nach oben

Erschienen in:

2016 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

The Study Approaches for Dissemination of Research Results in the Information Society

verfasst von : Dmitry Prokudin, Irina Mbogo, Lyudmila Murgulets, Marina Kudryavtseva

Erschienen in: Digital Transformation and Global Society

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

This paper presents the results of the study of current trends in the quick dissemination of scientific research results based on the application of information society technologies. The paper demonstrates approaches enabling automatic integration of scientific metadata into different information systems. It also demonstrates an optimal solution for the dissemination of interdisciplinary research results published as proceedings of an annual scientific conference. Specific features of metadata dissemination in diverse information systems have been studied. An approach is presented for the optimization and automation of metadata preparation and for their presentation into diverse information systems that do not support automatic metadata exchange.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Management of Collaboration Based on the Analysis of Social Structure

Nächstes Kapitel Digital Textbook for Vocationally-Oriented Informative Reading in the Research University

Aguillo, I.F.: Open Science, Metrics 2.0 and their impact at individual level (2015). http://hdl.handle.net/10261/131489

Dhiman, A.K., Sharma, H.: Accessing scholarly information in networked environment through institutional repositories. Pak. J. Inf. Manage. Libr. 9, 97–111 (2008). http://journals.pu.edu.pk/journals/index.php/pjiml/article/viewFile/814/449

Ashraf, K., Haneefa, M.: Scholarly use of social media. Ann. Libr. Inf. Stud. 63(27), 132–139 (2016). http://op.niscair.res.in/index.php/ALIS/article/view/12451

Bankier, J.G., Gleason, K.: Institutional Repository Software Comparison (2014). http://works.bepress.com/jean_gabriel_bankier/22/

Björk, B.C.: Open access subject repositories: an overview. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 65, 698–706 (2014). doi:10.1002/asi.23021 CrossRef

Burgelman, J.C., Luber, S., von Schomberg, R., Lusoli, W.: Open science: public consultation on Science 2.0: Science in transition. Key results, insights and possible follow up (2015). http://www.science20-conference.eu/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/01_Jean-Claude_Burgelman_-_Open_Science__outcome_of_the_public_consultation_on__Science-20_science_in_transition.pdf

Calderón-Martínez, A., Ruiz-Conde, E.: Leading emerging markets: capturing and diffusing scientific knowledge through research-oriented repositories. Scientometrics 104(3), 907–930 (2015). doi:10.1007/s11192-015-1603-9 CrossRef

DeSordi, J.O., Conejero, M.A., Meireles, M.: Bibliometric indicators in the context of regional repositories: proposing the D-index. Scientometrics 107(1), 235–258 (2016). doi:10.1007/s11192-016-1873-x CrossRef

Ferreras-Fernández, T., García-Peñalvo, F.J., Merlo-Vega, J.A.: Open access repositories as channel of publication scientific grey literature. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality - TEEM 2015, pp. 419–426. ACM Press, New York (2015). doi:10.1145/2808580.2808643

10.

Fisher, J.H.: Scholarly publishing re-invented: real costs and real freedoms. J. Electron. Publishing 11(2) (2008). doi:10.3998/3336451.0011.204

11.

Friesike, S., Widenmayer, B., Gassmann, O.: Opening science: towards an agenda of open science in academia and industry. J Technol. Trans. 40, 581–601 (2015). doi:10.1007/s10961-014-9375-6 CrossRef

12.

Gorraiz, J.: Individual Bibliometric Assessment @ University of Vienna: From Numbers to Multidimensional Profiles. Zenodo (2016). doi:10.5281/zenodo.45402

13.

Griffiths, P.: Maximizing the impact of your publications in an open access environment. In: Presentation on 43rd Biennial Convention (2016). http://hdl.handle.net/10755/603401

14.

Henkel, R., et al.: Bibliometrics: tracking research impact by selecting the appropriate metrics. Asian J. Androl. 18(2), 296–309 (2016). doi:10.4103/1008-682X.171582 CrossRef

15.

Kartashova, A.A.: Transformation and deformation of scientific knowledge in connection with expansion of scientific approaches and techniques. Rossiyskiy Gumanitarnyi Zhurnal (Russ. Hum. Sci. J.) 5, 347–357 (2015). doi:10.15643/libartrus-2015.5.3. (in Russia)

16.

Kousha, K., Thelwall, M.: Disseminating research with web CV hyperlinks. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 65, 1615–1626 (2014). doi:10.1002/asi.23070 CrossRef

17.

Kudim, K.A., Proskudina, G.Y., Reznichenko, V.A.: Comparing the EPrints 3.0 and DSpace 1.4.1 electronic libraries. In: Works of IX All-Russian Scientific Conference: Electronic Libraries: Advanced Techniques & Technologies, Electronic Collections - RCDL2007. Pereyaslavl-Zalesskyi, 15–18 October 2007 (2008). http://dspace.nsu.ru:8080/jspui/bitstream/nsu/143/1/paper_66_v2.pdf (in Russian)

18.

Li, X., Thelwall, M., Kousha, K.: The role of arXiv, RePEc, SSRN and PMC informal scholarly communication. Lib J. Inf. Manage. 67(6), 614–635 (2015). doi:10.1108/AJIM-03-2015-0049

19.

Mas-Bleda, A., Thelwall, M., Kousha, K., Aguillo, I.F.: Do highly cited researchers successfully use the social web? Scientometrics 101(1), 337–356 (2014). doi:10.1007/s11192-014-1345-0 CrossRef

20.

