Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen
Scholars have consistently found that firms in developing countries adopt voluntary environmental programs (VEPs) in high numbers when their major trade partners are home to many VEP-certified firms. This reflects the following dynamic: Importers based in countries with many VEP-certified facilities demand similarly sustainable production processes from trade partners, and so exporting firms in partner countries adopt VEPs to signal their sustainable practices. Studies have identified characteristics of developing countries that make local exporting firms more likely to adopt VEPs as a signal; however, there has been little analysis as to the country-level characteristics that make importers more (or less) likely to demand VEPs from suppliers abroad, beyond having many VEP-certified firms themselves. This study considers this matter, theorizing that VEP diffusion only accompanies exporting to countries with high levels of income and education, as well as a high number of VEP-certified firms. Panel data analysis provides support for the theory, showing that developing countries only experience trade-based diffusion of ISO 14001 (a widely adopted VEP) through their exports to countries with high income and/or education levels. In contrast, exporting to countries that lack these characteristics creates no such diffusion, even where importing countries’ VEP certification levels are high. Instead, such trade produces a “stuck in the mud” effect, as developing countries’ certification levels stagnate even as those of their import partners rise.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
Adolph, C., Quince, V., & Prakash, A. (2017). The shanghai effect: Do exports to China affect labor practices in Africa? World Development, 89(1), 1–18. CrossRef
Aertsens, J., Mondelaers, K., Verbeke, W., Buysse, J., & Van Huylenbroeck, G. (2011). The influence of subjective and objective knowledge on attitude, motivations and consumption of organic food. British Food Journal, 113(11), 1353–1378. CrossRef
Akbostanci, E. G., Tunc, I., & Turut-Asik, S. (2007). Pollution haven hypothesis and the role of dirty industries in Turkey’s exports. Environment and Development Economics, 12(2), 297–322. CrossRef
Andrews, R. N. L. (1998). Environmental regulation and business ‘self-regulation’. Policy Sciences, 31(3), 177–197. CrossRef
Arimura, T. H., Darnall, N., Ganguli, R., & Katayama, H. (2016). The effect of ISO 14001 on environmental performance: Resolving equivocal findings. Journal of Environmental Management, 166, 556–566. CrossRef
Baek, K. (2017). The diffusion of voluntary environmental programs: The case of ISO 14001 in Korea, 1996–2011. Journal of Business Ethics, 145(2), 325–336. CrossRef
Bansal, P., & Hunter, P. (2003). Strategic explanations for early adoption of ISO 14001. Journal of Business Ethics, 46(3), 289–299. CrossRef
Barro, R., & Lee, J. (2013). A new data set of educational attainment in the world, 1950–2010. Journal of Development Economics, 104, 184–198. CrossRef
Bartkus, K. R., Hartman, C. L., & Howell, R. D. (1999). The measurement of consumer environmental knowledge: Revisions and extensions. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 14(1), 129–146.
Bellemare, M. F., Masaki, T., & Pepinsky, T. B. (2017). Lagged explanatory variables and the estimation of causal effects. The Journal of Politics, 79(3), 949–963. CrossRef
Bellesi, F., Lehrer, D., & Tal, A. (2005). Comparative advantage: The impact of ISO 14001 environmental certification on exports. Environmental Science and Technology, 39(7), 1943–1953. CrossRef
Berliner, D., & Prakash, A. (2013). Signaling environmental stewardship in the shadow of weak governance: The global diffusion of ISO 14001. Law & Society Review, 47(2), 345–373. CrossRef
Berliner, D., & Prakash, A. (2014). Public authority and private rules: How domestic regulatory institutions shape the adoption of global private regimes. International Studies Quarterly, 58(4), 793–803. CrossRef
Bia, M., & Mattei, A. (2008). A stata package for the estimation of the dose-response function through adjustment for the generalized propensity score. The Stata Journal, 8(3), 354–373.
Blackman, A., & Rivera, J. (2011). Producer-level benefits of sustainability certification. Conservation Biology, 25(6), 1176–1185. CrossRef
Bu, M., & Wagner, M. (2016). Racing to the bottom and racing to the top: The crucial role of firm characteristics in foreign direct investment choices. Journal of International Business Studies, 47, 1032–1057. CrossRef
Chan, R. Y. K., & Lau, L. B. Y. (2000). Antecedents of green purchase: A survey in China. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 17(4), 338–357. CrossRef
Cole, M. A. (2004). Trade, the pollution haven hypothesis and the environmental kuznets curve: Examining the linkages. Ecological Economics, 48(1), 71–81. CrossRef
Connell, K. Y. H. (2010). Internal and external barriers to eco-conscious apparel acquisition. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 34(3), 279–286. CrossRef
Copeland, B. R., & Taylor, M. S. (2004). Trade, growth, and the environment. Journal of Economic Literature, 42(1), 7–71. CrossRef
Curkovic, S., & Sroufe, R. (2011). Using ISO 14001 to promote a sustainable supply chain strategy. Business Strategy and the Environment, 20(2), 71–93. CrossRef
Darnall, N., & Carmin, J. (2005). Greener and Cleaner? The signaling accuracy of U.S. Voluntary environmental programs. Policy Sciences, 38(2–3), 71–90. CrossRef
Davies, R. B., & Vadlamannati, K. C. (2013). A race to the bottom in labor standards? An empirical investigation. Journal of Development Economics, 103, 1–14. CrossRef
Delmas, M. A. (2000). Barriers and incentives to the adoption of ISO 14001 by firms in the United States. Duke Environmental Law & Policy Forum, 11(1), 1–38.
