nach oben

Asian Journal of Business Ethics

Erschienen in:

20.05.2022

The social and ethical issues of online learning during the pandemic and beyond

verfasst von: Sonali Bhattacharya, Venkatesha Murthy, Shubhasheesh Bhattacharya

Erschienen in: Asian Journal of Business Ethics | Ausgabe 1/2022

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

This article describes how the COVID-19 pandemic has forced the higher education institutes in developing nations like India to relook at pedagogical approaches. Due to government imposing nationwide lockdown, higher educational institutes were quickly adopting to imbibe online learning medium. This research takes a qualitative thematic analytical approach to explore the facilitators and challenges to online learning from the perspectives of both learners and educators in higher education institutes. We have specifically explored the ethical and social concerns related to online learning and the possible solution for the same.

Vorheriger Artikel Gender-inclusive corporate boards and business performance in Pakistan

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Agostinho, S. (2005). Naturalistic inquiry in e-learning research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 4(1), 13–26.CrossRef

Alessio, H. M., Malay, N., Maurer, K., Bailer, A. J., & Rubin, B. (2017). Examining the effect of proctoring on online test scores. Online Learning, 21(1), 146–161.CrossRef

Arnold, D. F., Bernardi, R. A., Neidermeyer, P. E., & Schmee, J. (2007). The effect of country and culture on perceptions of appropriate ethical actions prescribed by codes of conduct: A Western European perspective among accountants. Journal of Business Ethics, 70(4), 327–340.CrossRef

Aung TN, Khaing SS (2015) Challenges of implementing e-learning in developing countries: A review. In International Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computing (pp 405–411). Springer, Cham

Baumgartner, S. E., Weeda, W. D., van der Heijden, L. L., & Huizinga, M. (2014). The relationship between media multitasking and executive function in early adolescents. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 34(8), 1120–1144.CrossRef

Becker, R., & Mehlkop, G. (2006). Social class and delinquency: An empirical utilization of rational choice theory with cross-sectional data of the 1990 and 2000 German General Population Surveys (ALLBUS). Rationality and Society, 18(2), 193–235.CrossRef

Binkley, S., & Capetillo, J. (Eds.). (2009). A Foucault for the 21st century: Governmentality, biopolitics and discipline in the new millennium. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Bozalek, V., Gachago, D., Alexander, L., Watters, K., Wood, D., Ivala, E., & Herrington, J. (2013). The use of emerging technologies for authentic learning: A South African study in higher education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(4), 629–638.CrossRef

Burrus, R. T., McGoldrick, K., & Schuhmann, P. W. (2007). Self-reports of student cheating: Does a definition of cheating matter? The Journal of Economic Education, 38(1), 3–16.CrossRef

Chudzicka-Czupała, A., Grabowski, D., Mello, A. L., Kuntz, J., Zaharia, D. V., Hapon, N., ... & Börü, D. (2016). Application of the theory of planned behavior in academic cheating research–cross-cultural comparison.Ethics & Behavior 26(8), 638-659

CNNIC (2020). The 45th China statistical report on internet development. Beijing: CNNIC.

Collis, C., Foth, M., & Schroeter, R. (2009). The Brisbane media map: Participatory design and authentic learning to link students and industry. Learning Inquiry, 3(3), 143–155.CrossRef

Daffin, L. W., Jr., & Jones, A. A. (2018). Comparing student performance on proctored and non-proctored exams in online psychology courses. Online Learning, 22(1), 131–145.CrossRef

Day, N. E., Hudson, D., Dobies, P. R., & Waris, R. (2011). Student or situation? Personality and classroom context as predictors of attitudes about business school cheating. Social Psychology of Education, 14(2), 261–282.CrossRef

Diep, N. A., Cocquyt, C., Zhu, C., & Vanwing, T. (2016). Predicting adult learners’ online participation: Effects of altruism, performance expectancy, and social capital. Computers & Education, 101, 84–101.CrossRef

Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.CrossRef

Fask, A., Englander, F., & Wang, Z. (2014). Do online exams facilitate cheating? An experiment designed to separate possible cheating from the effect of the online test taking environment. Journal of Academic Ethics, 12(2), 101–112.CrossRef

Finchilescu, G., & Cooper, A. (2018). Perceptions of academic dishonesty in a South African university: A Q-methodology approach. Ethics & Behavior, 28(4), 284–301.CrossRef

Fitzgerald, A., Dawson, V., & Hackling, M. (2013). Examining the beliefs and practices of four effective Australian primary science teachers. Research in Science Education, 43(3), 981–1003.CrossRef

Golden, J., & Kohlbeck, M. (2020). Addressing cheating when using test bank questions in online Classes. Journal of Accounting Education, 52, 100671.CrossRef

Herrington, J., McKenzie, S., Pascoe, R., Woods-McConney, A., MacCallum, J., & Wright, P. (2010, May). A whole-school approach to technological literacy: Mobile learning and the iPhone. In Global Learn (pp. 181–186). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).

Jian, H., Li, G., & Wang, W. (2020). Perceptions, contexts, attitudes, and academic dishonesty in Chinese senior college students: A qualitative content-based analysis. Ethics & Behavior, 30(7), 543–555.CrossRef

Johnston, E., Olivas, G., Steele, P., Smith, C., & Bailey, L. (2018). Exploring pedagogical foundations of existing virtual reality educational applications: A content analysis study. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 46(4), 414–439.CrossRef

Kwon, M., Lee, J. Y., Won, W. Y., Park, J. W., Min, J. A., Hahn, C., ... & Kim, D. J. (2013).Development and validation of a smartphone addiction scale (SAS). PLoS ONE 8(2), e56936

Lee, K., Fanguy, M., Bligh, B., & Lu, X. S. (2022). Adoption of online teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic analysis of changes in university teaching activity. Educational Review, 1–24.

Li, L., & Lin, T. T. (2016). Exploring work-related smartphone dependency among young working adults in China: A qualitative approach. International Journal of Communication, 10, 19.

Lonsdale, D. (2017). Intentions to cheat: Ajzen’s planned behavior and goal-related personality facets. The Journal of Psychology, 151(2), 113–129.CrossRef

Machles, D. (2003). Situated Learning. Professional Safety, 48(9), 22–28.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage.

Nathanson, C., Paulhus, D. L., & Williams, K. M. (2006). Predictors of a behavioral measure of scholastic cheating: Personality and competence but not demographics. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 31(1), 97–122.CrossRef

Nyst, C., & Falchetta, T. (2017). The right to privacy in the digital age. Journal of Human Rights Practice, 9(1), 104–118.CrossRef

Ozverir, I., Herrington, J., & Osam, U. V. (2016). Design principles for authentic learning of English as a foreign language. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(3), 484–493.CrossRef

Parker, J., Maor, D., & Herrington, J. (2013). Authentic online learning: Aligning learner needs, pedagogy and technology. Issues in Educational Research, 23(2), 227–241.

Patterson, T., & Han, I. (2019). Learning to teach with virtual reality: Lessons from one elementary teacher. TechTrends, 63(4), 463–469.CrossRef

Peled, Y., Eshet, Y., Barczyk, C., & Grinautski, K. (2019). Predictors of academic dishonesty among undergraduate students in online and face-to-face courses. Computers & Education, 131, 49–59.CrossRef

Postma, L., Blignaut, A. S., Swan, K., & Sutinen, E. A. (2013). Reflections on the use of grounded theory to uncover patterns of exclusion in an online discussion forum at an institution of higher education. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 12(1), 529–550.CrossRef

Prosser, M., & Trigwell, K. (1999). Understanding learning and teaching: The experience in higher education. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).

