nach oben

Journal of Management Control

Erschienen in:

26.02.2024 | Original Paper

The role of informal controls in a green innovative setting: evidence from Brazilian AgTechs

verfasst von: Anderson Betti Frare, Ilse Maria Beuren

Erschienen in: Journal of Management Control | Ausgabe 4/2023

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Agriculture technology startups (AgTechs) must align innovation interests with green sustainability, amplifying managerial challenges. Therefore, this study aims to examine the role of informal controls, green learning, and green creativity in green process innovation of AgTechs. Data from 82 Brazilian AgTechs are analyzed by partial least squares-structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) and fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA). The results show that informal controls are directly and indirectly (mediated by green learning and green creativity) associated with green process innovation. Thus, green learning and green creativity mediate to facilitate that informal controls orchestrate green process innovation. Furthermore, two causal solutions lead AgTechs to high green process innovation. This study contributes by exploring the roles of informal controls, learning, creativity, and innovation in the green innovative setting of AgTechs. The findings are relevant for founders, managers, and stakeholders to promote the green sustainability of AgTechs. Agribusiness is one of the primary sectors of the Brazilian economy. Therefore, AgTechs have a broad field to offer technological solutions for agribusiness. Consequently, understanding how these startups align innovation and sustainability to generate cleaner and sustainable production is relevant to stakeholders and society.

Vorheriger Artikel A theory of management control packages and organizational identity

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Although informal controls may eventually include some formal elements (e.g., explicit codifications of values, symbols or norms, and procedure manuals), they are “typically supposed to be more informal than formal due to their rather indirect influence on employees’ behaviors” (Goebel & Weißenberger, 2017b, p. 509).

Kleine and Weißenberger (2014) reported a correlation of 0.648; Goebel and Weißenberger (2017a), a correlation of 0.643; and Goebel and Weißenberger (2017a), a correlation of 0.650 between the personnel control and cultural control variables.

For more details on higher-order modeling by the repeated indicators approach in the PLS-SEM see Sarstedt et al. (2019).

We conducted a complementary analysis in addition to the models presented in Table 4. Based on the assumption that there are synergies between learning, creativity, and innovation in organizations (Huber, 1998), in an additional (untabulated) analysis using an interaction term, we tested the combined effect of green learning and green creativity on GPI. The results show a positive and significant effect (β = 0.152, t = 1.899, p = 0.058), and all the other relationships remain qualitatively unchanged. This finding further reinforces the role of green learning and green creativity as enablers of GPI, either separately or combined.

Achi, A., Adeola, O., & Achi, F. C. (2022). CSR and green process innovation as antecedents of micro, small, and medium enterprise performance: Moderating role of perceived environmental volatility. Journal of Business Research, 139, 771–781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.10.016CrossRef

Akroyd, C., & Kober, R. (2020). Imprinting founders’ blueprints on management control systems. Management Accounting Research, 46, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2019.07.002CrossRef

Akroyd, C., Kober, R., & Li, D. (2019). The emergence of management controls in an entrepreneurial company. Accounting and Finance, 59(3), 1805–1833. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12477CrossRef

Al-Hattami, H. M. (2021). Validation of the D&M IS success model in the context of accounting information system of the banking sector in the least developed countries. Journal of Management Control, 32(1), 127–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00187-020-00310-3CrossRef

Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1154–1184. https://doi.org/10.5465/256995CrossRef

Anderson, N., Potočnik, K., & Zhou, J. (2014). Innovation and creativity in organizations: A state-of-the-science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework. Journal of Management, 40(5), 1297–1333. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314527128CrossRef

Arjaliès, D. L., & Mundy, J. (2013). The use of management control systems to manage CSR strategy: A levers of control perspective. Management Accounting Research, 24(4), 284–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2013.06.003CrossRef

Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977). Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14(3), 396–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224377701400320CrossRef

Asiaei, K., Bontis, N., Barani, O., & Jusoh, R. (2021). Corporate social responsibility and sustainability performance measurement systems: Implications for organizational performance. Journal of Management Control, 32(1), 85–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00187-021-00317-4CrossRef

