Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Business Ethics 3/2018

03.03.2016

Towards an Understanding of Social Responsibility Within the Church of England

verfasst von: Krystin Zigan, Alan Le Grys

Erschienen in: Journal of Business Ethics | Ausgabe 3/2018

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This research explores the interplay of individual, organisational and institutional variables that produce the current pattern of social responsibility practices within a specific religious organisation, namely the Church of England. By combining elements primarily of neo-institutional theory with Bourdieu’s theory of practice, we construct a theoretical framework to examine the extent to which social responsibility activity is modified or informed by a distinctive faith perspective. Given that neo-institutional theory predicts a convergence of structures and practices between different organisations operating in the same institutional sector, this research draws on a single case study focusing on social responsibility activity in six different Church of England dioceses and shows that the opposite is actually the case: there is evidence of a significant degree of divergence in terms of organisational practice within the same institutional structure. Reasons for that were found to be the impact of human agency and loose institutional structures. This paper thus contributes to the understanding of social responsibility in religious organisations by exploring the dynamics between institutional pressures, organisational context and individual agents operating in the field of faith-based social responsibility. It thereby also contributes to neo-institutional theory.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Fußnoten
1
‘Kingdom values’ are difficult to define, but the idea is often used in Church circles as an umbrella term holding together a range of ethical aspirations. The Sermon on the Mount (Matthew 5–7) and Luke 4.16–20 are sometimes cited as key biblical reference points, suggesting a number of values said to be characteristic of Jesus’ followers: these include the quality of relationships between people (love, mutual care, forgiveness, giving way to each other, etc.) as well as issues of social justice. Social justice, in turn, is defined in Old Testament terms as the ethical responsibilities individuals and communities have towards each other. The ‘Isaiah Manifesto’ in Isaiah 61.1–4, which seems to lie behind the sermon Luke associates with Jesus in Luke 4.16–20, is highly critical of the failure of Israel to maintain such social justice, and calls on the people of God (in generic terms) to bring good news to the oppressed, bind up the broken-hearted, proclaim liberty to the captives and release to the prisoners; and proclaim the year of the Lord’s favour—the Jubilee year of Leviticus 25, which speaks of debt release and radical economic realignment every 49 years. ‘Kingdom values; therefore, is convenient shorthand for a highly compressed set of associations.
 
2
This movement towards secular management approaches has been developing over an extended period of time—for example, the first attempts to introduce a clergy appraisal system can be dated back to the 1980s, and by at least the late 1990s, the House of Bishops sought to appoint management advisors. This trend has been widely noted, and a string of critical articles appear from time to time in publications such as the Church Times. The same trend towards secular models of ministry has also been detected by many in the appointment of the current Archbishop of Canterbury, who was a senior business executive before he was ordained (see, e.g. a report in the Guardian 2012, on his appointment). For a fuller study of management in ministry, see Torry (2005).
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2012). What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: a review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38(4), 932–968.CrossRef Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2012). What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: a review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38(4), 932–968.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Alves, M., & Koga, N. (2006). Brazilian nonprofit organizations and the new legal framework: an institutional perspective. Brazilian Administration Review, 3(2), 68–83.CrossRef Alves, M., & Koga, N. (2006). Brazilian nonprofit organizations and the new legal framework: an institutional perspective. Brazilian Administration Review, 3(2), 68–83.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Alvesson, M. (2003). Beyond neo-positivism, romanticism and localism. A reflexive approach to interviews. Academy of Management Review, 28(1), 13–33.CrossRef Alvesson, M. (2003). Beyond neo-positivism, romanticism and localism. A reflexive approach to interviews. Academy of Management Review, 28(1), 13–33.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Alvesson, M., & Skoldberg, K. (2008). Reflexive methodology: New vistas for qualitative research. London: Sage. Alvesson, M., & Skoldberg, K. (2008). Reflexive methodology: New vistas for qualitative research. London: Sage.
Zurück zum Zitat Andreini, D., Pedeliento, G., & Signori, S. (2014). CSR and service quality in nonprofit organizations: the case of a performing arts association. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 19, 127–142.CrossRef Andreini, D., Pedeliento, G., & Signori, S. (2014). CSR and service quality in nonprofit organizations: the case of a performing arts association. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 19, 127–142.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Antoci, A., Galeotti, M., Russu, P., & Zarri, L. (2006). Generalized trust and sustainable coexistence between socially responsible firms and nonprofit organizations. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 29, 783–802.CrossRef Antoci, A., Galeotti, M., Russu, P., & Zarri, L. (2006). Generalized trust and sustainable coexistence between socially responsible firms and nonprofit organizations. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 29, 783–802.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Athanasopoulou, A. (2012). Managers’ corporate social responsibility perceptions and attitudes across different organizational contexts within the non-profit–for-profit organizational continuum. Journal of Change Management, 12(4), 467–494.CrossRef Athanasopoulou, A. (2012). Managers’ corporate social responsibility perceptions and attitudes across different organizational contexts within the non-profit–for-profit organizational continuum. Journal of Change Management, 12(4), 467–494.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Avetisyan, E., & Ferrary, M. (2013). Dynamics of stakeholders’ implications in the institutionalization of the CSR field in France and in the United States. Journal of Business Ethics, 115(1), 115–133.CrossRef Avetisyan, E., & Ferrary, M. (2013). Dynamics of stakeholders’ implications in the institutionalization of the CSR field in France and in the United States. Journal of Business Ethics, 115(1), 115–133.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Avis, P. D. L. (2001). Church, state and establishment. London: SPCK. Avis, P. D. L. (2001). Church, state and establishment. London: SPCK.
