nach oben

Journal of Happiness Studies

Erschienen in:

12.12.2015 | Research Paper

The Role of Social Ties in Explaining Heterogeneity in the Association Between Economic Growth and Subjective Well-Being

verfasst von: Petri Böckerman, Jani-Petri Laamanen, Esa Palosaari

Erschienen in: Journal of Happiness Studies | Ausgabe 6/2016

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Whether economic growth improves subjective well-being has been under debate. Studies that find such an association also document heterogeneity between countries in the magnitude of the relationship. We test a theoretical model in which economic growth enhances subjective well-being only when a large share of the population derives their subjective well-being from relational goods with positive externalities instead of positional goods with negative externalities. The choice between relational and positional goods is determined by individuals’ relational abilities and expectations which we operationalize as attachment security. We specifically test whether economic growth improves subjective well-being more in those countries where the average attachment security is higher. We find support for the hypothesis in the Eurobarometer data but less support in the World Values Survey data.

Vorheriger Artikel Children’s and Adolescents’ Conceptions of Happiness

Nächster Artikel Cognitive-Social Sources of Wellbeing: Differentiating the Roles of Coping Style, Social Support and Emotional Intelligence

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

We use “subjective well-being” as a concept which includes both “happiness” and “life satisfaction”. Happiness and life satisfaction are somewhat distinct concepts and empirical counterparts of SWB and can have different correlates (Graham et al. 2010). We treat them separately in our empirical analysis although they are mostly not distinguished in the theoretical literature on the relationship between economic growth and SWB.

Another possible explanation is adaptation to the consumption level over time. There is empirical evidence suggesting that relative income concerns have a larger effect (Layard et al. 2010). Increases in inequality associated with economic growth can also result in stagnant SWB if inequality decreases SWB. Country differences in the effects of adaptation or in inequality could therefore also explain the heterogeneity in the GDP–SWB association.

The model implicitly assumes that market goods can affect well-being only through relational goods or through consumption which has negative externalities via positional comparisons. There is no effect of the higher quantity or quality of market goods such as tastier meals, for example, outside these channels. If deviations from this assumption are important, and product quality and quantity have significant positive effects on well-being, we should not observe a lack of association between GDP and SWB. If the deviation is significant only below a certain level of consumption, this prediction should accordingly be valid only among countries below that level (Akay et al. 2012).

A problem in using psychological survey measures in cross-country analyses is that people tend to evaluate themselves in comparison to the averages of the country they live in (Heine et al. 2008). This makes it more difficult to find statistically significant relationships across countries.

See Hovi and Laamanen (2015) for a more elaborate discussion on different types of models of GDP and SWB and their interpretations.

The inclusion of the attachment main effect in the regression equations leads to very high multicollinearity. Mean centering of the variables has been proposed as a way of alleviating multicollinearity (Aiken and West 1991). We tried this as a robustness check, and the results remained qualitatively intact.

We checked the robustness of the estimates by excluding Belgium from the sample. In the Eurobarometer data, the prediction of life satisfaction by the interaction of attachment and log GDP was no longer statistically significant, whereas the prediction of happiness by the interaction became, in general, more statistically significant. The estimates of the interaction term were not affected by the exclusion of Belgium in the WVS data.

Excluding Belgium from the sample led the estimates of log GDP to be statistically significant in the lowest quartile when predicting life satisfaction in the Eurobarometer data in levels with and without the country fixed effects. In the WVS data, the exclusion of Belgium decreased the statistical significance of differences in log GDP predicting life satisfaction in the lowest quartile. The estimate of log GDP predicting happiness in long first differences became almost statistically significant (p < .10).

The results are available from the authors.

There are earlier empirical studies that have examined various measures of SWB in panel data settings (e.g. Böckerman and Ilmakunnas 2009).

Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Akay, A., Martinsson, P., & Medhin, H. (2012). Does positional concern matter in poor societies? Evidence from a survey experiment in rural Ethiopia. World Development, 40, 428–435.CrossRef

Alpizar, F., Carlsson, F., & Johansson-Stenman, O. (2005). How much do we care about absolute versus relative income and consumption? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 56, 405–421.CrossRef

Alvarez-Cuadrado, F., & Long, N. V. (2011). The relative income hypothesis. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 35, 1489–1501.CrossRef

Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., van IJzendoorn, M. H., & Juffer, F. (2003). Less is more: Meta-analyses of sensitivity and attachment interventions in early childhood. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 195–215.CrossRef

Bartholomew, K., & Horowitz, L. M. (1991). Attachment styles in young adults: A test of a four-category model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 226–244.CrossRef

Bartolini, S., Bilancini, E., & Sarracino, F. (2009). Sociability predicts happiness: World-wide evidence from time series. Department of Economics University of Siena No. 579. Department of Economics, University of Siena. Retrieved from http://ideas.repec.org/p/usi/wpaper/579.html.

