Skip to main content

2017 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

5. Too Powerful or Just Doing Their Job? Explaining Differences in Conceptions of Media Power Among Politicians and Journalists

verfasst von : Rens Vliegenthart, Morten Skovsgaard

Erschienen in: How Political Actors Use the Media

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Within the broader debate about media and politics, a remarkable observation is that journalists and politicians evaluate the size of the political influence of the media fundamentally differently. While politicians tend to emphasize the strong influence of media over their work, journalists tend to downplay this impact. This chapter discusses and empirically tests several explanations for this gap in perceptions. Derived from literature on mediatization, journalistic role perceptions, and political agenda setting, several explanations are put forward. Based on existing comparative surveys with journalists and politicians, and some additional additionally in-depth interviews with Dutch and Danish politicians and journalists, this chapter investigates how we can explain these different evaluations of the political power of the media.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Altheide, D., & Snow, R. P. (1979). Media logic. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Altheide, D., & Snow, R. P. (1979). Media logic. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Zurück zum Zitat Cappella, J., & Jamieson, K. (1997). The spiral of cynicism: The press and the public good. New York: Oxford University Press. Cappella, J., & Jamieson, K. (1997). The spiral of cynicism: The press and the public good. New York: Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Cook, T. E. (2005). Governing with the news: The news media as a political institution (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago.CrossRef Cook, T. E. (2005). Governing with the news: The news media as a political institution (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Couldry, N., & Hepp, A. (2013). Conceptualizing mediatization: Contexts, traditions, arguments. Communication Theory, 23(3), 191–202.CrossRef Couldry, N., & Hepp, A. (2013). Conceptualizing mediatization: Contexts, traditions, arguments. Communication Theory, 23(3), 191–202.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Esser, F. (2013). Mediatization as a challenge: Media logic versus political logic. In Democracy in the age of globalization and mediatization (pp. 155–176). New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Esser, F. (2013). Mediatization as a challenge: Media logic versus political logic. In Democracy in the age of globalization and mediatization (pp. 155–176). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Zurück zum Zitat Esser, F., & Strömbäck, J. (2014). Mediatization of politics: Understanding the transformation of Western democracies. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef Esser, F., & Strömbäck, J. (2014). Mediatization of politics: Understanding the transformation of Western democracies. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Esser, F., Reinemann, C., & Fan, D. P. (2001). Spin doctors in the United States, Great Britain and Germany. Metacommunication about media manipulation. The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 6(1), 16–45. Esser, F., Reinemann, C., & Fan, D. P. (2001). Spin doctors in the United States, Great Britain and Germany. Metacommunication about media manipulation. The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 6(1), 16–45.
Zurück zum Zitat Fengler, S., & Ruß-Mohl, S. (2008). Journalists and the information-attention markets: Towards an economic theory of journalism. Journalism, 9(6), 667–690.CrossRef Fengler, S., & Ruß-Mohl, S. (2008). Journalists and the information-attention markets: Towards an economic theory of journalism. Journalism, 9(6), 667–690.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Green-Pedersen, C., & Stubager, R. (2010). The political conditionality of mass media. When do parties follow mass media attention? British Journal of Political Science, 40(3), 663–677.CrossRef Green-Pedersen, C., & Stubager, R. (2010). The political conditionality of mass media. When do parties follow mass media attention? British Journal of Political Science, 40(3), 663–677.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hanitzsch, T. (2011). Populist disseminators, detached watchdogs, critical change agents and opportunist facilitators: Professional milieus, the journalistic field and autonomy in 18 countries. International Communication Gazette, 73(6), 477–494.CrossRef Hanitzsch, T. (2011). Populist disseminators, detached watchdogs, critical change agents and opportunist facilitators: Professional milieus, the journalistic field and autonomy in 18 countries. International Communication Gazette, 73(6), 477–494.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Helfer, L. (2016). Media effects on politicians; An individual-level political agenda-setting experiment. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 21(2), 233–252.CrossRef Helfer, L. (2016). Media effects on politicians; An individual-level political agenda-setting experiment. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 21(2), 233–252.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hjarvard, S. (2013). The mediatization of culture and society. Abingdon: Routledge. Hjarvard, S. (2013). The mediatization of culture and society. Abingdon: Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Hopmann, D., Shehata, A., & Strömbäck, J. (2015). Contagious media effects: How media use and exposure to game-framed news influence media trust. Mass Communication & Society, 18(6), 776–798.CrossRef Hopmann, D., Shehata, A., & Strömbäck, J. (2015). Contagious media effects: How media use and exposure to game-framed news influence media trust. Mass Communication & Society, 18(6), 776–798.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jacobs, K., & Spierings, N. (2016). Social media, parties, and political inequalities. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef Jacobs, K., & Spierings, N. (2016). Social media, parties, and political inequalities. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Janowitz, M. (1975). Professional models in journalism: The gatekeeper and the advocate. Journalism Quarterly, 52(4), 218–226, 262. Janowitz, M. (1975). Professional models in journalism: The gatekeeper and the advocate. Journalism Quarterly, 52(4), 218–226, 262.