Delmas, M., & Montiel, I. (2008). The diffusion of voluntary international management standards: Responsible care, ISO 9000, and ISO 14001 in the chemical industry. Policy Studies Journal, 36(1), 65–93. CrossRef
Drezner, D. W. (2001). Globalization and policy convergence. International Studies Review, 3(1), 53–78. CrossRef
Esty, D. C., & Geradin, D. (1998). Environmental protection and international competitiveness: A conceptual framework. Journal of World Trade, 32(3), 5–46.
Eze, U. C., & Ndubisi, N. O. (2013). Green buyer behavior: Evidence from Asia consumers. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 48(4), 413–426. CrossRef
Gamso, J. (2017a). Trade partnerships and environmental performance in developing countries. Journal of Environment and Development, 26(4), 375–399. CrossRef
Gamso, J. (2017b). South–south trade and collective labour laws: Do developing countries race to the top when they trade with the South? Journal of International Relations and Development. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41268-017-0124-y.
Gelissen, J. (2007). Explaining popular support for environmental protection: A multilevel analysis of 50 nations. Environment and Behavior, 39(3), 392–415. CrossRef
Greenhill, B., Mosley, L., & Prakash, A. (2009). Trade-based diffusion of labor rights: A panel study, 1986–2002. American Political Science Review, 103(04), 669–690. CrossRef
Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1993). Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement. In P. M. Garber (Ed.), The Mexico-US free trade agreement (pp. 13–56). Cambridge: MIT Press. CrossRef
Haron, S. A., Paim, L., & Yahata, N. (2005). Towards sustainable consumption: An examination of environmental knowledge among malaysians. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 29(5), 426–436. CrossRef
Holzinger, K., & Sommerer, T. (2011). ‘Race to the bottom’ or ‘race to brussels’? Environmental competition in Europe. Journal of Common Market Studies, 49(2), 315–339. CrossRef
International Monetary Fund. (2014). Direction of trade statistics. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]. https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07628.v2.
Joshi, Y., & Rahman, Z. (2015). Factors affecting green purchase behavior and future research directions. International Strategic Management Review, 3(1–2), 128–143. CrossRef
Kaufman, R. R., & Segura-Ubiergo, A. (2001). Globalization, domestic politics, and social spending in latin America: A time-series cross-section analysis, 1973–97. World Politics, 53(4), 553–587. CrossRef
Kollman, K., & Prakash, A. (2002). EMS-based environmental regimes as club goods: Examining variations in firm-level adoption of ISO 14001 and EMAS in U.K., U.S. and Germany. Policy Sciences, 35(1), 43–67. CrossRef
Kopstein, J. S., & Reilly, D. A. (2000). Geographic diffusion and transformation of the post-communist world. World Politics, 53(1), 1–37. CrossRef
Kortelainen, K. (2008). Global supply chains and social requirements: Case studies of labour condition auditing in the People’s Republic of China. Business Strategy and the Environment, 17(7), 431–433. CrossRef
Lea, E., & Worsley, A. (2008). Australian consumers’ food-related environmental beliefs and behaviors. Appetite, 50(2), 207–214. CrossRef
Lewbel, A. (1997). Constructing instruments for regressions with measurement error when no additional data are available, with an application to patents and R&D. Econometrica, 65(5), 1201–1213. CrossRef
Mabey, N., McNally, R., & Zarsky, L. (2003). Foreign direct investment and the environment: From pollution havens to sustainable development (2nd ed.). Vaud: World Wide Fund for Nature, WWF-UK Report.
