Skip to main content
Erschienen in:
Buchtitelbild

Open Access 2023 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

The Influence of Coating Material and Thickness on the Corrosion Degree of Q345 Steel

verfasst von : Li Wan, Xiang Pan, Lizhen Huang, Baotao Huang, Cai Yang, Yiming Du

Erschienen in: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Innovative Solutions in Hydropower Engineering and Civil Engineering

Verlag: Springer Nature Singapore

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
download
DOWNLOAD
print
DRUCKEN
insite
SUCHEN
loading …

Abstract

In order to investigate the anti-corrosion effect of coated steel of steel bridge, Q345 steel plate specimens with three types of coatings, including zinc coating, aluminum coating and zinc-aluminum coating, are produced by the arc spraying technology. In the present study, chlorine corrosion tests are performed to investigate the influence law of different coating material and its thickness on the corrosion degree. Then the calculation results of two corrosion indicators are compared and analyzed. It is shown that the two corrosion indicators reflect the same corrosion law of three kinds of coating steel. The corrosion of all coated specimens is obviously severe in the early stage and gradually gentle in the later stage. It is also found that during the whole corrosion cycle, the corrosion rate of aluminum coating is smaller and change slower than the other two kinds of coatings, whereas the coating thickness of 200 μm of aluminum coating changes significantly. Therefore, aluminum coating is recommended as a priority, and the recommended coating thickness range of which is 100–150 μm.

1 Introduction

Owing to the advantages of high strength, light weight, good plasticity and toughness, and the continuous growth of steel production in recent years, steel structures have good prospects in the field of civil engineering. Now steel bridge plays a very important role in transportation power in China, but its corrosion in chloride salt environment has become one of the key problems affecting the durability of steel bridges. The corrosion of steel is more serious in the environment with high humidity and aggressive media, among which chloride ions is especially prominent. Therefore, protective measures such as rust removal, painting and coating must be taken to ensure the safety of the steel structures. Meanwhile, steel structures must also be regularly maintained, which spends a certain amount of maintenance costs. Experiment studies are carried out involved the corrosion behavior of steel in different marine areas and laboratory simulated marine environments. These studies mainly focus on the corrosion mechanisms of different types of steel as well as the components and properties of corrosion products. And whereas, the research on the corrosion rate of steel, especially coated steel, is yet relatively few. It is not only unhelpful for the accurate evaluation of the durability of steel bridges, but also for the reasonable selection of coating type and thickness. Therefore, it is very important to investigate the corrosion rate of coated steel adopted in steel bridges.
Corrosion rate is an important index to study the corrosion law of steel. Huang [1] and Zhu [2] point out that under the same corrosion cycles, the change rule of corrosion rate of different kinds of carbon steel is basically the same through analyzing the corrosion data. In addition, Schumacher’s empirical formula is applied to fit the corrosion data, and it is proposed that the slope of the linear part of the formula can be approximated as the long-term corrosion rate of carbon steel. However, this experimental formula does not take into account the influence of rust layer and other factors on corrosion rate. Yu [3], Pour-Ghaz [4, 5] and Pradhan [6] study on the corrosion rate of rebar in concrete in chloride environment by using self-made corrosion rate test equipment, and then the corrosion rate model of steel bar in corresponding environment is respectively established. The corrosion behavior of steel plated with galvanized, aluminum and zinc-aluminum alloy materials is studied in Refs. [79]. It is shown that these three plating layers can restrict the corrosion rate and have a good corrosion protection effect for steel. The practice of Arc spraying is well established because of its high strength, excellent coating performance and high efficient energy use. Now, it is few report about the anti-corrosion behavior of arc thermal spraying coatings. So it is urgently needed to study.
In this paper, the corrosion rate of Q345 steel coated by arc thermal spraying is studied based on chloride corrosion test. Then the effect of different coating type and thickness on the corrosion rate is also discussed. Finally, the existing representative corrosion rate models are evaluated by comparison.

