nach oben

TechTrends

Erschienen in:

30.05.2018 | Original Paper

The Perceived Value of Informal, Peer Critique in the Instructional Design Studio

verfasst von: Jason K. McDonald, Peter J. Rich, Nicholas B. Gubler

Erschienen in: TechTrends | Ausgabe 2/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate how instructional design students perceive the informal, peer critique as an influence in their studio education. Our participants were students enrolled in beginning and advanced studio courses in the department of Instructional Psychology and Technology at Brigham Young University. Groups of 2–3 beginning students were assigned a reviewer from the advanced course, who then led critiques over two face-to-face class sessions with their assigned groups. Students perceived the critique experience to be helpful, although beginning students perceived greater value than did the advanced (possibly due to the time advanced students took to build confidence in the beginners). Students also reported ways in which the critique experience could have been improved, with the most common suggestions being to hold critique sessions more frequently and for longer periods of time. We conclude by discussing the role of informal, peer critiques in the instructional design studio, including how they could complement other forms of feedback that students receive. We also discuss how our findings could contribute towards future research into the value of critique in the instructional design studio environment.

Vorheriger Artikel Educational Professionals’ Decision Making for Professional Growth using a Case of Twitter Adoption

Nächster Artikel Video-Based Teaching Playgrounds: Designing Online Learning Opportunities to Foster Professional Noticing of Teaching Practices

Anthony, K. H. (1991). Design juries on trial: The renaissance of the design studio. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

Boud, D. (2013). Introduction: Making the move to peer learning. In D. Boud, R. Cohen, & J. Sampson (Eds.), Peer learning in higher education: Learning from and with each other (pp. 1–17). New York: Routledge.

Brandt, C. B., Cennamo, K., Douglas, S., Vernon, M., McGrath, M., & Reimer, Y. (2013). A theoretical framework for the studio as a learning environment. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23, 329–348.CrossRef

Brill, J. M. (2016). Investigating peer review as a systemic pedagogy for developing the design knowledge, skills, and dispositions of novice instructional design students. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(4), 681–705. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-015-9421-6.CrossRef

Budge, K., Beale, C., & Lynas, E. (2013). A chaotic intervention: creativity and peer learning in design education. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 32(2), 146–156.CrossRef

Cennamo, K. (2014). In education we all want to be nice: Lessons learned from a multidisciplinary design studio. In B. Hokanson & A. S. Gibbons (Eds.), Design in educational technology: Design thinking, design process, and the design studio (pp. 57–73). New York: Springer.CrossRef

Cennamo, K. (2016). What is studio? In E. Boling, R. A. Schwier, C. M. Gray, K. M. Smith, & K. Campbell (Eds.), Studio teaching in higher education: Selected design cases (pp. 248–259). New York: Routledge.

Cennamo, K., & Brandt, C. (2012). The "right kind of telling": knowledge building in the academic design studio. Educational Technology Research and Development, 60(5), 839–858.CrossRef

Chiu, S.-H. (2010). Students’ knowledge sources and knowledge sharing in the design studio—an exploratory study. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 2, 27–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-008-9061-9.CrossRef

Clinton, G., & Rieber, L. P. (2010). The studio experience at the University of Georgia: an example of constructionist learning for adults. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(6), 755–780.CrossRef

Conanan, D. M., & Pinkard, N. (2001). Students’ perceptions of giving and receiving design critiques in an online learning environment. Paper presented at the European conference on computer-supported collaborative learning (EURO-CSCL).

Dannels, D. P. (2005). Performing tribal rituals: a genre analysis of “crits” in design studios. Communication Education, 54(2), 136–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520500213165.CrossRef

Dannels, D. P., & Martin, K. N. (2008). Critiquing critiques: a genre analysis of feedback across novice to expert design studios. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 22(2), 135–159. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651907311923.CrossRef

Dannels, D. P., Gaffney, A. H., & Martin, K. N. (2008). Beyond content, deeper than delivery: what critique feedback reveals about communication expectations in design education. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 2(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2008.020212.CrossRef

Gibbons, A. S. (2016). Evolving into studio. In E. Boling, R. A. Schwier, C. M. Gray, K. M. Smith, & K. Campbell (Eds.), Studio teaching in higher education: Selected design cases (pp. 137–151). New York: Routledge.

Gray, C. M. (2013a). Discursive structures of informal critique in an HCI design studio. Paper presented at the Nordes 2013: Experiments in Design Research, Copehnagen, Denmark/Malmö, Sweden, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Gray, C. M. (2013b). Informal peer critique and the negotiation of habitus in a design studio. Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 22(2), 195–209. https://doi.org/10.1386/adch.12.2.195_1.CrossRef

Gray, C. M. (2016). Emergent views of studio. In E. Boling, R. A. Schwier, C. M. Gray, K. M. Smith, & K. Campbell (Eds.), Studio teaching in higher education: Selected design cases (pp. 271–281). New York: Routledge.

Gray, C. M., & Smith, K. M. (2016). Critical views of studio. In E. Boling, R. A. Schwier, C. M. Gray, K. M. Smith, & K. Campbell (Eds.), Studio teaching in higher education: Selected design cases (pp. 260–270). New York: Routledge.

