Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Social Business: Defining and Situating the Concept Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2014 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

13. The One and the Many Sides of Social Business: A Critical Reflection

verfasst von : Karin Kreutzer, Stefanie Mauksch

Erschienen in: Social Business

Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The concept of social business has inspired many people world-wide. However, also critical voices have been raised pointing to potential shortcomings of social business models. Especially because the model addresses issues highly relevant to society, it is inevitable to scrutinize its positive effects, but also the challenges involved. In this chapter, we present the four main strengths of social business in fostering positive social change, empowering marginalized groups, producing effective solutions, and defining a new role for business. We then point to four limitations and critically discuss them. Thereby, we elaborate on a set of questions regarding the reach, effects, and sustainability of social business models as well as the degree of participation they achieve. Lastly, we provide an overview of critical management challenges social businesses are facing. We conclude that if social business policies and founders take account of and engage with these challenges, the concept bears considerable potential.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Social Business and Poverty Alleviation: Lessons from Grameen Danone and Grameen Veolia
Nächstes Kapitel Looking Forward
Literatur
Achleitner, A.-K., Spiess-Knafl, W., & Volk, S. (2011). Finanzierung von Social Enterprises – Neue Herausforderungen für die Finanzmärkte. In H. Hackenberg & S. Empter (Eds.), Social Entrepreneurship – Social Business: Für die Gesellschaftunternehmen (pp. 269–286). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.CrossRef
Albert, S., & Whetten, D. A. (1985). Organizational identity (Vol. 7). Greenwich: JAI Press.
Alexander, J. A., & Weiner, B. J. (1998). The adoption of the corporate governance model by nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 8(3), 223–242.CrossRef
Alvord, S. H., Brown, L. D., & Letts, C. W. (2004). Social entrepreneurship and societal transformation – An explanatory study. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 40(3), 260–282.CrossRef
Anheier, H. K. (2005). Nonprofit organizations: Theory, management, policy. New York: Routledge.
Austin, J., Stevenson, H., & Wei‐Skillern, J. (2006). Social and commercial entrepreneurship: Same, different, or both? Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 30(1), 1–22.CrossRef
Austin, R., Wareham, J., & Busquest, J. (2008). Specialisterne: Sense and details. Harvard Business School Paper: 9-608–109.
Battilana, J., & Dorado, S. (2010). Building sustainable hybrid organizations: The case of commercial microfinance organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6), 1419–1440.CrossRef
Beckmann, M., & Zeyen, A. (2013). Franchising as a strategy for combining small and large group advantages (Logics) in social entrepreneurship: A Hayekian perspective. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. doi:10.​1177/​0899764012470758​
Berglund, K., & Schwartz, B. (2013). Holding on to the anomaly of social entrepreneurship: Dilemmas in starting up and running a fair-trade enterprise. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 4(2), 237–255.CrossRef
Beyes, T., & Jäger, U. (2005). Erforschung multidiskursiver Organisationen. NPO-Management aus systemtheoretischer Sicht. Die Betriebswirtschaft, 65(6), 627–645.
Block, S. R., & Rosenberg, S. (2002). Toward an understanding of founder’s syndrome: An assessment of power and privilege among founders of nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 12(4), 353–368.CrossRef
Dees, J. G. (1998). The meaning of ‘social entrepreneurship’ Kauffman Center for Entrepreneurial Leadership (pp. 1–6). Palo Alto: Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation and Miriam and Peter Haas Centennial Professor in Public Service Graduate School of Business, Stanford University.
Defourny, J., & Nyssens, M. (2008). Social enterprise in Europe: Recent trends and developments. Social Enterprise Journal, 4(3), 202–228.CrossRef
Defourny, J., & Nyssens, M. (2010). Conceptions of social enterprise and social entrepreneurship in Europe and the United States: Convergences and divergences. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 1(1), 32–53.CrossRef
Dey, P., & Steyaert, C. (2010). The politics of narrating social entrepreneurship. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, 4(1), 85–108.
Dey, P., & Steyaert, C. (2012). Social entrepreneurship: Critique and the radical enactment of the social. Social Enterprise Journal, 8(2), 90–107.CrossRef
Di Domenico, M., Haugh, H., & Tracey, P. (2010). Social bricolage: Theorizing social value creation in social enterprises. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 34(4), 681–703.CrossRef
