Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen
The online version of this article (https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-017-9568-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Current energy efficiency policy and incentive programs tend to target economic motivations, which may misalign with other potentially important motivations arising from situational factors, individual differences, and social context. Thus, in this research, we review areas of work that have focused on psychological and social influences to energy efficiency adoption in commercial buildings. We then conduct an empirical scoping study interviewing 10 commercial building owners/managers (decision makers) and 10 experts/consultants (decision influencers) regarding perceived motives and barriers to energy efficient investments, decision-maker attributes, and the social context of the decision. Potential factors that emerge from the interviews, which are not yet extensively discussed in the energy efficiency literature, include owners/managers’ resistance to change and the influence of investment funding origins on the decision. Our results also suggest potential heterogeneity in energy efficiency decision-making philosophies between the two groups. Interviewed owners/managers prioritize corporate social responsibility (CSR) and prefer internal consulting (e.g., building engineers). Conversely, experts/consultants do not emphasize CSR and are more concerned with external policies. These findings suggest that accounting for the decision maker and the social context in which decisions are made could enhance the design of commercial sector energy efficiency programs.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
Online Resource 1 (PDF 190 kb)12053_2017_9568_MOESM1_ESM.pdf
Online Resource 2 (PDF 391 kb)12053_2017_9568_MOESM2_ESM.pdf
Online Resource 3 (PDF 305 kb)12053_2017_9568_MOESM3_ESM.pdf
Online Resource 4 (PDF 201 kb)12053_2017_9568_MOESM4_ESM.pdf
Online Resource 5 (PDF 97 kb)12053_2017_9568_MOESM5_ESM.pdf
Online Resource 6 (PDF 88 kb)12053_2017_9568_MOESM6_ESM.pdf
Online Resource 7 (PDF 83 kb)12053_2017_9568_MOESM7_ESM.pdf
Online Resource 8 (PDF 107 kb)12053_2017_9568_MOESM8_ESM.pdf
Online Resource 9 (PDF 235 kb)12053_2017_9568_MOESM9_ESM.pdf
Online Resource 10 (PDF 112 kb)12053_2017_9568_MOESM10_ESM.pdf
Online Resource 11 (PDF 108 kb)12053_2017_9568_MOESM11_ESM.pdf
Online Resource 12 (PDF 111 kb)12053_2017_9568_MOESM12_ESM.pdf
Online Resource 13 (PDF 109 kb)12053_2017_9568_MOESM13_ESM.pdf
2030 Districts (2015). About the 2030 Districts. Retrieved from: http://www.2030districts.org/about-2030-districts
Allcott, H. (2011). Social norms and energy conservation. Journal of Public Economics, 95(9), 1082–1095. CrossRef
Asensio, O., & Delmas, M. (2014). Nonprice incentives and energy conservation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(6), E510–E515. CrossRef
Attari, S., DeKay, M., Davidson, C., & Bruine De Bruin, W. (2010). Public perceptions of energy consumption and savings. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(37), 16054–16059. CrossRef
Ayres, R., Raseman, S., & Shih, A. (2012). Evidence from two large field experiments that peer comparison feedback can reduce residential energy usage. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 29(5), 992–1022. CrossRef
Beamish, T., Kunkle, R., Lutzenhiser, L., & Biggart, N. (2000). Why innovation happens: structured actors and emergent outcomes in the commercial buildings sector. Proceedings of the 2000 Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings. Consumer Behavior and Non-Energy Effects, 8.13–8.26. http://aceee.org/files/proceedings/2000/data/papers/SS00_Panel8_Paper02.pdf#page=1. Accessed 2 Oct 2017.
Berg, B. L. (2001). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Bin, S. (2012). Greening work styles: an analysis of energy behavior programs in the workplace. American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy, Report Number B121. http://www.aceee.org/research-report/b121
Bohi, D., & Zimmerman, M. (1984). An update on econometric studies of energy demand behavior. Annual Review of Energy, 9(1), 105–154. CrossRef
Bolderijk, J., Steg, L., Geller, E., Lehman, P., & Postmes, T. (2013). Comparing the effectiveness of monetary versus moral motives in environmental campaigning. Nature Climate Change, 3(4), 413. CrossRef
Bollinger, B., & Gillingham, K. (2012). Peer effects in the diffusion of solar photovoltaic panels. Marketing Science, 31(6), 900–912. CrossRef
Bostrom, A., Morgan, M. G., Fischhoff, B., & Read, D. (1994). What do people know about global climate change? Risk Analysis, 14(6), 959–970. CrossRef
Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000104.
