Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces
Erschienen in: Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces 4/2019

22.07.2019 | Original Paper

Time Well Spent with multimodal mobile interactions

verfasst von: Nadia Elouali

Erschienen in: Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces | Ausgabe 4/2019

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Mobile users lose a lot of time on their smartphones. They interact even with busy hands (hands-free interactions), distracted eyes (eyes-free interactions) and in different life situations (while walking, eating, working, etc.). The Time Well Spent (TWS) is a movement that aims to design applications which respect the users choices and availability. In this paper, we discuss how the multimodal mobile interactions and the TWS movement can support each other to protect the users time. We start by giving an overview of mobile multimodal interaction and highlighting the TWS concept. Then, we present our vision about applying mobile multimodality as a means to protect the users time. We show that multimodality can support the TWS by encouraging self-restraint, while the TWS supports multimodality by making the interaction modalities meaningful. Finally, we discuss our future works in this context.
Vorheriger Artikel GG Interaction: a gaze–grasp pose interaction for 3D virtual object selection
Nächster Artikel Object acquisition and selection using automatic scanning and eye blinks in an HCI system

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Fußnoten
Literatur
1.
Bolt R (1980) Put that there: voice and gesture at the graphics interface. In: Proceeding SIGGRAPH ’80 Proceedings of the 7th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques. ACM, New York, pp 262–270
2.
Elouali N, Rouillard J, Le Pallec X, Tarby J-C (2013) Multimodal interaction: a survey from model driven engineering and mobile perspectives. J Multimodal User Interfaces 7:351–370CrossRef
3.
Coutaz J, Nigay L, Salber D, Blandford A, May JY (1995) Four easy pieces for assessing the usability of multimodal interaction: the CARE properties. In: INTERACT’95, pp 115–120
4.
Zhang M, Li P, Yang P, Xiong J, Tian C (2016) Poster: Sonicnect: accurate hands-free gesture input system with smart acoustic sensing. In: MobiSys (Companion Volume)
5.
Tinwala H, MacKenzie IS (2009) Eyes-free text entry on a touchscreen phone. In: IEEE Toronto international conference science and technology for humanity TIC-STH 2009, pp 83–89
6.
Dicke C, Wolf K, Tal Y (2010) Foogue: eyes-free interaction for smartphones. In: MobileHCI’10
7.
Elouali N, Le Pallec X, Rouillard J, Tarby JC (2014) MIMIC: leveraging sensor-based interactions in multimodal mobile applications. In: CHI ’14 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems, pp 2323–2328
8.
Falaki H, Mahajan R, Kandula S, Lymberopoulos D, Govindan R, Estrin D (2010) Diversity in smartphone usage. In: ACM MobiSys
9.
Roberts JA, Pullig C, Manolis C (2015) I need my smartphone: a hierarchical model of personality and cell-phone addiction. Personal Individ Differ 79:139CrossRef
10.
Mark G, Shamsi TI, Czerwinski M, Johns P, Sano A, Yuliya L (2016) Email duration, batching and self-interruption: patterns of email use on productivity and stress. In: CHI’2016, pp 1717–1728
11.
Obrenovic Z, Starcevic D (2004) Modelling multimodal human-computer interaction. Computer 37:65–72CrossRef
12.
Bellik Y, Teil D (1992) Definitions Terminologiques pour la Communication Multimodale. In: IHM92, Quatrimes Journes sur lIngnierie des Interfaces Homme-Machine
13.
Nigay L, Coutaz J (1997) Multifeature systems: the CARE properties and their impact on software design. In: First international workshop on intelligence and multimodality in multimedia interfaces: research and applications, AAAI Press
14.
Kvale K, Warakagoda ND (2010) Multimodal interfaces to mobile terminals a design-for-all approach. In: User interfaces
15.
Bordegoni M, Faconti G, Feiner S, Maybury MT, Rist T, Ruggieri S, Trahanias P, Wilson M (1997) A standard reference model for intelligent multimedia presentation systems. In: Rist et al., pp 477–496
16.
Bellik Y (1995) Interface Multimodales: Concepts, Modles et Architectures. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Paris XI, France
17.
Bouchet J, Nigay L (2004) ICARE: a component-based approach for the design and development of multimodal interfaces. In: CHI extended abstracts, pp. 1325–1328
18.
Martin JC (1999) TYCOON: six primitive types of cooperation for observing, evaluating and specifying cooperations. In: AAAI fall, symposium on psychological models of communication in collaborative systems
19.