Miguel, S., Tannuride, O., Cabrini, G.: Scientific production on open access: a worldwide bibliometric analysis in the academic and scientific context. Publications 4(1), 1 (2016). doi:10.3390/publications4010001

21.

Laakso, M.: Green open access policies of scholarly journal publishers: a study of what, when, and where self-archiving is allowed. Scientometrics 99(2), 475–494 (2014). doi:10.1007/s11192-013-1205-3 CrossRef

22.

Mukherjee, A., Stern, S.: Disclosure or secrecy? The dynamics of open science. Int. J. Ind. Organ. 27(3), 449–462 (2009). doi:10.1016/j.ijindorg.2008.11.005 CrossRef

23.

Nicholson, S.W., Bennett, T.B.: Dissemination and discovery of diverse data: do libraries promote their unique research data collections? Int. Inf. Libr. Rev. 48(2), 85–93 (2016). doi:10.1080/10572317.2016.1176448 CrossRef

24.

Nielsen, M.: Reinventing Discovery: The New Era of Networked Science. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2011)CrossRef

25.

Nixon, W.: DAEDALUS: Initial Experiences with ePrints and Dspace at the University of Glasgow. Ariadne (37) (2003). http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue37/nixon/

26.

Open Access 2020. http://oa2020.org

27.

Paprinov, S.I.: Development of electronic libraries is the way to the open science. In: Electronic Libraries: Advanced Techniques and Technologies, Electronic Collections: Works of the XI All-Russian Scientific Conference RCDL 2009, pp. 225–234. Karelia Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Science, Petrozavodsk (2009). http://rcdl.ru/doc/2009/225_234_Invited-2.pdf (in Russian)

28.

Parinov, S., Lyapunov, V., Puzyrev, R., Kogalovsky, M.: Semantically enrichable research information system socionet. Knowledge engineering and semantic web. In: 6th International Conference, KESW 2015, Moscow, Russia, September 30 - October 2, 2015, Proceedings. 518 of the series Communications in Computer and Information Science, pp. 147–157 (2015). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24543-0_11

29.

Parsons, J.: Welcome to Science 2.0|Open Access in Action. Library Journal, March 15 (2016). http://lj.libraryjournal.com/2016/03/oa/welcome-to-science-2-0-open-access-in-action/

30.

Pinfield, S.: Making open access work: the “state-of-the-art” in providing Open Access to scholarly literature. Online Inf. Rev. 39(5), 604–636 (2015). doi:10.1108/OIR-05-2015-0167 CrossRef

31.

Porter, A.L., Rafols, I.: Is science becoming more interdisciplinary? Measuring and mapping six research fields over time. Scientometrics 81(3), 719–745 (2009). doi:10.1007/s11192-008-2197-2 CrossRef

32.

Prokudin, D.E.: Through an open software publishing platform for integration into the global scientific community: addressing rapid publication of research results. Sch. Commun. Rev. 6(18), 13–18 (2013). doi:10.18334/np36109

33.

Qin, J., Lancaster, F.W., Allen, B.: Types and levels of collaboration in interdisciplinary research in the sciences. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. 48, 893–916 (1997). doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199710)48:10<893:AID-ASI5>3.0.CO;2-X CrossRef

34.

Jamali, R., Russell, D., Nicholas, D., Watkinson, A.: Do online communities support research collaboration? Lib J. Inf. Manag. 66(6), 603–622 (2014). doi:10.1108/ajim-08-2013-0072

35.

Schmidt, B., Orth, A., Franck, G., Kuchma, I., Knoth, P., Carvalho, J.: Stepping up open science training for European research. Publications 4(2), 16 (2016). doi:10.3390/publications4020016 CrossRef

36.

Siedlok, F., Hibbert, P.: The organization of interdisciplinary research: modes, drivers and barriers. Int. J. Manag. Rev. 16, 194–210 (2014). doi:10.1111/ijmr.12016 CrossRef

37.

Smith, I.: Open access infrastructure. UNESCO, Paris (2015). http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0023/002322/232204e.pdf

38.

Solomon, D.J.: Strategies for developing sustainable open access scholarly journals. First Monday 11(6) (2006). doi:10.5210/fm.v11i6.1335

39.

Strakhovskaya, I.G.: Culturological tools of interdisciplinarity. Vestnik Slavyanslik Kultur (Bull. Slavic Cultures) 4, 35–43 (2011). (in Russian)

40.

Syrov, V.N.: Philosophy and Prospects of Interdisciplinary Researches in Russian Science. Vestnik VolgU (Bulletin of Volgograd University), Series 7, Philosophy. Sociology and Social Technologies, vol. 3, pp. 5–14 (2011)

41.

Ten years on from the Budapest Open Access Initiative: setting the default to open. http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/boai-10-recommendations

42.

Thelwall, M., Kousha, K.: Research gate: disseminating, communicating, and measuring scholarship? J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 66, 876–889 (2015). doi:10.1002/asi.23236 CrossRef

43.

Willinsky, J.: Open journal systems: an example of open source software for journal management and publishing. Libr. Hi Tech. 23(4), 504–519 (2005). doi:10.1108/07378830510636300 CrossRef

Titel: The Study Approaches for Dissemination of Research Results in the Information Society
verfasst von: Dmitry Prokudin
Irina Mbogo
Lyudmila Murgulets
Marina Kudryavtseva
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: Digital Transformation and Global Society
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-49699-3

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-49700-6

Copyright-Jahr: 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49700-6_33

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"