nach oben

Erschienen in:

2018 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

3. Towards Cosmopolitan Relational ‘Scales’ of Actoral Interconnectivity

verfasst von : Ingrid Volkmer, Kasim Sharif

Erschienen in: Risk Journalism between Transnational Politics and Climate Change

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The previous chapter addressed the dimensions of climate change as a globalized risk (Beck in World at risk, Polity Press, Cambridge, 2009), and it is argued that a globalized perspective requires a transnational methodological framework for assessing the new dimensions of interdependent risk journalism.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Risk Journalism—In Contexts of Trans-societal Interdependence

Nächstes Kapitel Pakistan, a Glocalized Context for Global Media Climate Change Research

Anderson, A. (2009). Media, politics and climate change: Towards a new research agenda. Sociology Compass, 3(2), 166.CrossRef

Anheier, H. K., & Themudo, N. (2002). Organisational forms of global civil society: Implications of going global. In H. Anheier, M. Glasius, & M. Kaldor (Eds.), Global civil society 2002 (pp. 191–216). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Anheier, H. K., Glasius, M., & Kaldor, M. (Eds.). (2001). Global civil society 2001. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Anheier, H., Kaldor, M., & Glasius, M. (2012). The global civil society yearbook: Lessons and insights 2001–2011. In M. Kaldor, H. L. Moore, & S. Selchow (Eds.), Global civil society 2012: Ten years of critical reflection (pp. 2–27). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef

Beck, U. (2008). The cosmopolitan vision. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Beck, U. (2009). World at risk. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Boykoff, M. T. (2007). From convergence to contention: United States mass media representations of anthropogenic climate change science. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 32(4), 477–489. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2007.00270.x.CrossRef

Brenner, N. (1997). Global, fragmented, hierarchical: Henri Lefebvre’s geographies of globalization. Public Culture, 10(1), 135–167.CrossRef

Brenner, N. (2001). The limits to scale? Methodological reflections on scalar structuration. Progress in Human Geography, 25(4), 591–614. https://doi.org/10.1191/030913201682688959.CrossRef

Carvalho, A. (2010a). Climate change as a ‘grand narrative’ (Interview by Filippo Bonaventura). Journal of Science Communication, 9(4), 1–4. Retrieved from http://jcom.sissa.it/sites/default/files/documents/Jcom0904(2010)C03.pdf.

Carvalho, A. (2010b). Media(ted) discourses and climate change: A focus on political subjectivity and (dis)engagement. WIREs Climate Change, 1, 172–179. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.13.CrossRef

Castells, M. (2002). Local and global: Cities in the network society. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, 93(5), 548–558. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9663.00225.

Castells, M. (2008). The new public sphere: Global civil society, communication networks, and global governance. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616, 78–93. https://doi.org/10.2307/25097995.CrossRef

Castells, M. (2009). Communication power. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.

Castells, M. (2010). The rise of the network society (2nd ed.). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.

Castells, M. (2013). Communication power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Chandhoke, N. (2002). The limits of global civil society. In M. Glasius, M. Kaldor, & H. Anheier (Eds.), Global civil society 2002 (pp. 35–52). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Chernilo, D. (2011). The critique of methodological nationalism: Theory and history. Thesis Eleven, 106(1), 98–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/0725513611415789.CrossRef

Climate and Development Knowledge Network. (2012). Scoping a combined programme on climate compatible development for Pakistan. Retrieved from http://cdkn.org/project/scoping-a-combined-programme-on-climate-compatible-development-for-pakistan/?loclang=en_gb.

Cox, K. R. (1998). Spaces of dependence, spaces of engagement and the politics of scale, or: Looking for local politics. Political Geography, 17(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0962-6298(97)00048-6.CrossRef

Delaney, D., & Leitner, H. (1997). The political construction of scale. Political Geography, 16, 93–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0962-6298(96)00045-5.CrossRef

Dunwoody, S., & Peters, H. P. (1992). Mass media coverage of technological and environmental risks: A survey of research in the United States and Germany. Public Understanding of Science, 1(2), 199.CrossRef

Eurobarometer. (2011). Special Eurobarometer 364: Public awareness and acceptance of CO₂ capture and storage. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_364_en.pdf.

Fischer, M. (2006). Civil society in conflict transformation: Ambivalence, potentials and challenges. Retrieved from Berghof Foundation website: http://www.berghof-foundation.org/fileadmin/redaktion/Publications/Handbook/Articles/fischer_cso_handbook.pdf.

Giddens, A. (1973). The class structure of the advanced societies. London: Hutchinson.

Giddens, A. (1991). The consequences of modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Godfrey, A., Burton, M., & Leroux-Rutledge, E. (Eds.). (2012). “Africa talks climate”: Comparing audience understandings of climate change in ten African countries. London: Blackwell Publishing.