Colaizzi, J. (2015). EPA’s Energy Star battle of the buildings competition saves $50 million, prevents 250,000 metric tons of GHG emissions. New Releases from Headquarters. http://yosemite.epa.gov/opa/admpress.nsf/bd4379a92ceceeac8525735900400c27/fb8f90f44e4cad4e85257e3b0059d8d8!OpenDocument
Cooremans, C. (2011). Make it strategic! Financial investment logic is not enough. Energy Efficiency, 4(4), 473–492. CrossRef
Cooremans, C. (2012). Investment in energy efficiency: do the characteristics of investments matter? Energy Efficiency, 5(4), 497–518. CrossRef
Corbett, C., and Muthulingam, S. (2007). Adoption of voluntary environmental standards: the role of signaling and intrinsic benefits in the diffusion of the LEED green building standards. Available at Social Science Research Network (SSRN). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1009294
Craske, M., Wittchen, U., Stein, M., Andrews, G., & Lebeu, R. (2013). Severity measure for specific phobia—adult. Lake St. Louis: American Psychiatric Association.
Dahl, C. (1993). A survey of energy demand elasticities in support of the development of NEMS. Munich Personal RePEc Archive Paper No. 72229. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/72229/8/MPRA_paper_72229.pdf. Accessed 2 Oct 2017.
Downs, J. S., Bruine de Bruin, W., & Fischhoff, B. (2008). Parents’ vaccination comprehension and decisions. Vaccine, 26(12), 1595–1607. CrossRef
Du, P., Zheng, L., Xie, B., & Mahalingam, A. (2014). Barriers to the adoption of energy-saving technologies in the building sector: a survey study of Jing-jin-tang, China. Energy Policy, 75, 206–216. CrossRef
Dutton, J., Walton, E., & Abrahamson, E. (1989). Important decisions of strategic issues: separating the wheat from the chaff. Journal of Management Studies, 26, 379–396. CrossRef
Eichholtz, P., Kok, N., & Quigley, J. M. (2010). Doing well by doing good? Green office buildings. The American Economic Review, 100(5), 2492–2509. CrossRef
Energy Information Administration (2015). Commercial Buildings Energy Consumption Survey (CBECS). http://www.eia.gov/consumption/commercial/reports/2012/buildstock/index.cfm
Farsi, M. (2010). Risk aversion and willingness to pay for energy efficient systems in rental apartments. Energy Policy, 38(6), 3078–3088. CrossRef
Fischer, C. (2008). Feedback on household electricity consumption: a tool for saving energy? Energy Efficiency, 1(1), 79–104. CrossRef
Frickel, S., Gibbon, S., Howard, J., Kempner, J., Ottinger, G., & Hess, D. (2009). Undone science: charting social movement and civil society challenges to research agenda setting. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 35(4), 444–473.
Gambatese, J., & Hallowell, M. (2011). Factors that influence the development and diffusion of technical innovations in the construction industry. Construction Management and Economics, 29(5), 507–517. CrossRef
Geller, H., Harrington, P., Rosenfield, A., Tanishima, S., & Unander, F. (2006). Policies for increasing energy efficiency: thirty years of experience in OECD countries. Energy Policy, 34(5), 556–573. CrossRef
Gilbraith, N., Azevedo, I., & Jaramillo, P. (2014). Evaluating the benefits of commercial building energy codes and improving federal incentives for code adoption. Environmental Science & Technology, 48(24), 14121–14130. CrossRef
Gillingham, K., Newell, R.G., Palmer, K. (2009). Energy efficiency economics and policy. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 1, 597–619. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.resource.102308.124234.
Goitein, B. (1989). Organizational decision-making and energy conservation investments. Evaluation and Program Planning, 12(2), 132–151. CrossRef
Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91, 481–510. CrossRef
Groot, H., Verhoef, E., & Nijkamp, P. (2001). Energy saving by firms: decision-making, barriers and policies. Energy Economics, 23(6), 717–740. CrossRef
Hall, S., Sparks, D., Hargroves, C., Desha, C., & Newman, P. (2013). The development of a simple multinodal tool to identify performance issues in existing commercial buildings. In Proceedings of the 19 th CIB World Building Congress, Brisbane 2013: Construction and Society. Brisbane Convention & Exhibition Centre, Brisbane, QLD: Queensland University of Technology.
Hauge, Å., Thomsen, J., & Löfström, E. (2013). How to get residents/owners in housing cooperatives to agree on sustainable renovation. Energy Efficiency, 6(2), 315–328. CrossRef
Hirst, E., & Brown, M. (1990). Closing the efficiency gap: barriers to the efficient use of energy. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 3(4), 267–281. CrossRef
Howarth, R., & Sanstad, A. (1995). Discount rates and energy efficiency. Contemporary Economic Policy, 13(3), 101–109. CrossRef
Jaffe, A., & Stavins, R. (1994). The energy-efficiency gap: what does it mean? Energy Policy, 22(10), 804–810. CrossRef
Jain, R., Gulbinas, R., Taylor, J., & Culligan, P. (2013). Can social influence drive energy savings? Detecting the impact of social influence on the energy consumption behavior of networked users exposed to normative eco-feedback. Energy and Buildings, 66, 119–217. CrossRef
Janda, K. (2014). Building communities and social potential: between and beyond organizations and individuals in commercial properties. Energy Policy, 67, 48–55. CrossRef
Kok, N., McGraw, M., & Quigley, J. M. (2011). The diffusion of energy efficiency in buildings. The American Economic Review, 101(3), 77–82. CrossRef
Ludwig, P., & Isaacson, M. (2010). Addressing climate change by retrofitting Chicago’s buildings: the whole home energy savers experience. Proceedings of the 2010 ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings, 8.232–8.244. http://aceee.org/files/proceedings/2010/data/papers/2181.pdf. Accessed 2 Oct 2017.
Lutzenhiser, L., Kunkle, R., & Biggart, N. (2001). Market structure and energy efficiency: the case of new commercial buildings. California Institute for Energy Efficiency, 76–98. http://www.uc-ciee.org/downloads/market_struc.pdf. Accessed 2 Oct 2017.
Lutzenhiser, L., Janda, K., Kunkle, R., & Payne, C. (2002). Understanding the response of commercial and institutional organizations to the California energy crisis. Sacramento, CA: California Energy Commission.
Mckenzie-Mohr, D. (2011). Step 3: Developing Strategies. Fostering sustainable behavior: an introduction to community-based social marketing, 3rd Ed. (pp. 41–121). Gabriola Island: New Society Publishers.
Min, J., Azevedo, I., Michalek, J., & Bruine de Bruin, W. (2013). Labeling energy cost on light bulbs lowers implicit discount rates. Ecological Economics, 97, 42–50. CrossRef
Morgan, M., Fischhoff, B., Bostrom, A., & Atman, C. (2002). Risk communication: a mental models approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Morgenstern, P., Raslan, R., & Huebner, G. (2015). Applicability, potential and limitations of staff-centered energy conservation initiatives in English hospitals. Energy Efficiency, 9, 27–48. CrossRef
Noll, D., Dawes, C., & Rai, V. (2014). Solar community organizations and active peer effects in the adoption of residential PV. Energy Policy, 67, 330–343. CrossRef
Oreg, S. (2003). Resistance to change: developing an individual differences measure. Journal of Applied Psychology., 88(4), 680–693. CrossRef
Orne, M. (1962). On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: with particular reference to demand characteristics and their implications. American Psychologist, 17(11), 776–783. CrossRef
Pasqualetti, M. (2011). Opposing wind energy landscapes: a search for common cause. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 101, 907–917. CrossRef
Peschiera, G., & Taylor, J. (2012). The impact of peer network position on electricity consumption in building occupant networks utilizing energy feedback systems. Energy and Buildings, 49, 584–590. CrossRef
Peschiera, G., Taylor, J., & Siegel, J. (2010). Response-relapse patterns of building occupant electricity consumption following exposure to personal, contextualized and occupant peer network utilization data. Energy and Buildings, 42(8), 1329–1336. CrossRef
Pfeffer, J. (1992). Decisions and implementation. In Managing with Power: Politics and Influence in Organizations. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Pittsburgh Green Workplace Challenge. (2015). 2014–2015 Competition Guidebook Version (06.20.2015). Sustainable Pittsburgh. http://gwcpgh.org/images/GWCGUIDEREV22.pdf
Rosenstein, A. (2002). Nurse-physician relationships: impact on nurse satisfaction and retention. The American Journal of Nursing, 102(6), 26–34. CrossRef
Ross, M. (1986). Capital budgeting practices of twelve large manufacturers. Financial Management, 15, 15–22. CrossRef
Ruderman, H., Levine, M., & McMahon, J. (1987). The behavior of the market for energy efficiency in residential appliances including heating and cooling equipment. Energy, 8(1), 101–124.
