Skip to main content

2016 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

The ‘Right-not-to-Know’

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This chapter deals with the ethical controversies related to the so-called right-not-to-know in biomedicine. By problematizing the substantive conflicts at the basis of patient’s decision to waive some health-related information, the chapter provides a normative map for instructing the practice of Ethical Counselling in the face of these claims. In particular, it is argued that both self-regarding and other-regarding considerations in the exercise of the right-not-to-know may ground or dismiss its ethical and legal legitimacy and may prove fundamental aspects of ethical counselling processes.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
This is not meant to affirm that genetic information differs, in an ethically relevant manner, from other types of medical information. Rather, this chapter will treat genetic knowledge very much like any other kind of knowledge about our health, thus rejecting claims of ‘genetic exceptionalism’. For a discussion of the reasons in favour and against genetic exceptionalism, see Green and Botkin (2003), Rothstein (2007).
 
2
By “welfarist considerations” we mean here to refer, very broadly, to the justificatory nature that affecting the well-being of an individual may have for guiding human agency. For a philosophical introduction to the concept of well-being and its normative import on welfarist moral theories, see Roger Crisp’s entry “Well-being” in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
 
3
Very much like in the case of ‘welfarism’ above, the reader who may want to plunge into the philosophical debate on the concept of autonomy may find useful to consult John Christman’s “Autonomy in Moral and Political Philosophy” in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
 
4
Council of Europe (1997a).
 
5
Council of Europe (1997b).
 
6
UNESCO (1997).
 
7
World Health Organization (1998).
 
8
The fact-sheet on the XYY syndrome by Genetic Alliance UK can be found at the following address: http://​www.​geneticalliance.​org.​uk/​docs/​translations/​english/​25-xyyt.​pdf (last accessed: July, 1 2015).
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Andorno R (2004) The right not to know: an autonomy based approach. J Med Ethics 30:435–439CrossRef Andorno R (2004) The right not to know: an autonomy based approach. J Med Ethics 30:435–439CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Green MJ, Botkin JR (2003) Genetic exceptionalism. In medicine: clarifying the differences between genetic and nongenetic tests. Ann Intern Med 138:571–575CrossRef Green MJ, Botkin JR (2003) Genetic exceptionalism. In medicine: clarifying the differences between genetic and nongenetic tests. Ann Intern Med 138:571–575CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Robertson S, Savulescu J (2001) Is there a case in favour of predictive genetic testing in young children? Bioethics 15:26–49CrossRef Robertson S, Savulescu J (2001) Is there a case in favour of predictive genetic testing in young children? Bioethics 15:26–49CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rothstein MA (2007) Genetic exceptionalism and legislative pragmatism. J Law Med Ethics 35:59–65CrossRef Rothstein MA (2007) Genetic exceptionalism and legislative pragmatism. J Law Med Ethics 35:59–65CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
The ‘Right-not-to-Know’
verfasst von
Luca Chiapperino
Copyright-Jahr
2016
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27690-8_8

Neuer Inhalt