Pu, Y. H., Wu, T. T., Chiu, P. S., & Huang, Y. M. (2016). The design and implementation of authentic learning with mobile technology in vocational nursing practice course. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(3), 494–509.CrossRef

Pulfrey, C. J., Vansteenkiste, M., & Michou, A. (2019). Under pressure to achieve? The impact of type and style of task instructions on student cheating. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1624.CrossRef

Qiao, P., Zhu, X., Guo, Y., Sun, Y., & Qin, C. (2021). The development and adoption of online learning in pre-and post-COVID-19: Combination of technological system evolution theory and unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 14(4), 162.CrossRef

Reamer, F. G. (2013). Social work in a digital age: Ethical and risk management challenges. Social Work, 58(2), 163–172.CrossRef

Sinkovics, R. R., Penz, E., & Ghauri, P. N. (2008). Enhancing the trustworthiness of qualitative research in international business. Management International Review, 48(6), 689–714.CrossRef

Steele, P. B., Burleigh, C., & Young, E. A. (2020). Considering educators’ perceptions of ethics and safety in virtual learning environments (VLEs). Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 10(1), 404–418.CrossRef

Steinmetz, K. F. (2012). Message received: Virtual ethnography in online message boards. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 11(1), 26–39.CrossRef

Suliman, M., Abdalrhim, A., Tawalbeh, L., & Aljezawi, M. (2022). The impact of online synchronous versus asynchronous classes on nursing students’ knowledge and ability to make legal and ethical decisions. Nurse Education Today, 109, 105245.CrossRef

Tatum, H., & Schwartz, B. M. (2017). Honor codes: Evidence based strategies for improving academic integrity. Theory into Practice, 56(2), 129–135.CrossRef

Teräs, H., Teräs, M., & Herrington, J. (2012, June). A reality check: Taking authentic e-learning from design to implementation. In EdMedia+ Innovate Learning (pp. 2219–2228). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).

Valtonen, T., Kukkonen, J., Kontkanen, S., Sormunen, K., Dillon, P., & Sointu, E. (2015). The impact of authentic learning experiences with ICT on pre-service teachers’ intentions to use ICT for teaching and learning. Computers & Education, 81, 49–58.CrossRef

Williams, M. W. M., & Williams, M. N. (2012). Academic dishonesty, self-control, and general criminality: A prospective and retrospective study of academic dishonesty in a New Zealand university. Ethics & Behavior, 22(2), 89–112.CrossRef

Yang, S. C., Huang, C. L., & Chen, A. S. (2013). An investigation of college students’ perceptions of academic dishonesty, reasons for dishonesty, achievement goals, and willingness to report dishonest behavior. Ethics & Behavior, 23(6), 501–522.CrossRef

Youn, S. (2009). Determinants of online privacy concern and its influence on privacy protection behaviors among young adolescents. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 43(3), 389–418.CrossRef

Young, D. (2013). Perspectives on cheating at a Thai University. Language Testing in Asia, 3(1), 1–15.CrossRef

Titel: The social and ethical issues of online learning during the pandemic and beyond
verfasst von: Sonali Bhattacharya
Venkatesha Murthy
Shubhasheesh Bhattacharya
Publikationsdatum: 20.05.2022
Verlag: Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in: Asian Journal of Business Ethics / Ausgabe 1/2022
Print ISSN: 2210-6723
Elektronische ISSN: 2210-6731
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13520-022-00148-z

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2022

“CSR leads to economic growth or not”: an evidence-based study to link corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities of the Indian banking sector with economic growth of India

Gender-inclusive corporate boards and business performance in Pakistan

Impact of servant leadership on employee life satisfaction through Islamic work ethics in the Islamic banking industry

Consumer perceptions of greenwashing: lessons learned from the fashion sector in the UAE

Smartphone addiction can maximize or minimize job performance? Assessing the role of life invasion and techno exhaustion

Junzi virtues: a Confucian foundation for harmony within organizations