Hannam, K., Sheller, M., & Urry, J. (2006). Editorial: Mobilities, immobilities and moorings. Mobilities, 1(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450100500489189.CrossRef

Harbinson, R., Mugara, R., & Chawla, A. (2006). Whatever the weather: Media attitudes to reporting climate change. Retrieved from PANOS website: http://panos.org.uk/wp-content/files/2011/03/whatever_weathermjwnSt.pdf.

Harvey, D. (1990). The condition of postmodernity: An enquiry into the origins of cultural change. Oxford: Blackwell.

Held, D. (2010). Cosmopolitanism: Ideals and realities. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Herod, A. (2001). Labor geographies: Workers and the landscapes of capitalism. New York: Guilford Press.

Herod, A. (2010). Scale. Hoboken: Taylor and Francis.

Kaldor, M. (2003a). Global civil society: An answer to war. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Kaldor, M. (2003b). The idea of global civil society. International Affairs, 79(3), 583–593.CrossRef

Karns, M. P., & Mingst, K. A. (2004). International organizations: The politics and processes of global governance. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.

Keane, J. (2001). Global civil society? In H. Anheier, M. Glasius, & M. Kaldor (Eds.), Global civil society 2001 (pp. 23–47). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Martins, H. (1974). Time and theory in sociology (Chapter 12). In J. Rex (Ed.), Approaches to sociology (pp. 246–294). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

McChesney, R. W. (1999). Rich media, poor democracy: Communication politics in dubious times. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

Paton, K., & Fairbairn-Dunlop, P. (2010). Listening to local voices: Tuvaluans respond to climate change. Local Environment, 15(7), 687–698. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2010.498809.CrossRef

Pillay, K., & Maharaj, M. (2010). An overview of Web 2.0 social media as a tool for advocacy. In Proceedings of the Conference ‘Scoring IT education goals in 2010’ of the Southern African Computer Lecturers’ Association, June 7–9, Pretoria. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Manoj_Maharaj/publication/266502528_An_Overview_of_Web_2.0_Social_Media_as_a_tool_for_advocacy/links/543bb95d0cf2d6698be31c45.pdf.

Rantanen, T. (2007). The cosmopolitanization of news. Journalism Studies, 8(6), 843–861. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700701556765.CrossRef

Robertson, R. (1995). Glocalization: Time-space and homogeneity-heterogeneity. In M. Featherstone, S. Lash, & R. Robertson (Eds.), Global modernities (pp. 25–44). London and Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRef

Ryghaug, M., Sorensen, K. H., & Naess, R. (2011). Making sense of global warming: Norwegians appropriating knowledge of anthropogenic climate change. Public Understanding of Science, 20(6), 778–795.CrossRef

Salamon, L. M. (1994). The rise of the nonprofit sector. Foreign Affairs, 73(4), 109.CrossRef

Sassen, S. (2001). The global city (2nd ed.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRef

Sassen, S. (2004). The global city: Introducing a concept. Brown Journal of World Affairs, 11(2), 27–43.

Sassen, S. (2007). Sociology of globalization. New York: W.W. Norton.

Sassen, S. (2008). Neither global nor national: Novel assemblages of territory, authority and rights. Ethics and Global Politics, 1(1–2), 61–79.CrossRef

Simmons, P. J. (1998). Learning to live with NGOs. Foreign Policy, 112, 82.CrossRef

Smith, A. D. (1979). Nationalism in the twentieth century. Oxford: Martin Robertson.

Smith, N. (1990). Uneven development (2nd ed.). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Söderbaum, F., & Shaw, T. M. (2003). Theories of new regionalism. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Urry, J. (2000). Sociology beyond societies: Mobilities for the twenty-first century. London and New York: Routledge.

Urry, J. (2007). Mobilities. Cambridge: Polity.

Volkmer, I. (2012). Deconstructing the “Methodological Paradox”: Comparative research between national centrality and networked spaces. In I. Volkmer (Ed.), The handbook of global media research (pp. 110–122). London: Blackwell Publishing.CrossRef

Volkmer, I. (2014). The global public sphere: Public communication in the age of reflective interdependence. Cambridge, UK and Malden, MA: Polity.

Weingart, P., Engels, A., & Pansegrau, P. (2000). Risks of communication: Discourses on climate change in science, politics, and the mass media. Public Understanding of Science, 9(3), 261–283.CrossRef

Wimmer, A., & Schiller, N. (2002). Methodological nationalism and beyond: Nation-state building, migration and the social sciences. Global Networks, 2(4), 301–334.CrossRef

Titel: Towards Cosmopolitan Relational ‘Scales’ of Actoral Interconnectivity
verfasst von: Ingrid Volkmer
Kasim Sharif
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: Risk Journalism between Transnational Politics and Climate Change
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-73307-4

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-73308-1

Copyright-Jahr: 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73308-1_3

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"