Zurück zum Zitat Banerjee, S. B. (2007). Corporate social responsibility: The good, the bad and the ugly. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRef Banerjee, S. B. (2007). Corporate social responsibility: The good, the bad and the ugly. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Battilana, J. (2006). Agency and institutions: The enabling role of individuals’ social position. Organization, 13(5), 653–676.CrossRef Battilana, J. (2006). Agency and institutions: The enabling role of individuals’ social position. Organization, 13(5), 653–676.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Battilana, J., & D’Aunno, T. (2009). Institutional work and the paradox of embedded agency. In T. B. Lawrence, R. Suddaby, & B. Leca (Eds.), Actors and agency in institutional studies of organizations (pp. 31–58). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Battilana, J., & D’Aunno, T. (2009). Institutional work and the paradox of embedded agency. In T. B. Lawrence, R. Suddaby, & B. Leca (Eds.), Actors and agency in institutional studies of organizations (pp. 31–58). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1967). The social construction of reality. Garden City, NY: Doubleday. Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1967). The social construction of reality. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
Zurück zum Zitat Bigoni, M., Deidda Gagliardo, E., & Funnell, W. (2013). Rethinking the sacred and secular divide- Accounting and accountability practices in the Diocese of Ferrara (1431–1457). Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 26(4), 567–594.CrossRef Bigoni, M., Deidda Gagliardo, E., & Funnell, W. (2013). Rethinking the sacred and secular divide- Accounting and accountability practices in the Diocese of Ferrara (1431–1457). Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 26(4), 567–594.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bisesi, M., & Lidman, R. (2009). Compassion and power: Religion, spirituality, and public administration. International Journal of Public Administration, 32(1), 4–23.CrossRef Bisesi, M., & Lidman, R. (2009). Compassion and power: Religion, spirituality, and public administration. International Journal of Public Administration, 32(1), 4–23.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Blowfield, M., & Frynas, J. G. (2005). Setting new agendas: critical perspectives on Corporate Social Responsibility in the developing world. International Affairs, 81, 499–503.CrossRef Blowfield, M., & Frynas, J. G. (2005). Setting new agendas: critical perspectives on Corporate Social Responsibility in the developing world. International Affairs, 81, 499–503.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bondy, K., Moon, J., & Matten, D. (2012). An institution of corporate social responsibility (CSR) in multi-national corporations (MNCs): Form and implications. Journal of Business Ethics, 111(2), 281–299.CrossRef Bondy, K., Moon, J., & Matten, D. (2012). An institution of corporate social responsibility (CSR) in multi-national corporations (MNCs): Form and implications. Journal of Business Ethics, 111(2), 281–299.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bouckaert, L., & Vandenhove, J. (1998). Business ethics and the management of non-profit institutions. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(9–10), 1073–1081.CrossRef Bouckaert, L., & Vandenhove, J. (1998). Business ethics and the management of non-profit institutions. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(9–10), 1073–1081.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bourdieu, P. (1988). Homo academicus. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Bourdieu, P. (1988). Homo academicus. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Cambridge: Polity Press. Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Bourdieu, P. (1996). The rules of art. Genesis and structure of the literary field. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Bourdieu, P. (1996). The rules of art. Genesis and structure of the literary field. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Bourdieu, P. (1998). Practical reason. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Bourdieu, P. (1998). Practical reason. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Bourdieu, P. (2005). The social structures of the economy. Cambridge: Polity Press. Bourdieu, P. (2005). The social structures of the economy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Bradbury, H., & Lichtenstein, B. (2000). Relationality in organizational research: Exploring the space between. Organization Science, 11, 551–564.CrossRef Bradbury, H., & Lichtenstein, B. (2000). Relationality in organizational research: Exploring the space between. Organization Science, 11, 551–564.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Brammer, S., Williams, G., & Zinkin, J. (2007). Religion and attitudes to corporate social responsibility in a large cross-country sample. Journal of Business Ethics, 71(3), 229–243.CrossRef Brammer, S., Williams, G., & Zinkin, J. (2007). Religion and attitudes to corporate social responsibility in a large cross-country sample. Journal of Business Ethics, 71(3), 229–243.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Brandsen, T. (2009). Civicness in organizations: A reflection on the relationship between professionals and managers. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 20(3), 260–273.CrossRef Brandsen, T. (2009). Civicness in organizations: A reflection on the relationship between professionals and managers. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 20(3), 260–273.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Calhoun, C. (2002). Dictionary of the social sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Calhoun, C. (2002). Dictionary of the social sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Calkins, M. (2000). Recovering religion’s prophetic voice for business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 23, 339–352.CrossRef Calkins, M. (2000). Recovering religion’s prophetic voice for business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 23, 339–352.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Campell, J. L. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 946–967.CrossRef Campell, J. L. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 946–967.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Church of England Record Centre. (2015). Board for social responsibility. London: Lambeth Palace Library. Church of England Record Centre. (2015). Board for social responsibility. London: Lambeth Palace Library.