Douglas, J. (1983). Why charity? The case for a third sector. London: Sage.
Eikenberry, A. M., & Kluver, J. D. (2004). The marketization of the nonprofit sector: Civil society at risk? Public Administration Review, 64(2), 132–140.CrossRef
Glynn, M. A. (2000). When cymbals become symbols: Conflict over organizational identity within a symphony orchestra. Organization Science, 11(3), 285–298.CrossRef
Goerke, J. (2003). Taking the quantum leap: nonprofits are now in business. An Australian perspective. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 8(4), 317–327.CrossRef
Haugh, H. (2007). Community‐led social venture creation. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 31(2), 161–182.CrossRef
Kamat, S. (2004). The privatization of public interest: Theorizing NGO discourse in a neoliberal era. Review of International Political Economy, 11(1), 155–176.CrossRef
Kerlin, J. A. (2006). Social enterprise in the United States and Europe: Understanding and learning from the differences. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 17(3), 246–262.CrossRef
Kerlin, J. A. (2010). A comparative analysis of the global emergence of social enterprise. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 21(2), 162–179.CrossRef
Kreutzer, K., & Jäger, U. (2011). Volunteering versus managerialism: Conflict over organizational identity in voluntary associations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(4), 634–661.CrossRef
Maier, F., & Meyer, M. (2011). Managerialism and beyond: Discourses of civil society organization and their governance implications. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 22(4), 731–756.CrossRef
Mair, J., & Marti, I. (2006). Social entrepreneurship research: A source of explanation, prediction, and delight. Journal of World Business, 41(1), 36–44.CrossRef
Maitland, I. (1997). Virtuous markets: “The market as school of the virtues”. Business Ethics Quarterly, 7(1), 17–31.CrossRef
Mauksch, S. (2012). Beyond managerial rationality: Exploring social enterprise in Germany. Social Enterprise Journal, 8(2), 156–170.CrossRef
Mead, L. M. (1997). The new paternalism: Supervisory approaches to poverty. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Milofsky, C. (1988). Community organizations: Studies in resource mobilization and exchange. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mintzberg, H. (1996). Managing government, governing management. Harvard Business Review, 74, 75–85.
Mort, G. S., Weerawardena, J., & Carnegie, K. (2003). Social entrepreneurship: Towards conceptualisation. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 8(1), 76–88.CrossRef
Nickel, P. M., & Eikenberry, A. M. (2009). A critique of the discourse of marketized philanthropy. American Behavioral Scientist, 52(7), 974–989.CrossRef
Paton, R. (2003). Managing and measuring social enterprises. London: Sage.
Peredo, A. M., & McLean, M. (2006). Social entrepreneurship: A critical review of the concept. Journal of World Business, 41(1), 56–65.CrossRef
Riben, M. (1988). Shedding light on… The dark side of adoption. Dayton: Advocate Publications.
Riben, M. (2007). The stork market: America’s multi-billion dollar unregulated adoption industry. Dayton: Advocate Publications.
Saerberg, S. (2007). The dining in the dark phenomenon. Disability Studies Quarterly, 27(3), 60–73.
Sen, A. K. (2009). The idea of justice. New York: Harvard University Press.
Shaw, E., & Carter, S. (2007). Social entrepreneurship: Theoretical antecedents and empirical analysis of entrepreneurial processes and outcomes. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 14(3), 418–434.CrossRef
Thompson, J., Alvy, G., & Lees, A. (2000). Social entrepreneurship – A new look at the people and the potential. Management Decision, 38(5), 328–338.CrossRef
Tracey, P., & Jarvis, O. (2006). An enterprising failure – Why a promising social franchise collapsed. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 5, 66–70.
Wood, M. M. (1992). Is governing board behavior cyclical? Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 3(2), 139–163.CrossRef
Yunus, M. (2009). Creating a world without poverty: Social business and the future of capitalism. New York: PublicAffairs.
Yunus, M. (2011b). Building social business: The new kind of capitalism that serves humanities most pressing needs. New York: PublicAffairs.
Zahra, S. A., Gedajlovic, E., Neubaum, D. O., & Shulman, J. M. (2009). A typology of social entrepreneurs: Motives, search processes and ethical challenges. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(5), 519–532.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
The One and the Many Sides of Social Business: A Critical Reflection
verfasst von
Karin Kreutzer
Stefanie Mauksch
Copyright-Jahr
2014
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Buch
Social Business

Print ISBN: 978-3-642-45274-1

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-642-45275-8

Copyright-Jahr: 2014

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45275-8_13