Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen
Monitoring your children’s Web browsing is important. You may not be able to monitor their surfing in real time. But it’s good to know exactly where they’ve been. So, what’s the easiest way to check what sites they’ve visited? Your Web browsers hold the information you need. Every browser records a surfing history. You can see every page your children have visited.
“Computer Guru” Kim Kommando
It has been recommended that parents should monitor their children’s Internet use, including what sites their children visit, what messages they receive, and what they post. In this paper, I claim that parents ought not to follow this advice, because to do so would violate children’s right to privacy over their on-line information exchanges. In defense of this claim, I argue that children have a right to privacy from their parents, because such a right respects their current capacities and fosters their future capacities for autonomy and relationships.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
American Library Association (2007). Privacy tool kit. Chicago, IL: American Library Association. http://www.ala.org/advocacy/privacyconfidentiality/toolkitsprivacy/introduction. Accessed 11 September 2012.
Archard, D. W. (2010). Children’s rights. In E. Zalta (Ed.), Stanford encylopedia of philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2011/entries/rights-children/. Accessed April 9 2012.
Attili, G., Vermigli, P., & Roazzi, A. (2010). Children’s social competence, peer status, and the quality of mother-child and father-child relationships: A multidimensional scaling approach. European Psychologist, 15(1), 23–33. CrossRef
Bahrampour, T., & Aratani, L. (2006). Teens’ bold blogs alarm area schools. The Washington Post, 17 January, http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/16/AR2006011601489.html. Accessed 15 February 2013.
Bardone‐Cone, A. M., & Cass, K. M. (2007). What does viewing a pro‐anorexia website do? An experimental examination of website exposure and moderating effects. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 40(6), 537–548.
Behnke, S., & Warner, E. (2002). Confidentiality in the treatment of adolescents. Monitor on Psychology, 33(3), 44.
Benn, S. I. (1971). Privacy, freedom, and respect for persons. In J. R. Pennock & J. W. Chapman (Eds.), Nomos XIII: Privacy (pp. 1–26). Atherton Press: New York.
Benn, S. I. (1984). Privacy, freedom, and respect for persons. In F. D. Schoeman (Ed.), Philosophical dimensions of privacy: An anthology (p. 223). New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
Bidjerano, T., & Newman, J. (2010). Autonomy in after-school activity choice among preadolescents from Taiwan and the United States. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 30(5), 733–764. CrossRef
Bloustein, E. J. (1984). Privacy as an aspect of human dignity. In F. D. Schoeman (Ed.), Philosophical dimensions of privacy: An anthology (pp. 156–202). New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
Bok, S. (1999). Lying: Moral choice in public and private life. New York: Vintage.
boyd, d. (2007). Why youth (heart) social network sites: The role of networked publics in teenage social life. In D. Buckingham (Ed.), Youth, identity, and digital media (pp. 119–142). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Brennan, S., & Noggle, R. (1997). The moral status of children: Children’s rights, parents’ rights, and family justice. Social Theory and Practice, 23, 1–26. CrossRef
Buss, E. (2004). The speech-enhancing effect of Internet regulation. Chicago-Kent Law Review, 79(103), 103.
Cantor, J. (2001). The media and children’s fears, anxieties, and perceptions of danger. In D. G. Singer & J. L. Singer (Eds.), Handbook of children and the media (pp. 207–221). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Casilli, A. A., Tubaro, P., & Araya, P. (2012). Ten years of Ana: Lessons from a transdisciplinary body of literature on online pro-eating disorder websites. Social Science Information, 51(1), 120–139.
Cohen, S. (1972). Folk devils and moral panics: The creation of the mods and rockers. London: MacGibbon and Kee.
Davis, K., & James, C. (2013). Tweens’ conceptions of privacy online: Implications for educators. Learning, Media and Technology, 38(1), 4–25. CrossRef
Dinger, D. R. (2005). Should parents be allowed to record a child’s telephone conversations when they believe the child is in danger? An examination of the federal wiretap statute and the doctrine of vicarious consent in the context of a criminal prosecution. Seattle University Law Review, 28(4), 955–1028.