Bank, N., Fichter, K., & Klofsten, M. (2017). Sustainability-profiled incubators and securing the inflow of tenants–The case of Green Garage Berlin. Journal of Cleaner Production, 157, 76–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.123CrossRef

Bastini, K., Getzin, F., & Lachmann, M. (2022). The effects of strategic choices and sustainability control systems in the emergence of organizational capabilities for sustainability. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 35(4), 1121–1153. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-04-2020-4515CrossRef

Battaglia, M., Passetti, E., Bianchi, L., & Frey, M. (2016). Managing for integration: A longitudinal analysis of management control for sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 136, 213–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.01.108CrossRef

Bedford, D. S., Malmi, T., & Sandelin, M. (2016). Management control effectiveness and strategy: An empirical analysis of packages and systems. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 51, 12–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2016.04.002CrossRef

Bedford, D. S., & Sandelin, M. (2015). Investigating management control configurations using qualitative comparative analysis: An overview and guidelines for application. Journal of Management Control, 26, 5–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00187-015-0204-3CrossRef

Beusch, P., Frisk, J. E., Rosen, M., & Dilla, W. (2022). Management control for sustainability: Towards integrated systems. Management Accounting Research, 54, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2021.100777CrossRef

Bocken, N. M. (2015). Sustainable venture capital–catalyst for sustainable start-up success? Journal of Cleaner Production, 108, 647–658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.079CrossRef

Bresciani, S., Rehman, S. U., Giovando, G., & Alam, G. M. (2023). The role of environmental management accounting and environmental knowledge management practices influence on environmental performance: Mediated-moderated model. Journal of Knowledge Management, 27(4), 896–918. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-12-2021-0953CrossRef

Burritt, R. L., & Schaltegger, S. (2010). Sustainability accounting and reporting: Fad or trend? Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 23(7), 829–846. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513571011080144CrossRef

Cardinal, L. B., Sitkin, S. B., & Long, C. P. (2004). Balancing and rebalancing in the creation and evolution of organizational control. Organization Science, 15(4), 411–431. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1040.0084CrossRef

Chen, Y. S. (2008). The driver of green innovation and green image–green core competence. Journal of Business Ethics, 81(3), 531–543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9522-1CrossRef

Chen, Y. S., & Chang, C. H. (2013). The determinants of green product development performance: Green dynamic capabilities, green transformational leadership, and green creativity. Journal of Business Ethics, 116(1), 107–119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1452-xCrossRef

Chen, Y. S., Chang, T. W., Lin, C. Y., Lai, P. Y., & Wang, K. H. (2016). The influence of proactive green innovation and reactive green innovation on green product development performance: The mediation role of green creativity. Sustainability, 8(10), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8100966CrossRef

Chenhall, R. H. (2003). Management control systems design within its organizational context: Findings from contingency-based research and directions for the future. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28(2–3), 127–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(01)00027-7CrossRef

Chenhall, R. H., & Moers, F. (2015). The role of innovation in the evolution of management accounting and its integration into management control. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 47, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2015.10.002CrossRef

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Psychology Press.

Cools, M., Stouthuysen, K., & Van den Abbeele, A. (2017). Management control for stimulating different types of creativity: The role of budgets. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 29(3), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.2308/jmar-51789CrossRef

Crespo, N. F., Curado, C., Oliveira, M., & Muñoz-Pascual, L. (2021). Entrepreneurial capital leveraging innovation in micro firms: A mixed-methods perspective. Journal of Business Research, 123, 333–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.10.001CrossRef

Crespo, N. F., Rodrigues, R., Samagaio, A., & Silva, G. M. (2019). The adoption of management control systems by start-ups: Internal factors and context as determinants. Journal of Business Research, 101, 875–884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.11.020CrossRef

Crutzen, N., Zvezdov, D., & Schaltegger, S. (2017). Sustainability and management control. Exploring and theorizing control patterns in large European firms. Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, 1291–1301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.135CrossRef