Zurück zum Zitat Claeye, F., & Jackson, T. (2012). The iron cage re-revisited: Institutional isomorphism in non-profit organisations in South Africa. Journal of International Development, 24(5), 602–622.CrossRef Claeye, F., & Jackson, T. (2012). The iron cage re-revisited: Institutional isomorphism in non-profit organisations in South Africa. Journal of International Development, 24(5), 602–622.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13(1), 3–21.CrossRef Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13(1), 3–21.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cornelius, N., Todres, M., Janjuha-Jivraj, S., Woods, A., & Wallace, J. (2008). Corporate social responsibility and the social enterprise. Journal of Business Ethics, 81, 355–370.CrossRef Cornelius, N., Todres, M., Janjuha-Jivraj, S., Woods, A., & Wallace, J. (2008). Corporate social responsibility and the social enterprise. Journal of Business Ethics, 81, 355–370.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Creswell, J. (2013). Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). London: Sage. Creswell, J. (2013). Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). London: Sage.
Zurück zum Zitat Dar, S., & Cooke, B. (Eds.). (2008). The new development management. London: Zed Books. Dar, S., & Cooke, B. (Eds.). (2008). The new development management. London: Zed Books.
Zurück zum Zitat Dart, R. (2004). Being “business-like” in a nonprofit organization: A grounded and inductive typology. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 33(2), 290–310.CrossRef Dart, R. (2004). Being “business-like” in a nonprofit organization: A grounded and inductive typology. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 33(2), 290–310.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Devinney, T. (2009). Is the socially responsible corporation a myth? The good, the bad, and the ugly of Corporate Social Responsibility. Academy of Management Perspectives, 23(2), 44–56.CrossRef Devinney, T. (2009). Is the socially responsible corporation a myth? The good, the bad, and the ugly of Corporate Social Responsibility. Academy of Management Perspectives, 23(2), 44–56.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat DiMaggio, P. (1979). Review essay: on Pierre Bourdieu. American Journal of Sociology, 84(6), 1460–1474.CrossRef DiMaggio, P. (1979). Review essay: on Pierre Bourdieu. American Journal of Sociology, 84(6), 1460–1474.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.CrossRef DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. (1991). Introduction. In W. Powell & P. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 1–38). Chicago: Chicago University Press. DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. (1991). Introduction. In W. Powell & P. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 1–38). Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Dolnicar, S., Irvine, H., & Lazarevski, K. (2008). Mission or money? Competitive challenges facing public sector nonprofit organisations in an institutionalised environment. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 13, 107–117.CrossRef Dolnicar, S., Irvine, H., & Lazarevski, K. (2008). Mission or money? Competitive challenges facing public sector nonprofit organisations in an institutionalised environment. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 13, 107–117.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Drori, G. S., Meyer, J. W., & Hwang, H. (2006). Globalization and organization: World society and organizational change. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Drori, G. S., Meyer, J. W., & Hwang, H. (2006). Globalization and organization: World society and organizational change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Eikenberry, A. M. (2009). Refusing the market: A democratic discourse for voluntary and nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 38(4), 582–596.CrossRef Eikenberry, A. M. (2009). Refusing the market: A democratic discourse for voluntary and nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 38(4), 582–596.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Eikenberry, A. M., & Kluver, J. D. (2004). The marketization of the nonprofit sector: Civil society at risk? Public Administration Review, 64(2), 132–140.CrossRef Eikenberry, A. M., & Kluver, J. D. (2004). The marketization of the nonprofit sector: Civil society at risk? Public Administration Review, 64(2), 132–140.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.CrossRef Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Emirbayer, M. (1997). Manifesto for a relational sociology. American Journal of Sociology, 103(2), 281–317.CrossRef Emirbayer, M. (1997). Manifesto for a relational sociology. American Journal of Sociology, 103(2), 281–317.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Emirbayer, M., & Mische, A. (1998). What is agency? American Journal of Sociology, 103(4), 962–1023.CrossRef Emirbayer, M., & Mische, A. (1998). What is agency? American Journal of Sociology, 103(4), 962–1023.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ferris, J. M. (1998). The role of the nonprofit sector in a self-governing society: A view from the United States. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 9(2), 137–151.CrossRef Ferris, J. M. (1998). The role of the nonprofit sector in a self-governing society: A view from the United States. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 9(2), 137–151.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fligstein, N. (2001). Social skill and the theory of fields. Sociological Theory, 19(2), 105–125.CrossRef Fligstein, N. (2001). Social skill and the theory of fields. Sociological Theory, 19(2), 105–125.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fowler, B. (1997). Pierre Bourdieu and cultural theory: Critical investigations. London: Sage. Fowler, B. (1997). Pierre Bourdieu and cultural theory: Critical investigations. London: Sage.
