Weitere Kapitel dieses Buchs durch Wischen aufrufen
Local communities in border areas, which have been until recently separated by political borders intended to legitimate and defend the essence of the nation-state, discovered in cross-border cooperation (CBC) a facilitator of good neighborly relations, economic opportunities, or a possibility to promote innovative and high-quality public services. At a European level, cross-border cooperation, supported by the integration policies of the EU, highlighted the growing role of local authorities and communities, as stakeholders and beneficiaries alike. This paper presents the results of a survey-based research conducted among managers, experts, and staff from local public administration, across the Hungarian-Romanian border, analyzing their opinion regarding the changes to their institutions brought forth by their involvement in cross-border actions in the Bihor–Hajdú-Bihar Euroregion. It focuses on revealing aspects such as the issue of human resources in local administration, the relationship between CBC projects developed by local administration and the employees’ expectations, involvement in decision-making, and prospects and career satisfaction in (local) public administration. Research results show that the local governments’ involvement in CBC projects should not only consider the opportunities of additional financing sources or improving cross-border relations in various fields (economic, cultural, communication, health, public order, tourism), as the results also reveal specific vulnerabilities and a particular indifference of local administration staff to generous, but often less tangible, objectives of CBC projects. The research also highlights the key role of human resource quality, echoing the role of managers in the selection, retention, and efficient use of human resources, linking the projects’ objectives to individual performance and expectations of a career in public administration.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
Abrudan, M.-M., Săveanu, T., Matei, M., & Ujhelyi, M. (2015). Obstacles, realities and opportunities in human resources Management in Public Administration Institutions from Bihor County (Romania) and Hajdú-Bihar County (Hungary). Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 45(E), 5–25.
AEBR. (2000). Practical guide to cross-border cooperation, Third Edition 2000. Gronau, Germany: Association of European Border Regions (AEBR) and European Commission.
AEBR. (2016). Association of European Border Regions, Regions List . Available from: http://www.aebr.eu/en/members/list_of_members.php (Accessed 2 December 2016).
Anderson, M., & Bort, E. (2001). The frontiers of the European Union. Chippenham, UK: Palgrave. CrossRef
Aston Centre for Europe. (2014). Local and regional authorities for a successful eastern partnership. Bruxelles, Belgium: European Union: Committee of the Regions.
Badulescu, A., Kolozsi, L., Badulescu, D., Lupau, C. (2016). Strengths and weaknesses in local public administration in Romania. Preliminary research results. Proceedings of The 10th International Days of Statistics and Economics. Prague: University of Economics. September 8–10, 2016.
Badulescu, D., Hoffman, I., Badulescu, A., & Simut, R. (2016). Local authorities’ involvement in fostering Hungarian-Romanian cross-border cooperation in tourism. Lex Localis-Journal of Local Self-Government, 14(3), 337–358. CrossRef
European Commission. (2013). Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council . Strasbourg, COM (2013) 301 final 2013/0156.
European Commission. (2015). Territorial Cooperation in Europe. A historical perspective. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
European Committee of the Regions. (2016). European Grouping of Territorial Cooperation, Maps & Register . [Interactiv] Available from: https://portal.cor.europa.eu/egtc/CoRActivities/Pages/egtc-list.aspx (Accessed 12 December 2016).
Feier, F., & Badulescu, A. (2016). The HU-RO cross border cooperation programme 2007-2013: Insights related to the effectiveness of using the European funds. Oradea Journal of Business and Economics, 1(1), 47–57.
Gasparini, A. (2008). Cross border cooperation in Central Europe. An analysis of strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats. Gorizia, Italy: Council of Europe & ISIG.
Hungarian Central Statistical Office. (2014). Times series of annual, regional statistics - Economic branches . Available at: http://www.ksh.hu/stadat_annual_6_4 (Accessed 01 November 2016).
I.S.I.G. (2013). Manual on removing obstacles to CBC. Gorizia, Italy: Institute of International Sociology Gorizia.
Knippenberg, H., & Markusse, J. (1999). 19th and 20th century borders and border regions in Europe. In H. Knippenberg & J. Markusse (Eds.), Nationalising and denationalising European border regions, 1800–2000: Views from geography and history (pp. 1–10). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer. CrossRef
Krugman, P. (1991). Increasing returns and economic geography. Journal of Political Economy, 99(3), 483–499. CrossRef
Krugman, P., & Venables, A. (1995). Globalization and the inequality of nations. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110, 857–880. CrossRef
Martinez, O. (1994). The dynamics of border interaction. New approaches to border analysis. In C. Schofield (Ed.), Global boundaries, world boundaries (Vol. 1, pp. 1–15). London: Routledge.
National Institute of Statistics (Romania). 2013. Statistical yearbook 2013 - Tourism . Available from: http://www.insse.ro/cms/files/Anuar%20statistic/20/20%20Turism_ro.pdf (Accessed 10 August 2015).
Nijkamp, P., & Batten, D. (1990). Barriers to communication and spatial interaction. The Annals of Regional Science, 24(4), 233–236. CrossRef
O’Dowd, L., McCall, C., Damkat, I. (2006). Sustaining cross-border cooperation: A cross-sectoral case study approach, University College Dublin, Institute for British-Irish Studies: IBIS Working Paper No. 61, MFPP Working Papers No. 11.
Perkmann, M. (2003). The rise of the Euroregion. A bird’s eye perspective on European cross-border co-operation. Lancaster, UK: Lancaster University, Department of Sociology.
Regional Office for Cross-border Cooperation for Romanian-Hungarian Border (BRECO). (2015). Programme. Overview . Available from: http://www.huro-cbc.eu/en/overview/ (Accessed 15 December 2016).
Saint-Germain, M. A. (1995). Similarities and differences in perceptions of public service among public administrators on the U.S.-Mexico border. Public Administration Review, 55(6), 507–516. CrossRef
Svensson, S. (2015). The bordered world of cross-border cooperation: The determinants of local government contact networks within Euroregions. Regional & Federal Studies, 25(3), 277–295. CrossRef
Szmigiel-Rawska, K. (2016). Sustainability of cross-border cooperation: PHARE CBC partnership development paths. European Urban and Regional Studies, 23(3), 513–526. CrossRef
Topaloglou, L., Kallioras, D., Manetos, P., & Petrakos, G. (2005). A border regions typology in the enlarged European Union. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 20(2), 67–89. CrossRef
- The Impact of Cross-Border Cooperation on Human Resources Employed in Local Administration: The Case of the Romanian-Hungarian Border Area
Ph.D. Daniel Badulescu
Ph.D. Ramona Simut
- Chapter 4
Neuer Inhalt/© Stellmach, Neuer Inhalt/© BBL, Neuer Inhalt/© Maturus, Pluta Logo/© Pluta, Neuer Inhalt/© hww, Voraussetzungen für wirtschaftliche additive Fertigung/© Marco2811 | Fotolia