2 Experimental Test

By using a 3.5% sodium chloride solution, corrosion tests are carried out in the environment of constant temperature and humidity (temperature is 20 °C, humidity is 95%). The experimental cycle were 7, 15, 30, and 60 days. The shape of steel specimens is rectangular plate with a size of 50 × 25 × 2 (mm). Three coating types are designed in the experiments, which are zinc coating, aluminum coating and zinc-aluminum coating. Three coating thickness are made for each type, respectively, 100 μm, 150 μm, 200 μm.
The preparation of the coating is in accordance with GB/T9 793–1997 “thermal spraying zinc, aluminum and their alloys for metal and other inorganic coatings” and other relevant standards. After each corrosion cycle, the corresponding specimen is removed and the corrosion products on the surface of the specimen are cleaned. The floating rust on the surface of the specimen is scraped off with a blade. Then 1000 ml solution is made for pickling and rust removal of specimens, which mixed with 500 ml hydrochloric acid, 3.5 g hexamethylenetetramine and distilled water. Specimens are put into anhydrous alcohol to dehydrate and to blow dry. The specimens are taken out of the oven after 24 h, and the weight of the corroded specimens are measured.

3 Results and Discussion

3.1 Test Results

Two indicators of corrosion degree are calculated in this paper, which are corrosion rate and cumulative loss of thickness, respectively.
(1)
Corrosion rate
 
The weightlessness method is the most intuitive and reliable method to evaluate the corrosion resistance of metals, which can reflect the macroscopic corrosion rate of metals [10]. It is assumed that the specimen is uniformly corroded. The corrosion rate is calculated by
$$ {\text{W}} = \left( {{\text{W}}_{0} - {\text{W}}_{{\text{t}}} } \right) \times \frac{{10^{6} }}{{\left[ {2\left( {{\text{a}} \times {\text{b}} + {\text{b}} \times {\text{c}} + {\text{a}} \times {\text{c}}} \right){\text{t}}} \right]}} $$
(1)
where \({\text{W}}\) is the corrosion rate. \({\text{W}}_{0}\) is the mass of the specimen before corrosion. \({\text{W}}_{{\text{t}}}\) is the mass of the specimen after corrosion. a, b and c are the length, width and height of the specimen, respectively.
(2)
Cumulative loss of thickness
 
The other indicator is cumulative loss of thickness [11]. The formula is given by
$$ {\text{D}}_{{\text{i}}} = \frac{{{\text{Wt}}_{{\text{i}}} }}{{\uprho }} $$
(2)
$$ {\text{D}} = \sum {\text{D}}_{{\text{i}}} $$
(3)
Where D is the cumulative loss of thickness of the specimen. Di is the loss of thickness of the corrosion cycle i. W is the corrosion rate. \({\text{t}}_{{\text{i}}}\) is the time of the corrosion cycle i. \(\uprho \) is the density of steel, the value is 7.8 g/cm3 in this paper.
The data recorded in the tests are introduced into these two equations, and the results of three coating types, which are zinc coating, aluminum coating and zinc-aluminum coating with different thicknesses, are obtained under each corrosion cycle. The calculation results are shown in Tables 1, 2 and 3.
Table 1
Results of corrosion rate of zinc coating
Corrosion time (day)
Coating thickness (μm)
Mass before test (g)
Mass after test
(g)
Corrosion rate \({\text{g}}/\left( {m^{2} \,h} \right)\)
Cumulative loss of thickness (μm)
7
100
19.452
17.369
4.428
95.375
150
19.120
16.675
5.199
111.981
200
24.318
21.888
5.166
111.264
15
100
18.312
17.097
1.205
151.007
150
20.508
18.805
1.690
189.973
200
25.255
23.929
1.315
171.978
30
100
18.257
16.852
0.697
215.324
150
18.635
16.963
0.829
266.514
200
23.983
22.325
0.822
247.894
60
100
18.029
16.192
0.456
299.420
150
20.235
16.855
0.838
421.261
200
21.397
18.668
0.677
372.833
Table 2
Results of corrosion rate of aluminum coating
Corrosion time (day)
Coating thickness (μm)
Mass before test (g)
Mass after test (g)
Corrosion rate \({\text{g}}/\left( {m^{2} \,h} \right)\)
Cumulative loss of thickness (μm)
7
100
16.689
15.969
1.530
32.952
150
18.079
17.402
1.439
30.998
200
19.736
17.500
4.753
102.381
15
100
16.495
15.676
0.812
70.421
150
18.103
16.878
1.215
87.057
200
19.480
18.578
0.894
143.651
30
100
16.486
15.838
0.322
100.122
150
18.256
17.641
0.305
115.217
200
19.429
17.740
0.838
220.971
60
100
16.933
16.129
0.199
136.935
150
17.844
16.781
0.264
163.889
200
20.177
19.916
0.065
232.921
Table 3
Results of corrosion rate of zinc-aluminum coating
Corrosion time (day)
Coating thickness (μm)
Mass before test (g)
Mass after test (g)
Corrosion rate \({\text{g}}/\left( {m^{2} \,h} \right)\)
Cumulative loss of thickness (μm)
7
100
19.071
18.460
1.299
27.976
150
20.238
19.674
1.199
25.824
200
21.466
20.672
1.689
36.386
15
100
18.701
16.651
2.034
121.841
150
19.481
16.460
2.996
164.118
200
20.032
17.356
2.655
158.929
30
100
19.294
17.768
0.757
191.712
150
20.355
19.475
0.437
204.411
200
21.770
19.896
0.929
244.704
60
100
19.328
17.649
0.416
268.574
150
19.856
18.226
0.404
279.014
200
21.177
19.399
0.441
326.084