Zurück zum Zitat Galston, W. A. (2005). The practice of liberal pluralism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Galston, W. A. (2005). The practice of liberal pluralism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Gambling, T., & Karim, R. (1991). Business and accounting ethics in Islam. London: Mansell. Gambling, T., & Karim, R. (1991). Business and accounting ethics in Islam. London: Mansell.
Zurück zum Zitat Garriga, E., & Mele, D. (2004). Corporate social responsibility theories: Mapping the territory. Journal of Business Ethics, 53, 51–71.CrossRef Garriga, E., & Mele, D. (2004). Corporate social responsibility theories: Mapping the territory. Journal of Business Ethics, 53, 51–71.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Garud, R., Jain, S., & Kumaraswamy, A. (2002). Institutional entrepreneurship in the sponsorship of common technological standards: the case of Sun Microsystems and Java. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 196–214. Garud, R., Jain, S., & Kumaraswamy, A. (2002). Institutional entrepreneurship in the sponsorship of common technological standards: the case of Sun Microsystems and Java. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 196–214.
Zurück zum Zitat Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books. Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books.
Zurück zum Zitat Geertz, C. (1983). Local knowledge. London: Fontana Press. Geertz, C. (1983). Local knowledge. London: Fontana Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Goddard, A. (2004). Budgetary practices and accountability habitus- A grounded theory. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 17(4), 543–577.CrossRef Goddard, A. (2004). Budgetary practices and accountability habitus- A grounded theory. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 17(4), 543–577.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Greenwood, R., & Suddaby, R. (2006). Institutional entrepreneurship by elite firms in mature fields: The big five accounting firms. Academy of Management Journal, 49(1), 27–48.CrossRef Greenwood, R., & Suddaby, R. (2006). Institutional entrepreneurship by elite firms in mature fields: The big five accounting firms. Academy of Management Journal, 49(1), 27–48.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Guest, M., Olson, E., & Wolfe, J. (2012). Christianity: Loss of monopoly. In L. Woodhead & R. Catto (Eds.), Religion and change in Modern Britain (pp. 57–78). Abingdon: Routledge. Guest, M., Olson, E., & Wolfe, J. (2012). Christianity: Loss of monopoly. In L. Woodhead & R. Catto (Eds.), Religion and change in Modern Britain (pp. 57–78). Abingdon: Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Guiso, L., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. (2003). People’s opium? Religion and economic attitudes. Journal of Monetary Economics, 50(1), 225–282.CrossRef Guiso, L., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. (2003). People’s opium? Religion and economic attitudes. Journal of Monetary Economics, 50(1), 225–282.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hardy, L., & Ballis, H. (2005). Does one size fit all? The sacred and secular divide revisited with insights from Niebuhr’s typology of social action. Accounting, Accountability & Auditing Journal, 18(2), 238–254.CrossRef Hardy, L., & Ballis, H. (2005). Does one size fit all? The sacred and secular divide revisited with insights from Niebuhr’s typology of social action. Accounting, Accountability & Auditing Journal, 18(2), 238–254.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Haugh, R. (2003). Getting the attention of big pharma. Hospitals and Health Networks, 77(10), 44. Haugh, R. (2003). Getting the attention of big pharma. Hospitals and Health Networks, 77(10), 44.
Zurück zum Zitat Hensmans, M. (2003). Social movement organizations: a metaphor for strategic actors in institutional fields. Organization Studies, 24(3), 355–381.CrossRef Hensmans, M. (2003). Social movement organizations: a metaphor for strategic actors in institutional fields. Organization Studies, 24(3), 355–381.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Herman, R. D., & Renz, D. O. (1999). Theses on nonprofit organizational effectiveness. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 28(2), 107–126.CrossRef Herman, R. D., & Renz, D. O. (1999). Theses on nonprofit organizational effectiveness. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 28(2), 107–126.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hiilamo, H. (2012). Rethinking the role of church in a socio-democratic welfare state. International Journal of Sociology and Social policy, 32(7/8), 401–414.CrossRef Hiilamo, H. (2012). Rethinking the role of church in a socio-democratic welfare state. International Journal of Sociology and Social policy, 32(7/8), 401–414.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hogan, E. (2009). Does ‘Corporate’ responsibility apply to not-for-profit organizations? In S. O. Idowu & W. L. Filho (Eds.), Professionals’ perspectives of corporate social responsibility (pp. 271–288). Berlin: Springer.CrossRef Hogan, E. (2009). Does ‘Corporate’ responsibility apply to not-for-profit organizations? In S. O. Idowu & W. L. Filho (Eds.), Professionals’ perspectives of corporate social responsibility (pp. 271–288). Berlin: Springer.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hollenbach, D. (2002). The common good and christian ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Hollenbach, D. (2002). The common good and christian ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hui, L. T. (2008). Combining faith and CSR: A paradigm of corporate sustainability. International Journal of Social Economics, 35(6), 449–465.CrossRef Hui, L. T. (2008). Combining faith and CSR: A paradigm of corporate sustainability. International Journal of Social Economics, 35(6), 449–465.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hwang, H., & Powell, W. W. (2009). The rationalization of charity: The influences of professionalism in the nonprofit sector. Administrative Science Quarterly, 54(2), 268–298.CrossRef Hwang, H., & Powell, W. W. (2009). The rationalization of charity: The influences of professionalism in the nonprofit sector. Administrative Science Quarterly, 54(2), 268–298.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Irvine, H. (2005). Balancing money and mission in a local church budget. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 18(2), 211–237.CrossRef Irvine, H. (2005). Balancing money and mission in a local church budget. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 18(2), 211–237.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jacobs, K. (2005). The sacred and the secular: Examining the role of accounting in the religious context. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 18(2), 189–210.CrossRef Jacobs, K. (2005). The sacred and the secular: Examining the role of accounting in the religious context. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 18(2), 189–210.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jensen, J., & Miszlivetz, F. (2006). Global civil society: From dissident discourse to World Bank parlance. In P. Wagner (Ed.), The languages of civil society (pp. 177–205). Oxford: Berghahn Books. Jensen, J., & Miszlivetz, F. (2006). Global civil society: From dissident discourse to World Bank parlance. In P. Wagner (Ed.), The languages of civil society (pp. 177–205). Oxford: Berghahn Books.