Drotner, K. (1999). Dangerous media? Panic discourses and dilemmas of modernity. Paedagogica Historica, 35(3), 593–619. CrossRef
Duerager, A., & Livingstone, S. (2012). How can parents support children’s internet safety? EUKids Online. http://www2.lse.ac.uk/media@lse/research/EUKidsOnline/EU%20Kids%20III/Reports/ParentalMediation.pdf. Accessed 5 February 2013.
d’Haenens, L. Vandonink, S., & Donoso, V. (2013). How to cope and build online resilience? http://www2.lse.ac.uk/media@lse/research/EUKidsOnline/EU%20Kids%20III/Reports/Copingonlineresilience.pdf. Accessed 1 February 2013.
Eastin, M. S. (2008). Toward a cognitive development approach to youth perceptions of credibility. In M. J. Metzger & A. J. Flanagin (Eds.), The digital media, youth, and credibility (pp. 29–48). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Federal Communications Commission vs. Pacifica Foundation, 438 U.S. 726 (1978).
Fried, C. (1984). Privacy (A moral analysis). In F. D. Schoeman (Ed.), Philosophical dimensions of privacy: An anthology (pp. 203–222). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Friedman, M. (2000). Autonomy, social disruption, and women. In C. Mackenzie & N. Stoljar (Eds.), Relational autonomy: Feminist perspectives on automony, agency, and the social self (pp. 35–51). New York: Oxford University Press.
Gerstein, R. S. (1984). Privacy and self-incrimination. In F. D. Schoeman (Ed.), Philosophical dimensions of privacy: An anthology (pp. 245–264). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Griffin, J. (2008). On human rights. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press. CrossRef
Gutman, A. (1980). Children, paternalism, and education: A liberal argument. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 9(4), 338–358.
Himma, K. E. (2007). Privacy versus security: Why privacy is not an absolute value or right. San Diego Law Review, 44, 857.
Hunt, A. (1997). ‘Moral panic’ and moral language in the media. British Journal of Sociology, 48(6), 629–648.
Iyengar, S. S., & Lepper, M. R. (1999). Rethinking the value of choice: A cultural perspective on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 349–366.
Jones, M. M., & Bayer, R. (2007). Paternalism and its discontents: Motorcycle helmet laws, libertarian values, and public health. American Journal of Public Health, 97(2), 208. CrossRef
Kagan, S. (1989). The limits of morality. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kerr, M., & Stattin, H. (2000). What parents know, how they know it, and several forms of adolescent adjustment: Further support for a reinterpretation of monitoring. Developmental Psychology, 36(3), 366–380. CrossRef
Kirwil, L. (2009). Parental mediation of children’s internet use in different European countries. Journal of Children and Media, 3(4), 394–409.
Kramer, R. M. (1999). Trust and distrust in organizations: Emerging perspectives, enduring questions. Annual Review of Psychology, 50(1), 569–598. CrossRef
Lenhart, A. (2009). Teens and sexting: How and why minor teens are sending sexually suggestive nude or nearly nude via text messaging. Washington, DC: Pew Internet and American Life Project. http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2009/Teens-and-Sexting/Overview.aspx. Accessed 1 December 2012.
Lenhart, A., Madden, M., Smith, A., Purcell, K., Zickuhr, K., & Rainie, L. (2011). Teens, kindness and cruelty on social network sites. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center. http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2011/Teens-and-social-media.aspx. Accessed 13 January 2013.
Liau, A. K., Khoo, A., & Hwaang, P. (2005). Factors influencing adolescents’ engagement in risky Internet behavior. Cyber Psychology and Behavior Cyber Psychology and Behavior, 8(6), 513–520. CrossRef
Littman, S. D. (2011). Point/counterpoint: proactive parenting privacy and youth. American Library Association. http://youthprivacy.ala.org/2011/05/05/pointcounterpoint-sarah-darer-littman-on-proactive-parenting. Accessed 5 June 2012.
Livingstone, S. (2009). Children and the Internet: Great expectations, challenging realities. Cambridge, Malden, MA: Polity.
Livingstone, S., & Bober, M. (2005). UK children go online: Final report of key project findings. London School of Economics and Political Science. http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/children-go-online/. Accessed 15 February 2013.
Livingstone, S., & Bober, M. (2006). Regulating the Internet at home: Contrasting the perspectives of children and parents. In D. Buckingham & R. Willett (Eds.), Digital generations: Children, young people, and new media (pp. 93–113). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
Livingstone, S., Haddon, L., Görzig, A., & Ólafsson, K. (2011). Risks and safety on the Internet: The perspective of European children: Full findings. London School of Economics and Political Science. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/33731. Accessed 20 November 2012.
Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E. J. (2008). Parental mediation of children’s Internet use. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 52(4), 581–599. CrossRef
Locke, J. (1996 ) Two treatises of government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Marwick A. E. (2008). To catch a predator? The Myspace moral panic. First Monday, 13(6). http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2152/1966. Accessed 22 July 2013.
Marwick, A. E., Diaz, M. D., & Palfrey, J. (2010). Youth, privacy and reputation. Berkman Center for Internet and Society. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1588163. Accessed 5 November 2012.
Mill, J. S. (1956 ). On liberty. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
Mobasher, B., Cooley, R., & Srivastava, J. (2000). Automatic personalization based on web usage mining. Communications of the ACM, 43(8), 142–151. CrossRef
Montgomery, K. (2007). Generation digital: Politics, commerce, and childhood, in the age of the Internet. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Moore, A. D. (2003). Privacy: Its meaning and value. American Philosophical Quarterly, 40(3), 215–227.
Moore, A. D. (2007). Toward informational privacy rights. San Diego Law Review, 44(4), 809–845.
O’Neill, O. (1988). Children’s rights and children’s lives. Ethics, 98(3), 445–463. CrossRef
Palfrey, J., Boyd, D., & Sacco, D. (2010). Enhancing child safety and online technologies: Final report of the Internet Safety Technical Task Force. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
Patchin, J., & Hinduja, S. (2006). Bullies move beyond the schoolyard. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 4(2), 148–169. CrossRef
Pettit, P. (1995). The cunning of trust. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 24(3), 202–225. CrossRef
Rachels, J. (1984). Why privacy is important. In F. D. Schoeman (Ed.), Philosophical dimensions of privacy: An anthology (pp. 290–299). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Reiman, J. H. (1976). Privacy, intimacy, and personhood. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 6(1), 26–44.
Rotenberg, K. J. (2010a). Introduction. In K. J. Rotenberg (Ed.), Interpersonal trust during childhood and adolescence (pp. 3–7). New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
Rotenberg, K. J. (2010b). The conceptualization of interpersonal trust: A basis, domain, and target framework. In K. J. Rotenberg (Ed.), Interpersonal trust during childhood and adolescence (pp. 8–27). New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
Russell, A., Pettit, G. S., & Mize, J. (1998). Horizontal qualities in parent-child relationships: Parallels with and possible consequences for children’s peer relationships. Developmental Review, 18(3), 313–352. CrossRef
Scarre, G. (1980). Children and paternalism. Philosophy, 55(211), 117–124. CrossRef
Schapiro, T. (2003). Childhood and personhood. Arizona Law Review, 45(3), 575–594.
Schoeman, F. (1980). Rights of children, rights of parents, and the moral basis of the family. Ethics, 91(1), 6–19. CrossRef
Schrag, F. (1977). The child in the moral order. Philosophy, 52(200), 167–177. CrossRef
Shmueli, B., & Blecher-Prigat, A. (2011). Privacy for children. Columbia Human Rights Law Review, 42(3), 759–795.
Smetna, J. G. (2010). The role of trust in adolescent–parent relationships: To trust is to tell you. In K. J. Rotenberg (Ed.), Interpersonal trust during childhood and adolescence (pp. 223–246). New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
Solove, D. J. (2007). The future of reputation: Gossip, rumor, and privacy on the Internet. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Steyer, J. C. (2012). Talking back to facebook: A common sense guide to raising kids in the digital age. New York: Scribner.
Taylor, J. S. (2002). Privacy and autonomy: A reappraisal. The Southern Journal of Philosophy, 40(4), 587–604. CrossRef
Welsh, M. C., Pennington, B. F., & Groisser, D. B. (1991). A normative-developmental study of executive function: A window on prefrontal function in children. Developmental Neuropsychology Developmental Neuropsychology, 7(2), 131–149. CrossRef
Westin, A. (1967). Privacy and freedom. New York: Atheneum.
Wolgast, E. (1987). Wrong rights. Hypatia, 2(1), 25–44. CrossRef
- The Internet, children, and privacy: the case against parental monitoring
- Springer Netherlands
Neuer Inhalt/© ITandMEDIA