Weitere Kapitel dieses Buchs durch Wischen aufrufen
Despite its status as the world’s leading school of economics during the second half of the nineteenth century, it is now generally accepted that within the contemporary mainstream, the GHSE has the ‘worst reputation’ of all the research programmes in the history of economic thought. This view has been largely shaped by Austrian School theorists. The Austrian School of Economics was originally founded on the basis of Carl Menger’s critiques of the supposed weaknesses and flaws of the German Historical School of Economics: this chapter examines how criticisms of the fundamental principles of the—as expressed by ASE theorists—influenced the formation and development of the ASE’s own fundamental principles. In addition to disputes over methodological collectivism or methodological individualism, the deductive versus the inductive method, ethical values and state intervention and the nature of ‘knowledge,’ there were emotional issues: Menger—who was truly upset by the severe criticisms directed against him and his book by GHSE theorists and their labelling of him as an ‘Austrian’ economist—went from having a high opinion of the GHSE to having a low opinion of its theorists.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
Alter, M. (1990). What Do We Know About Menger? In B. J. Caldwell (Ed.), Carl Menger and His Legacy in Economics. Annual Supplement to Volume 22, History of Political Economy. Durham: Duke University Press.
Bateman, B. W., & Papadopoulos, K. (2011). Karl Knies and the Prehistory of Neoclassical Economics: Understanding the Importance of ‘Die Nationaloekonomische Lehre vom Werth’ (1855). Journal of the History of Economic Thought,33(1), 19–35. CrossRef
Beiser, F. C. (2011). The German Historicist Tradition. New York: Oxford University Press. CrossRef
Caldwell, B. (2004). Hayek’s Challenge: An Intellectual Biography of F. A. Hayek. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Caldwell, B. (2006). Popper and Hayek: Who Influenced Whom? In I. C. Jarvie, K. Milford, & D. W. Miller (Eds.), Karl Popper: A Centenary Assessment (Vol. I, pp. 111–124). Burlington: Ashgate.
Cardoso, J. L., & Psalidopous, M. (2016). The German Historical School and European Economic Thought. London: Routledge.
Chaloupek, G. (2016). The Impact of the German Historical School on the Evolution of Economic Thought in Austria. In J. L. Cardoso & M. Psalidopous (Eds.), The German Historical School and European Economic Thought (pp. 22–41). London: Routledge.
Dingwall, J., & B. F. Hoselitz. (2007 ). Translator’s Preface. In C. Menger, Principles of Economics (J. Dingwall & B. F. Hoselitz, Trans., pp. 37–40). Auburn, AL: Ludwig von Mises Institute.
Giouras, T. (1995). Wilhelm Roscher: The Historical Method in the Social Sciences Critical Observations for a Contemporary Evaluation. Journal of Economic Studies, 22(3/4/5), 106–126. CrossRef
Gloria-Palermo, S. (1999). The Evolution of Austrian Economics from Menger to Lachmann. London: Routledge.
Grassl, W., & Smith, B. (1986). Austrian Economics: Historical and Philosophical Background. London: Helm Croom.
Hacohen, M. H. (2000). Karl Popper: The Formative Years, 1902–1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Haller, M. (2004). Mixing Economics and Ethics: Carl Menger vs. Gustav von Schmoller. Social Science Information,43(1), 5–33. CrossRef
Hayek, F. A. (1935). Prices and Production. London: Routledge.
Hayek, F. A. (1944). The Road to Serfdom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hayek, F. A. (1960). The Constitution of Liberty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hayek, F. A. (1964 ). The Counter-Revolution of Science: Studies on the Abuse of Reason. London: Free Press of Glencoe.
Hayek, F. A. (1967). Studies in Philosophy, Politics and Economics. London: Routledge & K. Paul.
Hayek, F. A. (1976). Law, Legislation and Liberty, Volume 2: The Mirage of Social Justice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hayek, F. A. (1983). Knowledge, Evolution, and Society. London: Adam Smith Institute.
Hayek, F. A. (1988). The Fatal Conceit: The Errors of Socialism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. CrossRef
Hayek, F. A. (1994 ). The Road to Serfdom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hayek, F. A. (2007 ). Introduction. In C. Menger, Principles of Economics (J. Dingwall & B. F. Hoselitz, Trans., pp. 11–36). Auburn, AL: Ludwig von Mises Institute.
