Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen
Relatively low participation in the hard sciences (mathematics, science, engineering and technology) has become a concern with respect to the capacity of Australia to meet critical infrastructure projects. This problem has its roots in poor student attitudes towards and perceptions about the study of prerequisite subjects including mathematics and science. Perception formation commences early in students’ education where students have claimed that mathematics was not intrinsically useful and was difficult to understand. With this mind, an intervention was planned and implemented in which technology and design practice was used to integrate the study of mathematics so students could produce and explain a useful artefact. The integrated design project included a focus upon instructional and regulatory discourse. Useful integration tools were developed that facilitated positive cognitive discourses such that students demonstrated a functional understanding of mathematical concepts, reported a broader and more applied understanding of the nature of mathematics and a belief that integration had helped them to make more sense of mathematics.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) (2005). AAAS Mission. Available online: http://www.aaas.org/aboutaaas/.
Anderson, J. (1999). Being mathematically educated in the 21st century: What should it mean. In C. Hoyles, C. Morgan, & G. Woodhouse (Eds.), Rethinking the mathematics curriculum, (pp. 8–21). London: The Falmer Press.
Australian Academy of Science (AAS) (1994). Primary investigations: Teacher resource book: Energy and change. Canberra: Australian Academy of Science.
Australian Academy of Technological Sciences and Engineering (AATSE) (2002). The teaching of science and technology in Australian primary schools: A cause for concern. Melbourne: Australian Academy of Technological Sciences and Engineering.
Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers (1997). Numeracy in contemporary education. Numeracy = everyone’s business (pp. 11–16). Adelaide: Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers.
Australian Education Council (1989). The Hobart Declaration on Schooling, Retrieved 1.8.2005 from http://www.mceetya.edu.au/hobdec.htm.
Australian Science Technology and Engineering Council (1997). Foundations for Australia’s future science and technology in primary schools. Canberra, ACT: Australian Government Publishing Service.
Australian Science Teacher’s Association (ASTA) (2002). National professional standards for highly accomplished teachers of science. Canberra: ASTA.
Bell, P. (2004). On the theoretical breadth of design-based research in education. Educational Psychologist, 39(4), 243–253. CrossRef
Bereiter, C. (2002). Design research for sustained innovation. Cognitive Studies, Bulletin of the Japanese Cognitive Science Society, 9(3), 321–327.
Barrington, F. (2006). Participation in Year 12 Mathematics Across Australia 1995–2004. International Centre of Excellence in Mathematics and Australian Mathematical Science Institute. Melbourne: University of Melbourne.
Batterham, R. (2000). The chance to change final report of the chief scientist. Canberra, Australia: Commonwealth Government.
Bowler-Reyer, A. (1999). Becoming a woman in the 1970’s: Female adolescent sexual identity and popular literature. In S. R. Mazzarella & N. O. Pecora (Eds.), Growing up girls: Popular culture and the construction of identity (pp. 21–48). New York: Peter Lang.
Collins, A., Joseph, D., & Bielaczyc, K. (2004). Design research: Theoretical and methodological issues. Journal of the Learning Science, 13(1), 15–42. CrossRef
Cooper, T., Nuyen, A., & Baturo, A. (2003). Rich task project: Integrated mathematics outcomes with rich tasks within a productive pedagogies framework. Queensland University of Technology. Available from: http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&lr=&q=cache:dx6p-TQV0hEJ://www.ansearch.com.au/out%3Feducation.qld.gov.au/corporate/newbasics/pdfs/richtaskrep3-final-8.4.03.pdf+Nuyen+Cooper+Baturo.
Corte, E. (2004). Mainstreams and perspectives in research on learning (mathematics) from instruction. Applied Psychology, 53(2), 279. Available online http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/links/doi/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2004.00172.x/full/?cookieSet=1.
Curriculum Corporation (1994a). A statement on technology for Australian schools. Carlton, Victoria: Curriculum Corporation.
Curriculum Corporation (1994b). Technology—A curriculum profile for Australian schools. Carlton, Victoria: Curriculum Corporation.
Custer, R. (2003). Technology education in the United States—A status report. In G. Martin & H. Middleton (Eds.), Initiatives in technology education: Comparative perspectives. (pp. 16–29). Brisbane, Australia. Technical Foundation of America and the Centre for Technological Education Research: Griffith University.
Daniels, H. (2001). Bernstein and activity theory. In A. Morais, I. Neves, B. Davies, & H. Daniels (Eds.), Towards a sociology of pedagogy (pp. 99–112). New York: Peter Lang.
Davies, T. (1996). Modelling and creativity in design and technology. Retrieved 10 November 2005 from: http://www.lboro.ac.uk/idater/download96davies96.pdf.
De Bono, E. (2004). Thinking course: Powerful tools to transform your thinking. London: BBC Books.
Deek, F., Hiltz, S. R., Kimmel, H., & Rotter, N. (1999). Cognitive assessment of students’ problem solving and program development skills. Journal of Engineering Education, 88(3), 317–326.
Design-Based Research Collective (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5–8. CrossRef
Education Queensland (2001). New basics project; Technical paper. Retrieved July 1 2003, from: http://www.education.qld.gov.au/corporate/newbasics/docs/nbftech.doc.
Ethington, C. (1992). Gender differences in a psychological model of mathematics achievement. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23(2), 166–181. CrossRef
Guba, E., & Lincoln, Y. (1998). Fourth generation evaluation. Sage: Newbury Park, London.