Hattie, J. (2008). Visible learning. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.CrossRef

Hoadley, C. M., & Cox, C. (2008). What is design knowledge and how do we teach it? In C. DiGiano, S. V. Goldman, & M. Choroset (Eds.), Educating learning technology designers: Guiding and inspiring creators of innovative educational tools (pp. 19–35). New York: Routledge.

Hokanson, B. (2012). The design critique as a model for distributed learning. In L. Moller & J. Huett (Eds.), The next generation of distance education: Unconstrained learning (pp. 71–83). New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRef

Huet, G., Culley, S. J., McMahon, C. A., & Fortin, C. (2007). Making sense of engineering design review activities. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 21(3), 243–266. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0890060407000261.CrossRef

Jurado, J. A. (2011). Group projects in interiior design studio classes: peer feedback benefits. Journal of Family and Consumer Sciences, 103(1), 34–39.

Knowlton, D. S. (2016). Design studios in instructional design and technology: what are the possibilities? TechTrends, 60(4), 350–358.CrossRef

Knowlton, D. S., Johnson, L., Thomeczek, M., Liu, Y., & Liumsden, J. N. (2016). Juries as innovation in an instructional design and technology program: a saga of continuous improvement efforts. International Journal of Designs for Learning, 7(3), 1–18.CrossRef

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

McDonnell, J. (2016). Scaffolding practices: a study of design practitioner engagement in design education. Design Studies, 45(A), 9–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2015.12.006.CrossRef

Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Oh, Y., Ishizaki, S., Gross, M. D., & Do, E. Y.-L. (2013). A theoretical framework of design critiquing in architecture studios. Design Studies, 34(3), 302–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2012.08.004.CrossRef

Rich, P. J., West, R. E., & Warr, M. (2015). Innovating how we teach collaborative design through studio-based pedagogy. In M. A. Orey & R. M. Branch (Eds.), Educational media and technology yearbook (Vol. 39, pp. 147–163). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.

Salama, A. M., & Wilkinson, N. (2007). Introduction: Legacies for the future of design studio pedagogy. In A. M. Salama & N. Wilkinson (Eds.), Design studio pedagogy: Horizons for the future (pp. 3–8). Gateshead: Urban International Press.

Sawyer, R. K. (2017). Teaching creativity in art and design studio classes: a systematic literature review. Educational Research Review, 22, 99–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.07.002.CrossRef

Schön, D. A. (1985). The design studio: An exploration of its traditions and potentials. London: RIBA Publications Limited.

Schrand, T., & Eliason, J. (2012). Feedback practices and signature pedagogies: what can the liberal arts learn from the design critique? Teaching in Higher Education, 17(1), 51–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2011.590977.CrossRef

Shaffer, D. W. (2003). Portrait of the oxford design studio: An ethnography of design pedagogy. WCER Working Paper No. 2003–11. Wisconsin Center for Education Research.

Smith, K. M. (2015). Conditions influencing the development of design expertise: as identified in interior design student accounts. Design Studies, 36, 77–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2014.09.001.CrossRef

Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

Thiessen, M. (2017). I don’t know, I just like it: exploring how design students think about criticism. Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 16(2), 145–156. https://doi.org/10.1386/adch.16.2.145_1.CrossRef

Topping, K. J. (2009). Peer assessment. Theory Into Practice, 48(1), 20–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600680836.CrossRef

Webster, H. (2006). Power, freedom and resistance: excavating the design jury. The International Journal of Art & Design Education, 25(3), 286–296. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-8070.2006.00495.x.CrossRef

Wilson, B. G. (2013). A practice-centered approach to instructional design. In J. M. Spector, B. B. Lockee, S. E. Smaldino, & M. Herring (Eds.), Learning, problem solving, and mind tools: Essays in honor of David H. Jonassen (pp. 35–54). New York: Routledge.

Wood, D., & Kurzel, F. (2008). Engaging students in reflective practice through a process of formative peer review and peer assessment. Paper presented at the ATN Assessment Conference 2008: Engaging Students in Assessment.

Woolf, N. H., & Quinn, J. (2001). Evaluating peer review in an introductory instructional design course. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 14(3), 20–42.CrossRef

Zamberlan, L., & Wilson, S. E. (2015). Developing an embedded peer tutor program in design studio to support first year design students. Journal of Peer Learning, 8(1), 5–17.

Zamberlan, L., & Wilson, S. E. (2017). “Conversation leading to progress”: student perceptions of peer tutors’ contribution to enhancing creativity and collaboration in a first year design studio. Journal of Peer Learning, 10(1), 59–75.

Titel: The Perceived Value of Informal, Peer Critique in the Instructional Design Studio
verfasst von: Jason K. McDonald
Peter J. Rich
Nicholas B. Gubler
Publikationsdatum: 30.05.2018
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: TechTrends / Ausgabe 2/2019
Print ISSN: 8756-3894
Elektronische ISSN: 1559-7075
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-018-0302-9

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2019

Here or There Instruction: Lessons Learned in Implementing Innovative Approaches to Blended Synchronous Learning

Student Perceptions on the Role of the Classroom Environment on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning

Six Key Elements Identified in an Active and Thriving Blended Community of Practice

A Year in the Life of a Pilot Program for Implementing a Digital Clinical Experience Assessment Model

Creativity and Expressive Arts, Performance, Physicality and Wellness: a Conversation with Dr. Paula Thomson and Dr. Victoria Jaque

Developing an Open Textbook for Learning and Instructional Design Technology