Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Kongresse
Themenseiten
Künstliche Intelligenz Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Veranstaltungskalender Awards MyNewsletter Firmensuche
Kunden Login
Über Einzelzugang informieren
Über Unternehmenszugang informieren
Referenzkunden
Zukunftswerkstatt Sales Excellence 2025 | 08. Mai 2025

KI als Booster im Vertrieb

Lernen Sie von Digital-Experten, wie der gezielte Einsatz von KI-Unterstützung Ihrem Unternehmen in vielen Bereichen hilft, im Vertrieb einen Schritt voraus zu sein. Jetzt wieder live vor Ort teilnehmen in Frankfurt am Main!
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
TechTrends
Erschienen in:

04.06.2016 | Original Paper

The Use of Self-Regulated Learning Measure Questionnaires as a Predictor of Academic Success

verfasst von: Jackie L. Bruso, Jill E. Stefaniak

Erschienen in: TechTrends | Ausgabe 6/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This study examined the potential of utilizing the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) and the Online Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (OSLQ) as instruments in predicting academic success as measured by overall grade point average (GPA). These instruments were of particular interest because the MSLQ was designed to measure student motivation and the OSLQ was designed to include self-regulated learning within a distance learning environment. Participants of the study were 134 graduate students recruited from a large, urban university in the southeast region of the United States. Participants provided general demographic information and completed one survey that was composed of 81 questions from the MSLQ and 24 questions from the OSLQ. Results indicated that neither instrument was shown to be a more accurate predictor of academic success as measured by overall GPA. Results also indicated that independent variables such as age, gender, graduate status, department, and campus had no significant impact on either MSLQ or OSLQ scores.
Vorheriger Artikel Online Group Work Design: Processes, Complexities, and Intricacies
Nächster Artikel Graduate Students’ Readiness and Perceptions of the Pedagogical Application of Collaborative Video Logs
Literatur
Azevedo, R., & Cromley, J. G. (2004). Does training on self-regulated learning facilitate students’ learning with hypermedia? Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(3), 523–535.CrossRef
Barnard, L., Lan, W. Y., To, Y. M., Paton, V. O., & Lai, S. L. (2009). Measuring self-regulation in online and blended learning environments. Internet and Higher Education, 12(1), 1–6.CrossRef
Barnard-Brak, L., Paton, V. O., & Lan, W. Y. (2010). Profiles in self-regulated learning in the online learning environment. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 11(1), 61–80.
Byman, R., & Kansanen, P. (2008). Pedagogical thinking in a student’s mind: a conceptual clarification on the basis of self-determination and volition theories. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 52(6), 603–621.CrossRef
Chih-Yuan Sun, J., & Rueda, R. (2012). Situational interest, computer self-efficacy and self-regulation: their impact on student engagement in distance education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(2), 191–204.CrossRef
Corno, L., & Mandinach, E. B. (1983). The role of cognitive engagement in classroom learning and motivation. Educational Psychologist, 18(2), 88–108.CrossRef
Deimann, M., & Bastiaens, T. (2010). The role of volition in distance education: an exploration of its capacities. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 11(1), 1–16.
DiBenedetto, M., & Bembenutty, H. (2013). Within the pipeline: self-regulated learning, self-efficacy, and socialization among college students in science courses. Learning & Individual Differences, 23, 218–224.CrossRef
Dominguez, P. S., & Ridley, D. R. (2001). Assessing distance education courses and discipline differences in their effectiveness. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 28(1), 15–19.
Drake, K., Fearon, R. P., & Belsky, J. (2014). From early attachment to engagement with learning in school: the role of self-regulation and persistence. Developmental Psychology, 50(5), 1350–1361.CrossRef
Fay, D., & Frese, M. (2001). The concept of personal initiative: an overview of validity studies. Human Performance, 14(1), 97–124.CrossRef
Fish, L. A., & Snodgrass, C. R. (2014). A preliminary study of business student perceptions of online versus face-to-face education. The BRC Academy Journal of Education, 4(1), 1–21.
Hu, H., & Gramling, J. (2009). Learning strategies for success in a web-based course: a descriptive exploration. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 10(2), 123–134.
Jonassen, D., Davidson, M., Collins, M., Campbell, J., & Haag, B. B. (1995). Constructivism and computer-mediated communication in distance education. The American Journal of Distance Education, 9(2), 7–26.CrossRef
Kanuka, H. (2002). A principled approach to facilitating distance education: the Internet, higher education and higher levels of learning. Journal of Distance Education, 17(2), 70–86.
Kauffman, H. (2015). A review of predictive factors of student success in and satisfaction with online learning. Research in Learning Technology, 23.
King, F. B., Harner, M., & Brown, S. W. (2000). Self-regulatory behavior influences in distance learning. International Journal of Instructional Media, 27(2), 147–156.
Kirmizi, O. (2013). Investigating self-regulated learning habits of distance education students. Tarih Kültür ve Sanat Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2(2), 161–174.