Marcoux, C., & Urpelainen, J. (2012). Dynamics of spatial interdependence: The convergent effects of international trade on voluntary environmental standards. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 30(5), 871–890. CrossRef
Neumayer, E. (2001). Do countries fail to raise environmental standards? An evaluation of policy options addressing ‘regulatory chill’. International Journal of Sustainable Development, 4(3), 231–244. CrossRef
Neumayer, E., & Perkins, R. (2004). What explains the uneven take-up of ISO 14001 at the global level? A panel-data analysis. Environment and Planning A, 36(5), 823–839. CrossRef
Peattie, K. (2010). Green consumption: Behavior and norms. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 35, 195–228. CrossRef
Perkins, R., & Neumayer, E. (2012). Does the ‘California effect’ operate across borders? Trading- and investing-up in automobile emission standards. Journal of European Public Policy, 19(2), 217–237. CrossRef
Porter, G. (1999). Trade competition and pollution standards: “Race to the bottom” or “stuck at the bottom”. The Journal of Environment and Development, 8(2), 133–151. CrossRef
Posthuma, A. (2010). Beyond “regulatory enclaves”: Challenges and opportunities to promote decent work in global production networks. In A. Posthuma & D. Nathans (Eds.), Labor in global production networks in India (pp. 57–80). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Potoski, M. (2001). Clean air federalism: Do states race to the bottom? Public Administration Review, 61(3), 335–342. CrossRef
Prakash, A., & Potoski, M. (2006). Racing to the bottom? Trade, environmental governance, and ISO 14001. American Journal of Political Science, 50(2), 350–364. CrossRef
Prakash, A., & Potoski, M. (2007). Investing up: FDI and the cross-country diffusion of ISO 14001 management systems. International Studies Quarterly, 51(3), 723–744. CrossRef
Prakash, A., & Potoski, M. (2016). The EU effect: Does trade with the EU reduce CO 2 emissions in the developing world. Environmental Politics, 26(1), 27–48. CrossRef
Preuss, L. (2005). Rhetoric and reality of corporate greening: A view from the supply chain management function. Business Strategy and the Environment, 14(2), 123–139. CrossRef
Rivera, J. (2002). Assessing a voluntary environmental initiative in the developing world: The Costa Rican certification for sustainable tourism. Policy Sciences, 35(4), 333–360. CrossRef
Rivera, J., & De Leon, P. (2005). Chief executive officers and voluntary environmental performance: Costa Rica’s certification for sustainable tourism. Policy Sciences, 38(2–3), 107–127. CrossRef
Rivera, J., & Oh, C. H. (2013). Environmental regulations and multinational corporations’ foreign market entry investments. Policy Studies Journal, 41(2), 243–272. CrossRef
Rodrik, D. (1998). Why do more open economies have bigger governments? Journal of Political Economy, 106(5), 997–1032. CrossRef
Roht-Arriaza, N. (1997). Environmental management system and environmental protection. Journal of Environment and Development, 6(3), 292–316. CrossRef
Saikawa, E. (2013). Policy diffusion of emission standards: Is there a race to the top? World Politics, 65(01), 1–33. CrossRef
Sheldon, I. (2006). Trade and environmental policy: A race to the bottom? Journal of Agricultural Economics, 57(3), 365–392. CrossRef
Simmons, B., & Elkins, Z. (2004). The globalization of liberalization. American Political Science Review, 98(1), 171–189. CrossRef
Studer, S., Welford, R., & Hills, P. (2006). Engaging Hong Kong business in environmental change: Drivers and barriers. Business Strategy and the Environment, 15(6), 416–431. CrossRef
Vachon, S., & Klassen, R. D. (2007). Supply chain management and environmental technologies: The role of integration. International Journal of Production Research, 45(2), 401–423. CrossRef
Vogel, D. (1995). Trading up: Consumer and environmental regulation in a global economy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Vogel, D. (2008). Private global business regulation. Annual Review of Political Science, 11, 261–282. CrossRef
Wu, J., & Ma, Z. (2016). Export intensity and MNE customers’ environmental requirements: Effects on local Chinese suppliers’ environmental strategies. Journal of Business Ethics, 135(2), 327–339. CrossRef
Zarsky, L. (1997). Stuck in the mud? Nation-states, globalization, and environment. Globalization and environment—preliminary perspectives (pp. 27–51). Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.
Zeng, K., & Eastin, J. (2007). International economic integration and environmental protection: The case of China. International Studies Quarterly, 51(4), 971–995. CrossRef
Zeng, K., & Eastin, J. (2012). Do developing countries invest up? The environmental effects of foreign direct investment from less-developed countries. World Development, 40(11), 2221–2233. CrossRef
- Trade-based adoption of voluntary environmental programs in the developing world: Racing to the top or stuck in the mud?
- Springer US
Integrating Knowledge and Practice to Advance Human Dignity
Print ISSN: 0032-2687
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-0891
Neuer Inhalt/© Stellmach, Neuer Inhalt/© BBL, Neuer Inhalt/© Maturus, Pluta Logo/© Pluta, Neuer Inhalt/© hww, So bewältigen Sie Stress im Fernstudium/© granata68 | stock.adobe.com | AdobeStock