Skip to main content

Tipp

Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen

Erschienen in: Automatic Documentation and Mathematical Linguistics 2/2021

01.03.2021 | INFORMATION ANALYSIS

The Rationale of Indicators for the Management of Scientific Achievements

verfasst von: P. A. Kalachikhin

Erschienen in: Automatic Documentation and Mathematical Linguistics | Ausgabe 2/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The problem of the substantiation of the optimal composition of indicators intended for assessing existing and predicting new scientific achievements is considered. The types of indicators that are commonly used in the management of scientific achievements are systematized. A differentiated approach to the selection of such indicators is proposed, depending on the sections of knowledge to which they relate. In addition to the scientometric parameters of knowledge sections, the factors that influence the formation of sets of indicators are listed. The development of a quantitative model of the ratio of types of indicators in their sets based on measures of sets and binary relations of order over numbers is presented. Within the framework of this model, an explanation is given for the prevalence of expert indicators. The decision on the composition of the indicator sets is made based on heuristic rules. An example of finding the optimal ratio of the types of indicators for predicting achievements in the natural sciences and assessing the results achieved in the humanities is given.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Syuntyurenko, O.V., Funding for fundamental research: The conceptual image of a decision support system using methods of scientometrics and data analysis, Inf. Ee Primeneniya, 2018, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 118–127. Syuntyurenko, O.V., Funding for fundamental research: The conceptual image of a decision support system using methods of scientometrics and data analysis, Inf. Ee Primeneniya, 2018, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 118–127.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Khoroshevskii, V.F. and Efimenko, I.V., Semantic technologies in scientometrics: Objectives, problems, solutions, and prospects, in Kognitivno-semioticheskie aspekty modelirovaniya v gumanitarnoi sfere (Cognitive-Semiotic Aspects of Modeling in the Humanitarian Sphere), Kazan: Izd. Akad. Nauk, 2017, pp. 222–266. Khoroshevskii, V.F. and Efimenko, I.V., Semantic technologies in scientometrics: Objectives, problems, solutions, and prospects, in Kognitivno-semioticheskie aspekty modelirovaniya v gumanitarnoi sfere (Cognitive-Semiotic Aspects of Modeling in the Humanitarian Sphere), Kazan: Izd. Akad. Nauk, 2017, pp. 222–266.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Markusova, V., Kotel’nikova, N., Zolotova, A., and Shukhaeva, A., Promising areas of scientific research: Global and domestic trends in the SCI-E database, 2009 and 2015, Inf. Innovatsii, 2017, no. S1, pp. 111–118. Markusova, V., Kotel’nikova, N., Zolotova, A., and Shukhaeva, A., Promising areas of scientific research: Global and domestic trends in the SCI-E database, 2009 and 2015, Inf. Innovatsii, 2017, no. S1, pp. 111–118.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Filatova, T.E. and Ponomarev, V.V., The “black swan” theory, Materialy XVI mezhvuzovskoi nauchno-tekhnicheskoi konferentsii “Novye tekhnologii v uchebnom protsesse i proizvodstve” (Proc. XVI Interuniversity Scientific and Technical Conference “New Technologies in the Educational Process and Production”), Ryazan, 2018, pp. 486–488. Filatova, T.E. and Ponomarev, V.V., The “black swan” theory, Materialy XVI mezhvuzovskoi nauchno-tekhnicheskoi konferentsii “Novye tekhnologii v uchebnom protsesse i proizvodstve” (Proc. XVI Interuniversity Scientific and Technical Conference “New Technologies in the Educational Process and Production”), Ryazan, 2018, pp. 486–488.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Hicks, D., Wouters, P., Waltman, L., De Rijcke, S., and Rafols, I., Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics, Nature, 2015, vol. 520, no. 7548, pp. 429–431. CrossRef Hicks, D., Wouters, P., Waltman, L., De Rijcke, S., and Rafols, I., Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics, Nature, 2015, vol. 520, no. 7548, pp. 429–431. CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Lazar, M.G., Plagiarism in scientific communications of the modern era, Uch. Zap. Ross. Gos. Gidrometeorol. Univ., 2019, no. 56, pp. 166–175. Lazar, M.G., Plagiarism in scientific communications of the modern era, Uch. Zap. Ross. Gos. Gidrometeorol. Univ., 2019, no. 56, pp. 166–175.