3.2 Analysis and Discussion

Based on the obtained calculation results in Tables 1, 2 and 3, the curves of the corrosion degree indicators with time are drawn by Origin, as shown in Figs. 1 and 2, respectively.
As shown in Figs. 1 and 2, it can be seen that:
The corrosion law of three coating types is basically the same in Fig. 1. In the early stage, the corrosion of various coated specimens is severe, and then decreases rapidly. When the corrosion continues for 30 days, the corrosion rate tend to be gentle. During the whole cycle, the corrosion rate curves of zinc coating specimens and zinc-aluminum coating specimens fluctuate greatly, while the corrosion rate of aluminum coating specimens is the smallest, continuing to decline.
It is not difficult to find that like the corrosion rate, the growth of corrosion loss of thickness is evident in the early stage and smooth in the late stage in Fig. 2. The cumulative loss of thickness of zinc coating is the largest, zinc-aluminum coating comes second, and aluminum coating is smallest. In other words, the corrosion resistance of aluminum coating is the best.
In addition, compared with other thickness, it is more severe corrosion in all aluminum coating specimens with 200 μm at the initial stage of corrosion, and the corrosion loss of thickness is bigger than 100 and 150 μm. Therefore, aluminum coating is recommended to be the optimal solution, and the coating thickness ranges from 100 to 150 μm .

4 Conclusions

This paper focuses on the influence of different coating categories and thickness on the corrosion resistance of Q345 steel. Corrosion tests are performed by using 3.5% sodium chloride solution, the results are present. Then the corrosion degree is determined by two indicators for comparison. Based on experimental studies associated with analytical studies, the key conclusions are as follows:
(1)
It can be shown that the corrosion evolution law of the three coating types is consistent according to the two indicators, the corrosion is severe in the early stage and gentle in the late stage.
 
(2)
The corrosion resistance of aluminum coating is better than that of Zinc coating and Zinc-aluminum coating. The corrosion rate and the cumulative loss of thickness of aluminum coating are smaller. It is recommended that aluminum coating is preferred, and the reasonable thickness range of coating is 100–150 μm.
 

