Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Introduction: Reflections on Working Together—Through and Beyond Design Thinking Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2018 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Theoretical Foundations of Design Thinking

Part I: John E. Arnold’s Creative Thinking Theories

verfasst von : Julia P. A. von Thienen, William J. Clancey, Giovanni E. Corazza, Christoph Meinel

Erschienen in: Design Thinking Research

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Design thinking is acknowledged as a thriving innovation practice plus something more, something in the line of a deep understanding of innovation processes. At the same time, quite how and why design thinking works—in scientific terms—appeared an open question at first. Over recent years, empirical research has achieved great progress in illuminating the principles that make design thinking successful. Lately, the community began to explore an additional approach. Rather than setting up novel studies, investigations into the history of design thinking hold the promise of adding systematically to our comprehension of basic principles. This chapter makes a start in revisiting design thinking history with the aim of explicating scientific understandings that inform design thinking practices today. It offers a summary of creative thinking theories that were brought to Stanford Engineering in the 1950s by John E. Arnold.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Introduction: Reflections on Working Together—Through and Beyond Design Thinking
Nächstes Kapitel Quadratic Model of Reciprocal Causation for Monitoring, Improving, and Reflecting on Design Team Performance
Literatur
Adams, J. L. (1974). Conceptual blockbusting. Stanford, CA: Stanford Alumni Association.
Arnold, J. E. (1956). Problem solving—A creative approach (National Defense University, Publication No. L57-20). Washington, DC: Industrial College of the Armed Forces.
Arnold, J. E. (1953/2016). The Arcturus IV case study. Edited with an Introduction by John E. Arnold, Jr. (Stanford University, Engineering Case Program (1948–1972), Case Files, Stanford Digital Repository) (Original work published 1953).
Arnold, J. E. (1959/2016). Creative engineering. In W. J. Clancey (Ed.), Creative engineering: Promoting innovation by thinking differently (pp. 59–150). Stanford Digital Repository. http://​purl.​stanford.​edu/​jb100vs5745 (Original manuscript 1959).
Buchanan, R. (1992). Wicked problems in design thinking. Design Issues, 8(2), 5–21.CrossRef
Carleton, T., & Leifer, L. (2009). Stanford’s ME310 course as an evolution of engineering design. In R. Roy & E. Shehab (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th CIRP Design Conference – Competitive design (pp. 547–554). Cranfield: Cranfield University.
Corazza, G. E. (2016). Potential originality and effectiveness: The dynamic definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 28(3), 258–267.CrossRef
Corazza, G. E. (2017). Creativity and anticipation. In R. Poli (Ed.), Handbook of anticipation. Theoretical and applied aspects of the use of future in decision making. Springer.
Doorley, S., & Witthoft, S. (2012). Make space. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Dubberly, H. (2004). How do you design? A compendium of models. San Francisco: Dubberly Design Office.
Grots, A., & Pratschke, M. (2009). Design thinking – Kreativität als Methode. Marketing Review St. Gallen, 2, 18–23.CrossRef
Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444–454.CrossRef
Katz, B. (2016, March). Design thinking in design practice: A tale of two cities. Keynote speech at the Hasso Plattner Design Thinking Research Community Building Workshop, Stanford, United States of America.
Kelley, T., & Kelley, D. (2013). Creative confidence. New York: Crown Publishing.
Koberg, D., & Bagnall, J. (1972). The universal traveller. A soft-systems guide to: Creativity, problem-solving and the process of reaching goals. Los Altos, CA: William Kaufmann.
Koestler, A. (1949). Insight and outlook. New York: Macmillan.
Leifer, L. (1998). Design-team performance: Metrics and the impact of technology. In S. M. Brown & C. J. Seidner (Eds.), Evaluating corporate training: Models and issues (pp. 297–319). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRef
Mabogunje, A., Sonalkar, N., & Leifer, L. (2016). Design thinking: A new foundational science for engineering. International Journal of Engineering Education, 32(3B), 1540–1556.
Maslow, A. H. (2016). Emotional blocks to creativity. In W. J. Clancey (Ed.), Creative engineering: Promoting innovation by thinking differently (pp. 188–197). Stanford Digital Repository. http://​purl.​stanford.​edu/​jb100vs5745 (Original manuscript 1959).
