Weitere Kapitel dieses Buchs durch Wischen aufrufen
According to the author’s understanding, developing a mega infrastructure construction management theory (system) is a complex project that involves the building of a knowledge system and then the promotion of that system. The core task is to adhere to the general rules for developing a theory, consider the essential elements of the theory and their logical relations with one another as the foundation, and then design and transform the theory (system) into a structure. During this process, it is necessary to identify the principles of thinking behind the theory system, the essential theoretical elements, the concepts and fundamentals that can be derived from these elements and concepts by logical judgment, and the basic abstractions that can be further extracted from the fundamentals of mega infrastructure construction. To form basic abstractions means to develop basic scientific questions. Although each of these steps is relatively independent of the others, they are logically related to the others. As a result, a complete structure of a theory (system) can be developed as follows: principles of thinking (category theory), substantial concepts, fundamental principles, and scientific questions.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
Forsberg, K., Mooz, H., & Cotterman, H. (2005). Visualizing project management: Models and frameworks for mastering complex systems. New York: Wiley.
Giezen, M. (2012). Keeping it simple? A case study into the advantages and disadvantages of reducing complexity in mega project planning. International Journal of Project Management, 30(7), 781–790. CrossRef
He, J., & Wang, M. (2008). Philosophy thinking on engineering and engineering management. Engineering Science, 10(3), 9–12.
Jin, W. (2001). The meaning, characteristics and forms of the management of complex organizations. Journal of Systemic Dialectics, 9(4), 24–27.
Kerzner, H. R. (2013). Project management: A systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling. Hoboken: Wiley.
Kuhn, T. S. (1979). Metaphor in science. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 409–19). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Mercer, N. (2000). Words and minds: How we use language to think together. London: Psychology Press. CrossRef
Rasmussen, C. E., & Ghahramani, Z. (2001). Occam's razor. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 13, 294–300.
Salet, W., Bertolini, L., & Giezen, M. (2013). Complexity and uncertainty: Problem or asset in decision making of mega infrastructure projects? International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(6), 1984–2000. CrossRef
Tian, P. (2014). The “top-level design” in the theory of engineering philosophy field of vision. Studies in Dialectics of Nature, 30(4), 56–60.
Walker, A. (2015). Project management in construction. Chichester: Wiley.
Wang, Q., & Cheng, S. (2009). The system complexity of large-scale construction project. Scientific Decision Making, 1, 11–17.
Wu, L. (2005). The systematic character of terms and terminology. Chinese Science and Technology Terms Journal, 7(2), 44–48.
Wu, Y., & Du, G. (2001). Foundations of management science (Vol. 9). Tianjin: Tianjin University.
Xu, C. (2001). On the humanities and social sciences theory thinking and engineering thinking arrogation. Tianjin Social Sciences, 2, 25–31.
Xu, T., Sheng, Z., & Li, J. (2008). Complex engineering management system based on metasynthsis. Complex Systems and Complexity Science, 5(3), 48–54.
Yan, Y., Ren, H., & Fan, G. (2009). Complexity analysis and complexity management of large scale construction project system. Science and Technology Management Research, 6, 303–305.
- The Formation Path of Mega Infrastructure Construction Management Theory
- Chapter 4
Neuer Inhalt/© Stellmach, Neuer Inhalt/© BBL, Neuer Inhalt/© Maturus, Pluta Logo/© Pluta, Neuer Inhalt/© hww, Best Practices zu agiler Qualität