Hoadley, C. M. (2004). Methodological alignment in design-based research. Educational Psychologist 39(4), 202–212. CrossRef
Hollingsworth, H., Lokan, J., & McRae, B. (2003). Teaching mathematics in Australia: Results from the TIMSS 1999 video study. Melbourne, Victoria: Australian Council for Educational Research.
Jones, G., Langton, C., Thornton, C., & Nesbit, S. (2002). Elementary students’ access to powerful mathematical ideas. In L. English (Ed.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (pp. 113–141). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Karplus, R., Pulos, S., & Stage, E. (1983). Proportional reasoning of early adolescents. In R. Lesh & M. Landan (Eds.), Acquisition of mathematical concepts and processes (pp. 44–90). Orlando: Academic Press.
Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (2000). Participatory action research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 567–606). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Khoo, S., & Ainley, J. (2005). Longitudinal surveys of Australian youth, Research report 41: Attitudes, intentions and participation. Camberwell, Victoria: Australians Council for Educational Research.
Liljedahl, P. (2005). Mathematics discovery and affect: Effect of the AHA! Experiences on undergraduate mathematics students. International Journal of Mathematics Education in Science and Technology, 36(2&3), 219–234. CrossRef
Macklin, J. (20005). Media Release 26 April 2005. http://jennymacklin.net.au/infocentre.asp?data=480E0F0504094F5851515E587E45555F48454B4E.
Markku, S. (2002). Attitude toward mathematics: Emotions, expectations and values. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 49(1), 67–81.
Murdoch, K., & Hornsby, D. (2003). Planning curriculum connections: Whole-school planning for integrated curriculum. South Yarra, Victoria: Eleanor Curtain Publishing.
Murphy, P. F., & Gibbs, C. V. (1996). Equity in the classroom: Towards effective pedagogy for girls and boys. London: The Falmer Press.
National Advisory Committee on Creative and Cultural Education (NACCCE) (1998). All our futures: Creativity, culture and education. Nottingham, UK: DfEE Publications.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) (2005). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Available online: http://www.standards.nctm.org/document/chapter1/index.htm.
Norby, R. (2003). It is a gender issue: Changes in attitudes towards science in a technology based K-8 pre-service preparation science classroom. Philadelphia: Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching.
Norton, S. J., McRobbie, C. J., & Ginns, I. S. (2004a). Studentes to design in a robotics challenge. In H. Middleton, M. Pavlova, & D. Roebuck (Eds.), International conference on technology in educational research, Gold Coast, 9–11th December, pp. 26–36.
Norton. S. J., McRobbie, C. J., & Ginns, I. S. (2004b). Using activity theory to investigate the influence of teachers’ beliefs upon their teaching of science through robotics. In the proceedings of the Australian computers in education conference, Adelaide, 5th–8th July.
Papert, S., & Harel, I. (1991). Situated constructivism. Retrieved 21 February 2002. From: http://www.papert.com/articles/SituatingConstructionism.html.
Qualter, A., Strang, J., Swatton, P., & Taylor, R. (1990). Exploration: A way of learning science. Oxford: Blackwell Education.
Queensland School Curriculum Council (1999). Science initial in-service materials. Brisbane, Queensland: The State of Queensland.
Queensland Studies Authority (QSA) (2003). Technology: Years 1–10 syllabus. Brisbane, Queensland: The State of Queensland.
Queensland Studies Authority (QSA) (2004a). Queensland Years 3, 5 and 7 tests in aspects of literacy and numeracy. Brisbane, Queensland: The State of Queensland.
Queensland Studies Authority (QSA) (2004b). Mathematics: Years 1 to 10 syllabus. Brisbane, Queensland: The State of Queensland.
Reid, N., & Skryabina, E. (2002). Attitude toward physics. Research in Science and Technology Education, 20(1), 67–81. CrossRef
Roth, W.-M., Tobin, K., & Ritchie, S. (2001). Re/constructing elementary science. New York: Peter Lang.
Singh, P. (2001). Pedagogic discourses and student resistance in Australian secondary schools. In A. Morais, I. Neves, B. Davies, & H. Daniels (Eds.), Towards a sociology of pedagogy (pp. 251–286). New York: Peter Lang.
Skamp, K. (2004). Teaching primary science constructively. South Bank, Victoria: Thompson.
Stepulevage, L. (2001). Gender/technology relations: Complicating the gender binary. Gender and Education, 13(3), 325–338. CrossRef
Thompson, A. G. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and conceptions: A synthesis of the research. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 127–146). New York: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Townend, S. (2001). Integrating case studies in engineering mathematics: A response to SARTOR 3. Teaching in Higher Education, 6(2), 203–215. CrossRef
Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority (VCAC) (2005). Victorian essential learning. Available online http://www.vels.vcaa.vic.edu.au/about/rationale/index.html.
Watt, H. (2005). Exploring adolescent motivations for pursuing maths-related careers. Australian Journal of Educational and Developmental Psychology, 5, 107–116.
Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68–81. CrossRef
William, E. D. (2003). Technological literacy. In G. Martin & H. Middleton (Eds.), Initiatives in technology education: Comparative perspectives (pp. 16–29). Brisbane, Australia.
Yin, R. (2003). Case study research design and methods. Sage Publications Inc.
Zubrowski, B. (2002). Integrating science into design technology projects: Using a standard model in the design process. Journal of Technology Education, 13(2), 48–67.
- The use of design practice to teach mathematics and science
Stephen John Norton
- Springer Netherlands
International Journal of Technology and Design Education
Print ISSN: 0957-7572
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-1804
Neuer Inhalt, AVL List GmbH/© AVL List GmbH, dSpace, BorgWarner, Smalley, Valeo Logo/© Valeo, FEV