Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen
This research addresses estimations of distance, an important factor in numerous consumer decisions (e.g., store choice, willingness to pay for travel). Our central hypothesis is that when two places are located in the same geographic category, individuals estimate them to be closer to each other than when they are located in different categories, a bias we term “the out-of-region bias.” In study 1, we demonstrate that participants are more willing to visit a store located in the city in which they live rather than a store located in a neighboring city because they mistakenly think that a store in their city is closer to home. In studies 2a and b, we show that the out-of-region bias leads consumers to express higher willingness to pay for an airline ticket that involves travel across versus within regions because they inaccurately estimate greater distance between cities that are located in different regions (vs. the same region). Study 2a also demonstrates that the out-of-region bias is ameliorated in the presence of a map, indicating that the bias is a conceptual (vs. perceptual) bias, and study 2b rules out an alternative explanation for our results based on consumers’ tendency to exaggerate north–south distances.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
Allen, G. L., & Kirasic, K. C. (1985). Effects of the cognitive organization of route knowledge on judgments of macrospatial distance. Memory & Cognition, 13, 218–227. CrossRef
Brown, N. R. (2002). Real-world estimation: Estimation modes and seeding effects. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory. Vol 41 (pp. 321–359). San Diego: Academic.
Burris, C. T., & Branscombe, N. R. (2005). Distorted distance estimation induced by a self-relevant national boundary. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 305–312. CrossRef
Burris, C. T., & Rempel, J. K. (2004). “It’s the end of the world as we know it”: Threat and the spatial-symbolic self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 19–42. CrossRef
Carvalho, S. W., Block, L. G., Sivaramakrishnan, S., Manchanda, R. V., & Mitakakis, C. (2008). Risk perception and risk avoidance: The role of cultural identity and personal relevance. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 25, 319–326. CrossRef
Coren, S., & Girgus, J. S. (1980). Principles of perceptual organization and spatial distortion: The gestalt illusions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 6, 404–412. CrossRef
Friedman, A. (2009). The role of categories and spatial cuing in global-scale location estimates. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 94–112. CrossRef
Friedman, A., & Brown, N. R. (2000a). Updating geographical knowledge: Principles of coherence and inertia. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 900–914. CrossRef
Friedman, A., & Brown, N. R. (2000b). Reasoning about geography. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 193–219. CrossRef
Friedman, A., & Montello, D. R. (2006). Global-scale location and distance estimates: Common representations and strategies in absolute and relative judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 333–346. CrossRef
Friedman, A., Brown, N. R., & McGaffey, A. P. (2002a). A basis for bias in geographical judgments. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 151–159. CrossRef
Friedman, A., Kerkman, D. D., & Brown, N. R. (2002b). Spatial location judgments: A cross-national comparison of estimation bias in subjective North American geography. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 615–623. CrossRef
Goldstone, R. L. (1994). The role of similarity in categorization: Providing a groundwork. Cognition, 52, 125–157. CrossRef
Gregan-Paxton, J., Hoeffler, S., & Zhao, M. (2005). When categorization is ambiguous: Factors that facilitate the use of a multiple category inference strategy. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 15, 127–140. CrossRef
Huff, D. L. (1963). A probabilistic analysis of shopping center trade areas. Land Economics, 39, 81–90. CrossRef
Huff, D. L. (2003). Parameter estimation in the Huff model. ArcUser, October–December, 34–36.
Huff, D. L., & Rust, R. T. (1984). Measuring the congruence of market areas. Journal of Marketing, 48, 68–74. CrossRef
Judd, C. M., Kenny, D. A., & McClelland, G. H. (2001). Estimating and testing mediation and moderation in within-subject designs. Psychological Methods, 6, 115–134. CrossRef
Kang, Y., Herr, P. M., & Page, C. M. (2003). Time and distance: Asymmetries in consumer trip knowledge and judgments. Journal of Consumer Research, 30, 420–429. CrossRef
Krishna, A. (2007). Biases in spatial perception: A review and integrative framework. In M. Wedel & R. Peters (Eds.), Visual marketing: From attention to action (pp. 162–192). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Nelson, L., & Simmons, J. P. (2009). On southbound ease and northbound fees: Literal consequences of the metaphoric link between vertical position and cardinal direction. Journal of Marketing Research, 46, 715–724. CrossRef
Raghubir, P., & Krishna, A. (1996). As the crow flies: Bias in consumers’ map-based distance judgments. Journal of Consumer Research, 23, 26–39. CrossRef
Ratneshwar, S., Barsalou, L. W., Pechmann, C., & Moore, M. (2001). Goal-derived categories: The role of personal and situational goals in category representations. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 10, 147–157. CrossRef
Rosch, E. (1973). Natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 328–350. CrossRef
Saarinen, T., Parton, M., & Billberg, R. (1996). Relative size of continents on world sketch maps. Cartographica, 33, 37–47.
Snyder, J. P. (1993). Flattening the earth: Two thousand years of map projections. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Soman, D., & Shi, M. (2003). Virtual progress: The effect of path characteristics on perceptions of progress and choice. Management Science, 49, 1229–1250. CrossRef
Tversky, B. (1981). Distortions in memory for maps. Cognitive Psychology, 13, 407–433. CrossRef
- The out-of-region bias: Distance estimations based on geographic category membership
Rebecca Walker Naylor
William O. Bearden
- Springer US
Best Practices für Web-Exzellenz im Online-Handel/© venimo | Fotolia