nach oben

Journal of Visualization

Erschienen in:

16.03.2021 | Regular Paper

Topological modifications due to ramped vanes in a flare-induced shock–boundary layer interaction flowfield

verfasst von: T. Nilavarasan, G. N. Joshi, A. Misra, C. Manisankar, S. B. Verma

Erschienen in: Journal of Visualization | Ausgabe 5/2021

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Effect of ′ramped vane′-type vortex generators on a shock-induced flow separation in the vicinity of an axisymmetric compression corner was evaluated. Numerical simulations were performed at Mach 2 on a cone–cylinder–flare model with a flare angle of 24°. The undisturbed boundary layer thickness (δ) at the location of the compression corner was 5 mm. A single array of these vortex generators with a device height of 0.28δ (1.4 mm) was placed on the cylinder surface at different streamwise positions, viz. 5δ, 10δ and 15δ upstream of the compression corner, and their ability to manipulate the shock–boundary layer interaction flowfield was compared. The presence of these devices caused substantial changes in the interaction region and the separation bubble structure. The separation bubble transformed into a series of spade-shaped structures with pockets of attached flow in between them. The ramped vanes increased the separation length along the device centreline, but this effect was attenuated considerably, by bringing them closer to the interaction region. Moving the ramped vanes closer also had a collapsing effect on the spade-shaped structures, which simultaneously widened the attached flow zones in between them.

Graphic Abstract

Vorheriger Artikel A new dynamic masking technique for time resolved PIV analysis

Nächster Artikel A comparative analysis for visualizing the temporal evolution of contact networks: a user study

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Ahmed MYM, Qin N (2010) Drag reduction using aerodisks for hypersonic hemispherical bodies. J Spacecr Rockets 47(1):62–80. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.46655CrossRef

Anderson BH, Tinapple J. and Surber J (2006) Optimal Control of Shock Wave Turbulent Boundary Layer Interaction using Micro Array Actuation. 3rd AIAA Flow Control Conference, AIAA Paper 2006 – 3197. doi: https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2006-3197

Andreopoulos J, Muck KC (1987) Some new aspects of the shock wave boundary layer interaction in compression ramp flows. J Fluid Mech 180:405–428. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112087001873CrossRef

Ashill PR, Fulker JL and Hackett KC, (2002) Studies of flows induced by Sub Boundary layer Vortex Generators (SBVGs). AIAA Paper. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2002-968CrossRef

Babinsky H, Edwards JA (1996) On the incipient separation of a turbulent hypersonic boundary layer. Aeronaut J 100(996):209–214. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0001924000067166CrossRef

Babinsky H, Li Y, Pitt Ford CW (2009) Microramp control of oblique shock-wave/boundary-layer interactions. AIAA J 47(3):668–675. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.38022CrossRef

Barter JW, Dolling DS (1995) Reduction of Fluctuating Pressure Loads in Shock/Boundary Layer Interactions using Vortex Generators. AIAA J 33(10):1842–1849. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.12736CrossRef

Blevins RD, BofIlios D, Holehouse I, Hwa VW, Tratt MD, Laganelli AL, Pozefsky P and Pierucci M (2009) Thermo-Vibro-Acoustic loads and fatigue of hypersonic flight vehivle structure. AFRL-RB-WP-TR-2009–3139

Cole HA, Erickson AL and Rainey AG (1970) Buffeting during atmospheric ascent. NASA SP-8001

Coleman GT, Stollery JL (1973) Incipient Separation of Axially symmetric Hypersonic Turbulent Boundary Layers. AIAA Journal 12(1):119–120. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.49175CrossRef

Delery J (2013) Three-dimensional Separated Flow Topology: Critical Points. Separation Lines and Vortical Structures, John Wiley and Sons Inc, USACrossRef

Dolling DS, Murphy MT (1983) Unsteadiness of the separation shock wave structure in a supersonic compression ramp flow field. AIAA J 21(12):1628–1634. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.60163CrossRef

Dolling DS, Brusniak L (1989) Separation shock motion in fin, cylinder, and compression ramp - induced turbulent interactions. AIAA J 27(6):734–742. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.10173CrossRef

Dolling DS (2001) Fifty years of shock-wave/boundary-layer interaction research: what next? AIAA J 39(8):1517–1531. https://doi.org/10.2514/2.1476CrossRef

Edney B (1968) Anomalous heat transfer and pressure distributions on blunt bodies at hypersonic speeds in the presence of impinging shock FFA Report. Bromma, Aeronautical Research Institute of SwedenCrossRef

Erengil ME, Dolling DS (1993) Effect of sweepback on unsteady separation in Mach 5 compression ramp interactions. AIAA J 31(2):302–311. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.60176CrossRef

Ericcson LE, Reding JP (1965) Analysis of flow separation effects on the dynamics of a large space booster. J of Spacecr Rockets 2(4):481–490. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.28216CrossRef

