuw N, Visser P, Svehla D (2003) CHAMP gravity field recovery using the energy balance approach. Adv Geosci 1: 73–80, ISSN 1680-7340, https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-1-73-2003CrossRef

Gerlach C, Sneeuw N, Visser P, Svehla D (2003) CHAMP gravity field recovery with the energy balance approach: first results. In: Reigber C, Lühr H, Schwintzer P (eds) First CHAMP mission results for gravity, magnetic and atmospheric studies, pp 134–139, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-38366-6_20CrossRef

Hugentobler U (2012) The development of the IGS in 2011 the governing board’s perspective. IGS Technical Report 2011, pp 3–10, IGS Central Bureau, Jet Propulsion Laboratory

Hugentobler U, Gruber T, Steigenberger P, Angermann D, Bouman J, Gerstl M, Richter B (2012) GGOS Bureau for Standards and Conventions: Integrated standards and conventions for geodesy. In: Kenyon SC, Pacino MC, Marti UJ (eds) Geodesy for planet earth, IAG symposia, vol 136, pp 995–998. Springer, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20338-1_124

Hwang C, Tseng TP, Lin T, Svehla D, Schreiner B (2009) Precise orbit determination for the FORMOSAT-3/COSMIC satellite mission using GPS. J Geodesy 83(5): 477–489. Springer, ISSN 0949-7714, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-008-0256-3CrossRef

Hwang C, Tseng TP, Lin TJ, Svehla D, Hugentobler U, Chao B (2010) Quality assessment of FORMOSAT-3/COSMIC and GRACE GPS observables: analysis of multipath, ionospheric delay and phase residual in orbit determination. GPS Solutions 14(1):121–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-009-0145-0,2010CrossRef

Jäggi A, Bock H, Prange L et al (2011) GPS-only gravity field recovery with GOCE, CHAMP, and GRACE. Adv Space Res 47:1020–1028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2010.11.008CrossRef

Jäggi A, Hugentobler U, Beutler G (2006) Pseudo-stochastic orbit modeling techniques for low-earth orbiters. J Geodesy 80:47–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-006-0029-9CrossRef

Kaula WM (1966) Theory of satellite geodesy: applications of satellites to geodesy. Blaisdell Publishing Company, Waltham, Massachusettss

Mayer-Gürr T, Eicker A, Kurtenbach E, Ilk K-H (2010) ITG-GRACE: global static and temporal gravity field models from GRACE data. In: Flechtner FM, Gruber T, Güntner A et al (eds) System earth via geodetic-geophysical space techniques. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 159–168CrossRef

Mayer-Gürr T, Ilk KH, Eicker A, Feuchtinger M (2005) ITG-CHAMP01: a CHAMP gravity field model from short kinematic arcs over a one-year observation period. J Geodesy 78:462–480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-004-0413-2CrossRef

Pail R, Bruinsma S, Migliaccio F et al (2011) First GOCE gravity field models derived by three different approaches. J Geod 85:819–843. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-011-0467-xCrossRef

Pail R, Goiginger H, Schuh WD, et al (2010) Combined satellite gravity field model GOCO01S derived from GOCE and GRACE. Geophys Res Lett 37:1–5, L20314. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010gl044906CrossRef

Ray J (2002) C1/P1 biases for Leica and Trimble 5700 receivers

Reubelt T, Götzelmann M, Grafarend E (2006) Harmonic analysis of the earth’s gravitational field from kinematic CHAMP orbits based on numerically derived satellite accelerations. In: Observation of the earth system from space, pp 27–42

Rothacher M, Schmid R, Steigenberger P, Svehla D, Thaller D (2004) Combination of the space-geodetic techniques for monitoring the Earth’s system. In: EOS Transactions AGU, Fall Meeting Supplement, Abstract G22A-01, vol 85, Nr 47, AGU

Rummel R, Bosch W, Drewes H (2000) Towards an integrated global geodetic observing system (IGGOS). In: International association of geodesy symposia, vol 120. Springer, Heidelberg, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59745-9

Rummel R, Yi W, Stummer C (2011) GOCE gravitational gradiometry. J Geod 85:777–790. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-011-0500-0CrossRef

Schaer S (1999) Mapping and predicting the earth’s ionosphere using Global Positioning System. Schweizerische Geodätische Kommission

Schmidt M, Kusche J, Loon JP, et al (2005) Multiresolution representation of a regional geoid from satellite and terrestrial gravity data. In: Gravity, geoid and space missions, pp 167–172

Steigenberger P, Rothacher M, Dietrich R et al (2006) Reprocessing of a global GPS network. J Geophys Res 111:B05402. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JB003747CrossRef

Sneeuw N, Gerlach C, Svehla D, Gruber C (2003) A first attempt at time variable gravity recovery from CHAMP using the energy balance approach. In: Gravity and geoid: proceedings of 3rd meeting of the international gravity and geoid commission, Thessaloniki, 2002. ZITI-Publishing, pp 237–242

