nach oben

Erschienen in:

2017 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

5. The Friedman Versus Korten Argument: Are These Dichotomies Still Valid in the Twenty-First Century?

verfasst von : Christopher Anne Robinson-Easley

Erschienen in: Leadership for Global Systemic Change

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Many years ago, when I taught my first introduction to business class at my former university, I was appalled to see that the textbook chosen provided such limited coverage on the topic of social responsibility. The primary views on social responsibility presented in this textbook were those of Dr. Milton Friedman—a view I felt to be very limited.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel The Current Landscape

Nächstes Kapitel Reclaiming Our World: The United Nations Global Compact in the Midst of a Vision of Change

Ahenkora, K., Banahene, S., & Quartey, J. (2013). Societal value antecedent of corporate social responsibility and business strategy. Journal of Management and Strategy, 4(4), 58.CrossRef

Boatright, J. (2012). Ethics and the conduct of business. New Jersey, NJ: Pearson.

Freeman, I., & Hasnaoui, A. (2011). The meaning of corporate responsibility: The vision of four nations. Journal of Business Ethics, 100, 419–443.CrossRef

Friedman, M. (1962). Capitalism and freedom. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Korten, D. C. (2001). When corporations rule the world (2nd ed.). Sterling, VA: Kumarian Press.

Kravitz, D. A. (2002). Promoting diversity and social justice: Educating people from privileged groups. Personnel Psychology, 55(2), 507–511.

Pedersen, E. (2010). Modelling CSR: How managers understand the responsibilities of business towards society. Journal of Business Ethics, 91, 155–166.CrossRef

Pirson, M., & Lawrence, P. (2010). Humanism in business—Towards a paradigm shift? Journal of Business Ethics, 93, 553–565.CrossRef

Robinson-Easley, C. A. (2014). Beyond diversity and intercultural management. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef

Spencer, D., & Fitzgerald, A. (2013). Three ecologies, transversality and victimization: The case of the British Petroleum oil spill. Crime Law and Social Change, 59, 209–223.CrossRef

Syed, A. (2011). Ethics and absolute values: Connection with society and religion. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(23), 256–262.

Tengblad, S., & Ohlsson, C. (2010). The framing of corporate social responsibility and the globalization of national business systems: A longitudinal case study. Journal of Business Ethics, 93, 63–669.CrossRef

Westaway, J. (2012). Globalization, transnational corporations and human rights—A new paradigm. International Law Research, 1(1), 63–72.CrossRef

White-Zappa, B. (2001). Hopeful corporate citizenship: A quantitative and qualitative examination of the relationship between organizational hope, appreciative inquiry, and organizational citizenship behaviors. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Benedictine University, Lisle, Illinois.

Titel: The Friedman Versus Korten Argument: Are These Dichotomies Still Valid in the Twenty-First Century?
verfasst von: Christopher Anne Robinson-Easley
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: Leadership for Global Systemic Change
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-38948-6

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-38949-3

Copyright-Jahr: 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38949-3_5