Estruch-Samper D, Vanstone L, Hillier R, Ganapathisubramani B (2015) Micro vortex generator control of axisymmetric high-speed laminar boundary layer separation. Shock Waves 25(5):521533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00193-014-0514-7CrossRef

Giepman RHM, Schrijer FFJ, van Oudheusden BW (2014) Flow control of an oblique shock wave reflection with micro-ramp vortex generators: Effect of location and size. Phys Fluids 26(066101):1–16. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4881941CrossRef

Ginoux JJ (1971) Streamwise vortices in reattaching high speed flows: A suggested approach. AIAA J 9(4):759–760. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.6271CrossRef

Grilli M, Hickel S, Adams NA (2013) Large eddy simulation of a supersonic turbulent boundary layer over a compression-expansion ramp. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 42:79–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2012.12.006CrossRef

Heffener KS, Chpoun A, and Lengrand JC (1993) Experimental Study of Transitional Axisymmetric Shock-Boundary Layer Interactions at Mach 5. 23rd Fluid Dynamics, Plasmadynamics and Lasers Conference, AIAA Paper 1993–3131, doi: https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1993-3131

Holden HA, and Babinsky H (2004) Vortex Generators Near Shock/Boundary Layer Interactions. 42nd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, AIAA Paper 2004–1242. doi: https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2004-1242

Kistler AL (1964) Fluctuating wall pressure under a separated supersonic flow. J Acoust Soc Am 36(3):543–550. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1918998CrossRef

Kontis K, Stollery JL (1999) Incipient Separation on flared bodies at hypersonic speeds. Aeronaut J 103(1027):405–414. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0001924000027950CrossRef

Kuehn DM (1962) Laminar boundary-layer separation induced by flares on cylinders at zero angle of attack. Technical Report R-146.

Lee S, Loth E, Babinsky H (2011) Normal shock boundary layer control with various vortex generator geometries. Computer and Fluids. 49:233–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2011.06.003CrossRefMATH

Lee S, Loth E (2012) Impact of ramped vanes on normal shock boundary layer interaction. AIAA J 50(10):2069–2079. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J051253CrossRef

Lee S, Loth E (2018) On ramped vanes to control normal shock boundary layer interactions. Aeronaut J 122(1256):1568–1585. https://doi.org/10.1017/aer.2018.88CrossRef

Lighthill JM (1963) Attachment And Separation In Three-Dimensional Flow. In: Rosenhead L (ed) Laminar Boundary-Layer Theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, pp 77–82

Liou MS, Steffen C (1993) A new flux splitting scheme. J Comput Phys 107(1):23–39. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcph.1993.1122MathSciNetCrossRefMATH

Lu FK (2015) Visualization of supersonic flow around a sharp-edged, sub boundary-layer protuberance. J Visualization 18(4):619–629. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12650-014-0272-8CrossRef

Martis RR, Misra A (2017) Separation attenuation in swept shock wave-boundary layer interactions using different micro vortex generator geometries. Shock Waves 27(5):747–760. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00193-016-0690-8CrossRef

Maull DJ (1960) Hypersonic flow over axially symmetric spiked bodies. J Fluid Mech 4:584–592. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112060000815MathSciNetCrossRef

Narayanaswamy V, Raja LL, Clemens NT (2010) Characterization of a high-frequency pulsed-plasma jet actuator for supersonic flow control. AIAA J 48(2):297–305. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.41352CrossRef

Nilavarasan T, Joshi GN, Misra A, Manisankar C, and Verma SB (2019) Control of Flare Induced Shock–Boundary Layer Interaction using Micro Vortex Generators. Proceedings of the 32nd International Symposium on Shock Waves, Singapore, 2019. doi: https://doi.org/10.3850/978-981-11-2730-4_0094-cd

Nilavarasan T, Joshi GN, Misra A (2020) Effect of microramps on flare induced shock–boundary layer interaction. The Aeronaut J 124(1271):121–149. https://doi.org/10.1017/aer.2019.138CrossRef

Panaras AG, Lu FK (2015) Micro-vortex generators for shock wave/boundary layer interactions. Prog Aerosp Sci 74:16–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paerosci.2014.12.006CrossRef

Priebe S, Martin MP (2012) Low frequency unsteadiness in shock wave - turbulent boundary layer interaction. J Fluid Mech 699:1–49. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2011.560CrossRefMATH

Raman KR (1974) A study of surface pressure fluctuations in hypersonic turbulent boundary layers. NASA CR-2386.

