Skip to main content

2015 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

10. The System Value of CCS Technologies in the Context of CO2 Mitigation Scenarios for Germany

verfasst von : Dag Martinsen, Heidi Heinrichs, Peter Markewitz, Wilhelm Kuckshinrichs

Erschienen in: Carbon Capture, Storage and Use

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This chapter analyses the system value of CCS in Germany within the context of consistent greenhouse gas reduction scenarios with and without the implementation of CCS technologies. The system value of CCS is determined using additional CO2 avoidance costs that would occur if climate change mitigation targets were to be met without using CCS even though CCS technology was available. The development of important parameters, assumptions and energy- and climate-policy targets are represented in scenarios. The methodological basis for the scenario calculations is the bottom-up energy system model IKARUS. The energy economics results comprise energy and CO2 balances, capacity development, and the costs of CO2 reduction strategies. From this, the system value of CCS and the contribution of all sectors to it are derived.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
With regard to the use of nuclear energy, this aspect does not come into play. Both scenarios assume that nuclear energy will be phased out and that no nuclear power stations will produce electricity from 2023 onwards. On the other hand, CCS power plants will effectively only be available from 2020. See Sect. 10.3.
 
2
For reasons of space, it is not possible to discuss the individual measures and the resulting additional costs or cost reductions here.
 