Böckerman, P., & Ilmakunnas, P. (2009). Unemployment and self-assessed health: Evidence from panel data. Health Economics, 18, 161–179.CrossRef

Borrero, S., Escobar, A. B., Cortés, A. M., & Maya, L. C. (2013). Poor and distressed, but happy: Situational and cultural moderators of the relationship between wealth and happiness. Estudios Gerenciales, 29, 2–11.CrossRef

Boyce, C. J., Brown, G. D. A., & Moore, S. C. (2010). Money and happiness: Rank of income, not income, affects life satisfaction. Psychological Science, 21, 471–475.CrossRef

Bruni, L., & Stanca, L. (2008). Watching alone: Relational goods, television and happiness. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 65, 506–528.CrossRef

Caporale, G. M., Georgellis, Y., Tsitsianis, N., & Yin, Y. P. (2009). Income and happiness across Europe: Do reference values matter? Journal of Economic Psychology, 30, 42–51.CrossRef

Clark, A. E., Frijters, P., & Shields, M. A. (2008). Relative income, happiness, and utility: An explanation for the Easterlin paradox and other puzzles. Journal of Economic Literature, 46, 95–144.CrossRef

Corazzini, L., Esposito, L., & Majorano, F. (2012). Reign in hell or serve in heaven? A cross-country journey into the relative vs absolute perceptions of well-being. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 81, 715–730.CrossRef

Deaton, A. (2008). Income, health and well-being around the world: Evidence from the Gallup World Poll. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 22, 53–72.CrossRef

Deaton, A., & Stone, A. A. (2013). Two happiness puzzles. American Economic Review, 103, 591–597.CrossRef

del Salinas-Jiménez, M., Artés, J., & Salinas-Jiménez, J. (2010). Income, motivation, and satisfaction with life: An empirical analysis. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11, 779–793.CrossRef

Diener, E., Oishi, S., & Lucas, R. E. (2003). Personality, culture, and subjective well-being: Emotional and cognitive evaluations of life. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 403–425.CrossRef

DiTommaso, E., Brannen-McNulty, C., Ross, L., & Burgess, M. (2003). Attachment styles, social skills and loneliness in young adults. Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 303–312.CrossRef

Easterlin, R. A. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. In P. A. David & W. R. Melvin (Eds.), Nations and households in economic growth (pp. 89–125). New York: Academic Press.CrossRef

Easterlin, R. A. (1995). Will raising the incomes of all increase the happiness of all? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 27, 35–47.CrossRef

Easterlin, R. A., McVey, L. A., Switek, M., Sawangfa, O., & Zweig, J. S. (2010). The happiness–income paradox revisited. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107, 22463–22468.CrossRef

Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A. (2005). Income and well-being: An empirical analysis of the comparison income effect. Journal of Public Economics, 89, 997–1019.CrossRef

Fraley, R. C., & Shaver, P. R. (2000). Adult romantic attachment: Theoretical developments, emerging controversies, and unanswered questions. Review of General Psychology, 4, 132–154.CrossRef

Georgellis, Y., Tsitsianis, N., & Yin, Y. P. (2009). Personal values as mitigating factors in the link between income and life satisfaction: Evidence from the European Social Survey. Social Indicators Research, 91, 329–344.CrossRef

Graham, C., Chattopadhyay, S., & Picon, M. (2010). The Easterlin and other paradoxes: Why both sides of the debate may be correct. In E. Diener, D. Kahneman, & J. Helliwell (Eds.), International differences in well-being (pp. 247–290). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef

Gui, B. (1996). On “relational goods”: Strategic implications of investment in relationships. International Journal of Social Economics, 23, 260–278.CrossRef

Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. R. (1994). Attachment as an organizational framework for research on close relationships. Psychological Inquiry, 5, 1–22.CrossRef

Heine, S. J., Buchtel, E. E., & Norenzayan, A. (2008). What do cross-national comparisons of personality traits tell us? The case of conscientiousness. Psychological Science, 19, 309–313.CrossRef

Hilburn-Cobb, C. (2004). Adolescent psychopathology in terms of multiple behavioral systems: The role of attachment and controlling strategies and frankly disorganized behavior. In L. Atkinson & S. Goldberg (Eds.), Attachment issues in psychopathology and intervention (pp. 99–135). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Hovi, M., & Laamanen, J.-P. (2015). It’s complicated. The relationship between GDP and subjective well-being. Tampere Economic Working Papers 97. University of Tampere.