Ramaswamy DP, Schreyer A-M (2019) Effect of jet spacing in separation control with air jet vortex generators. AIAA Paper. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2019-1653CrossRef

Roshko A, Thomke GJ (1976) Flare-induced interaction lengths in supersonic. Turbul Bound Layers AIAA J 14(7):873–879. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.61429CrossRef

Rybalko M, Babinsky H, Loth E (2010) VGs for a normal SBLI with a downstream diffuser. AIAA Paper. https://doi.org/10.2514/2010-4464CrossRef

Schreyer A-M, Sahoo D, Smits AJ (2011) Experiments on the influence of a microramp array on a hypersonic shock turbulent boundary layer interaction. AIAA Paper. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2011-3428CrossRef

Settles GS (2001) Schlieren and Shadowgraph techniques Visualizing phenomena in transparent media. Verlag Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-56640-0CrossRefMATH

Settles GS, Bogdonoff SM, Vas IE (1976) Incipient separation of a supersonic turbulent boundary layer at high reynolds numbers. AIAA Journal 14(1):50–56. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.61331CrossRef

Souverein LJ, Debieve JF (2010) Effects of air jet vortex generators on a shock wave boundary layer interaction. Exp Fluids 49(5):1053–1064. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-010-0854-8CrossRef

Spalart PR and Allmaras SR (1992) A One-Equation Turbulence Model for Aerodynamic Flows. 30th Aerospace Sciences Exhibit, AIAA Paper 1992–0439. doi: https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1992-439

Sriram R, Jagadeesh G (2014) Shock tunnel experiments on control of shock induced large separation bubble using boundary layer bleed. Aerosp Sci Technol 36(7):87–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2014.04.003CrossRef

Su C, Li Y, Cheng B, Wang J, Cao J (2010) MHD flow control of oblique shock waves around ramps in low-temperature supersonic flows. Chin J Aeronaut 23(1):22–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/P1000-9361(09)60183-7CrossRef

Taylor GI, Maccoll JW (1933) The air pressure on a Cone Moving at High Speeds–I. Proc R Soc Lond Ser A 139(838):278–297. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1933.0018CrossRefMATH

Titchener N, Babinsky H (2015) A review of the use of vortex generators for mitigating shock-induced separation. Shock Waves 25(5):473–494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00193-015-0551-xCrossRef

Upadhya AR and Somashekar BR (1984) Review of launch vehicle related aeroelastic instability studies at NAL. In: Analysis of structures – A commemorative volume published on the occasion of the 60th anniversary of Dr. S.R. Valluri, NAL Bengaluru, India.

Verma SB, Koppenwallner G (2002) Unsteady separation in flare-induced hypersonic shock-wave-boundary-layer interaction flowfield. J Spacecr Rockets 39(3):467–470. https://doi.org/10.2514/2.3831CrossRef

Verma SB, Manisankar C, Raju C (2012) Control of shock unsteadiness in shock boundary layer interaction on a compression corner using a mechanical vortex generators. Shock Waves 22(4):327–339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00193-012-0369-8CrossRef

Verma SB, Manisankar C (2017) Assessment of various low-profile Mechanical vortex generators in controlling a shock induced separation. AIAA J 55(7):1–13. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J055446CrossRef

Verma SB, Manisankar C (2018) Control of incident shock – induced separation using vane-type vortex generating devices. AIAA J 56(4):1600–1615. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J056460CrossRef

Verma SB, Manisankar C (2019) Study of Compression-Ramp-Induced Interaction with Steady Microjets. AIAA J 57(7):2892–2904. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J057509CrossRef

Volpiani PS, Bernardini M, Larsson J (2018) Effects of a non-adiabatic wall on supersonic shock boundary layer interactions. Phy Rev Fluids. 3(8):083401. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2018-1806CrossRef

Xue DW, Chen ZH, Jiang XH, Fan BC (2014) Numerical investigations on the wake structures of micro-ramps and micro-vanes. Fluid Dyn Res 46(015505):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1088/0169-5983/46/1/015505CrossRef

Yan Y, Chen L, Lee Q and Liu C, (2017) Numerical study of micro-ramp vortex generator for supersonic ramp flow control at Mach 2.5. Shock Waves 27(1): 79–96. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00193-016-0633-4

Titel: Topological modifications due to ramped vanes in a flare-induced shock–boundary layer interaction flowfield
verfasst von: T. Nilavarasan
G. N. Joshi
A. Misra
C. Manisankar
S. B. Verma
Publikationsdatum: 16.03.2021
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Journal of Visualization / Ausgabe 5/2021
Print ISSN: 1343-8875
Elektronische ISSN: 1875-8975
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12650-020-00735-x

Springer Professional

Abstract

Graphic Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2021

Correction to: Visual dimension analysis based on dimension subdivision

SemanticAxis: exploring multi-attribute data by semantic construction and ranking analysis

Visual analysis of droplet dynamics in large-scale multiphase spray simulations

Recent advances and challenges in uncertainty visualization: a survey

Experimental analysis of two-period quasi-periodic oscillations in a turbulent hydrogen combustor

Photo4Action: phone camera-based interaction for graph visualizations on large wall displays