nach oben

Erschienen in:

2018 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

The Selective Nature of Innovator Networks: From the Nascent to the Early Growth Phase of the Organizational Life Cycle

verfasst von : Uwe Cantner, Tina Wolf

Erschienen in: Entrepreneurship and the Industry Life Cycle

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Earlier studies have shown that entrepreneurs play a key role in shaping regional development. Innovator networks where these entrepreneurs are members of, have been identified as one among many critical factors for their firms’ success. This paper intents to go one step further and analyses in how far differing characteristics of these networks lead to different firm performances along the early stages of the organizational life cycle (nascent stage, emergent stage, early growth stage). A sample of 149 innovative firms in Thuringia is analysed, using data from the commercial register and the German patent office. The results show that there is an inverted u-shaped relationship between the chances of a firm to survive and the connectivity of the network the firms are connected to but only in the later stage of the early organizational life cycle; while the structure of the ego-network never plays a role. A quite central position in the network shows-up to be unfavourable.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Specific Practices of Human Resource Management in the Creation and Development of Micro and Small Firms, Case Studies in Portuguese Firms

Nächstes Kapitel The Decline of Innovation in the Antibiotics Industry and the Global Threat of Antibiotic Resistance: When Entrepreneurial Efforts are Not Enough

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Note that this data base was just the starting point for the Thuringian Founder Study Questionnaire. It is therefore not identical to the questionnaire data collected by the Thuringian Founder Study.

Figure 1 in the appendix shows a card of Thuringia and its ttwas. Sonneberg, Saale-Orla-Kreis, Altenburger Land and Eichsfeld are connected to regions outside Thuringia by means of commuter streams. For the creation of the regional innovator networks, we also included patents and inventors from these regions.

For details see Lobo and Strumsky (2008, p. 876).

We measured centrality by means of Eigenvector centrality (Bonacich 1972). There exist different measures for centrality like betweeness centrality (Anthonisse 1971; Freeman 1977), closeness centrality (Beauchamp 1965) or hub centrality (Kleinberg 1999). We decided for the Eigenvector centrality since it is a feedback centrality which is showing whether the actor is connected to the top connected other actors in the net which might be especially useful for young and small companies who are in need of good contacts.

Ahuja, G. (2000). Collaboration networks, structural holes and innovation: A longitudinal study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 425–455.CrossRef

Aldrich, H. E. (1999). Organizations evolving. London: Sage.

Aldrich, H. E., & Reese, P. R. (1993). Does networking pay off? A panel study of entrepreneurs in the research triangle. In N. Churchill et al. (Eds.), Frontiers of entrepreneurship research (pp. 325–399). Babson, MA: Babson College.

Anthonisse, J. M. (1971). The rush in a graph. Amsterdam: Mathematisch Centrum.

Audretsch, D. B. (1995). Innovation and industry evolution. Massachusetts: MIT Press.

Audretsch, D. B., & Lehmann, E. E. (2005). Does the knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship hold for regions? Research Policy, 34, 1191–1202.CrossRef

Balconi, M., Breschi, S., & Lissoni, F. (2004). Networks of inventors and the role of academia: An exploration of Italian patent data. Research Policy, 33, 127–145.CrossRef

Balland, P. A., Boschma, R., & Frenken, K. (2015). Proximity and innovation: From statics to dynamics. Regional Studies, 49, 907–920.CrossRef

Bartelsman, E., Scarpetta, S., & Schivardi, F. (2005). Comparative analysis of firm demographics and survival: Evidence from micro-level sources in OECD countries. Industrial & Corporate Change, 14, 365–391.CrossRef

Baum, J. C. A. (1996). Organizational ecology. In S. Clegg, C. Hardy, & W. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies (pp. 77–114). London: Sage.

Beauchamp, M. A. (1965). An improved index of centrality. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 10, 161–163.CrossRef

Bonacich, P. (1972). Factoring and weighting approaches to clique identification. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 2, 113–120.CrossRef

Breschi, S., & Catalani, C. (2010). Tracing the links between science and technology: An exploratory analysis of scientists’ and inventors’ networks. Research Policy, 39, 14–26.CrossRef

Breschi, S., & Lissoni, F. (2006). Cross-firm inventors and social networks: Localized knowledge spillovers revisited. Annules d’Economie et de Statistique, 79–8, 189–209.

Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Cantner, U., & Goethner, M. (2011). Performance differences between academic spin-offs and non-academic start-ups: An empirical investigation. Presented at the DIME Final Conference 2011, Maastricht.

Cantner, U., Goethner, M., & Stuetzer, M. (2010). Disentangling the effects of new venture team functional heterogeneity on new venture performance. Jena Economic Research Papers, 2010–29.

Cantner, U., & Graf, H. (2007). Growth, development and structural change of innovator networks – The case of Jena. Jena Economic Research Papers, #2007-090.

Cantner, U., & Stuetzer, M. (2013). Knowledge and innovative entrepreneurship – Social capital and individual capacities. In P. Morone (Ed.), Knowledge, innovation and internationalization. Essays in Honour of Cesare Imbriani (pp. 59–90). New York: Routledge.

Cantner, U., & Wolf, T. (2016). On regional innovator networks as hubs for innovative ventures. Jena Economic Research Papers, 2016-006.

Churchill, N. C., & Levis, V. L. (1983). The five stages of small business growth. Harvard Business Review, 61, 30–50.

Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95–120.CrossRef

Cox, D. R. (1972). Regression models and life-tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 34, 187–220.

Ejermo, O., & Karlsson, C. (2006). Interregional inventor networks as studied by patent coinventorships. Research Policy, 35, 412–430.CrossRef

Fershtman, C., & Gandal, N. (2011). Direct and indirect knowledge spillovers: The ‘social network’ of open source projects. RAND Journal of Economics, 42, 70–91.CrossRef

Freeman, L. C. (1977). A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry, 40, 35–41.CrossRef

Gartner, W. B., Birs, B. J., & Starr, J. A. (1992). Acting as if: Differentiating entrepreneurial from organizational behaviour. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 16, 13–31.

Gay, B., & Dousset, B. (2005). Innovation and network structural dynamics: Study of the alliance network of a major sector of the biotechnology industry. Research Policy, 34, 1457–1475.CrossRef

Gilsing, V. A., & Nooteboom, B. (2005). Density and strength of ties in innovation networks, an analysis of multimedia and biotechnology. European Management Review, 2, 179–197.CrossRef

Gilsing, V. A., Nooteboom, B., Vanhaverbeke, W., Duysters, G., & van den Oord, A. (2008). Network embeddedness and the exploration of novel technologies: Technological distance, betweenness centrality and density. Research Policy, 37, 1717–1731.CrossRef

Gnyawali, D. R., & Madhavan, R. (2001). Cooperative networks and competitive dynamics: A structural embeddedness perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26, 431–445.CrossRef

Golden, P. A., & Dollinger, M. (1993). Cooperative alliances and competitive strategies in small manufacturing firms. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 17, 43–56.

Granato, N., & Farhauer, O. (2007). Die Abgrenzung von Arbeitsmarktregionen: Gütekriterien und Maßzahlen. Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Dokumentation der TU Berlin. 2007/2.

Grupp, H., & Legler, H. (2000). Hochtechnologie 2000 – Neudefinition der Hochtechnologie für die Berichterstattung zur technologischen Leistungsfähigkeit Deutschlands. Karlsruhe/Hannover.

Hanneman, R. A., & Riddle, M. (2005). Introduction to social network methods. Riverside, CA: University of California.

Hargadon, A., & Sutton, R. I. (1997). Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 716–749.CrossRef

Harhoff, D., Stahl, K., & Woywode, M. (1998). Legal form, growth and exit of west German firms – Empirical results for manufacturing, construction, trade and service industries. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 46, 453–488.CrossRef

Heckmann, M., & Schnabel, C. (2005). Überleben und Beschäftigungsentwicklung neu gegründeter Betriebe. Discussion Paper No. 39. Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg.

Hite, J. M., & Hesterly, W. S. (2001). The evolution of firm networks: from emergence to early growth of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 275–286. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.156 CrossRef

Howells, J. R. L. (2002). Tacit knowledge, innovation and economic geography. Urban Studies, 39, 871–884.CrossRef

Kessler, A., & Frank, H. (2009). Nascent entrepreneurship in a longitudinal perspective: The impact of person, environment, resources and the founding process on the decision to start business activities. International Small Business Journal, 27, 720–742.CrossRef

Kleinberg, J. M. (1999). Authoritative sources in a hyperlinked environment. Journal of the ACM, 46, 604–632.CrossRef

Larson, A. L., & Starr, J. A. (1993). A network model of organization formation. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 17, 5–15.

Lobo, J., & Strumsky, D. (2008). Metropolitan patenting, inventor agglomeration and social networks: A tale of two effects. Journal of Urban Economics, 63, 871–884.CrossRef

Meagher, K., & Rogers, M. (2004). Network density and R&D spillovers. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 53, 237–260.CrossRef

Murray, F. (2004). The role of academic inventors in entrepreneurial firms: Sharing the laboratory life. Research Policy, 33, 643–659.CrossRef

Ostgaard, T. A., & Birley, S. (1994). Personal Networks and firm competitive strategy: A strategic or coincidental match? Journal of Business Venturing, 9, 281–305.CrossRef

Parker, S. C. (2009). The economics of entrepreneurship. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Phillips, B. D., & Kirchhoff, B. A. (1989). Formation, growth and survival. Small Business Economics, 1, 65–74.CrossRef

Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996). Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 116–145.CrossRef

Reynolds, P. D. (2000). National panel study of U.S. business start-ups: Background and methodology. In J. A. Katz (Ed.), Databases for the study of entrepreneurship (pp. 153–227). Amsterdam: JAI Press.CrossRef

Storey, D. J. (1994). Understanding the small business sector. London: Thomson Learning.

Stuart, T. E., Hoang, H., & Hybels, R. (1999). Inter-organizational endorsements and the performance of entrepreneurial ventures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 315–350.CrossRef

Utterback, J. M. (1974). Innovation in industry and the diffusion of technology. Science, 183, 620–626.CrossRef

Walker, G., Kogut, B., & Shan, W. (1997). Social capital, structural holes and the formation of an industry network. Organization Science, 8, 109–125.CrossRef

Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis – Methods and applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Titel: The Selective Nature of Innovator Networks: From the Nascent to the Early Growth Phase of the Organizational Life Cycle
verfasst von: Uwe Cantner
Tina Wolf
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: Entrepreneurship and the Industry Life Cycle
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-89335-8

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-89336-5

Copyright-Jahr: 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89336-5_8