Irons, C., & Gilbert, P. (2005). Evolved mechanisms in adolescent anxiety and depression symptoms: The role of the attachment and social rank systems. Journal of Adolescence, 28, 325–341.CrossRef

Karreman, A., & Vingerhoets, A. J. (2012). Attachment and well-being: The mediating role of emotion regulation and resilience. Personality and Individual Differences, 53, 821–826.CrossRef

Krueger, A. (2008). Comments on economic growth and subjective well-being: Reassessing the Easterlin Paradox. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 39, 95–100.

Layard, R., Mayraz, G., & Nickell, S. (2010). Does relative income matter? Are the critics right? In E. Diener, D. Kahneman, & J. Helliwell (Eds.), International differences in well-being (pp. 139–165). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef

Noftle, E. E., & Shaver, P. R. (2006). Attachment dimensions and the big five personality traits: Associations and comparative ability to predict relationship quality. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 179–208.CrossRef

Proto, E., & Rustichini, A. (2013). A reassessment of the relationship between GDP and life satisfaction. PLoS One, 8(11), e79358.CrossRef

Pugno, M. (2009). The Easterlin paradox and the decline of social capital: An integrated explanation. Journal of Socio-Economics, 38, 590–600.CrossRef

Rojas, M. (2007). Heterogeneity in the relationship between income and happiness: A conceptual-referent-theory explanation. Journal of Economic Psychology, 28, 1–14.CrossRef

Sacks, D., & Wolfers, J. (2010). Debunking the Easterlin paradox, again. The Brookings Institution. Retrieved April 14, 2014, from http://www.brookings.edu/research/opinions/2010/12/13-debunking-easterlin-wolfers.

Schmitt, D. P., Alcalay, L., Allensworth, M., Allik, J., Ault, L., Austers, I., et al. (2004). Patterns and universals of adult romantic attachment across 62 cultural regions are models of self and of other pancultural constructs? Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35, 367–402.CrossRef

Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. (2008). Economic growth and subjective well-being: Reassessing the Easterlin Paradox. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 39, 1–102.CrossRef

Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. (2013). Subjective well-being and income: Is there any evidence of satiation? The American Economic Review, 103, 598–604.CrossRef

Towler, A. J., & Stuhlmacher, A. F. (2013). Attachment styles, relationship satisfaction, and well-being in working women. Journal of Social Psychology, 153, 279–298.CrossRef

Uhlaner, C. J. (1989). “Relational goods” and participation: Incorporating sociability into a theory of rational action. Public Choice, 62, 253–285.CrossRef

Van Lange, P. A., De Bruin, E. M. N., Otten, W., & Joireman, J. A. (1997). Development of prosocial, individualistic, and competitive orientations: Theory and preliminary evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 733–746.CrossRef

Titel: The Role of Social Ties in Explaining Heterogeneity in the Association Between Economic Growth and Subjective Well-Being
verfasst von: Petri Böckerman
Jani-Petri Laamanen
Esa Palosaari
Publikationsdatum: 12.12.2015
Verlag: Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in: Journal of Happiness Studies / Ausgabe 6/2016
Print ISSN: 1389-4978
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7780
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-015-9702-0

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2016

Developments in the Measurement of Subjective Well-Being and Poverty: An Economic Perspective

The Instrumental Role of Personality Traits: Using Mixture Structural Equation Modeling to Investigate Individual Differences in the Relationships Between the Big Five Traits and Life Satisfaction

Are Most People Happy? Exploring the Meaning of Subjective Well-Being Ratings

Dark Storm Clouds and Rays of Sunshine: Profiles of Negative and Positive Rumination About Daily Hassles and Uplifts

Materialism, Spending, and Affect: An Event-Sampling Study of Marketplace Behavior and Its Affective Costs

Cortisol Awakening Response as an Index of Mental Health and Well-Being in Adolescents