Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Specific Viruses Present in Polluted Groundwater Are Indicative of the Source of Nitrates and Faecal Contamination in Agricultural Areas Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2016 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Trend Assessment for Groundwater Pollutants: A Brief Review and Some Remarks

verfasst von : Francesc Oliva, Esteban Vegas, Sergi Civit, Teresa Garrido, Josep Fraile, Antoni Munné

Erschienen in: Experiences from Ground, Coastal and Transitional Water Quality Monitoring

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Groundwater is a valuable natural resource that needs to be assessed and protected. The European Union (EU) adopted new water legislation that includes the Water Framework Directive (WFD) and the Groundwater Daughter Directive (GWD). Both require the identification of sustained increasing pollution trends and their reversal. This is the second pillar of the WFD: such trends have to be identified for any pollutants that result in groundwater being characterized as at risk of not meeting the environmental objectives. Measuring these trends is necessary to determine and understand whether changes in land use, fertilizer application, pollution history, or climate change are affecting groundwater quality. However, in many cases, groundwater data series may not meet minimum requirements for classical statistical procedures employed in trend assessment: among other obstacles, data may be sparse, with missing or extreme values, censored data, seasonal effects, and autocorrelation. The aim of this chapter is to present and review several statistical methodologies that have been proposed and applied in recent years to deal with groundwater trend assessment, discussing the relative advantages and disadvantages of each one.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Specific Viruses Present in Polluted Groundwater Are Indicative of the Source of Nitrates and Faecal Contamination in Agricultural Areas
Nächstes Kapitel Occurrence of Polar Organic Pollutants in Groundwater Bodies of Catalonia
Literatur
1.
EC (2008) European Commission Groundwater Protection in Europe. The new groundwater directive-consolidating the EU regulatory framework, vol 35. doi: 10.2779/84304
2.
Grath J, Ward R, Scheidleder A, Quevauviller P (2009) General introduction: objectives of groundwater assessment and monitoring. In: Quevauviller P, Fouillac A, Gralh J, Ward R (eds) Groundwater monitoring. Wiley, Chichester, pp 3–22
3.
EU (2000) European Parliament and Council Directive 2000/60/EC of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy (OJ L 327, 22/12/2000, p. 1) as amended by European Parliament and Council Decision 2455/2001/EC (OJ L 331, 15/12/2001, p. 1), European Commission, Brussels
4.
EU (2006) European Parliament and Council of the European Union European Parliament and Council Directive of 12 December 2006 on the protection of groundwater against pollution and deterioration (2006/118/EC). Offi J Eur Commun L372/19
5.
6.
Hirsch RM, Slack JR (1984) A nonparametric trend test for seasonal data with serial dependence. Water Resour Res 20:727CrossRef
7.
Broers HP, Visser A, Chilton JP, Stuart ME (2009) Assessing and aggregating trends in groundwater quality. In: Quevauviller P, Fouillac A, Gralh J, Ward R (eds) Groundwater monitoring. Wiley, Chichester, pp 189–206CrossRef
8.
Grath J, Scheidleder A, Uhlig S et al (2001) The EU water framework directive: statistical aspects of the identification of groundwater pollution trends, and aggregation of monitoring results. Final Report. 63
9.
EC (2009) European Commission Environment Common implementation strategy guidance for the water framework strategy (2000/60/2006). Guidance Document No 18. Guidance on groundwater status and trend assessment, vol 82