Zurück zum Zitat Johnstone, J. W. C., Slawski, E. J., & Bowman, W. W. (1972–1973). The professional values of American newsmen. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(4), 522–540. Johnstone, J. W. C., Slawski, E. J., & Bowman, W. W. (1972–1973). The professional values of American newsmen. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(4), 522–540.
Zurück zum Zitat Kaplan, R. L. (2006). The news about new institutionalism: Journalism’s ethic of objectivity and its political origins. Political Communication, 23(2), 173–185.CrossRef Kaplan, R. L. (2006). The news about new institutionalism: Journalism’s ethic of objectivity and its political origins. Political Communication, 23(2), 173–185.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat McNair, B. (1998). The sociology of journalism. London: Arnold. McNair, B. (1998). The sociology of journalism. London: Arnold.
Zurück zum Zitat McQuail, D. (2005). Mass communication theory (5th ed.). London: Sage. McQuail, D. (2005). Mass communication theory (5th ed.). London: Sage.
Zurück zum Zitat O’Neill, D., & Harcup, T. (2009). News values and selectivity. In K. Wahl-Jørgensen & T. Hanitzsch (Eds.), The handbook of journalism studies (pp. 161–174). London: Routledge. O’Neill, D., & Harcup, T. (2009). News values and selectivity. In K. Wahl-Jørgensen & T. Hanitzsch (Eds.), The handbook of journalism studies (pp. 161–174). London: Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Patterson, T. E. (1998). The political roles of the journalist. In D. Graber, D. McQuail, & P. Norris (Eds.), The politics of news; The news of politics (pp. 23–39). Washington, DC: CQ Press. Patterson, T. E. (1998). The political roles of the journalist. In D. Graber, D. McQuail, & P. Norris (Eds.), The politics of news; The news of politics (pp. 23–39). Washington, DC: CQ Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Skovsgaard, M., Albæk, E., Bro, P., & de Vreese, C. (2013). A reality check: How journalists’ role perceptions impact their implementation of the objectivity norm. Journalism, 14(1), 22–42.CrossRef Skovsgaard, M., Albæk, E., Bro, P., & de Vreese, C. (2013). A reality check: How journalists’ role perceptions impact their implementation of the objectivity norm. Journalism, 14(1), 22–42.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Strömbäck, J. (2005). In search of a standard: Four models of democracy and their normative implications for journalism. Journalism Studies, 6(3), 331–345.CrossRef Strömbäck, J. (2005). In search of a standard: Four models of democracy and their normative implications for journalism. Journalism Studies, 6(3), 331–345.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Strömbäck, J., & Van Aelst, P. (2013). Why political parties adapt to the media: Exploring the fourth dimension of mediatization. International Communication Gazette, 75(4), 341–358.CrossRef Strömbäck, J., & Van Aelst, P. (2013). Why political parties adapt to the media: Exploring the fourth dimension of mediatization. International Communication Gazette, 75(4), 341–358.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Tuchman, G. (1972). Objectivity as strategic ritual: An examination of newsmen’s notions of objectivity. American Journal of Sociology, 77(4), 660–679.CrossRef Tuchman, G. (1972). Objectivity as strategic ritual: An examination of newsmen’s notions of objectivity. American Journal of Sociology, 77(4), 660–679.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Van Aelst, P., & Walgrave, S. (2016). Information and arena: The dual function of the news media for political elites. Journal of Communication, 66(3), 496–518.CrossRef Van Aelst, P., & Walgrave, S. (2016). Information and arena: The dual function of the news media for political elites. Journal of Communication, 66(3), 496–518.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Van Aelst, P., Shehata, A., & Van Dalen, A. (2010). Members of parliament: Equal competitors for media attention? An analysis of personal contacts between MPs and political journalists in five European countries. Political Communication, 27(3), 310–325.CrossRef Van Aelst, P., Shehata, A., & Van Dalen, A. (2010). Members of parliament: Equal competitors for media attention? An analysis of personal contacts between MPs and political journalists in five European countries. Political Communication, 27(3), 310–325.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Vliegenthart, R., Walgrave, S., Baumgartner, F. R., Bevan, S., Breunig, C., Brouard, S., et al. (2016). Do the media set the parliamentary agenda? A comparative study in seven countries. European Journal of Political Research, 55(2), 283–301.CrossRef Vliegenthart, R., Walgrave, S., Baumgartner, F. R., Bevan, S., Breunig, C., Brouard, S., et al. (2016). Do the media set the parliamentary agenda? A comparative study in seven countries. European Journal of Political Research, 55(2), 283–301.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Too Powerful or Just Doing Their Job? Explaining Differences in Conceptions of Media Power Among Politicians and Journalists
verfasst von
Rens Vliegenthart
Morten Skovsgaard
Copyright-Jahr
2017
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60249-3_5