Cruz, A. P. C., Frare, A. B., Accadrolli, M. C., & Horz, V. (2021). Effects of informal controls and psychological empowerment on job satisfaction. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças, 33, 29–45. https://doi.org/10.1590/1808-057x202114660CrossRef

Cui, R., & Wang, J. (2022). Shaping sustainable development: External environmental pressure, exploratory green learning, and radical green innovation. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 29(3), 481–495. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2213CrossRef

Cui, R., Wang, J., & Zhou, C. (2023). Exploring the linkages of green transformational leadership, organizational green learning, and radical green innovation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(1), 185–199. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3124CrossRef

Curtis, E., & Sweeney, B. (2017). Managing different types of innovation: Mutually reinforcing management control systems and the generation of dynamic tension. Accounting and Business Research, 47(3), 313–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2016.1255585CrossRef

Davila, A., & Ditillo, A. (2017). Management control systems for creative teams: Managing stylistic creativity in fashion companies. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 29(3), 27–47. https://doi.org/10.2308/jmar-51806CrossRef

Davila, A., & Foster, G. (2009). The adoption and evolution of management control systems in entrepreneurial companies: Evidence and a promising future. In R. H. Chenhall (Ed.), Handbooks of management accounting research (pp. 1323–1336). Elsevier.CrossRef

Davila, A., Foster, G., & Jia, N. (2015). The valuation of management control systems in start-up companies: International field-based evidence. European Accounting Review, 24(2), 207–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2014.965720CrossRef

Davila, A., Foster, G., & Oyon, D. (2009). Accounting and control, entrepreneurship and innovation: Venturing into new research opportunities. European Accounting Review, 18(2), 281–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180902731455CrossRef

Davila, T. (2005). An exploratory study on the emergence of management control systems: Formalizing human resources in small growing firms. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 30(3), 223–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2004.05.006CrossRef

Demirel, P., Li, Q. C., Rentocchini, F., & Tamvada, J. P. (2019). Born to be green: New insights into the economics and management of green entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 52(4), 759–771. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9933-zCrossRef

Doblinger, C., Surana, K., & Anadon, L. D. (2019). Governments as partners: The role of alliances in US cleantech startup innovation. Research Policy, 48(6), 1458–1475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.02.006CrossRef

Durden, C. (2008). Towards a socially responsible management control system. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 21(5), 671–694. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570810872969CrossRef

Endenich, C., Lachmann, M., Schachel, H., & Zajkowska, J. (2023). The relationship between management control systems and innovativeness in start-ups: Evidence for product, business model, and ambidextrous innovation. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 19(5), 706–734. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAOC-06-2022-0087CrossRef

Feder, M., & Weißenberger, B. E. (2021). Towards a holistic view of CSR-related management control systems in German companies: Determinants and corporate performance effects. Journal of Cleaner Production, 294, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126084CrossRef

Fichter, K., & Tiemann, I. (2020). Impacts of promoting sustainable entrepreneurship in generic business plan competitions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 267, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122076CrossRef

Fiss, P. C. (2011). Building better causal theories: A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research. Academy of Management Journal, 54(2), 393–420. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.60263120CrossRef

Flamholtz, E. G., Das, T. K., & Tsui, A. S. (1985). Toward an integrative framework of organizational control. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 10(1), 35–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(85)90030-3CrossRef

Frare, A. B., & Akroyd, C. (2023). Performance management and open innovation: Evidence from Brazilian startups. Management Decision. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-07-2022-0892CrossRef

Frare, A. B., & Beuren, I. M. (2021). Fostering individual creativity in startups: Comprehensive performance measurement systems, role clarity and strategic flexibility. European Business Review, 33(6), 869–891. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2020-0262CrossRef

Frare, A. B., & Beuren, I. M. (2022). Effects of corporate reputation and social identity on innovative job performance. European Journal of Innovation Management, 25(5), 1409–1427. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-02-2021-0071CrossRef

