nach oben

Erschienen in:

2016 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Transforming Process Models to Problem Frames

verfasst von : Stephan Faßbender, Banu Aysolmaz

Erschienen in: Business Process Management Workshops

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

An increase of process awareness within organizations and advances in IT systems led to a development of process-aware information systems (PAIS) in many organizations. UPROM is developed as a unified BPM methodology to conduct business process and user requirements analysis for PAIS in an integrated way. However, due to the purpose, granularity and form of UPROM artifacts, one cannot analyze the software requirements in detail with (semi-)formal methods for properties such as completeness, compliance and quality. In contrast, Problem Frames modeled using the UML4PF tool can be used for such analysis. But using the Problem Frames notation and corresponding methods alone does not cover a direct support for building a PAIS. Hence, in this work we propose to integrate UPROM and UML4PF using model transformation. We use eCompany, a project which is part of an e-government program, as running example.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Counterexample Analysis for Supporting Containment Checking of Business Process Models

Nächstes Kapitel Visualizing Human Behavior and Cognition: The Case of Process Modeling

All transformation tables can be found in a technical report available under http://www.uml4pf.org/publications/TR20150306_UPROM2UML4PF.pdf.

http://www.uml4pf.org/publications/TR20150306_UPROM2UML4PF.pdf.

The tool and used models are available under http://www.uml4pf.org/ext-uprom/index.html.

Sinur, J., Hill, J.B.: Magic Quadrant for Business Process Management Suites (2010)

Monsalve, C., April, A., Abran, A.: On the expressiveness of business process modeling notations for software requirements elicitation. In: IECON 2012, pp. 3132–3137 (2012)

de la Vara, J.L., Fortuna, M.H., Sánchez, J., Werner, C.M.L., Borges, M.R.S.: A requirements engineering approach for data modelling of process-aware information systems. In: Abramowicz, W. (ed.) BIS 2009. LNBIP, vol. 21, pp. 133–144. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRef

Aysolmaz, B., Demirörs, O.: Modeling business processes to generate artifacts for software development: a methodology. In: MISE Workshop, Hydarabad, India (2014)

Nicolás, J., Toval, A.: On the generation of requirements specifications from software engineering models: a systematic literature review. Inf. Softw. Technol. 51(9), 1291–1307 (2009)CrossRef

Aysolmaz, B.: UPROM: A Unified Business Process Modeling Methodology. Phd, Middle East Technical University (2014)

Jackson, M.: Problem Frames: Analyzing and Structuring Software Development Problems. Addison-Wesley, Boston (2001)

Hatebur, D., Heisel, M.: Making pattern- and model-based software development more rigorous. In: Dong, J.S., Zhu, H. (eds.) ICFEM 2010. LNCS, vol. 6447, pp. 253–269. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRef

Beckers, K., Faßbender, S., Heisel, M., Meis, R.: A problem-based approach for computer-aided privacy threat identification. In: Preneel, B., Ikonomou, D. (eds.) APF 2012. LNCS, vol. 8319, pp. 1–16. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)CrossRef

10.

Faßbender, S., Heisel, M., Meis, R.: Functional requirements under security pressure. In: Proceedings of ICSOFT-PT 2014 (2014)

11.

Faßbender, S., Heisel, M.: A computer-aided process from problems to laws in requirements engineering. In: Cordeiro, J., Sinderen, M. (eds.) ICSOFT 2013. CCIS, vol. 457, pp. 215–234. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

12.

Beckers, K., Côté, I., Faßbender, S., Heisel, M., Hofbauer, S.: A pattern-based method for establishing a cloud-specific information security management system. RE J. (2013)

13.

Alebrahim, A., Faßbender, S., Heisel, M., Meis, R.: Problem-based requirements interaction analysis. In: Salinesi, C., van de Weerd, I. (eds.) REFSQ 2014. LNCS, vol. 8396, pp. 200–215. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)CrossRef

14.

Alebrahim, A., Choppy, C., Faßbender, S., Heisel, M.: Optimizing functional and quality requirements according to stakeholders’ goals. In: System Quality and Software Architecture (SQSA), pp. 75–120. Elsevier (2014)

15.

Faßbender, S., Heisel, M., Meis, R.: Aspect-oriented requirements engineering with problem frames. In: Proceedings of ICSOFT-PT 2014 (2014)

16.

Alebrahim, A., Faßbender, S., Filipczyk, M., Goedicke, M., Heisel, M., Konersmann, M.: Towards a computer-aided problem-oriented variability requirements engineering method. In: Iliadis, L., Papazoglou, M., Pohl, K. (eds.) CAiSE Workshops 2014. LNBIP, vol. 178, pp. 136–147. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

17.

Alebrahim, A., Hatebur, D., Heisel, M.: Towards systematic integration of quality requirements into software architecture. In: Crnkovic, I., Gruhn, V., Book, M. (eds.) ECSA 2011. LNCS, vol. 6903, pp. 17–25. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRef

18.

Aysolmaz, B., Demirörs, O.: Deriving user requirements from business process models for automation: a case study. In: IEEE REBPM Workshop, pp. 19–28 (2014)

19.

Pourshahid, A., Amyot, D., Peyton, L., Ghanavati, S., Chen, P., Weiss, M., Forster, A.J.: Toward an integrated user requirements notation framework and tool for business process management. In: 2008 International MCETECH Conference on e-Technologies (2008)

20.

Cox, K., Phalp, K.T., Bleistein, S.J., Verner, J.M.: Deriving requirements from process models via the problem frames approach. Inf. Softw. Technol. 47(5), 319–337 (2005)CrossRef

Titel: Transforming Process Models to Problem Frames
verfasst von: Stephan Faßbender
Banu Aysolmaz
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: Business Process Management Workshops
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-42886-4

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-42887-1

Copyright-Jahr: 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42887-1_42

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"