nach oben

Education and Information Technologies

Erschienen in:

10.01.2020

The impact of preservice teachers’ cognitive and technological perceptions on their continuous intention to use flipped classroom

verfasst von: Ibrahim Arpaci, Gulsah Basol

Erschienen in: Education and Information Technologies | Ausgabe 5/2020

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

With the integration of popular technologies such as social media, smartphones, and tablets in the education system, new online course delivery methods such as flipped classrooms have emerged to enhance teaching and learning. To understand implications of the integration of such technologies in education the study examined the responses of 550 preservice teachers. Participants took their regular classes on a flipped classroom during a semester. After this experience, the participants completed a survey instrument adapted for this study to measure their continuous intention to use flipped classroom. The research model, which is based on technology acceptance model and social cognitive theory, was tested by employing a structural equation modelling approach. Results indicated that self-regulation and self-efficacy have a positive impact on perceived ease of use (PEOU). Whereas, perceived anxiety has a negative impact on the PEOU and self-efficacy. Self-efficacy mediates the relationship between perceived anxiety and PEOU. Further, the results indicated that PEOU has a positive impact on perceived usefulness (PU). Both PU and PEOU have a positive impact on the continuous intention to use flipped classroom for teaching and learning. The findings suggested significant relationships between cognitive and technological factors and continuous intention to use flipped classroom.

Vorheriger Artikel Critical success factors influencing the adoption of digitalisation for teaching and learning by business schools

Nächster Artikel Determinants of learning management systems adoption in Nigeria: A hybrid SEM and artificial neural network approach

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Abeysekera, L., & Dawson, P. (2015). Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom: Definition, rationale and a call for research. Higher Education Research and Development, 34(1), 1–14.

Aghaei, K., Rajabi, M., Lie, K. Y., & Ajam, F. (2019). Flipped learning as situated practice: A contrastive narrative inquiry in an EFL classroom. Education and Information Technologies, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10039-9.

Al Zahrani, A. M. (2015). From passive to active: The impact of the flipped classroom through social learning platforms on higher education students’ creative thinking. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(6), 1133–1148.

Al-Emran, M., & Teo, T. (2019). Do knowledge acquisition and knowledge sharing really affect e-learning adoption? An empirical study. Education and Information Technologies, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10062-w.

Andrade, M. S. (2014). Dialogue and structure: Enabling learner self-regulation in technology-enhanced learning environments. European Educational Research Journal, 13(5), 563–574.

Arpaci, I. (2015). A comparative study of the effects of cultural differences on the adoption of mobile learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(4), 699–712. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12160.CrossRef

Arpaci, I. (2017). The role of self-efficacy in predicting use of distance education tools and learning management systems. The Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 18(1), 52–62.

Arpaci, I. (2019). A hybrid modeling approach for predicting the educational use of mobile cloud computing services in higher education. Computers in Human Behavior, 90, 181–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.09.005.CrossRef

Arpaci, I., Yardimci Cetin, Y., & Turetken, O. (2015). A cross-cultural analysis of smartphone adoption by Canadian and Turkish organizations. Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 18(3), 214–238.

Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action (pp. 5–107). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.

Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 1–26.MathSciNet

Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.

Basol, G., & Balgalmis, E. (2016). A multivariate investigation of gender differences in the number of online tests received-checking for perceived self-regulation. Computers in Human Behavior, 58, 388–397.

Basol, G., & Balgalmis, E. (2018). The predictors of success in a high-stakes test: Cramschools, test anxiety and self-efficacy. European Journal of Education Studies, 4(9), 83–96.

Bishop, J. L., & Verleger, M. A. (2013). The flipped classroom: A survey of the research. In ASEE National Conference Proceedings, Atlanta, GA (vol. 30, no. 9, pp. 1-18).

Chiang, T. H. C. (2017). Analysis of learning behavior in a flipped programing classroom adopting problem-solving strategies. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(2), 189–202.

Chiang, F. K., & Chen, C. (2017). Modified flipped classroom instructional model in “learning sciences” course for graduate students. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 26(1–2), 1–10.

Chiu, P. H. P., & Cheng, S. H. (2017). Effects of active learning classrooms on student learning: A two-year empirical investigation on student perceptions and academic performance. Higher Education Research and Development, 36(2), 269–279.

Chu, R. J., & Chu, A. Z. (2010). Multi-level analysis of peer support, internet self-efficacy and e-learning outcomes-the contextual effects of collectivism and group potency. Computers & Education, 55(1), 145–154.

Comber, D. P., & Brady-Van den Bos, M. (2018). Too much, too soon? A critical investigation into factors that make Flipped Classrooms effective. Higher Education Research & Development, 1–15.

Compeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995). Application of social cognitive theory to training for computer skills. Information Systems Research, 6(2), 118–143.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.

Foldnes, N. (2016). The flipped classroom and cooperative learning: Evidence from a randomized experiment. Active Learning in Higher Education, 17(1), 39–49.

Green, R. D., & Schlairet, M. C. (2017). Moving toward heutagogical learning: Illuminating undergraduate nursing students’ experiences in a flipped classroom. Nurse Education Today, 49, 122–128.

Gündüz, A. Y., & Akkoyunlu, B. (2019). Student views on the use of flipped learning in higher education: A pilot study. Education and Information Technologies, 24(4), 2391–2401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09881-8.CrossRef

Hao, Y. (2016). Middle school students’ flipped learning readiness in foreign language classrooms: Exploring its relationship with personal characteristics and individual circumstances. Computers in Human Behavior, 59, 295–303.

Hao, Y., & Lee, K. S. (2016). Teaching in flipped classrooms: Exploring pre-service teachers’ concerns. Computers in Human Behavior, 57, 250–260.

Howard, G. S. (1986). Computer anxiety and management use of microcomputers. Ann Arbor: UMI Research press.

Jiajun, G., Islam, A. A., Teo, T., & Spector, J. M. (2019). Computer-enabled visual creativity: An empirically-based model with implications for learning and instruction. Instructional Science, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-019-09487-0.

Karoly, P. (1993). Mechanisms of self-regulation: A systems view. Annual Review of Psychology, 44(1), 23–52.

Kinzie, M. B., Delcourt, M. A., & Powers, S. M. (1994). Computer technologies: Attitudes and self-efficacy across undergraduate disciplines. Research in Higher Education, 35(6), 745–768.

Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). New York: Guilford Press.MATH

Knowles, M. S. (1970). The modern practice of adult education (Vol. 41). New York: New York Association Press.

Kong, S. C. (2014). Developing information literacy and critical thinking skills through domain knowledge learning in digital classrooms: An experience of practicing flipped classroom strategy. Computers & Education, 78, 160–173.

Lai, C. L., & Hwang, G. J. (2016). A self-regulated flipped classroom approach to improving students’ learning performance in a mathematics course. Computers & Education, 100, 126–140.

Leso, T., & Peck, K. L. (1992). Computer anxiety and different types of computer courses. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 8(4), 469–478.

Liaw, S. S., & Huang, H. M. (2013). Perceived satisfaction, perceived usefulness and interactive learning environments as predictors to self-regulation in e-learning environments. Computers & Education, 60(1), 14–24.

Mazur, E. (1997). Peer instruction: Getting students to think in class. AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 399, no. 1, pp. 981-988). AIP.

Nwoke, M. B., Onuigbo, E. N., & Odo, V. O. (2017). Social support, self-efficacy and gender as predictors of reported stress among inpatient caregivers. The Social Science Journal, 54(2), 115–119.

Ooi, P. B., Jaafar, W. M. B. W., & Baba, M. B. (2018). Relationship between sources of counseling self-efficacy and counseling self-efficacy among Malaysian school counselors. The Social Science Journal, 55(3), 369–376.

Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223–231.

Raaijmakers, S. F., Boars, M., Schaap, L., Paas, F., Van Merriënboer, J., & Van Gog, T. (2018). Training self-regulated learning skills with video modeling examples: Do task-selection skills transfer? Instructional Science, 46(2), 273–290.

Rogers, E. M. (2010). Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.). New York: Simon and Schuster.

Rohatgi, A., Scherer, R., & Hatlevik, O. E. (2016). The role of ICT self-efficacy for students’ ICT use and their achievement in a computer and information literacy test. Computers & Education, 102, 103–116.

Rui, Z., Lian-rui, X., Rong-zheng, Y., Jing, Z., Xue-hong, W., & Chuan, Z. (2017). Friend or foe? Flipped classroom for undergraduate electrocardiogram learning: A randomized controlled study. BMC Medical Education, 17(1), 53.

Saadé, R. G., & Kira, D. (2009). Computer anxiety in e-learning: The effect of computer self-efficacy. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 8, 177–191.

Sohrabi, B., & Iraj, H. (2016). Implementing flipped classroom using digital media: A comparison of two demographically different groups perceptions. Computers in Human Behavior, 60, 514–524.

Sun, J. C. Y., & Rueda, R. (2012). Situational interest, computer self-efficacy and self-regulation: Their impact on student engagement in distance education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(2), 191–204.

Tao, D., Shao, F., Wang, H., Yan, M., & Qu, X. (2019). Integrating usability and social cognitive theories with the technology acceptance model to understand young users’ acceptance of a health information portal. Health Informatics Journal, 1460458219879337.

Thai, T. N., De Wever, B., & Valcke, M. (2017). The impact of a flipped classroom design on learning performance in higher education: Looking for the best “blend” of lectures and guiding questions with feedback. Computers in Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.01.003.

Tsai, C. H. (2014). Integrating social capital theory, social cognitive theory, and the technology acceptance model to explore a behavioral model of telehealth systems. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 11(5), 4905–4925.

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478.

Wang, A. Y., & Newlin, M. H. (2002). Predictors of web-student performance: The role of self-efficacy and reasons for taking an on-line class. Computers in Human Behavior, 18(2), 151–163.

Wood, R., & Bandura, A. (1989). Impact of conceptions of ability on self-regulatory mechanisms and complex decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(3), 407–415.

Yang, C. C. R., & Chen, Y. (2019). Implementing the flipped classroom approach in primary English classrooms in China. Education and Information Technologies, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10039-9.

Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2011). Self-regulated learning and performance: An introduction and an overview. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 1–12). New York: Routledge.

Titel: The impact of preservice teachers’ cognitive and technological perceptions on their continuous intention to use flipped classroom
verfasst von: Ibrahim Arpaci
Gulsah Basol
Publikationsdatum: 10.01.2020
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Education and Information Technologies / Ausgabe 5/2020
Print ISSN: 1360-2357
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7608
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10104-8

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2020

Students’ perception and acceptance of web-based τechnologies: a multi-group pls analysis in romania and spain

Students’ interaction patterns in different online learning activities and their relationship with motivation, self-regulated learning strategy and learning performance

Adoption of artificial intelligence in higher education: a quantitative analysis using structural equation modelling

Refreshable braille displays and reading fluency: A pilot study in individuals with blindness

Cognitive optimism of distinctive initiatives to foster self-directed and self-regulated learning skills: A comparative analysis of conventional and blended-learning in undergraduate studies

An account of EFL learners’ self-efficacy and gender in the Flipped Classroom Model