Frare, A. B., Cruz, A. P. C., Lavarda, C. E. F., & Akroyd, C. (2022). Packages of management control systems, entrepreneurial orientation, and performance in Brazilian startups. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 18(5), 643–665. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAOC-04-2021-0052CrossRef

Giudici, G., Guerini, M., & Rossi-Lamastra, C. (2019). The creation of cleantech startups at the local level: The role of knowledge availability and environmental awareness. Small Business Economics, 52(4), 815–830. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9936-9CrossRef

Goebel, S., & Weißenberger, B. E. (2016). The dark side of tight financial control: Causes and remedies of dysfunctional employee behaviors. Schmalenbach Business Review, 17(1), 69–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41464-016-0005-8CrossRef

Goebel, S., & Weißenberger, B. E. (2017a). Effects of management control mechanisms: Towards a more comprehensive analysis. Journal of Business Economics, 87(2), 185–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-016-0816-6CrossRef

Goebel, S., & Weißenberger, B. E. (2017b). The relationship between informal controls, ethical work climates, and organizational performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 141(3), 505–528. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2700-7CrossRef

Gomez-Conde, J., Lopez-Valeiras, E., Malagueño, R., & Gonzalez-Castro, R. (2023). Management control systems and innovation strategies in business-incubated start-ups. Accounting and Business Research, 53(2), 210–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2021.1986365CrossRef

Gomez-Conde, J., Lunkes, R. J., & Rosa, F. S. (2019). Environmental innovation practices and operational performance: The joint effects of management accounting and control systems and environmental training. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 32(5), 1325–1357. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-01-2018-3327CrossRef

Gond, J. P., Grubnic, S., Herzig, C., & Moon, J. (2012). Configuring management control systems: Theorizing the integration of strategy and sustainability. Management Accounting Research, 23(3), 205–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2012.06.003CrossRef

Guenther, E., Endrikat, J., & Guenther, T. W. (2016). Environmental management control systems: A conceptualization and a review of the empirical evidence. Journal of Cleaner Production, 136, 147–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.043CrossRef

Guo, B., Paraskevopoulou, E., & Sanchez, L. S. (2019). Disentangling the role of management control systems for product and process innovation in different contexts. European Accounting Review, 28(4), 681–712. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2018.1528168CrossRef

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage.

Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203CrossRef

Henri, J. F., & Journeault, M. (2010). Eco-control: The influence of management control systems on environmental and economic performance. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(1), 63–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2009.02.001CrossRef

Henry, M., Bauwens, T., Hekkert, M., & Kirchherr, J. (2020). A typology of circular start-ups: An analysis of 128 circular business models. Journal of Cleaner Production, 245, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118528CrossRef

Hörisch, J., Schaltegger, S., & Freeman, R. E. (2020). Integrating stakeholder theory and sustainability accounting: A conceptual synthesis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 275, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124097CrossRef

Huang, J. W., & Li, Y. H. (2017). Green innovation and performance: The view of organizational capability and social reciprocity. Journal of Business Ethics, 145(2), 309–324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2903-yCrossRef

Huang, S. Z., Lu, J. Y., Chau, K. Y., & Zeng, H. L. (2020). Influence of ambidextrous learning on eco-innovation performance of startups: Moderating effect of top management’ s environmental awareness. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01976CrossRef

Huber, G. (1998). Synergies between organizational learning and creativity & innovation. Creativity and Innovation Management, 7(1), 3–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8691.00079CrossRef

Jaworski, B. J. (1988). Toward a theory of marketing control: Environmental context, control types, and consequences. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 23–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224298805200303MathSciNetCrossRef

Jirakraisiri, J., Badir, Y. F., & Frank, B. (2021). Translating green strategic intent into green process innovation performance: The role of green intellectual capital. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 22(7), 43–67. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-08-2020-0277CrossRef

Johnson, M. P., & Schaltegger, S. (2020). Entrepreneurship for sustainable development: A review and multilevel causal mechanism framework. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 44(6), 1141–1173. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258719885368CrossRef

