Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Zeitschrift für Energiewirtschaft
Erschienen in: Zeitschrift für Energiewirtschaft 3/2016

28.06.2016

The Solar Shakeout – Capital Market Reactions to Bankruptcy Announcements in the German Solar Industry

verfasst von: Thomas Kaspereit, Prof. Kerstin Lopatta

Erschienen in: Zeitschrift für Energiewirtschaft | Ausgabe 3/2016

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This paper investigates how bankruptcy announcements in the German solar industry affect the stock market returns of announcing firms and their competitors. We show that German solar firms experience negative capital market reactions to their own bankruptcy announcements and to the announcements of their competitors. Cross-sectional analysis reveals that these negative information externalities are magnified by higher leverage. Further analysis also indicates that these negative information externalities are valuable predictors in short-term default probability models.
Vorheriger Artikel Techno-ökonomische Bewertung von Energie-Autarkie für die Energieversorgung von Einfamilienhäusern
Nächster Artikel Lessons to Learn? Rückblick auf 10 Jahre „Schiefergasrevolution“ in den USA und Bestandsaufnahme für Europa

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Zeitschrift für Energiewirtschaft

Zeitschrift für Energiewirtschaft (ZfE) ist eine unabhängige Fachzeitschrift mit aktuellen Themen zu Energiewirtschaft, Energiepolitik und Energierecht. JETZT BESTELLEN

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Fußnoten
1
Gesetz für den Vorrang Erneuerbarer Energien (ErneuerbareEnergien-Gesetz – EEG) sowie zur Änderung des Energiewirtschaftsgesetzes und des Mineralölsteuergesetzes from 23 March 2000 (BGBl. I, 305).
 
2
Datasource: Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Energie (Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy 2014).
 
3
Gesetz zur Neuregelung des Rechts im Bereich der Erneuerbaren Energien from 21 July 2004 (BGBl. I, 1918).
 
4
Gesetz zur Neuregelung des Rechts der Erneuerbaren Energien im Strombereich und zur Änderung damit zusammenhängender Vorschriften from 25 October 2008 (BGBl. I, 2074).
 
5
E. g., Erneuerbare-Energien-Gesetz from 25 October 2008 (BGBl. I, 2074), lastly amended by Article 1 of Erstes Gesetzes zur Änderung des Erneuerbare Energien-Gesetzes from 11 August 2010 (BGBl. I, 1170).
 
6
According to rough estimates from Bloomberg analysts, production costs for solar panels have decreased from around 5 US-dollar per Watt in 2000 to around 0.50 US-dollar per Watt in 2014 (Bloomberg 2014).
 
7
Using SIC codes has proven inconvenient since there is no unique code for solar firms and a pre-analysis has shown that, despite most solar firms as defined by our criteria being classified under 3,674, “Semiconductors and Related Devices”, many others are spread across several SIC codes such as 4,991 “Cogeneration Services & Small Power Producers” and 8,711 “Engineering Services”.
 
8
The daily movements of prices, i. e., returns, in this study are quantified by their relative change to the price at the end of the previous day while assuming reinvestment of any cash distributions to shareholders. All returns in this study are defined as continuously compounded returns calculated as differences between the natural logarithms of daily closing prices.
 
9
We merge our database of bankruptcy announcements with accounting data from Compustat based on event dates and dates of fiscal year end. In particular, we merge event dates with the next lower available fiscal year end of sample firms. If this accounting data is older than 735 days, we reset it to “missing” and exclude this observation from the analysis.
 
10
For a critical review of the marginal benefit of the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index over simpler concentration measures, see Kwoka (1985) and Bailey and Boyle (1971).
 
11
(Jorion and Zhang 2010: 696), for instance, report adjusted R‑squareds between 2.46 % and 6.17 % in a cross-sectional analysis with similar explanatory variables. In Jorion and Zhang (2009: 2072–2074) the adjusted R‑squareds range between 2.64 % and 25.84 %.
 
12
The unconditional ratio of probability of defaut to probability of non-default is 0.1613/(1-0.1613) ≈ 0.1923. A decrease in this ratio by exp(−0.04) minus 1, which is −0.0392 leads to 0.1923 − 0.0392 ≈ 0.1531. These implies that the new probability of default equals 0.1531/(1 + 0.1531) ≈ 0.1328.
 
