nach oben

Erschienen in:

2024 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

The Judge as a Populist Actor

verfasst von : Lucia Corso

Erschienen in: The People’s Constitution

Verlag: Springer Nature Switzerland

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The essay proposes a reading of constitutional populism which departs from the widespread opinion whereby populists’ constitutional reforms are mainly aimed at tampering judicial power and strengthening the executive. On the contrary, it argues that the judiciary can be actually involved in the task to carry out the populist battle. A theoretical explanation for such empirical conclusion will be presented.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Populist Transformation of Constitutional Law: North Macedonia

Nächstes Kapitel Populist Government and Judicial Power in Brazil in Times of the Covid-19 Pandemic: A Conflicting Relationship

Hofstadter (1955), p. 67 ; Id. (1963), pp. 418–419.

Rosanvallon (2008), p. 270.

Id., p. 270.

For a discussion on the relationship between populism and legalism, see Corso (2019), p. 462.

Halmai (2019), p. 296.

Petrov (2021), p. 1.

Id. p. 15.

Stone Sweet (2000).

Blokker (2020), p. 1433; Id. (2019), p. 519; Canovan (1999), p. 2.

Casaleggio and Grillo (2011); Manucci and Amsler (2018), p. 109.

Arguelhes (2017).

Id.

Id; see also Barroso (2016), p. 71. For a different characterization of the role of the Brazilian Supreme Court vis a vis the Bolsonaro’s Cabinet, see in this volume, Mesquita Ceia.

Report accompanying the reform at http://documenti.camera.it/_dati/leg18/lavori/stampati/pdf/18PDL0028960.pdf.

Ibidem.

Casaleggio (2015), p. 25.

Grillo (2018) at, https://beppegrillo.it/il-piu-grande-inganno-della-politica-e-farci-credere-che-servano-politici/.

Casaleggio, supra, p. 25.

Mudde (2017), p. 27; Müller (2016).

Ostiguy (2017), p. 73.

Mark, 2:27.

Corso (2022), p. 67.

Hamilton, Federalist 51.

Observations of the Dutch Government, annexed to the judgment in A. v. The United Kingdom, ECHR 17 December 2002, App. No. 35373/97.

Anselmi and Anastasia (2020), p. 1469.

Fiandaca (2013), p. 95.

Ferrajoli (2018), p. 515; Violante (2014), p. 199.

Violante (2014), p. 199.

Law n. 3/ 2019.

Law Decree n. 29, 10 May 2020, at https://www.gazzettaufficiale.it/eli/id/2020/05/10/20G00047/SG.

Anselmi and Anastasia (2020), p. 1470.

Court of Cassation, Criminal section, Decision n. 49691/2004.

Rosanvallon (2008), p. 270.

Corso (2019), p. 462.

Acemoglu and Robinson (2019), p. 18.

Acemoglu D, Robinson J (2019) The narrow corridor. States, society and the fate of liberty. Viking Press, NY

Anselmi M, Anastasia S (2020) Populist punitiveness in the Italian Yellow Green Government. Partecipazione e Conflitto:1469–1486

Arguelhes DW (2017) Judges speaking for the people: judicial populism beyond judicial decisions. VerfBlog, 2017/5/04. https://verfassungsblog.de/judges-speaking-for-the-people-judicial-populism-beyond-judicial-decisions/

Barroso LR (2016) Reason without vote: the representative and majoritarian function of constitutional courts. In: Bustamante T, Fernandes BG (eds) Democratizing constitutional law. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, pp 71–90CrossRef

Blokker P (2019) Populist counter-constitutionalism, conservatism, and legal fundamentalism. Eur Const Law Rev 15:519–543

Blokker P (2020) Populist understandings of the law: a conservative backlash? Partecipazione e conflitto 13:1433–1452

Canovan M (1999) Trust the people! Populism and the two faces of democracy. Polit Stud 47(1):2–16CrossRef

Casaleggio G (2015) Veni Vidi Web. Adagio

Casaleggio, Grillo B (2011) Siamo in guerra. Per una nuova politica Brossura

Corso L (2019) When anti-politics becomes political: what can the Italian five star movement tell us about the relationship between populism and legalism. Eur Const Law Rev 15(3):462–487

Corso L (2022) Anti-elitism and the constitution. Some reflections on populist constitutionalism. In: Krygier M, Czarnota A, Sadurski W (eds) Anti-constitutional populism. Cambridge University Press, pp 67–98CrossRef

Ferrajoli L (2018) Democrazia e populismo. Rivista AIC 3:515–524

Fiandaca G (2013) Populismo politico e populismo giudiziario. Criminalia:95–121

Grillo B (2018) ‘Il Senato dei cittadini’, Jun 27th. https://beppegrillo.it/il-piu-grande-inganno-della-politica-e-farci-credere-che-servano-politici/

Halmai G (2019) Populism, authoritarianism and constitutionalism. German Law J 20(3):296–313CrossRef

Hofstadter R (1955) The age of reform: from Bryan to F.D.R. Vintage Books, NY

Hofstadter R (1963) Anti-intellectualism in American life. Vintage Books, NY

Manucci L, Amsler L (2018) Where the wind blows: Five Star Movement’s populism, direct democracy and ideological flexibility. Ital Polit Sci Rev 48(1):109CrossRef

Mesquita Ceia E (2023) Populist government and judicial power in Brazil in times of the Covid19 pandemic: a conflicting relationship

Mudde C (2017) Populism: an ideational approach. In: Kaltwasser CR, Taggart P, Espejo PO, Ostiguy P (eds) The Oxford handbook of populism. Oxford University Press, pp 27–47

Müller J-W (2016) What is populism? University of Pennsylvania PressCrossRef

Ostiguy P (2017) Populism: a socio-cultural approach. In: The Oxford handbook of populism, pp 73–100

Petrov J (2021) (De-)judicialization of politics in the era of populism: lessons from Central and Eastern Europe. Int J Hum Rights:1–26

Rosanvallon P (2008) Counter democracy. Politics in the age of distrust. Cambridge University PressCrossRef

Stone Sweet A (2000) Governing with judges. Constitutional politics in Europe. Oxford University PressCrossRef

Violante L (2014) Populismo e plebeismo nelle politiche criminali. Criminalia:197–207

Titel: The Judge as a Populist Actor
verfasst von: Lucia Corso
Verlag: Springer Nature Switzerland
Buch: The People’s Constitution
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-71888-5

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-031-71889-2

Copyright-Jahr: 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-71889-2_7