Journeault, M. (2016). The influence of the eco-control package on environmental and economic performance: A natural resource-based approach. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 28(2), 149–178. https://doi.org/10.2308/jmar-51476CrossRef

Khan, S. J., Kaur, P., Jabeen, F., & Dhir, A. (2021). Green process innovation: Where we are and where we are going. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(7), 3273–3296. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2802CrossRef

Kleine, C., & Weißenberger, B. E. (2014). Leadership impact on organizational commitment: The mediating role of management control systems choice. Journal of Management Control, 24(3), 241–266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00187-013-0181-3CrossRef

Kloot, L. (1997). Organizational learning and management control systems: Responding to environmental change. Management Accounting Research, 8(1), 47–73. https://doi.org/10.1006/mare.1996.0033CrossRef

Kock, N. (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of e-Collaboration, 11(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijec.2015100101CrossRef

Kraus, S., Rehman, S. U., & García, F. J. S. (2020). Corporate social responsibility and environmental performance: The mediating role of environmental strategy and green innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 160, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120262CrossRef

Laguir, I., Stekelorum, R., & El Baz, J. (2021). Proactive environmental strategy and performances of third party logistics providers (TPLs): Investigating the role of eco-control systems. International Journal of Production Economics, 240, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2021.108249CrossRef

Langfield-Smith, K. (1997). Management control systems and strategy: A critical review. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 22(2), 207–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(95)00040-2CrossRef

Lapierre, J., & Giroux, V. P. (2003). Creativity and work environment in a high-tech context. Creativity and Innovation Management, 12(1), 11–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8691.00263CrossRef

Latan, H., Jabbour, C. J. C., Jabbour, A. B. L. S., Renwick, D. W. S., Wamba, S. F., & Shahbaz, M. (2018). ‘ Too-much-of-a-good-thing’ ? The role of advanced eco-learning and contingency factors on the relationship between corporate environmental and financial performance. Journal of Environmental Management, 220, 163–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.05.012CrossRefPubMed

Leifer, R., & Mills, P. K. (1996). An information processing approach for deciding upon control strategies and reducing control loss in emerging organizations. Journal of Management, 22(1), 113–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063(96)90014-8CrossRef

Li, W., Bhutto, T. A., Xuhui, W., Maitlo, Q., Zafar, A. U., & Bhutto, N. A. (2020). Unlocking employees’ green creativity: The effects of green transformational leadership, green intrinsic, and extrinsic motivation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 255, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120229CrossRef

Liu, J., Zhao, M., & Wang, Y. (2020). Impacts of government subsidies and environmental regulations on green process innovation: A nonlinear approach. Technology in Society, 63, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101417CrossRef

Lopez-Valeiras, E., Gomez-Conde, J., & Naranjo-Gil, D. (2015). Sustainable innovation, management accounting and control systems, and international performance. Sustainability, 7(3), 3479–3492. https://doi.org/10.3390/su7033479CrossRef

Lunardi, G. L., Maçada, A. C. G., Becker, J. L., & Van Grembergen, W. (2017). Antecedents of IT governance effectiveness: An empirical examination in Brazilian firms. Journal of Information Systems, 31(1), 41–57. https://doi.org/10.2308/isys-51626CrossRef

Merchant, K. A. (1985). Control in business organizations. Financial Times/Prentice Hall.

Merchant, K. A., & Otley, D. T. (2007). A review of the literature on control and accountability. In C. S. Chapman, A. G. Hopwood, & M. D. Shields (Eds.), Handbook of Management Accounting Research (pp. 785–802). Elsevier.

Merchant, K. A., & Van der Stede, W. A. (2012). Management control systems: Performance measurement, evaluation and incentives (3rd ed.). Prentice Hall.