10.
11.
Lettenmaier DP, Conquest LL, Hughes JP (1982) Routine streams and rivers water quality trend monitoring review. Charles W. Harris Hydraulics Laboratory, Technical Report No. 75. University of Washington
12.
Van Belle G, Hughes JP (1984) Nonparametric tests for trend in water quality. Water Resour Res 20:127–136CrossRef
13.
14.
15.
Hirsch RM, Alexander RB, Smith RA (1991) Selection of methods for the detection and estimation of trends in water quality. Water Resour Res 27:803–813CrossRef
16.
17.
Esterby SR (1993) Trend analysis methods for environmental data. Environmetrics 4:459–481CrossRef
18.
Esterby S (1996) Review of methods for the detection and estimation of trends with emphasis on water quality applications. Hydrol Process 10:127–149CrossRef
19.
Reckhow KH, Kepford K, Hicks WW (1993) Statistical methods for the analysis of lake water quality trends. Report 841-R-93-003
20.
Loftis J (1996) Trends in groundwater quality. Hydrol Process 10:335–355CrossRef
21.
22.
Helsel DR, Hirsch RM (2002) Trend analysis. In: Statistical methods in water resources. Techniques of Water Resources Investigations, Book 4, chapter A3. U.S. Geological Survey, pp 323–355
23.
Kundzewicz ZW, Robson AJ (2004) Change detection in hydrological records—a review of the methodology / Revue méthodologique de la détection de changementsdans les chroniqueshydrologiques. Hydrol Sci J 49:7–19. doi:10.​1623/​hysj.​49.​1.​7.​53993 CrossRef
24.
Helsel DR, Frans LM (2006) Regional Kendal test for trend. Environ Sci Technol 40(13):4066–4073CrossRef
25.
26.
Visser A, Dubus I, Broers HP et al (2009) Comparison of methods for the detection and extrapolation of trends in groundwater quality. J Environ Monit 11:2030–2043. doi:10.​1039/​b905926a CrossRef
27.
NNPSMP (2011) Statistical analysis for monotonic trends, Tech Notes 6. Office of Water US Environmental Protection Agency
28.
Machiwal D, Jha MK (2012) Trend and homogeneity in subsurface hydrologic variables: case study in a hard-rock aquifer of western India. In: Machiwal D, Jha MK (eds) Hydrologic time series analysis: theory and practice. Springer, Netherlands, pp 165–180. doi:10.​1007/​978-94-007-1861-6_​8 CrossRef
29.
30.
Devreker D, Lefebvre A (2014) TTAinterfaceTrendAnalysis: an R GUI for routine temporal trend analysis and diagnostics. J Oceanogr Res Data 7:1
31.
32.
Hampel FR, Rousseuw PJ, Ronchetti E, Stahel W (1986) Robust statistic: the approach based on influence functions. Wiley, New York
33.
Rousseeuw PJ, Leroy AM (1987) Robust regression and outlier detection. Wiley, New YorkCrossRef
34.
Marazzi A (1993) Algorithms, routines, and S functions for robust statistics. CRC, New York
35.
36.
Bellio R, Ventura L (2005) An introduction to robust estimation with R functions. Proceedings of 1st International Work, pp 1–57
37.
Huber PJ (1973) Robust regression: asymptotics, conjectures and Monte Carlo. Ann Stat 1:799–821CrossRef
38.
Cleveland WS (1979) Robust locally weighted regression and smoothing scatterplots. J Am Stat Assoc 74:829–836CrossRef
39.
Cleveland WS, Devlin SJ, Grosse E (1988) Regression by local fitting. J Econ 37:87–114CrossRef
40.
Cleveland WS, Grosse E (1991) Computational methods for local regression. Stat Comput 1:47–62CrossRef
41.
Cleveland WS, Devlin SJ (1988) Locally weighted regression: an approach to regression analysis by local fitting. J Am Stat Assoc 83:596–610. doi:10.​2307/​2289282 CrossRef
42.
Hurvich CM, Simonoff JS, Tsai CL (1998) Smoothing parameter selection in nonparametric regression using an improved Akaike Information Criterion. J R Stat Soc Ser B 60:271–293CrossRef
43.