Sanstad, A., Hanemann, M., & Auffhammer, M. (2006). End-use energy efficiency in a “post carbon” California economy: policy issues and research frontiers. Berkeley, CA: Calif. Climate Change Center.
Schleich, J. (2009). Barriers to energy efficiency: a comparison across the German commercial and services sector. Ecological Economics, 68(7), 2150–2159. CrossRef
Schultz, P. (1999). Changing behavior with normative feedback interventions: a field experiment on curbside recycling. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 21(1), 25–36. CrossRef
Schwartz, D., Bruine de Bruin, W., Fischhoff, B., & Lave, L. (2015). Advertising energy saving programs: the potential environmental cost of emphasizing monetary savings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 21(2), 158.
Shove, E. (2010). Beyond the ABC: climate change policy and theories of social change. Environment and Planning, 42(6), 1273–1285. CrossRef
Sorrell, S., Schleich J., Scott, S., O’Malley, E., Trace, F., Boede, U., Ostertag, K., & Radgen, P. (2000). Reducing barriers to energy efficiency in public and private organisations. Science Policy Research Unit.
Sorrell, S., Dimitropoulos, J., & Sommerville, M. (2009). Empirical estimates of the direct rebound effect: a review. Energy Policy, 37(4), 1356–1371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.11.026.
Stephenson, J., Barton, B., Carrington, G., Gnoth, D., Lawson, R., & Thorsnes, P. (2010). Energy cultures: a framework for understanding energy behaviours. Energy Policy, 38(10), 6120–6129. CrossRef
Stern, P. (1992). What psychology knows about energy conservation. Psychology in the public forum. American Psychologist, 47(10), 1224–1232. CrossRef
Stern, P., Dietz, T., & Black, J. (1985). Support for environmental protection: the role of moral norms. Population and Environment, 8(3–4), 204–222. CrossRef
Stern, P., Janda, K., Brown, M., Steg, L., Vine, E., & Lutzenhiser, L. (2016). Opportunities and insights for reducing fossil fuel consumption by households and organizations. Nature Energy, 1, 16043. CrossRef
Straus, A. L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
Sturgis, P., & Allum, N. (2004). Science in society: re-evaluating the deficit model of public attitudes. Public Understanding of Science, 13(1), 55–74. CrossRef
Swim, J., Geiger, N., & Zawadski, S. (2014). Psychology and energy-use reduction policies. Environment, 1(1), 180–188.
Taylor, M., Spurlock, A., & Yang, H-C. (2015). Confronting regulatory cost and quality expectations: an exploration of technical change in minimum efficiency performance standards. Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. LBNL-1000576. http://www.rff.org/files/document/file/RFF-DP-15-50.pdf. Accessed 2 Oct 2017.
Thaler, R. (1985). Mental accounting and consumer choice. Marketing Science, 4(3), 199–214. CrossRef
Thomas, B., & Azevedo, I. (2013). Estimating direct and indirect rebound effects for U.S. households with input-output analysis Part 1: theoretical framework. Ecological Economics, 86, 199–210. CrossRef
Train, K. (1985). Discount rates in consumers’ energy-related decisions: a review of the literature. Energy, 10(12), 243–253. CrossRef
Trutnevyte, E., and Strachan, N., (2013). Nearly perfect and poles apart: investment strategies into the UK power system until 2050. Paper for the International Energy Workshop, Paris, France.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124–1131. CrossRef
U.S. Department of Energy, Better Buildings (2015). Progress Report 2015. http://betterbuildingssolutioncenter.energy.gov/sites/default/files/news/attachments/DOE%20BB%202015%20Progress%20Report%20052015_0.pdf
Venmans, F. (2014). Triggers and barriers to energy efficiency measures in the ceramic, cement and lime sectors. Journal of Cleaner Production, 69, 133–142. CrossRef
Vogel, J., Lundqvist, P., Blomkvist, P., & Arias, J. (2015). Problem areas related to energy efficiency implementation in Swedish multifamily buildings. Energy Efficiency, 9, 109–127. CrossRef
Weber, E., & Stern, P. (2011). Public understanding of climate change in the United States. American Psychologist, 66(4), 315–328. CrossRef
Wilson, C., & Dowlatabadi, H. (2007). Models of decision making and residential energy use. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 32(1), 169–203. CrossRef
- The role of psychology and social influences in energy efficiency adoption
Mitchell J. Small
- Springer Netherlands
Systemische Notwendigkeit zur Weiterentwicklung von Hybridnetzen