Monteiro, J. J., Lunkes, R. J., & Rosa, F. (2023). Influence of formal and informal controls on trust and individual creativity. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 19(5), 689–705. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAOC-08-2021-0122CrossRef

Munck, J. C., Tkotz, A., Heidenreich, S., & Wald, A. (2020). The performance effects of management control instruments in different stages of new product development. Journal of Accounting and Organizational Change, 16(2), 259–284. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAOC-09-2019-0101CrossRef

Muñoz, P., & Kibler, E. (2016). Institutional complexity and social entrepreneurship: A fuzzy-set approach. Journal of Business Research, 69(4), 1314–1318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.098CrossRef

Nitzl, C., & Chin, W. W. (2017). The case of partial least squares (PLS) path modeling in managerial accounting research. Journal of Management Control, 28, 137–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00187-017-0249-6CrossRef

Norris, G., & O’ Dwyer, B. (2004). Motivating socially responsive decision making: The operation of management controls in a socially responsive organisation. The British Accounting Review, 36(2), 173–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2003.11.004CrossRef

Nuhu, N. A., Baird, K., & Su, S. (2022). The association between the interactive and diagnostic use of financial and non-financial performance measures with individual creativity: The mediating role of perceived fairness. Journal of Management Control, 33(3), 371–402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00187-022-00339-6CrossRef

Olteanu, Y., & Fichter, K. (2022). Startups as sustainability transformers: A new empirically derived taxonomy and its policy implications. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(7), 3083–3099. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3065CrossRef

Ouchi, W. G. (1979). A conceptual framework for the design of organizational control mechanisms. Management Science, 25(9), 833–848. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.25.9.833CrossRef

Pant, L. W. (2001). The growing role of informal controls: Does organization learning empower or subjugate workers? Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 12(6), 697–712. https://doi.org/10.1006/cpac.2001.0475CrossRef

Pavlou, P. A., Liang, H., & Xue, Y. (2007). Understanding and mitigating uncertainty in online exchange relationships: A principal-agent perspective. MIS Quarterly, 31(1), 105–136. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148783CrossRef

Peralta, C. B. L., Echeveste, M. E., Martins, V. L. M., & Lermen, F. H. (2020). Applying the framework to identify customer value: A case of sustainable product in agriculture. Journal of Cleaner Production, 270, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122384CrossRef

Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879CrossRefPubMed

Prihadyanti, D., & Aziz, S. A. (2023). Indonesia toward sustainable agriculture–Do technology-based start-ups play a crucial role? Business Strategy & Development, 6(2), 140–157. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsd2.229CrossRef

Ragin, C. C. (2000). Fuzzy-set social science. University of Chicago Press.

Ragin, C. C. (2008). Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond. University of Chicago Press.CrossRef

Ramos, P. H. B., & Pedroso, M. C. (2021). Classification and categorization of Brazilian agricultural startups (Agtechs). Innovation & Management Review, 18(3), 237–257. https://doi.org/10.1108/INMR-12-2019-016CrossRef

Ramos, P. H. B., & Pedroso, M. C. (2022). Main elements involved in the startup scalability process: A study on Brazilian agtechs. Revista De Gestão, 29(3), 220–237. https://doi.org/10.1108/REGE-04-2021-0070CrossRef

Rosa, F., Lunkes, R. J., Bortoluzzi, D. A., & Monteiro, J. J. (2023). Do cultural controls, eco-learning and environmental strategy lead to high environmental innovation? Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 19(5), 625–641. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAOC-01-2022-0010CrossRef

Samagaio, A., Crespo, N. F., & Rodrigues, R. (2018). Management control systems in high-tech start-ups: An empirical investigation. Journal of Business Research, 89, 351–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.12.028CrossRef

Sánchez-Triana, E., & Ortolano, L. (2001). Organizational learning and environmental impact assessment at Colombia’ s Cauca Valley Corporation. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 21(3), 223–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-9255(01)00074-9CrossRef

Santos, V., Beuren, I. M., Bernd, D. C., & Fey, N. (2023). Use of management controls and product innovation in startups: Intervention of knowledge sharing and technological turbulence. Journal of Knowledge Management, 27(2), 264–284. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-08-2021-0629CrossRef

Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Jr., Cheah, J. H., Becker, J. M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). How to specify, estimate, and validate higher-order constructs in PLS-SEM. Australasian Marketing Journal, 27(3), 197–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ausmj.2019.05.003CrossRef

Schaltegger, S., & Wagner, M. (2011). Sustainable entrepreneurship and sustainability innovation: Categories and interactions. Business Strategy and the Environment, 20(4), 222–237. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.682CrossRef

Shahzad, M., Qu, Y., Zafar, A. U., Ding, X., & Rehman, S. U. (2020). Translating stakeholders’ pressure into environmental practices–The mediating role of knowledge management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 275, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124163CrossRef

Singh, S. K., Del Giudice, M., Chierici, R., & Graziano, D. (2020). Green innovation and environmental performance: The role of green transformational leadership and green human resource management. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 150, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119762CrossRef

Song, W., Wang, G. Z., & Ma, X. (2020). Environmental innovation practices and green product innovation performance: A perspective from organizational climate. Sustainable Development, 28(1), 224–234. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1990CrossRef

Song, W., & Yu, H. (2018). Green innovation strategy and green innovation: The roles of green creativity and green organizational identity. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(2), 135–150. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1445MathSciNetCrossRef

Su, J., Zhang, S., & Ma, H. (2019). Entrepreneurial orientation, environmental characteristics, and business model innovation: A configurational approach. Innovation, 22(4), 399–421. https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2019.1707088CrossRef

Taylor, D., King, R., & Smith, D. (2019). Management controls, heterarchy and innovation: A case study of a start-up company. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 32(6), 1636–1661. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-11-2017-3208CrossRef

Venkatesh, V., Brown, S. A., & Bala, H. (2013). Bridging the qualitative-quantitative divide: Guidelines for conducting mixed methods research in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 31(1), 21–54. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.1.02CrossRef

Volkmann, C., Fichter, K., Klofsten, M., & Audretsch, D. B. (2021). Sustainable entrepreneurial ecosystems: An emerging field of research. Small Business Economics, 56(3), 1047–1055. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-019-00253-7CrossRef

Waltz, E. (2017). Digital farming attracts cash to agtech startups. Nature Biotechnology, 35, 397–398. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0517-397CrossRefPubMed

Wang, J., Xue, Y., Sun, X., & Yang, J. (2020). Green learning orientation, green knowledge acquisition and ambidextrous green innovation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 250, 119475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119475CrossRef

Wijethilake, C. (2017). Proactive sustainability strategy and corporate sustainability performance: The mediating effect of sustainability control systems. Journal of Environmental Management, 196, 569–582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.03.057CrossRefPubMed

Wijethilake, C., Munir, R., & Appuhami, R. (2018). Environmental innovation strategy and organizational performance: Enabling and controlling uses of management control systems. Journal of Business Ethics, 151(4), 1139–1160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3259-7CrossRef

Xie, X., Zhu, Q., & Wang, R. (2019). Turning green subsidies into sustainability: How green process innovation improves firms’ green image. Business Strategy and the Environment., 28(7), 1416–1433. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2323CrossRef

Yin, C., Salmador, M. P., Li, D., & Lloria, M. B. (2022). Green entrepreneurship and SME performance: The moderating effect of firm age. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 18(1), 255–275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-021-00757-3CrossRef

Yoruk, E., & Jones, P. (2023). Firm-environment alignment of entrepreneurial opportunity exploitation in technology-based ventures: A configurational approach. Journal of Small Business Management, 61(2), 612–658. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2020.1800354CrossRef

Titel: The role of informal controls in a green innovative setting: evidence from Brazilian AgTechs
verfasst von: Anderson Betti Frare
Ilse Maria Beuren
Publikationsdatum: 26.02.2024
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Journal of Management Control / Ausgabe 4/2023
Print ISSN: 2191-4761
Elektronische ISSN: 2191-477X
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00187-024-00367-4

Springer Professional

The role of informal controls in a green innovative setting: evidence from Brazilian AgTechs

Abstract

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2023

Premium Partner

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"