Akaike H (1973) Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In: Petrov BN, Csáki F (eds) Second international symposium on information theory, Tsahkadsor, Armenia, USSR, September 2–8, 1971, AkadémiaiKiadó, Budapest, pp 267–281
44.
45.
46.
47.
48.
Kundzewicz ZW, Robson AJ (eds) (2000) Detecting trend and other changes in hydrological data. World Climate Programme—Water, World Climate Programme Data and Monitoring, WCDMP-45, WMO/TD no. 1013. World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
49.
50.
Toms JD, Lesperance ML (2003) Piecewise regression: a tool for identifying ecological thresholds. Ecology 84:2034–2041CrossRef
51.
Steele TD, Gilroy EJ, Hawkinson RO (1974) Techniques for the assessment of areal and temporal variations in streamflow quality. Open File Report, U.S. Geol. Surv., Washington, D.C.
52.
Cailas MD, Cavadias G, Gehr R (1986) Application of a nonparametric approach for monitoring and detecting trends in water quality data of the St. Lawrence River. Water Pollut Res J Can 21(2):153–167
53.
Berryman D, Bobée B, Haemmerli J (1988) Nonparametric tests for trend detection in water quality time series. J Am Water Resour Assoc 24:545–556CrossRef
54.
55.
56.
Yu Y, Zou S, Whittemore D (1993) Non-parametric trend analysis of water quality data of rivers in Kansas. J Hydrol 150:61–80CrossRef
57.
58.
Gan TY (1998) Hydroclimatic trends and possible climatic warming in the Canadian Prairies. Water Resour Res 34:3009–3015CrossRef
59.
Cun C, Vilagines R (1997) Time series analysis on chlorides, nitrates, ammonium and dissolved oxygen concentrations in the Seine river near Paris. Sci Total Environ 208:59–69CrossRef
60.
Douglas E, Vogel R, Kroll C (2000) Trends in floods and low flows in the United States: impact of spatial correlation. J Hydrol 240:90–105CrossRef
61.
62.
63.
Mann HB (1945) Non-parametric test against trend. Econometrica 13:245–259CrossRef
64.
65.
Kendall MG (1962) Rank correlation methods, 3rd edn. Hafner, New York
66.
Kendall M (1975) Multivariate methods. Charles Griffin, London
67.
68.
Gan TY (1992) Finding trends in air temperature and precipitation for Canada and North-eastern United States. In: Kite GW, Harvey KD (eds) Using hydrometric data to detect and monitor climatic change. Proceedings of NHRI Workshop No. 8, National Hydrology Research Institute, Saskatoon, SK, pp 57–78
69.
70.
Sneyers R (1990) On the statistical analysis of series of observations. World Meteorological Organization, Technical Note 143, Geneva, Switzerland
71.
72.
73.
Theil H (1950) A rank-invariant method of linear and polynomial regression analysis. NederlAkadWetensch Proc 53:386–392 (Part I), 521–525 (Part II), 1397–1412 (Part III)
74.
Sen PK (1968) Estimates of the regression coefficient based on Kendall’s Tau. J Am Stat Assoc 63:1379–1389CrossRef
75.
76.
Bodenhofer U, Klawonn F (2008) Robust rank correlation coefficients on the basis of fuzzy orderings: initial steps. An overview of rank correlation measures. Mathwa Soft Comput 15:5–20
77.
78.
Bodenhofer U, Krone M (2013) RoCoCo an R package implementing a robust rank correlation coefficient and a corresponding test, software manual. Institute of Bioinformatics, Johannes Kepler University Linz
79.
Von Storch H (1995) Misuses of statistical analysis in climate research. In: von Storch H, Navarra A (eds) Analysis of climate variability SE-2. Springer, Berlin, pp 11–26CrossRef
80.
Yue S, Pilon P, Phinney B, Cavadias G (2002) The influence of autocorrelation on the ability to detect trend in hydrological series. Hydrol Process 16:1807–1829. doi:10.​1002/​hyp.​1095 CrossRef
81.
82.
Yue S, Pilon P (2004) A comparison of the power of the t test, Mann–Kendall and bootstrap tests for trend detection. Hydrol Sci J 49(1):21–37CrossRef
83.
Önöz B, Bayazit M (2011) Block bootstrap for Mann–Kendall trend test of serially dependent data. Hydrol Process 26:1–19