Literatur
Aharony J, Swary I (1996) Additional evidence on the information-based contagion effects of bank failures. J Bank Financ 20(1):57–69CrossRef
Akhigbe A, Madura J (2001) Why do contagion effects vary among bank failures? J Bank Financ 25(4):657–680CrossRef
Altman EI (1968) Financial ratios, discriminant analysis and the prediction of corporate bankruptcy. J Finance 23(4):589–609CrossRef
Alves P, Pope PF, Young S (2009) Cross-border information transfers: Evidence from profit warnings issued by European firms. Account Bus Res 39(5):449–472CrossRef
Amankwah-Amoah J (2015) Where will the axe fall?: An integrative framework for understanding attributions after a business failure. Eur Bus Rev 27(4):409–429CrossRef
Arent DJ, Wise A, Gelman R (2011) The status and prospects of renewable energy for combating global warming. Energy Econ 33(4):584–593CrossRef
Bailey D, Boyle SE (1971) The optimal measure of concentration. J Am Stat Assoc 66(336):702–706CrossRef
Bardt H, Niehues J (2013) Distribution effects of the renewable energies act. Z Energiewirtsch 37(3):211–218CrossRef
Benzschawel T, Assing A (2012) Inferring default probabilities from credit spreads. J Fixed Income 21(4):13–24CrossRef
Betzer A, Doumet M, Rinne U (2013) How policy changes affect shareholder wealth: the case of the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear disaster. Appl Econ Lett 20(8):799–803CrossRef
Brown SJ, Warner JB (1980) Measuring security price performance. J Financ Econ 8(3):205–258CrossRef
Campello M, Graham JR, Harvey CR (2010) The real effects of financial constraints: evidence from a financial crisis. J Financ Econ 97(3):470–487CrossRef
Carhart MM (1997) On persistence in mutual fund performance. J Finance 52(1):57–82CrossRef
Ciliberto F, Schenone C (2012) Bankruptcy and product-market competition: evidence from the airline industry. Int J Ind Organ 30(6):564–577CrossRef
Clark TA, Weinstein MI (1983) The Behavior of the Common Stock of Bankrupt Firms. J Finance 38(2):489–504CrossRef
Corrado CJ, Zivney TL (1992) The specification and power of the sign test in event study hypothesis tests using daily stock returns. J Financ Quant Anal 27(3):465–478CrossRef
Datta S, Iskandar-Datta ME (1995) The information content of bankruptcy filing on security holders of the bankrupt firm: an empirical investigation. J Bank Financ 19(5):903–919CrossRef
Dawkins MC, Bhattacharya N, Bamber LS (2007) Systematic share price fluctuations after bankruptcy filings and the investors who drive them. J Financ Quant Anal 42(2):399–419CrossRef
Duchin R, Ozbas O, Sensoy BA (2010) Costly external finance, corporate investment, and the subprime mortgage credit crisis. J Financ Econ 97(3):418–435CrossRef
Elkamhi R, Jacobs K, Pan X (2014) The cross section of recovery rates and default probabilities implied by credit default swap spreads. J Financ Quant Anal 49(1):193–220CrossRef
Fama EF, French KR (1992) The cross-section of expected stock returns. J Finance 47(2):427–465CrossRef
Fama EF, French KR (1993) Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. J Financ Econ 33(1):3–56MATHCrossRef
Fama EF, French KR (1996) Multifactor explanations of asset pricing anomalies. J Finance 51(1):55–84CrossRef
Ferstl R, Utz S, Wimmer M (2012) The effect of the Japan 2011 disaster on nuclear and alternative energy stocks worldwide: An event study. J Bus Res 5(1):25–41CrossRef
Firth M (1996) The transmission of corporate financial information across national borders and equity market linkages. Rev Account Stud 1(4):309–337CrossRef
Gärtner B, Schiereck D, Welkoborsky C (2015) Stock market reactions to layoff announcements in the international electricity sector. Z Energiewirtsch 39(3):189–203CrossRef
Goncharov I, Werner JR, Zimmermann J (2006) Does compliance with the German Corporate Governance Code have an impact on stock valuation? An empirical analysis. Corp Gov Int Rev 14(5):432–445CrossRef
Gort M, Klepper S (1982) Time paths in the diffusion of product innovations. Econ J 92(367):630–653CrossRef
Hanazono M, Yang H (2009) Dynamic entry and exit with uncertain cost positions. Int J Ind Organ 27(3):474–487CrossRef
Hertzel MG, Li Z, Officer MS, Rodgers KJ (2008) Inter-firm linkages and the wealth effects of financial distress along the supply chain. J Financ Econ 87(2):374–387CrossRef