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by [Natural Science Foundation of Hubei] grant number [2022CFB547], [Natural Science program of Xiaogan] grant number [XGKJ2022010097], [Innovation and Entrepreneurship Training Program for university students] grant number [202110528019, 202210340048].
Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Huang GQ (2001) Corrosion behavior of carbon steels immersed in sea areas of China. Corrosion Sci Protection Technol 13(2):81–84, 88 Huang GQ (2001) Corrosion behavior of carbon steels immersed in sea areas of China. Corrosion Sci Protection Technol 13(2):81–84, 88
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhu XR, Huang GQ, Lin LY et al (2005) Research progress on the long period corrosion law of metallic materials in seawater. J Chin Soc Corrosion Protection 25(3):142–148 Zhu XR, Huang GQ, Lin LY et al (2005) Research progress on the long period corrosion law of metallic materials in seawater. J Chin Soc Corrosion Protection 25(3):142–148
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Yu B, Ling GZ, Liu JB et al (2019) Probabilistic prediction model of steel corrosion rate in concrete. Bull Chin Ceramic Soc 38(11):3385–3391 Yu B, Ling GZ, Liu JB et al (2019) Probabilistic prediction model of steel corrosion rate in concrete. Bull Chin Ceramic Soc 38(11):3385–3391
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Pour-Ghaz M, Isgor OB, Ghods P (2009) The effect of temperature on the corrosion of steel in concrete. Part 1: simulated polarization resistance tests and model development. Corrosion Sci 51(2):415–425 Pour-Ghaz M, Isgor OB, Ghods P (2009) The effect of temperature on the corrosion of steel in concrete. Part 1: simulated polarization resistance tests and model development. Corrosion Sci 51(2):415–425
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Pour-Ghaz M, Isgor OB, Ghods P (2009) The effect of temperature on the corrosion of steel in concrete. Part 2: model verification and parametric study. Corrosion Sci 51(2):426–433 Pour-Ghaz M, Isgor OB, Ghods P (2009) The effect of temperature on the corrosion of steel in concrete. Part 2: model verification and parametric study. Corrosion Sci 51(2):426–433
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Pradhan B, Bhattacharjee B (2009) Performance evaluation of rebar in chloride contaminated concrete by corrosion rate. Constr Build Mater 23(6):2346–2356CrossRef Pradhan B, Bhattacharjee B (2009) Performance evaluation of rebar in chloride contaminated concrete by corrosion rate. Constr Build Mater 23(6):2346–2356CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang LX, Wang JJ, Yu JH, Qi HQ (2022) Corrosion performance of arc-sprayed Zn coating in simulated acid rain environment. Welding Joining 06:49–53 Wang LX, Wang JJ, Yu JH, Qi HQ (2022) Corrosion performance of arc-sprayed Zn coating in simulated acid rain environment. Welding Joining 06:49–53
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang Y, Zhao XN, Wang XD et al (2018) Aluminizing steel surface for providing protection in Marine environment: a technological review. Mater Rep 32(21):3805–3813+3822 Wang Y, Zhao XN, Wang XD et al (2018) Aluminizing steel surface for providing protection in Marine environment: a technological review. Mater Rep 32(21):3805–3813+3822
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Su X (2015) Study on corrosion behavior of Zn-Al coating in typical simulated environment. Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan Su X (2015) Study on corrosion behavior of Zn-Al coating in typical simulated environment. Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Ministry of Railways: TB/T 2375-1993 (1993) Test method for periodic immersion corrosion of weathering steels for railway, Beijing Ministry of Railways: TB/T 2375-1993 (1993) Test method for periodic immersion corrosion of weathering steels for railway, Beijing
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Gong TTL (2015) A study on correlation between typical metal materials marine environmental atmospheric exposure test and practical accelerated corrosion test. Guangdong Ocean University, Zhanjiang Gong TTL (2015) A study on correlation between typical metal materials marine environmental atmospheric exposure test and practical accelerated corrosion test. Guangdong Ocean University, Zhanjiang
Metadaten
Titel
The Influence of Coating Material and Thickness on the Corrosion Degree of Q345 Steel
verfasst von
Li Wan
Xiang Pan
Lizhen Huang
Baotao Huang
Cai Yang
Yiming Du
Copyright-Jahr
2023
Verlag
Springer Nature Singapore
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-1748-8_6