nach oben

TechTrends

Erschienen in:

12.11.2019 | Original Paper

The Motivational Effects of Involving Students in Rubric Development on Animation Instruction

verfasst von: Hua Zheng, Lu Ding, Zhenqiu Lu, Robert Maribe Branch

Erschienen in: TechTrends | Ausgabe 1/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

This exploratory study examined the motivational effects of an instructional method that involved students in the rubric development on animation instruction. Drawing upon Keller’s ARCS motivation model, this study compared student motivation regarding attention (A), relevance (R), confidence (C), and satisfaction (S) towards animation instruction before and after their involvement in the rubric development. This study recruited seventeen undergraduates participating in a technology integration course and administered motivation surveys before and after implementing the instructional method. The survey results revealed that student motivation was significantly increased in terms of relevance. Motivated students developed a self-developed rubric by drawing upon their experience and perspectives of creating animated research presentation videos. Another motivational effect was identified in students’ improved performance in creating animated videos to present research. (125).

Vorheriger Artikel Investigating the Effectiveness of Gamification on Group Cohesion, Attitude, and Academic Achievement in Collaborative Learning Environments

Nächster Artikel Exploring Student Preference between Textbook Chapters and Adaptive Learning Lessons in an Introductory Environmental Geology Course

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Andrade, H. L., & Du, Y. (2005). Student perspectives on rubric-referenced assessment. Educational & Counseling Psychology Faculty Scholarship, 10(3), 1–11.

Andrade, H. L., Du, Y., & Wang, X. (2008). Putting rubrics to the test: The effect of a model, criteria generation, and rubric-referenced self-assessment on elementary school students' writing. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 27(2), 3–13.CrossRef

Bolton, F. C. (2006). Rubrics and adult learners: Andragogy and assessment. Assessment Update, 18(3), 5–6.

Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40.CrossRef

Brookhart, S. M., & Durkin, D. T. (2003). Classroom assessment, student motivation, and achievement in high school social studies classes. Applied Measurement in Education, 16(1), 27–54.CrossRef

Brown, G. T., Glasswell, K., & Harland, D. (2004). Accuracy in the scoring of writing: Studies of reliability and validity using a New Zealand writing assessment system. Assessing Writing, 9(2), 105–121.CrossRef

Changeiywo, J. M., Wambugu, P. W., & Wachanga, S. W. (2011). Investigations of students' motivation towards learning secondary school physics through mastery learning approach. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9(6), 1333–1350.CrossRef

Chappuis, S., & Stiggins, R. J. (2002). Classroom assessment for learning. Educational Leadership, 60(1), 40–44.

Field, A. (2009). Discussing statistics using SPSS. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

Greenberg, K. P. (2015). Rubric use in formative assessment: A detailed behavioral rubric helps students improve their scientific writing skills. Teaching of Psychology, 42(3), 211–217.CrossRef

Hancock, D. (2004). Cooperative learning and peer orientation effects on motivation and achievement. The Journal of Educational Research, 97(3), 159–168.CrossRef

Hoban, G., Loughran, J., & Nielsen, W. (2011). Slowmation: Preservice elementary teachers representing science knowledge through creating multimodal digital animations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(9), 985–1009.CrossRef

Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687.CrossRef

Jablonski, D., Hoban, G. F., Ransom, H. S., & Ward, K. S. (2015). Exploring the use of slowmation as a pedagogical alternative in science teaching and learning. Pacific-Asian education journal, 27(1), 5–20.

Jacobs, B., & Clark, J. C. (2018). Create to critique: animation creation as conceptual consolidation. Teaching Science, 64(1), 26–36.

Kapucu, M. S., Eren, E., & Avcı, Z. Y. (2014). Investigation of pre-service science teachers’ opinions about using GoAnimate to create animated videos. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 5(4), 23–40.CrossRef

Keller, J. M. (1987). Development and use of the ARCS model of instructional design. Journal of Instructional Development, 10(3), 2–10.CrossRef

Mogen, K. S. (2013). Mastery learning instruction versus traditional instructional methods in eight grade language arts. Retrieved from https://library.ndsu.edu/ir/bitstream/handl/10365/27043/Mastery%20Learning%20Instruction%20Versus%20Traditional%20Instctional%20Methods%20in%20Eighth%20Grade%20Language%20Arts.pdf?sequence=.

NEA Education Policy and Practice Department. (2008). Universal design for learning (UDL): Making learning accessible and engaging for all students. https://www.nea.org/assets/docs/PB23_UDL08.pdf. Accessed 18 Sept 2018.

Nielsen, W., Hoban, G., & Hyland, C. J. (2017). Pharmacology students’ perceptions of creating multimodal digital explanations. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 18(2), 329–339. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RP00244G.CrossRef

Ozdemir, M., Izmirli, S., & Sahin-Izmirli, O. (2016). The effects of captioning videos on academic achievement and motivation: Reconsideration of redundancy principle in instructional videos. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 19(4), 1–10.

Popham, W. J. (1997). What's wrong-and what's right-with rubrics. Educational Leadership, 55, 72–75.

Rivoltella, P. C. (2012). Beyond digital natives: European research on media education; challenges of technology and pedagogical issues. Educational Technology, 52(2), 25–29.

Schneider, F. J. (2006). Rubrics for teacher education in community college. The Community College Enterprise, 12(1), 39.

Skillings, M. J., & Ferrell, R. (2000). Student-generated rubrics: Bringing students into the assessment process. The Reading Teacher, 53(6), 452–455.

Stiggins, R. (1997). Student-centered classroom assessment. Columbus, OH: Merrill Publishing.

Stratton, M. T., Julien, M., & Schaffer, B. (2014). GoAnimate. Journal of Management Education, 38(2), 282–289.CrossRef

Vyond (2017). The new GoAnimate video maker (Now the Vyond studio). Retrieved from https://www.vyond.com/blog/new-goanimate-video-make.

Zheng, H., Branch, R. M., & Lee, H. (2019). Creating animated videos as an innovative instructional alternative to writing essays for presenting research. TechTrends, 63(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00400-7.CrossRef

Titel: The Motivational Effects of Involving Students in Rubric Development on Animation Instruction
verfasst von: Hua Zheng
Lu Ding
Zhenqiu Lu
Robert Maribe Branch
Publikationsdatum: 12.11.2019
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: TechTrends / Ausgabe 1/2020
Print ISSN: 8756-3894
Elektronische ISSN: 1559-7075
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00443-w

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2020

Designing Computational Thinking and Coding Badges for Early Childhood Educators

Maker-Centered Teacher Professional Development: Examining K-12 Teachers’ Learning Experiences in a Commercial Makerspace

Investigating the Effectiveness of Gamification on Group Cohesion, Attitude, and Academic Achievement in Collaborative Learning Environments

Evaluating the Impact of Blended Learning: a Mixed-Methods Study with Difference-in-Difference Analysis

Writing on Social Media: a Review of Research in the High School Classroom

January 2020