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Vinogradova, T.V., Dobrosovestnost’ v nauchnykh issledovaniyakh: Analit. obzor (Integrity in Scientific Research: Analytical Overview), Moscow: INION RAN, 2017. Vinogradova, T.V., Dobrosovestnost’ v nauchnykh issledovaniyakh: Analit. obzor (Integrity in Scientific Research: Analytical Overview), Moscow: INION RAN, 2017.
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Sidel’nikov, Yu.V., Sistemnyi analiz ekspertnogo prognozirovaniya (System Analysis of Expert Forecasting), Moscow: MAI, 2007. Sidel’nikov, Yu.V., Sistemnyi analiz ekspertnogo prognozirovaniya (System Analysis of Expert Forecasting), Moscow: MAI, 2007.
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Vinogradova, T.V., Bibliometrics and social sciences are not compatible?, Naukoved. Issled., 2016, no. 2016, pp. 90–106. Vinogradova, T.V., Bibliometrics and social sciences are not compatible?, Naukoved. Issled., 2016, no. 2016, pp. 90–106.
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Malashuk, N.M. and Pavlova, E.A., Problems and methods of evaluating the effectiveness of scientific research, in Al’manakh nauchnykh rabot molodykh uchenykh Universiteta informatsionnykh tekhnologii, mekhaniki i optiki (Almanac of Scientific Works of Young Scientists of the University of Information Technologies, Mechanics, and Optics), 2017, pp. 173–177. Malashuk, N.M. and Pavlova, E.A., Problems and methods of evaluating the effectiveness of scientific research, in Al’manakh nauchnykh rabot molodykh uchenykh Universiteta informatsionnykh tekhnologii, mekhaniki i optiki (Almanac of Scientific Works of Young Scientists of the University of Information Technologies, Mechanics, and Optics), 2017, pp. 173–177.
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Feigel’man, M.V. and Tsirlina, G.A., Bibliometric heat as a consequence of the lack of scientific expertise, Upr. Bol’shimi Sist.: Sb. Tr., 2013, no. 44, pp. 335–342. Feigel’man, M.V. and Tsirlina, G.A., Bibliometric heat as a consequence of the lack of scientific expertise, Upr. Bol’shimi Sist.: Sb. Tr., 2013, no. 44, pp. 335–342.
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Golubkov, E.P., Metody prinyatiya upravlencheskikh reshenii (Methods for Making Management Decisions), Moscow: Yurait, 2020, part 2. Golubkov, E.P., Metody prinyatiya upravlencheskikh reshenii (Methods for Making Management Decisions), Moscow: Yurait, 2020, part 2.
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Mikhailov, O.V. and Aristov, I.V., “Hybrid” Hirsch indices in the assessment of scientific activity, Naukoved. Issled., 2015, no. 2015, pp. 110–116. Mikhailov, O.V. and Aristov, I.V., “Hybrid” Hirsch indices in the assessment of scientific activity, Naukoved. Issled., 2015, no. 2015, pp. 110–116.
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Tsai, C.F., Hu, Y.H., and Ke, S.W.G., A Borda count approach to combine subjective and objective based MIS journal rankings, Online Inf. Rev., 2014, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 469–483. CrossRef Tsai, C.F., Hu, Y.H., and Ke, S.W.G., A Borda count approach to combine subjective and objective based MIS journal rankings, Online Inf. Rev., 2014, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 469–483. CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Sakulin, S.A. and Alfimtsev, A.N., On the problem of practical application of fuzzy measures and the Choquet integral, Vestn. Mosk. Gos. Tekh. Univ. im. N.E. Baumana, Ser. Priborostr., 2012, no. 1, pp. 55–63. Sakulin, S.A. and Alfimtsev, A.N., On the problem of practical application of fuzzy measures and the Choquet integral, Vestn. Mosk. Gos. Tekh. Univ. im. N.E. Baumana, Ser. Priborostr., 2012, no. 1, pp. 55–63.
Metadaten
Titel
The Rationale of Indicators for the Management of Scientific Achievements
verfasst von
P. A. Kalachikhin
Publikationsdatum
01.03.2021
Verlag
Pleiades Publishing
Erschienen in
Automatic Documentation and Mathematical Linguistics / Ausgabe 2/2021
Print ISSN: 0005-1055
Elektronische ISSN: 1934-8371
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3103/S0005105521020035

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2021

Automatic Documentation and Mathematical Linguistics 2/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Premium Partner