Hayek, F. A. (2011 ). The Constitution of Liberty: The Definitive Edition (R. Hamowy, Ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hayek, F. A. (2013). Law, Legislation and Liberty: A New Statement of the Liberal Principles of Justice and Political Economy. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. CrossRef
Herbener, J. M. (1991). Ludwig von Mises and the Austrian School of Economics. The Review of Austrian Economics,5(2), 33–50. CrossRef
Hodgson, G. M. (2001). How Economics Forgot History: The Problem of Historical Specificity in Social Science. London: Routledge. CrossRef
Ingram, J. K. (1967). A History of Political Economy. New York: Augustus M. Kelley.
Kobayasi, J. (2000). Karl Knies’s Conception of Political Economy: The Logical Status of Analogie and Sitte. In Y. Shionoya (Ed.), German Historical School: The Historical and Ethical Approach to Economics (pp. 54–71). London: Routledge.
Louzek, M. (2011). The Battle of Methods in Economics: The Classical Methodenstreit: Menger vs. Schmoller. American Journal of Economics and Sociology,70(2), 439–463. CrossRef
Menger, C. (1963 ). Problems of Economics and Sociology. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Menger, C. (1985 ). Investigations into the Method of the Social Sciences with Special Reference to Economics (L. Schneider, Ed., F. J. Nock, Trans.). New York: New York University Press.
Menger, C. (2007 [1976/1871]). Principles of Economics (J. D. Dingwall & B. F. Hoselitz, Trans.). Auburn, AL: Ludwig von Mises Institute.
Milford, K. (1995). Roscher’s Epistemological and Methodological Position Its Importance for the Methodenstreit. Journal of Economic Studies, 22(3/4/5), 26–52. CrossRef
von Mises, L. (1966). Human Action: A Treatise on Economics. Chicago: Henry Regnery.
von Mises, L. (1936 ). Socialism: An Economic and Sociological Analysis (J. Kahane, Trans.). London: Jonathon Cape.
Nau, H. H. (2000). Gustav Schmoller’s Historico—Ethical Political Economy: Ethics, Politics and Economics in the Younger German Historical School, 1860–1917. European Journal History of Economic Thought, 7(4), 507–531. CrossRef
Pearson, H. 1999. Was there Really a German Historical School of Economics? History of Political Economy, 31(3), 547–562. CrossRef
Peuker, H. (2001). The Schmoller Renaissance. History of Political Economy, 33(1), 71–116. CrossRef
Richter, R. (1996). Bridging Old and New Institutional Economics: Gustav Schmoller, the Leader of the Younger German Historical School, Seen with Neoinstitutionalists’ Eyes. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE)/Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staatswissenschaft, 152(4), 567–592.
Roscher, W. (1972 ). Principles of Political Economy. New York: Arno Press.
von Schmoller, G. (1967 ). The Mercantile System and Its Historical Significance. New York: A.M. Kelley.
Senn, P. R. (1989). What Has Happened to Gustav von Schmoller in English? HES Bulletin,11(2), 252–295.
Shionoya, Y. (2000). German Historical School: The Historical and Ethical Approach to Economics. London: Routledge.
Shionoya, Y. (2005). The Soul of the German Historical School: Methodological Essays on Schmoller, Weber and Schumpeter. Boston: Springer.
Solow, R. M. (1985). Economic History and Economics. American Economic Review,75(2), 328–331.
Spicer, M. W. (1998). Cameralist Thought and Public Administration. Journal of Management History,4(3), 149–159. CrossRef
Stigler, G. J. (1937). The Economics of Carl Menger. Journal of Political Economy,45(2), 229–250. CrossRef
Tribe, K. (1998). Governing Economy: Reformation of German Economic Discourse 1750–1840. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tribe, K. (2002). Historical Schools of Economics: German and English. Keele Economics Research Papers. www.keele.ac.uk/depts/ec/web/wpapers/kerp0202.pdf.
Tribe, K. (2003). The German Historical School: The Historical and Ethical Approach to Economics. History of Political Economy,35(1), 173–194. CrossRef
Tribe, K. (2007). Strategies of Economic Order: German Economic Discourse, 1750–1950. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wakefield, A. (2005). Books, Bureaus, and the Historiography of Cameralism. European Journal of Law and Economics,19, 311–320. CrossRef
Wakefield, A. (2009). The Disordered Police State: German Cameralism as Science and Practice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. CrossRef
- The German Historical School of Economics and the Foundations and Development of the Austrian School of Economics
- Chapter 2
Neuer Inhalt/© Stellmach, Neuer Inhalt/© BBL, Neuer Inhalt/© Maturus, Pluta Logo/© Pluta, Neuer Inhalt/© hww, Best Practices zu agiler Qualität