Martin JC (1997) Towards intelligent cooperation between modalities. The example of a system enabling multimodal interaction with a map. In: IJCAI-97 workshop on intelligent multimodal systems
20.
McNab T, James DA, Rowlands D (2011) iphone sensor platforms: applications to sports monitoring. Proc Eng 13:507–512CrossRef
21.
Lane ND, Miluzzo E, Lu H, Peebles D, Choudhury T, Campbell AT (2010) A survey of mobile phone sensing. Commun Mag 48(9):140–150CrossRef
22.
Phansalkar N, Kumthekar N, Mulay M, Khedkar S, Shinde GR (2014) Air Gesture Library for Android using Camera. Int J Eng Res Technol (IJERT)
23.
Elouali N (2014) Approche base de modles pour la construction dapplications mobiles multimodales. Ph.D. thesis, Lille 1 University
24.
Karlson AKBBB (2006) Understanding single-handed mobile device interaction. Technical report
25.
Roudaut A (2010) Conception et valuation de techniques dinteraction pour dispositifs mobiles. Ph.D. thesis, Telecom ParisTech, France
26.
Foucault C, Micaux M, Bonnet D, Beaudouin-Lafon M (2014) Spad: a bimanual interaction technique for productivity applications on multi-touch tablets. In: CHI 14 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems. CHI EA 14. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp 1879–884
27.
Naumann A, Wechsung I, Hurtienne J (2009) Multimodality, inclusive design, and intuitive use. Is prior experience the same as intuition in the context of inclusive design
28.
Abdallah El Ali A (2013) Minimal mobile human computer interaction. Ph.D. thesis, University van Amsterdam, Pays-Bas
29.
Oulasvirta A, Reichel A, Li W, Zhang Y, Bachynskyi M, Vertanen K, Kristensson PO (2013) Improving two-thumb text entry on touchscreen devices. In: SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, CHI 13, pp. 2765–2774. ACM, New York, NY, USA
30.
Xiao B, Girand C, Oviatt S (2002) Multimodal integration patterns in children. In: ICSLP02, pp. 629–632
31.
Xiao B, Lunsford R, Coulston R, Wesson M, Oviatt S (2003) Modeling multimodal integration patterns and performance in seniors: toward adaptive processing of individual differences. In: The fifth international conference on multimodal interfaces. ACM Press, pp. 265–272
32.
Dabbish L, Mark G, Gonzalez V (2011) Why do i keep interrupting myself?: environment, habit and self-interruption. In: CHI’11
33.
Patil P, Sawant K, Desai S, Shinde A (2018) Task trigger: reminder application based on location. Int Res J Eng Technol (IRJET)
34.
Khamis M, Hassib M, Zezschwitz E, Bulling A, Alt F (2017) GazeTouchPIN: protecting sensitive data on mobile devices using secure multimodal authentication. In: Proceedings of the 19th ACM international conference on multimodal interaction (ICMI 2017)
35.
Bastien JC, Scapin DL (1993) Ergonomic criteria for the evaluation of human-computer interfaces. Doctoral dissertation. Inria. France
36.
Turk M (2014) Multimodal interaction: a review. Pattern Recognit Lett 36:189–195CrossRef
37.
Elouali N (2018) How young Algerians interact with their smartphones. In: Third international conference on multimedia information processing CITIM, Algeria
38.
Bellal Z, Elouali N, Benslimane SM (2017) Une approche de programmation par dmonstration pour lintgration de la multimodalitsous mobile. IHM’17, Poitiers
39.
Bedjaoui M, Elouali N, Benslimane S (2018) User time spent between persuasiveness and usability of social networking mobile applications: a case study of Facebook and YouTube. In: The 16th international conference on advances in mobile computing and multimedia (MoMM)
Metadaten
Titel
Time Well Spent with multimodal mobile interactions
verfasst von
Nadia Elouali
Publikationsdatum
22.07.2019
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces / Ausgabe 4/2019
Print ISSN: 1783-7677
Elektronische ISSN: 1783-8738
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12193-019-00310-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2019

Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces 4/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Original Paper

Model driven approach for adapting user interfaces to the context of accessibility: case of visually impaired users

Original Paper

Thumb touch control range and usability factors of virtual keys for smartphone games

Original Paper

Design and evaluation of a time adaptive multimodal virtual keyboard

Original Paper

SliceType: fast gaze typing with a merging keyboard

Original Paper

Haptic feedback combined with movement sonification using a friction sound improves task performance in a virtual throwing task

Correction

Correction to: Haptic feedback combined with movement sonification using a friction sound improves task performance in a virtual throwing task