Impson M (2000) Contagion effects of dividend reduction or omission announcements in the electric utility industry. Financ Rev 35(1):121–136CrossRef
Jorion P, Zhang G (2007) Good and bad credit contagion: evidence from credit default swaps. J Financ Econ 84(3):860–883CrossRef
Jorion P, Zhang G (2009) Credit contagion from counterparty risk. J Finance 64(5):2053–2087CrossRef
Jorion P, Zhang G (2010) Information transfer effects of bond rating downgrades. Financ Rev 45(3):683–706CrossRef
Joskow AS, Werden GJ, Johnson RL (1994) Entry, exit, and performance in airline markets. Int J Ind Organ 12(4):457–471CrossRef
Jovanovic B, MacDonald GM (1994) The life cycle of a competitive industry. J Polit Econ 102(2):322–347CrossRef
Karafiath I (2008) Incomplete temporal overlap and cross-sectional independence in event studies. Appl Financ Econ Lett 4(2):81–86CrossRef
Kaspereit T, Lopatta K, Zimmermann J (2015) Does compliance with the German Corporate Governance Code pay off?: An investigation of the implied cost of capital. J Risk Financ 16(3):344–376CrossRef
Kawashima S, Takeda F (2012) The effect of the Fukushima nuclear accident on stock prices of electric power utilities in Japan. Energy Econ 34(6):2029–2038CrossRef
Keller A (2010) Competition effects of mergers. Energy Policy 38(9):5264–5271CrossRef
Klepper S, Graddy E (1990) The Evolution of new industries and the determinants of market structure. RAND J Econ 21(1):27–44CrossRef
Kobialka M, Rammerstorfer M (2009) Regulatory risk and market reactions – empirical evidence from germany. Z Energiewirtsch 33(3):221–227CrossRef
Kolari JW, Pynnonen S (2010) Event study testing with cross-sectional correlation of abnormal returns. Rev Financ Stud 23(11):3996–4025CrossRef
Kwoka JE (1985) The Herfindahl index in theory and practice. Antitrust Bull 30:915–947
Lang LHP, Stulz RM (1992) Contagion and competitive intra-industry effects of bankruptcy announcements. J Financ Econ 32(1):45–60CrossRef
Lee S‑H, Bach SB, Baik Y‑S (2011) The impact of IPOs on the values of directly competing incumbents. Strateg Entrepreneursh J 5(2):158–177CrossRef
Li K, Zhao X (2008) Asymmetric information and dividend policy. Financ Manag 37(4):673–694CrossRef
Lopatta K, Kaspereit T (2014) The cross-section of returns, benchmark model parameters, and idiosyncratic volatility of nuclear energy firms after Fukushima Daiichi. Energy Econ 41:125–136CrossRef
Maynes E, Rumsey J (1993) Conducting event studies with thinly traded stocks. J Bank Financ 17(1):145–157CrossRef
Miller MH, Rock K (1985) Dividend policy under asymmetric information. J Finance 40(4):1031–1051CrossRef
Molina CA (2005) Are firms underleveraged? An examination of the effect of leverage on default probabilities. J Finance 60(3):1427–1459CrossRef
Otchere I, Ross M (2002) Do share buy back announcements convey firm-specific or industry-wide information? Int Rev Financ Anal 11(4):511–531CrossRef
Pegels A, Lütkenhorst W (2014) Is Germany’s energy transition a case of successful green industrial policy? Contrasting wind and solar PV. Energy Policy 74:522–534CrossRef
Reichelstein S, Yorston M (2013) The prospects for cost competitive solar PV power. Energy Policy 55:117–127CrossRef
Weinstock DS (1982) Using the Herfindahl Index to measure concentration. Antitrust Bull 27:285–297
Metadaten
Titel
The Solar Shakeout – Capital Market Reactions to Bankruptcy Announcements in the German Solar Industry
verfasst von
Thomas Kaspereit
Prof. Kerstin Lopatta
Publikationsdatum
28.06.2016
Verlag
Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden
Erschienen in
Zeitschrift für Energiewirtschaft / Ausgabe 3/2016
Print ISSN: 0343-5377
Elektronische ISSN: 1866-2765
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12398-016-0178-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2016

Zeitschrift für Energiewirtschaft 3/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Veranstaltungskalender

Veranstaltungskalender

OriginalPaper

Techno-ökonomische Bewertung von Energie-Autarkie für die Energieversorgung von Einfamilienhäusern

OriginalPaper

Lebensdaueranalyse fossil gefeuerter Kraftwerke

OriginalPaper

Lessons to Learn? Rückblick auf 10 Jahre „Schiefergasrevolution“ in den USA und Bestandsaufnahme für Europa

OriginalPaper

Zur Methodik von Effizienzbewertungen im energiewirtschaftlichen Kontext