Zurück zum Zitat Johansen, T. S., & Nielsen, A. E. (2012). CSR in corporate self-storying: Legitimacy as a question of differentiation and conformity. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 17(4), 434–448.CrossRef Johansen, T. S., & Nielsen, A. E. (2012). CSR in corporate self-storying: Legitimacy as a question of differentiation and conformity. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 17(4), 434–448.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kotler, P., & Lee, N. (2005). Corporate social responsibility: Doing the most good for your company and your cause. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. Kotler, P., & Lee, N. (2005). Corporate social responsibility: Doing the most good for your company and your cause. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Zurück zum Zitat Kreander, N., McPhail, K., & Molyneaux, D. (2005). God’s fund managers: A critical study of stock market investment practices of the Church of England and UK Methodists. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 17(3), 408–441.CrossRef Kreander, N., McPhail, K., & Molyneaux, D. (2005). God’s fund managers: A critical study of stock market investment practices of the Church of England and UK Methodists. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 17(3), 408–441.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Larsson, O. (2013). Convergence in ideas, divergence in actions organizational hypocrisy in nonprofit organizations. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 35(2), 271–289.CrossRef Larsson, O. (2013). Convergence in ideas, divergence in actions organizational hypocrisy in nonprofit organizations. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 35(2), 271–289.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lawrence, T. B. (1999). Institutional strategy. Journal of Management, 25, 161–188.CrossRef Lawrence, T. B. (1999). Institutional strategy. Journal of Management, 25, 161–188.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lawrence, T. B., & Suddaby, R. (2006). Institutions and institutional work. In S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, T. B. Lawrence, & W. R. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies (pp. 215–254). Sage: London.CrossRef Lawrence, T. B., & Suddaby, R. (2006). Institutions and institutional work. In S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, T. B. Lawrence, & W. R. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies (pp. 215–254). Sage: London.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lawrence, T. B., Suddaby, R., & Leca, B. (2009). Introduction: Theorizing and studying institutional work. In T. B. Lawrence, R. Suddaby, & B. Leca (Eds.), Actors and agency in institutional studies of organizations (pp. 1–28). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Lawrence, T. B., Suddaby, R., & Leca, B. (2009). Introduction: Theorizing and studying institutional work. In T. B. Lawrence, R. Suddaby, & B. Leca (Eds.), Actors and agency in institutional studies of organizations (pp. 1–28). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Leca, B., Battilana, J., & Boxenbaum, E. (2008). Agency and institutions: a review of institutional entrepreneurship. Harvard business school working paper, 08-096. Cambridge, MA. Leca, B., Battilana, J., & Boxenbaum, E. (2008). Agency and institutions: a review of institutional entrepreneurship. Harvard business school working paper, 08-096. Cambridge, MA.
Zurück zum Zitat Lewis, D. (2007). The management of non-governmental development organisations (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. Lewis, D. (2007). The management of non-governmental development organisations (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Lewis, D. (2008). Nongovernmentalism and the reorganization of public action. In S. Dar & B. Cooke (Eds.), The new development management (pp. 41–55). London: Zed Books. Lewis, D. (2008). Nongovernmentalism and the reorganization of public action. In S. Dar & B. Cooke (Eds.), The new development management (pp. 41–55). London: Zed Books.
Zurück zum Zitat Longenecker, J. G., McKinney, J. A., & Moore, C. W. (2004). Religious intensity, evangelical Christianity, and business ethics: An empirical study. Journal of Business Ethics, 55(4), 373–386.CrossRef Longenecker, J. G., McKinney, J. A., & Moore, C. W. (2004). Religious intensity, evangelical Christianity, and business ethics: An empirical study. Journal of Business Ethics, 55(4), 373–386.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Louche, C., Arenas, D., & van Cranenburgh, K. (2012). From preaching to investing: Attitudes of religious organisations towards responsible investment. Journal of Business Ethics, 110(3), 301–320.CrossRef Louche, C., Arenas, D., & van Cranenburgh, K. (2012). From preaching to investing: Attitudes of religious organisations towards responsible investment. Journal of Business Ethics, 110(3), 301–320.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lounsbury, M. (2008). Institutional rationality and practice variation: New directions in the institutional analysis of practice. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(4–5), 349–361.CrossRef Lounsbury, M. (2008). Institutional rationality and practice variation: New directions in the institutional analysis of practice. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(4–5), 349–361.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat MacCulloch, D. (2009). A history of Christianity: The first three thousand years. London: Allen Lane. MacCulloch, D. (2009). A history of Christianity: The first three thousand years. London: Allen Lane.
Zurück zum Zitat Maier, F. (2011). Philanthropy and nonprofit leaders. Rise of the business model in philanthropy. In K. A. Agard (Ed.), Leadership in nonprofit organizations (pp. 484–490). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Maier, F. (2011). Philanthropy and nonprofit leaders. Rise of the business model in philanthropy. In K. A. Agard (Ed.), Leadership in nonprofit organizations (pp. 484–490). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Zurück zum Zitat Maier, F., Leitner, J., Meyer, M., & Millner, R. (2009). Managerialismus in Nonprofit Organisationen. Zur Untersuchung von Wirkungen und unerwünschten Nebenwirkungen. Kurswechsel, 4, 94–101. Maier, F., Leitner, J., Meyer, M., & Millner, R. (2009). Managerialismus in Nonprofit Organisationen. Zur Untersuchung von Wirkungen und unerwünschten Nebenwirkungen. Kurswechsel, 4, 94–101.
Zurück zum Zitat Maier, F., & Meyer, M. (2011). Managerialism and beyond: Discourses of civil society organization and their governance implications. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 22(4), 1–26.CrossRef Maier, F., & Meyer, M. (2011). Managerialism and beyond: Discourses of civil society organization and their governance implications. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 22(4), 1–26.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Maignan, I., & Ferrell, O. (2003). Nature of corporate responsibilities: Perspectives from American, French, and German consumers. Journal of Business Research, 56(1), 55–67.CrossRef Maignan, I., & Ferrell, O. (2003). Nature of corporate responsibilities: Perspectives from American, French, and German consumers. Journal of Business Research, 56(1), 55–67.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Meyer, J., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363.CrossRef Meyer, J., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Meyer, J. W., & Scott, W. R. (1983). Organizational environments: Ritual and rationality. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Meyer, J. W., & Scott, W. R. (1983). Organizational environments: Ritual and rationality. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Zurück zum Zitat Moorman, (1980). History of the Church of England (3rd ed.). Harrisburg: Morehouse. Moorman, (1980). History of the Church of England (3rd ed.). Harrisburg: Morehouse.
Zurück zum Zitat Mutch, A. (2003). Communities of practice and habitus: A critique. Organization Studies, 24(3), 383–401.CrossRef Mutch, A. (2003). Communities of practice and habitus: A critique. Organization Studies, 24(3), 383–401.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat O’ Riordan, L., & Fairbrass, J. (2008). Corporate social responsibility (CSR): Models and theories in stakeholder dialogue. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(4), 745–758.CrossRef O’ Riordan, L., & Fairbrass, J. (2008). Corporate social responsibility (CSR): Models and theories in stakeholder dialogue. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(4), 745–758.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Okonkwo, B. (Ed.). (2013). Christian ethics and corporate culture: A critical view on corporate responsibilities-CSR, sustainability, ethics & governance. Heidelberg: Springer. Okonkwo, B. (Ed.). (2013). Christian ethics and corporate culture: A critical view on corporate responsibilities-CSR, sustainability, ethics & governance. Heidelberg: Springer.
Zurück zum Zitat Otte, J. (2009). Virtuous enterprises: the place of Christian ethics. Finance & The Common Good/Bien Commun, 33(1), 87–98.CrossRef Otte, J. (2009). Virtuous enterprises: the place of Christian ethics. Finance & The Common Good/Bien Commun, 33(1), 87–98.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Pedersen, E. R., & Neergaard, P. (2009). What matters to managers? Management Decision, 47(8), 1261–1280.CrossRef Pedersen, E. R., & Neergaard, P. (2009). What matters to managers? Management Decision, 47(8), 1261–1280.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Putnam, R. D. (2007). E pluribus unum: Diversity and community in the twenty-first century. The 2006 Johan Skytte Prize Lecture. Scandinavian Political Studies, 30(2), 137–174.CrossRef Putnam, R. D. (2007). E pluribus unum: Diversity and community in the twenty-first century. The 2006 Johan Skytte Prize Lecture. Scandinavian Political Studies, 30(2), 137–174.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Raimi, L., Patel, A., Yekini, K., & Aljadani, A. (2013). Exploring the theological foundation of corporate social responsibility in Islam, Christianity and Judaism for strengthening compliance and reporting: An eclectic approach. Issues in Social and Environmental Accounting, 7(4), 228–249.CrossRef Raimi, L., Patel, A., Yekini, K., & Aljadani, A. (2013). Exploring the theological foundation of corporate social responsibility in Islam, Christianity and Judaism for strengthening compliance and reporting: An eclectic approach. Issues in Social and Environmental Accounting, 7(4), 228–249.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ramanath, R. (2009). Limits to institutional isomorphism: examining internal processes in NGO–government interactions. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 38(1), 51–76.CrossRef Ramanath, R. (2009). Limits to institutional isomorphism: examining internal processes in NGO–government interactions. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 38(1), 51–76.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Reay, T., Golden-Biddle, K., & Germann, K. (2006). Legitimizing a new role: Small wins and microprocesses of change. Academy of Management Journal, 49(5), 977–998.CrossRef Reay, T., Golden-Biddle, K., & Germann, K. (2006). Legitimizing a new role: Small wins and microprocesses of change. Academy of Management Journal, 49(5), 977–998.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rey, T. (2007). Bourdieu on religion: Imposing faith and legitimacy. Key thinkers in the study of religion. London: Equinox Pub. Rey, T. (2007). Bourdieu on religion: Imposing faith and legitimacy. Key thinkers in the study of religion. London: Equinox Pub.
Zurück zum Zitat Riches, G. (2011). Thinking and acting outside the charitable food box: hunger and the right to food in rich societies. Development in Practice, 21(4–5), 768–775.CrossRef Riches, G. (2011). Thinking and acting outside the charitable food box: hunger and the right to food in rich societies. Development in Practice, 21(4–5), 768–775.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Roberts, S. M., Jones, J. P, I. I. I., & Fröhling, O. (2005). NGOs and the globalization of managerialism: A research framework. World Development, 33(11), 1845–1864.CrossRef Roberts, S. M., Jones, J. P, I. I. I., & Fröhling, O. (2005). NGOs and the globalization of managerialism: A research framework. World Development, 33(11), 1845–1864.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rousseau, S. (2008). Entreprises publiques et développement durable: Réflexion sur un engouement. Revue française de gestion, 185(5), 47–64.CrossRef Rousseau, S. (2008). Entreprises publiques et développement durable: Réflexion sur un engouement. Revue française de gestion, 185(5), 47–64.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rusconi, G., & Signori, S. (2007). Responsabilità sociale e impresa non profit: quale declinazione? Impresa Sociale, 76, 40–58. Rusconi, G., & Signori, S. (2007). Responsabilità sociale e impresa non profit: quale declinazione? Impresa Sociale, 76, 40–58.
Zurück zum Zitat Sahlin, K., & Wedlin, L. (2008). Circulating ideas: Imitation, translation and editing. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 218–242). London: Sage.CrossRef Sahlin, K., & Wedlin, L. (2008). Circulating ideas: Imitation, translation and editing. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 218–242). London: Sage.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2007). Research methods for business students (4th ed.). Pearson Education Ltd.: England. Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2007). Research methods for business students (4th ed.). Pearson Education Ltd.: England.
Zurück zum Zitat Scott, W. R. (2014). Institutions and organizations (4th ed.). Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage. Scott, W. R. (2014). Institutions and organizations (4th ed.). Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage.
Zurück zum Zitat Sedgwick, P. (1999). The market economy and Christian ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Sedgwick, P. (1999). The market economy and Christian ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Seitanidi, M. (2005). Corporate social responsibility and the non-commercial sector. What does corporate social responsibility mean for the non-commercial sector? And is it different from the CSR for businesses? New Academy Review, 3(4), 60–71. Seitanidi, M. (2005). Corporate social responsibility and the non-commercial sector. What does corporate social responsibility mean for the non-commercial sector? And is it different from the CSR for businesses? New Academy Review, 3(4), 60–71.
Zurück zum Zitat Sewell, W. H. (1992). A theory of structure: Duality, agency, and transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 98(1), 1–29.CrossRef Sewell, W. H. (1992). A theory of structure: Duality, agency, and transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 98(1), 1–29.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Shoham, A., Ruvio, A., Vigoda-Gadot, E., & Schwabsky, N. (2006). Market orientations in the nonprofit and voluntary sector: A meta-analysis of their relationships with organizational performance. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 35(3), 453–476.CrossRef Shoham, A., Ruvio, A., Vigoda-Gadot, E., & Schwabsky, N. (2006). Market orientations in the nonprofit and voluntary sector: A meta-analysis of their relationships with organizational performance. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 35(3), 453–476.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Silverman, D. (2013). Doing qualitative research: A practical handbook (4th ed.). London: Sage. Silverman, D. (2013). Doing qualitative research: A practical handbook (4th ed.). London: Sage.
Zurück zum Zitat Smith, S. R., & Lipsky, M. (1998). Nonprofits for hire: The welfare state in the age of contracting (3rd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Smith, S. R., & Lipsky, M. (1998). Nonprofits for hire: The welfare state in the age of contracting (3rd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Soltani, E., Syed, J., Liao, Y. Y., & Iqbal, A. (2014). Managerial mindsets toward corporate social responsibility: The case of auto industry in Iran. Journal of Business Ethics,. doi:10.1007/s10551-014-2137-4.CrossRef Soltani, E., Syed, J., Liao, Y. Y., & Iqbal, A. (2014). Managerial mindsets toward corporate social responsibility: The case of auto industry in Iran. Journal of Business Ethics,. doi:10.​1007/​s10551-014-2137-4.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sparkes, R., & Cowton, C. J. (2004). The maturing of socially responsible investment: A review of the developing link with corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 52(1), 45–57.CrossRef Sparkes, R., & Cowton, C. J. (2004). The maturing of socially responsible investment: A review of the developing link with corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 52(1), 45–57.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Srinivas, N. (2009). Against NGOs? A critical perspective on nongovernmental action. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 38(4), 614–626.CrossRef Srinivas, N. (2009). Against NGOs? A critical perspective on nongovernmental action. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 38(4), 614–626.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. London: Sage. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. London: Sage.