3
For more information on modelling discounting and selecting discount rates, see the extensive discussions in the specialist literature (Cairns 2006; Dasgupta 1982; Hellweg et al. 2003; Kenley and Armsteasd 2004; Newel and Pizer 2004; Rabl 1996), which comprise the economic, engineering, and scientific perspectives.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Bauer N, Edenhofer O, Leimbach M (2009) Low-stabilisation scenarios and technologies for carbon capture and sequestration. Energy Procedia 1:4031–4038CrossRef Bauer N, Edenhofer O, Leimbach M (2009) Low-stabilisation scenarios and technologies for carbon capture and sequestration. Energy Procedia 1:4031–4038CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cairns J (2006) Developments in discounting: with special reference to future health events. Resour Energy Econ 28:282–297CrossRef Cairns J (2006) Developments in discounting: with special reference to future health events. Resour Energy Econ 28:282–297CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dasgupta P (1982) Resource depletion, research and development, and the social rate of discount. In: Lind RC, Arrow KJ, Corey GR, Sen AK, Dasgupta P (eds) Discounting for time and risk in energy policy. The John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore/London, pp 273–324 Dasgupta P (1982) Resource depletion, research and development, and the social rate of discount. In: Lind RC, Arrow KJ, Corey GR, Sen AK, Dasgupta P (eds) Discounting for time and risk in energy policy. The John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore/London, pp 273–324
Zurück zum Zitat Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt (DLR), Fraunhofer Institut für Windenergie und Energiesystemtechnik (Fraunhofer IWES), Ingenieurbüro für neue Energien (IFNE) (2012) Langfristszenarien und Strategien für den Ausbau der erneuerbaren Energien in Deutschland bei Berücksichtigung der Entwicklung in Europa und global. Studie im Auftrag des BMU Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt (DLR), Fraunhofer Institut für Windenergie und Energiesystemtechnik (Fraunhofer IWES), Ingenieurbüro für neue Energien (IFNE) (2012) Langfristszenarien und Strategien für den Ausbau der erneuerbaren Energien in Deutschland bei Berücksichtigung der Entwicklung in Europa und global. Studie im Auftrag des BMU
Zurück zum Zitat Hake JF, Hansen P, Heckler R, Linßen J, Markewitz P, Martinsen D, Weber K (2009) Projektionsrechnungen bis 2050 für das Energiesystem von Deutschland – im Rahmen des VDI-Projektes “Future Climate Engineering Solutions”. Forschungszentrum Jülich, Institute of Energy Research – Systems Analysis and Technology Evaluation, Research Report 5–2009, Jülich Hake JF, Hansen P, Heckler R, Linßen J, Markewitz P, Martinsen D, Weber K (2009) Projektionsrechnungen bis 2050 für das Energiesystem von Deutschland – im Rahmen des VDI-Projektes “Future Climate Engineering Solutions”. Forschungszentrum Jülich, Institute of Energy Research – Systems Analysis and Technology Evaluation, Research Report 5–2009, Jülich
Zurück zum Zitat Hellweg S, Hofstetter TB, Hungerbühler K (2003) Discounting and the environment – should current impacts be weighted differently than impacts harming future generations? Int J LCA 8(1):8–18 Hellweg S, Hofstetter TB, Hungerbühler K (2003) Discounting and the environment – should current impacts be weighted differently than impacts harming future generations? Int J LCA 8(1):8–18
Zurück zum Zitat Kenley CR, Armsteasd DC (2004) Discounting models for long-term decision making. Syst Eng 7(1):13–24CrossRef Kenley CR, Armsteasd DC (2004) Discounting models for long-term decision making. Syst Eng 7(1):13–24CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Komendantova N, Patt A, Barras L, Battaglini A (2010) Perception of risks in renewable energy projects: the case of concentrated solar power in North Africa. Energy Policy doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2009.12.008 (online first) Komendantova N, Patt A, Barras L, Battaglini A (2010) Perception of risks in renewable energy projects: the case of concentrated solar power in North Africa. Energy Policy doi:10.​1016/​j.​enpol.​2009.​12.​008 (online first)
Zurück zum Zitat Krewitt W, Teske S, Simon S, Pregger T, Graus W, Blomen E, Schmid S, Schäfer O (2009) Energy [R]evolution 2008 – a sustainable world energy perspective. Energy Policy 37(12):5764–5775CrossRef Krewitt W, Teske S, Simon S, Pregger T, Graus W, Blomen E, Schmid S, Schäfer O (2009) Energy [R]evolution 2008 – a sustainable world energy perspective. Energy Policy 37(12):5764–5775CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Manger S, Pietzcker R, Bauer N, Bruckner T, Luderer G (2009) Option values of concentrating solar power and photovoltaics for reaching a 2 °C climate target. www.gfz-potsdam.de Manger S, Pietzcker R, Bauer N, Bruckner T, Luderer G (2009) Option values of concentrating solar power and photovoltaics for reaching a 2 °C climate target. www.​gfz-potsdam.​de
Zurück zum Zitat Martinsen D, Linssen J, Markewitz P, Vögele S (2007) A future CO2 mitigation option for Germany? – a bottom-up approach. Energy Policy 35(4):2110–2120CrossRef Martinsen D, Linssen J, Markewitz P, Vögele S (2007) A future CO2 mitigation option for Germany? – a bottom-up approach. Energy Policy 35(4):2110–2120CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Newel RG, Pizer WA (2004) Uncertain discount rates in climate policy analysis. Energy Policy 32:519–529CrossRef Newel RG, Pizer WA (2004) Uncertain discount rates in climate policy analysis. Energy Policy 32:519–529CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Pietzcker R, Manger S, Bauer N, Luderer G, Bruckner T (2009) The role of concentrating solar power and photovoltaics for climate protection www.aaee.at Pietzcker R, Manger S, Bauer N, Luderer G, Bruckner T (2009) The role of concentrating solar power and photovoltaics for climate protection www.​aaee.​at
Zurück zum Zitat Rabl A (1996) Discounting of long-term costs: what would future generations prefer us to do? Ecol Econ 17:137–145CrossRef Rabl A (1996) Discounting of long-term costs: what would future generations prefer us to do? Ecol Econ 17:137–145CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Williges K, Lilliestam J, Patt A (2010) Making concentrated solar power competitive with coal: the costs of a European feed-in tariff. Energy Policy 38(6):3089–3097CrossRef Williges K, Lilliestam J, Patt A (2010) Making concentrated solar power competitive with coal: the costs of a European feed-in tariff. Energy Policy 38(6):3089–3097CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
The System Value of CCS Technologies in the Context of CO2 Mitigation Scenarios for Germany
verfasst von
Dag Martinsen
Heidi Heinrichs
Peter Markewitz
Wilhelm Kuckshinrichs
Copyright-Jahr
2015
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11943-4_10