McKim, R. H. (1972). Experiences in visual thinking. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing.
McKim, R. H. (2016). Designing for the whole man. In W. J. Clancey (Ed.), Creative engineering: Promoting innovation by thinking differently (pp. 198–217). Stanford Digital Repository. Available at: http://​purl.​stanford.​edu/​jb100vs5745. (Original manuscript 1959)
Meinel, C., & Leifer, L. (2011). Design thinking research. In H. Plattner, C. Meinel, & L. Leifer (Eds.), Design thinking. Understand – improve – apply (pp. xiii–xxxi). Heidelberg: Springer.
Meinel, C., & Weinberg, U. (2013). Innovatoren kann man ausbilden. Die HPI School of Design Thinking. Fachzeitschrift für Innovation. Organisation und Management, 03, 61–67.
Plattner, H. (2011). Foreword. In H. Plattner, C. Meinel, & L. Leifer (Eds.), Design thinking. Understand – improve – apply (pp. v–vi). Heidelberg: Springer.
Plattner, H., Meinel, C., & Weinberg, U. (2009). Design thinking. Innovation lernen. Ideenwelten öffnen. München: Mi-Wirtschaftsbuch.
Plattner, H., Meinel, C., & Leifer, L. (2011). Design thinking. Understand – improve – apply. Heidelberg: Springer.
Plattner, H., Meinel, C., & Leifer, L. (2012a). Design thinking research. Measuring performance in context. Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRef
Plattner, H., Meinel, C., & Leifer, L. (2012b). Design thinking research. Studying co-creation in practice. Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRef
Plattner, H., Meinel, C., & Leifer, L. (2014). Design thinking research. Building innovation eco-systems. Cham: Springer.
Plattner, H., Meinel, C., & Leifer, L. (2015). Design thinking research. Building innovators. Cham: Springer.
Plattner, H., Meinel, C., & Leifer, L. (2016). Design thinking research. Making design thinking foundational. Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRef
Rittel, H. (1972) On the planning crisis: Systems analysis of the ‘first and the second generations’ (Bedriftsøkonomen Nr. 8, pp. 390–396).
Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155–169.CrossRef
Roth, B. (2015a). The achievement habit. New York: Harper Collins.
Roth, B. (2015b). Design thinking in Stanford. In C. Meinel, U. Weinberg & T. Krohn (Eds.), Design thinking live (pp. 64–71; 250–251). Hamburg: Murmann.
Royalty, A., Oishi, L. N., & Roth, B. (2012). “I use it every day”: Pathways to adaptive innovation after graduate study in design thinking. In H. Plattner, C. Meinel, & L. Leifer (Eds.), Design thinking research. Measuring performance in context (pp. 95–105). Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRef
Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner. How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
von Thienen, J. P. A., Ford, C. & Meinel, C. (2016a, September). The emergence of design thinking in Californian engineering classes: Four historic concepts worth knowing. Presentation at the MIC Conference 2016: From creative brains to creative societies, Bologna, Italy.
von Thienen, J. P. A., Meinel, C., & Nicolai, C. (2014). How design thinking tools help to solve wicked problems. In H. Plattner, C. Meinel, & L. Leifer (Eds.), Design thinking research. Building innovation eco-systems (pp. 97–102). Cham: Springer.CrossRef
von Thienen, J. P. A., Noweski, C., Meinel, C., Lang, S., Nicolai, C., & Bartz, A. (2012a). What can design thinking learn from behavior group therapy? In H. Plattner, C. Meinel, & L. Leifer (Eds.), Design thinking research. Measuring performance in context (pp. 285–302). Berlin: Springer.CrossRef
von Thienen, J. P. A., Noweski, C., Rauth, I., Meinel, C., & Lang, S. (2012b). If you want to know who you are, tell me where you are: The importance of places. In H. Plattner, C. Meinel, & L. Leifer (Eds.), Design thinking research: Studying co-creation in practice (pp. 53–73). Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRef
von Thienen, J. P. A., Royalty, A., & Meinel, C. (2016b). Design thinking in higher education: How students become dedicated creative problem solvers. In C. Zhou (Ed.), Handbook of research on creative problem-solving skill development in higher education (pp. 306–328). IGI Global: Hershey.
Wallas, G. (1926). The art of thought. New York: Harcourt Brace.
Weinberg, U. (2016). Design thinking (Interview). Ideen & Management, Materialien für nachhaltige Unternehmensführung, 1, 4–7.
Metadaten
Titel
Theoretical Foundations of Design Thinking
verfasst von
Julia P. A. von Thienen
William J. Clancey
Giovanni E. Corazza
Christoph Meinel
Copyright-Jahr
2018
Buch
Design Thinking Research

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60966-9

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-60967-6

Copyright-Jahr: 2018

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60967-6_2