Zurück zum Zitat Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Zurück zum Zitat Suddaby, R., & Greenwood, R. (2005). Rhetorical strategies of legitimacy. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(1), 35–67.CrossRef Suddaby, R., & Greenwood, R. (2005). Rhetorical strategies of legitimacy. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(1), 35–67.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Tan, J. (2010). Grounded theory in practice: Issues and discussion for new qualitative researchers. Journal of Documentation, 66(1), 93–112.CrossRef Tan, J. (2010). Grounded theory in practice: Issues and discussion for new qualitative researchers. Journal of Documentation, 66(1), 93–112.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Tolbert, P. S., & Zucker, L. G. (1983). Institutional sources of change in the formal structure of organizations: The diffusion of civil service reform 1880–1935. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28(1), 22–39.CrossRef Tolbert, P. S., & Zucker, L. G. (1983). Institutional sources of change in the formal structure of organizations: The diffusion of civil service reform 1880–1935. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28(1), 22–39.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Torry, M. (2005). Managing God's business-religious and faith-based organizations and their management. Abingdon: Routledge. Torry, M. (2005). Managing God's business-religious and faith-based organizations and their management. Abingdon: Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Van Aaken, D., Splitter, V., & Seidl, D. (2013). Why do corporate actors engage in pro-social behaviour? A Bourdieusian perspective on corporate social responsibility. Organization, 20(3), 349–371.CrossRef Van Aaken, D., Splitter, V., & Seidl, D. (2013). Why do corporate actors engage in pro-social behaviour? A Bourdieusian perspective on corporate social responsibility. Organization, 20(3), 349–371.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Van Cranenburgh, K., Arenas, D., Goodman, J., & Louche, C. (2014). Religious organisations as investors: a Christian perspective on shareholder engagement. Society and Business Review, 9(2), 195–213.CrossRef Van Cranenburgh, K., Arenas, D., Goodman, J., & Louche, C. (2014). Religious organisations as investors: a Christian perspective on shareholder engagement. Society and Business Review, 9(2), 195–213.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Van Maanen, J. (2011). Ethnography as work: Some rules of engagement. Journal of Management Studies, 48(1), 218–234.CrossRef Van Maanen, J. (2011). Ethnography as work: Some rules of engagement. Journal of Management Studies, 48(1), 218–234.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Waters, R. D., & Ott, H. K. (2014). Corporate social responsibility and the nonprofit sector: Assessing the thoughts and practices across three nonprofit subsectors. Public Relations Journal, 8(3), 1–18. Waters, R. D., & Ott, H. K. (2014). Corporate social responsibility and the nonprofit sector: Assessing the thoughts and practices across three nonprofit subsectors. Public Relations Journal, 8(3), 1–18.
Zurück zum Zitat Weaver, G. R., & Agle, B. R. (2002). Religiosity and ethical behavior in organizations: A symbolic interactionist perspective. Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 77–97.CrossRef Weaver, G. R., & Agle, B. R. (2002). Religiosity and ethical behavior in organizations: A symbolic interactionist perspective. Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 77–97.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Woodhead, L., & Catto, R. (2012). Religion and change in modern Britain. Oxon: Routledge. Woodhead, L., & Catto, R. (2012). Religion and change in modern Britain. Oxon: Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Worrall, B. (2004). The making of the modern Church (3rd ed.). London: SPCK. Worrall, B. (2004). The making of the modern Church (3rd ed.). London: SPCK.
Zurück zum Zitat Ybema, S., Yanow, D., Wels, H., & Kamsteeg, F. (2009). Organizational ethnography: Studying the complexities of everyday life. London: Sage.CrossRef Ybema, S., Yanow, D., Wels, H., & Kamsteeg, F. (2009). Organizational ethnography: Studying the complexities of everyday life. London: Sage.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Yin, R. (2014). Case study research-design and methods. London: Sage. Yin, R. (2014). Case study research-design and methods. London: Sage.
Zurück zum Zitat Yin, J., & Zhang, Y. (2012). Institutional dynamics and corporate social responsibility (CSR) in an emerging country context: Evidence from China. Journal of Business Ethics, 111(2), 301–316.CrossRef Yin, J., & Zhang, Y. (2012). Institutional dynamics and corporate social responsibility (CSR) in an emerging country context: Evidence from China. Journal of Business Ethics, 111(2), 301–316.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Towards an Understanding of Social Responsibility Within the Church of England
verfasst von
Krystin Zigan
Alan Le Grys
Publikationsdatum
03.03.2016
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Journal of Business Ethics / Ausgabe 3/2018
Print ISSN: 0167-4544
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-0697
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3104-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2018

Journal of Business Ethics 3/2018 Zur Ausgabe