nach oben

Erschienen in:

2021 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

The Rule of Law and Compliance: Legal Quadrant and Conceptual Clustering

verfasst von : Pompeu Casanovas, Mustafa Hashmi, Louis de Koker

Erschienen in: AI Approaches to the Complexity of Legal Systems XI-XII

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

We present in this paper: (i) a regulatory quadrant to describe the rule of law; (ii) a cluster of concepts to describe instruments and processes of the law; (iii) the methodology followed to select the technical papers concerning regulatory compliance; and (iv) an initial mapping to frame the selected papers about legal compliance that we used in our final survey. The result is a conceptual clustering that is useful to analyse and differentiate Compliance by Design (CbD) and Compliance through Design (CtD).

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Like Circles in the Water: Responsibility as a System-Level Function

Nächstes Kapitel The Web of Data’s Role in Legal Ecosystems to Address Violent Extremism Fuelled by Hate Speech in Social Media

Under review (2021) https://ec.europa.eu/isa2/shaping-future-interoperability-policy_en

In addition, we applied the Sørenson similarity coefficient [5] to enhance our analysis, and validate the similarity and strenght of the relationship between the concepts. Essentially, with the Sørenson coefficient we compared other two coefficients (Jaccard and Pearson). However, the Sørenson coefficient is somewhat similar to Jaccard’s coefficient and takes the same number of values but it only counts true positives. Hence, we immediately discarded the Sørenson coefficient from the analysis. See [22] for further details.

TOGAF: An introduction to the European interoperability reference architecture (EIRA\(\copyright \)), version 2.1.0 (2017)

Ahlborg, H., Ruiz-Mercado, I., Molander, S., Masera, O.: Bringing technology into social-ecological systems research-motivations for a socio-technical-ecological systems approach. Sustainability 11(7) (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11072009. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/7/2009

Arajärvi, N.: The rule of law in the 2030 agenda. Hague J. Rule Law 10(1), 187–217 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40803-017-0068-8

Arthur, W.B., Polak, W.: The evolution of technology within a simple computer model. Complexity 11(5), 23–31 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1002/cplx.20130CrossRef

Binanto, I., Warnars, H.L.H.S., Abbas, B.S., Heryadi, Y., Sianipar, N.F., Lukas, Perez Sanchez, H.E.: Comparison of similarity coefficients on morphological rodent tuber. In: 2018 Indonesian Association for Pattern Recognition International Conference (INAPR), pp. 104–107 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/INAPR.2018.8627050

Boell, S.K., Cecez-Kecmanovic, D.: Literature reviews and the hermeneutic circle. Aust. Acad. Res. Libr. 41(2), 129–144 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1080/00048623.2010.10721450CrossRef

Mondorf, A., Wimmer, M.A.: Requirements for an architecture framework for pan-European e-government services. In: Scholl, H.J., et al. (eds.) EGOV 2016. LNCS, vol. 9820, pp. 135–150. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44421-5_11 CrossRef

Casanovas, P.: A note on validity in law and regulatory systems (position paper). Quaderns de filosofia i ciència 42, 29–40 (2012). https://ddd.uab.cat/pub/artpub/2012/119545/quafilcie_a2012n42p29iENG.pdf

Casanovas, P., Rodríguez-Doncel, V., González-Conejero, J.: The role of pragmatics in the web of data. In: Poggi, F., Capone, A. (eds.) Pragmatics and Law. PPPP, vol. 10, pp. 293–330. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44601-1_12CrossRef

10.

Casanovas, P.: Open source intelligence, open social intelligence and privacy by design. In: Proceedings of the European Conference on Social Intelligence (ECSI-2014), Barcelona, Spain, 3–5 November 2014, pp. 174–185 (2014). http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1283/paper_24.pdf

11.

Casanovas, P., González-Conejero, J., de Koker, L.: Legal compliance by design (LCbD) and through design (LCtD): preliminary survey. In: Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Technologies for Regulatory Compliance Co-located with the 30th International Conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems (JURIX 2017), Luxembourg, 13 December 2017, pp. 33–49 (2017). http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2049/05paper.pdf

12.

Casanovas, P., et al.: Summary legal and technical report on spent convictions, July 2019. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3271525. DC25008: Compliance by Design (CbD) and Compliance through Design (CtD) solutions to support automated information sharing (2018–19). Law and Policy. Project C. Spent Convictions Use Case. Australian Government funded Data to Decisions Cooperative Research Centre (2018–2019), end-user: Australian Criminal Intelligence Commission

13.

Castelfranchi, C.: The micro-macro constitution of power. Protosociology 18, 208–265 (2003)CrossRef

14.

Dann, P.: The Law of Development Cooperation: A Comparative Analysis of the World Bank, the EU and Germany. Cambridge International Trade and Economic Law, Cambridge University Press (2013). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139097130

15.

Dopfer, K., Foster, J., Potts, J.: Micro-meso-macro. J. Evol. Econ. 14(3), 263–279 (2004)

16.

Filtz, E., Kirrane, S., Polleres, A.: The linked legal data landscape. linking legal data across different countries. Artif. Intell. Law (2021, to appear). http://www.polleres.net/publications/filt-etal-2021AILAW.pdf

17.

Governatori, G., Romeu, P.C., de Koker, L.: On the formal representation of the Australian spent conviction scheme. In: Gutiérrez-Basulto, V., Kliegr, T., Soylu, A., Giese, M., Roman, D. (eds.) RuleML+RR 2020. LNCS, vol. 12173, pp. 177–185. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57977-7_14CrossRef

18.

Grabowski, A.: Juristic Concept of the Validity of Statutory Law. A Critique of Contemporary Legal Nonpositivism. Springer, Cham (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27688-0

19.

Graneheim, U., Lundman, B.: Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today 24(2), 105–112 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0260691703001515

20.

Hage, J.: What Is legal validity? Lessons from soft law. In: Westerman, P., Hage, J., Kirste, S., Mackor, A.R. (eds.) Legal Validity and Soft Law. LPL, vol. 122, pp. 19–45. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77522-7_2CrossRef

21.

Hart, H., Honoré, T.: Causation in the Law. Clarendon Press (1985). https://books.google.com.au/books?id=k1gQAQAAMAAJ

22.

Hashmi, M., Casanovas, P., de Koker, L.: Legal compliance through design: preliminary results. In: Rodríguez-Doncel, V., Casanovas, P., González-Conejero, J., Montiel-Ponsoda, E. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Technologies for Regulatory Compliance Co-located with the 31st International Conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems (JURIX 2018), Groningen, The Netherlands, December 12, 2018. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 2309, pp. 59–72. CEUR-WS.org (2018). http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2309/06.pdf

23.

Hashmi, M., Governatori, G., Lam, H.P., Wynn, M.T.: Are we done with business process compliance: state of the art and challenges ahead. Knowl. Inf. Syst. 57(1), 79–133 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10115-017-1142-1

24.

Hogan, A., et al.: Knowledge graphs (2021)

25.

Howe, J.S.T., Khang, L.H., Chai, I.E.: Legal area classification: a comparative study of text classifiers on Singapore supreme court judgments (2019)

26.

Hsieh, H.F., Shannon, S.E.: Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual. Health Res. 15(9), 1277–1288 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687. pMID: 16204405

27.

Jaccard, P.: Distribution of alpine flora in the Dranses basin and some neighboring regions. Bull. Soc. Vaudoise Sci. Nat. 37, 241–272 (1901). https://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/10027880482/en/

28.

Kirch, W. (ed.): Pearson’s Correlation Coefficient, pp. 1090–1091. Springer, Dordrecht (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5614-7_2569

29.

Kitchenham, B., Brereton, P.: A systematic review of systematic review process research in software engineering. Inf. Softw. Technol. 55(12), 2049–2075 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2013.07.010CrossRef

30.

Köpcke-Tinturé, M.: Legal Validity: The Fabric of Justice. Hart Publishing, Oxford (2019)

31.

Liepina, R., Sartor, G., Wyner, A.: Causal models of legal cases. In: Pagallo, U., Palmirani, M., Casanovas, P., Sartor, G., Villata, S. (eds.) AICOL 2015–2017. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10791, pp. 172–186. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00178-0_11CrossRef

32.

de Maat, E., Winkels, R.: A next step towards automated modelling of sources of law. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pp. 31–39. ICAIL 2009, Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2009). https://doi.org/10.1145/1568234.1568239

33.

de Maat, E., Winkels, R.: Automated classification of norms in sources of law. In: Francesconi, E., Montemagni, S., Peters, W., Tiscornia, D. (eds.) Semantic Processing of Legal Texts. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 6036, pp. 170–191. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12837-0_10CrossRef

34.

Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D.G.: Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the prisma statement. PLoS Med. 6(7), 1–6 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed1000097CrossRef

35.

Møller, J.: Medieval origins of the rule of law: the Gregorian reforms as critical juncture? Hague J. Rule Law 9(2), 265–282 (2017)CrossRef

36.

Moore, M.: Causation of law. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2019 Edition), Zalta, E.N. (ed.) (2019). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2019/entries/causation-law/

37.

Noriega, P., Verhagen, H., d’Inverno, M., Padget, J.: A manifesto for conscientious design of hybrid online social systems. In: Cranefield, S., Mahmoud, S., Padget, J., Rocha, A.P. (eds.) COIN-2016. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10315, pp. 60–78. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66595-5_4CrossRef

38.

de Oliveira Rodrigues, C.M., de Freitas, F.L.G., Barreiros, E.F.S., de Azevedo, R.R., de Almeida Filho, A.: Legal ontologies over time: a systematic mapping study. Expert Syst. Appl. 130, 12–30 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2019.04.009. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957417419302398

39.

Ostrom, E.: Understanding Institutional Diversity. Book Collections on Project MUSE, Princeton University Press (2009). https://books.google.com.au/books?id=LbeJaji_AfEC

40.

Pagallo, U., Casanovas, P., Madelin, R.: The middle-out approach: assessing models of legal governance in data protection, artificial intelligence, and the web of data. Theory Pract. Legislation 7(1), 1–25 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/20508840.2019.1664543CrossRef

41.

Palombella, G.: The Rule of Law as an Institutional Ideal, pp. 1–37. Brill, Leiden (2010). https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004181694.i-215.6

42.

Pattaro, E., Rottleuthner, H., Shiner, R.A., Peczenik, A., Sartor, G.: A Treatise of Legal Philosophy and General Jurisprudence. Springer, Dordrecht (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3505-5

43.

Peczenik, A.: Scientia Iuris - an unsolved philosophical problem. Ethical Theory Moral Pract. 3(3), 273–302 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009948025411

44.

Pitt, Jeremy, J.D., Ober, J.: Algorithmic reflexive governance for socio-techno-ecological systems. IEEE Technol. Soc. Mag. 39(2), 52–59 (2020)

45.

Poblet, M., Casanovas, P., Rodríguez-Doncel, V.: Legal Linked Data Ecosystems and the Rule of Law, pp. 87–126. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13363-4_5

46.

Rodríguez-Doncel, V., Casanovas, P., González-Conejero, J. (eds.): Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Technologies for Regulatory Compliance Co-located with the 30th International Conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems (JURIX 2017), Luxembourg, 13 December 2017, CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 2049. CEUR-WS.org (2018). http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2049

47.

Sileno, G., Boer, A., van Engers, T.: Revisiting constitutive rules. In: Pagallo, U., Palmirani, M., Casanovas, P., Sartor, G., Villata, S. (eds.) AICOL 2015-2017. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10791, pp. 39–55. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00178-0_3CrossRef

48.

Tamanaha, B.Z.: On the Rule of Law: History, Politics, Theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004)

49.

Waldron, J.: The rule of international law. Harvard J. Law Public Policy 30, 15–30 (2006)

Titel: The Rule of Law and Compliance: Legal Quadrant and Conceptual Clustering
verfasst von: Pompeu Casanovas
Mustafa Hashmi
Louis de Koker
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: AI Approaches to the Complexity of Legal Systems XI-XII
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-89810-6

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-89811-3

Copyright-Jahr: 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89811-3_15

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"