84.
85.
Khaliq MN, Ouarda TBMJ, Gachon P et al (2009) Identification of hydrological trends in the presence of serial and cross correlations: a review of selected methods and their application to annual flow regimes of Canadian rivers. J Hydrol 368:117–130. doi:10.​1016/​j.​jhydrol.​2009.​01.​035 CrossRef
86.
87.
Yue S, Wang CY (2002) Applicability of prewhitening to eliminate the influence of serial correlation on the Mann-Kendall test. Water Resour Res 38:4–1–4–7. doi:10.​1029/​2001WR000861
88.
Miao C, Ni J (2010) Implement of filter to remove the autocorrelation’s influence on the Mann-Kendall test: a case in hydrological series. Int J Food Agric 8:1241–1246
89.
90.
91.
Perron P, Yabu T (2009) Estimating deterministic trends with an integrated or stationary noise component. J Econ 151:56–69CrossRef
92.
Salmi T, Maatta A, Anttila P, Ruoho-Airola T, Amnell T (2002) Detecting trends of annual values of atmospheric pollutants by the Mann–Kendall test and Sen’s slope estimates. Publ Air Qual 31:1–35
93.
94.
U.S. EPA (2009) US Environmental Protection Agency. Statistical analysis of groundwater monitoring data at RCRA facilities. Unified Guidance. Appendix C3. EPA 530/R-09-007
95.
Arnau J, Bono R (2001) Autocorrelation and bias in short time series: an alternative estimator. Qual Quant 365–387
96.
Arnau J, Bono R (2002) A program to calculate the empirical bias in autocorrelation estimators. Psicothema 14:669–672
97.
98.
Solanas A, Manolov R, Sierra V (2010) Lag-one autocorrelation in short series: estimation and hypotheses testing. Int J Method Exp Psychol 31(2):357–381
99.
Fuller WA (1976) Introduction to statistical time series. Wiley, New York
100.
Moran PAP (1948) The interpretation of statistical maps. J R Stat Soc Ser B 3:243–251
101.
102.
Kendall M, Ord JK (1990) Time series. Edward Arnold, London
103.
Decarlo LT, Tryon WW (1993) Estimating and testing autocorrelation with small samples: a comparison of the c-statistic to a modified estimator. Behav Res Ther 31:781–788CrossRef
104.
Matyas TA, Greenwood KM (1991) Problems in the estimation of autocorrelation in brief time series and some implications for behavioral data. Behav Assess 13:137–157
105.
106.
107.
108.
Bayley G, Hammersley J (1946) The “effective” number of independent observations in an autocorrelated time series. J R Stat Soc 8:184–197
109.
Yue S, Pilon P, Phinney B (2003) Canadian streamflow trend detection: impacts of serial and cross-correlation. Hydrol Sci J 48:51–63CrossRef
110.
111.
112.
113.
114.
Tabari H, Abghari H, Hosseinzadeh Talaee P (2012) Temporal trends and spatial characteristics of drought and rainfall in arid and semiarid regions of Iran. Hydrol Process 26:3351–3361. doi:10.​1002/​hyp.​8460 CrossRef
115.
116.
117.
Salas-La Cruz JD (1972) Information content of the regional mean, vol 2. In: Proceedings of the international symposium on uncertainties in hydrologic and water resource systems. University of Arizona, Tucson, pp 646–660
118.
119.
120.
121.
Davies RB (1987) Hypothesis testing when a nuisance parameter is present only under the alternative. Biometrika 74:33–43
122.
Muggeo VMR (2008) Segmented: an R package to fit regression models with broken-line relationships. R News 8:20–25
Metadaten
Titel
Trend Assessment for Groundwater Pollutants: A Brief Review and Some Remarks
verfasst von
Francesc Oliva
Esteban Vegas
Sergi Civit
Teresa Garrido
Josep Fraile
Antoni Munné
Copyright-Jahr
2016
Buch
Experiences from Ground, Coastal and Transitional Water Quality Monitoring

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-23903-3

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-23904-0

Copyright-Jahr: 2016

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/698_2015_407