Sneeuw N, Gerlach C, Földváry L, Gruber T, Peters T, Rummel R, Svehla D (2005) One year of time-variable CHAMP-only gravity field models using kinematic orbits. In: Sansò F, (eds) A window on the future of geodesy, IAG Symposia, vol 128, pp 288–293, https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-27432-4_49

Švehla D, Rothacher M (2002) Kinematic orbit determination of LEOs based on zero– or double–difference algorithms using simulated and real SST data. In: Vistas for geodesy in the new millenium. International association of geodesy symposia, vol 125. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 322–328, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-04709-5_53

Švehla D, Rothacher M (2003a) CHAMP double–difference kinematic POD with ambiguity resolution. In: First CHAMP mission results for gravity, magnetic and atmospheric studies. Springer-Verlag, Potsdam, pp 70–77, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-38366-6_11CrossRef

Švehla D, Rothacher M (2003b) Kinematic and reduced-dynamic precise orbit determination of low Earth orbiters. Adv. Geosci. 1:47–56. https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-1-47-2003CrossRef

Švehla D, Rothacher M (2004a) Two years of CHAMP kinematic orbits for geosciences. European geosciences union, 1st general assembly, 25–30 April 2004, Nice, France. Geophysical Research Abstracts, European Geophysical Society, vol 6. ISSN:1029–7006

Švehla D, Rothacher M (2005a) Kinematic positioning of LEO and GPS satellites and IGS stations on the ground. Adv Space Res 36:376–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2005.04.066CrossRef

Švehla D, Rothacher M (2005b) Kinematic precise orbit determination for gravity field determination. In: A window on the future of geodesy. International association of geodesy symposia, vol 128. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 181–188, https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-27432-4_32

Teunissen PJG (2001) The probability distribution of the ambiguity bootstrapped GNSS baseline. J Geodesy 75:267–275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001900100172CrossRef

Tseng Tzu-Pang, Hwang Ch, Yang SK (2012) Assessing attitude error of FORMOSAT-3/COSMIC satellites and its impact on orbit determination. Adv Space Res 49(9):1301–1312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2012.02.007CrossRef

van den Ijssel J, Visser P, Patino Rodriguez E (2003) Champ precise orbit determination using GPS data. Adv Space Res 31:1889–1895. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0273-1177(03)00161-3CrossRef

Visser P, van den Ijssel J, van Helleputte T, Bock H, Jäggi A, Beutler G, Svehla D, Hugentobler U, Heinze, M (2009) Orbit determination for the GOCE satellite. Adv Space Res 43(5): 760–768. Elsevier, ISSN 0273-1177, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2008.09.016CrossRef

Visser P, van den Ijssel J, van Helleputte T, Bock H, Jäggi A, Beutler G, Hugentobler U, Svehla D (2007) Rapid and precise orbit determination for the GOCE satellite. In: proceedings of the 3rd international GOCE user workshop, ESA SP-627, pp 235–239, ISBN (Print) 92-9092-938-3, ISSN 1609-042X, 2007

Wermuth M, Gerlach C, Svehla D, Földváry L (2004) Comparison of different gravity field solution methods applied to CHAMP gravity field modelling. In: Proceedings of the 1st international workshop on gravity field research, Österreichische Beiträge zu Meteorologie und Geophysik, Heft 31, pp 45–50, Zentralanstalt für Meteorologie und Geodynamik (ZAMG), ISSN 1016-6254

Williams J, Lightsey EG, Yoon SP, Schutz BE (2002) Testing of the ICESat BlackJack GPS Receiver Engineering Model

Yunck T, Bertiger W, Wu S et al (1994) First assessment of GPS-based reduced dynamic orbit determination on TOPEX/POSEIDON. Geophys Res Lett 21:541–544CrossRef

Zehentner N, Mayer-Gürr T (2015) Mitigation of ionospheric scintillation effects in kinematic LEO precise orbit determination. In: Geophysical research abstracts, Vienna, EGU2015-10477–1

Titel: The First Geometric POD of LEO Satellites—A Piece of History
verfasst von: Dr.-Ing. Drazen Svehla
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: Geometrical Theory of Satellite Orbits and Gravity Field
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-76872-4

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-76873-1

Copyright-Jahr: 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76873-1_1

Neuer Inhalt

Bildnachweise

VDI-Icon, Profil Icon, inhalt2, Springer Professional Modul/© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, Nachhaltigkeitsaward Key Visual/© Cometis AG/Global ESG Monitor | Daniel Rupp | Generiert mit KI, Search Icon, Banner Hanser, Frank Urbansky/© Peter Eichler / Leipzig, CO2-Fußabdruck/© Jenny Sturm / stock.adobe.com, Interview Entropie Bild 1/© Bernhard Weßling, Zeitschrift Wissensmanagement Cover, PatentFit-Logo/© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, Sustainibility Finance/© Robert Kneschke / stock.adobe.com / Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, Zukunftswerkstatt Sales Excellence 2024/© AndreyPopov / Getty Images / iStock, 2023_Antrieb/© supervisuell

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Neuer Inhalt

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.