Lawanto, O., Santoso, H. B., Goodridge, W., & Lawanto, K. N. (2014). Task value, self-regulated learning, and performance in a web-intensive undergraduate engineering course: how are they related? Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 10(1), 97–111.
Lynch, D. J. (2006). Motivational factors, learning strategies and resource management as predictors of course grades. College Student Journal, 40(2), 423.
Lynch, R., & Dembo, M. (2004). The relationship between self-regulation and online learning in a blended learning context. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 5(2).
McCann, E., & Turner, J. (2004). Increasing student learning through volitional control. The Teachers College Record, 106(9), 1695–1714.CrossRef
McCombs, B. L. (1984). Processes and skills underlying continuing intrinsic motivation skills training interventions. Educational Psychologist, 19(4), 199–218.CrossRef
McMahon, M., & Luca, J. (2001). Assessing students’ self-regulatory skills. In annual conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education, Melbourne, Australia.
Mega, C., Ronconi, L., & De Beni, R. (2014). What makes a good student? How emotions, self-regulated learning, and motivation contribute to academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(1), 121–131.CrossRef
Mezirow, J. (1990). How critical reflection triggers transformative learning. Fostering critical reflection in adulthood, 1–20.
Muilenburg, L. Y., & Berge, Z. L. (2005). Student barriers to online learning: a factor analytic study. Distance Education, 26(1), 29–48.CrossRef
Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane‐Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218.CrossRef
Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 385–407.CrossRef
Pintrich, P. R., & DeGroot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33–40.CrossRef
Ponton, M. K., Derrick, M. G., & Carr, P. B. (2005). The relationship between resourcefulness and persistence in adult autonomous learning. Adult Education Quarterly, 55(2), 116–128.CrossRef
Puzziferro, M. (2008). Online technologies self-efficacy and self-regulated learning as predictors of final grade and satisfaction in college-level online courses. The American Journal of Distance Education, 22(2), 72–89.CrossRef
Radovan, M. (2011). The relation between distance students’ motivation, their use of learning strategies, and academic success. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 10(1), 216–222.
Salomon, G. (1984). Television is easy and print is tough: the differential investment of mental effort in learning as a function of perceptions and attributions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(4), 647–658.CrossRef
Sanders, S. A., & Hirschbuhl, J. J. (2007). Effect of learner attributes, dialogue, and course structure on students’ satisfaction and performance in online allied health courses. Journal of Interactive Instruction Development, 20(1), 17–27.
Schunk, D. H. (1986). Verbalization and children’s self-regulated learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 11(4), 347–369.CrossRef
Shih, C. C., & Gamon, J. A. (2002). Relationships among learning strategies, patterns, styles, and achievement in web-based courses. Journal of Agricultural Education, 43(4), 1–11.CrossRef
Valle, A., Núñez, J. C., Cabanach, R. G., González-Pienda, J. A., Rodríguez, S., Rosário, P., et al. (2008). Self-regulated profiles and academic achievement. Psicothema, 20(4), 724–731.
Wang, S., & Lin, S. J. (2007). The application of social cognitive theory to web-based learning through NetPorts. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(4), 600–612.CrossRef
Whipp, J. L., & Chiarelli, S. (2004). Self-regulation in a web-based course: a case study. Educational Technology Research & Development, 52(4), 5–22.CrossRef
Zimmerman, B. (1989). A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(3), 329–339.CrossRef
Zimmerman, B. J. (1990). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: an overview. Educational Psychologist, 25(1), 3–17.CrossRef
Zimmerman, B. J. (1998). Academic studying and the development of personal skill: a self-regulatory perspective. Educational Psychologist, 33(2/3), 73–86.CrossRef
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: an overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64–70.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
The Use of Self-Regulated Learning Measure Questionnaires as a Predictor of Academic Success
verfasst von
Jackie L. Bruso
Jill E. Stefaniak
Publikationsdatum
04.06.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
TechTrends / Ausgabe 6/2016
Print ISSN: 8756-3894
Elektronische ISSN: 1559-7075
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0096-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2016

Incorporating Social Networking Sites into Traditional Pedagogy: a Case of Facebook

  • Original Paper

From Las Vegas to Jacksonville

  • Column: AECT President’s Message

Downtime as a Key to Novelty Generation: Understanding the Neuroscience of Creativity with Dr. Rex Jung

  • Column: Rethinking Technology & Creativity in the 21st Century

A Working Model for Complying with Accessibility Guidelines for Online Learning

  • Original Paper

Computational Thinking for All: Pedagogical Approaches to Embedding 21st Century Problem Solving in K-12 Classrooms

  • Open Access
  • Original Paper

Online Student Collaboration and FERPA Considerations

  • Original Paper

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise