Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Wireless Personal Communications
Erschienen in: Wireless Personal Communications 4/2018

18.05.2018

Trust Based Intrusion Detection Technique to Detect Selfish Nodes in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks

verfasst von: Sunil Kumar, Kamlesh Dutta

Erschienen in: Wireless Personal Communications | Ausgabe 4/2018

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The applications and protocols conceived for mobile ad hoc networks rely on the assumption of cooperation amongst the mobile nodes because of lacking infrastructure. All nodes have to spend their precious resources (e.g. battery power, memory, computational power, and network bandwidth) for routing and packet forwarding operations for other nodes, in a cooperative way in the network. However, there are some nodes that may intentionally turn themselves to behave selfishly in order to conserve their valuable resources. The selfish behaviour of such nodes drastically reduces the desired degree of cooperation amongst the mobile nodes. Over the course of time, the non-cooperative activities of, such selfish nodes would paralyze the normal functioning of the whole network. Therefore, these types of nodes should be detected and isolated from the network, as soon as they begin to exhibit their selfish behaviour. In this paper, a dynamic trust based intrusion detection technique is presented to detect and isolate the selfish nodes from the network, where the direct trust degree based on direct communication interactions and indirect (recommended) trust degree based on the neighbours’ recommendations are taking into account to accurately judge the selfishness nature of the nodes. The results obtained throughout the simulation experiments clearly show the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed intrusion detection technique.
Vorheriger Artikel A Resource Allocation Scheme with Fractional Frequency Reuse in Multi-cell OFDMA Systems
Nächster Artikel Cognitive Radio Networks: Analysis of a Paid-Sharing Approach Based on Admission Control Decisions

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
1.
Chlamtac, I., Conti, M., & Liu, J. J. N. (2003). Mobile ad hoc networking: imperatives and challenges. Ad Hoc Networks, 1(1), 13–64.CrossRef
2.
Hoebeke, J., Moerman, I., Dhoedt, B., & Demeester, P. (2004). An overview of mobile ad hoc networks: applications and challenges. Journal-Communications Network, 3(3), 60–66.
3.
Al-Karaki, J. N., & Kamal, A. E. (2004). Routing techniques in wireless sensor networks: A survey. IEEE Wireless Communications, 11(6), 6–28.CrossRef
4.
Buttyán, L., & Hubaux, J. P. (2003). Stimulating cooperation in self-organizing mobile ad hoc networks. Mobile Networks and Applications, 8(5), 579–592.CrossRef
5.
Chiejina, E., Xiao, H., & Christianson, B. (2015). A dynamic reputation management system for mobile ad hoc networks. Computers, 4(2), 87–112.CrossRef
6.
Rodriguez-Mayol, A., & Gozalvez, J. (2014). Reputation based selfishness prevention techniques for mobile ad-hoc networks. Telecommunication Systems, 57(2), 181–195.CrossRef
7.
Sun, Y. L., Han, Z., Yu, W., & Liu, K. R. (2006). A trust evaluation framework in distributed networks: Vulnerability analysis and defense against attacks. In Proceedings of 25TH IEEE international conference on computer communications (IEEE INFOCOM 2006) (pp. 1–13). IEEE.
8.
Jiang, J., Han, G., Wang, F., Shu, L., & Guizani, M. (2015). An efficient distributed trust model for wireless sensor networks. IEEE transactions on parallel and distributed systems, 26(5), 1228–1237.CrossRef
9.
Perkins, C. E, & Royer, E. M. (1999). Ad hoc on-demand distance vector routing. In Proceedings of 2nd IEEE workshop on mobile computing systems and applications (WMCSA’99) (pp. 90–100). IEEE.
10.
Michiardi, P., & Molva, R. (2002). Simulation-based analysis of security exposures in mobile ad hoc networks. In Proceedings of European wireless conference 2002: Next generation wireless networks: Technologies, protocols, services applications (pp. 15–17).
11.
Subramaniyan, S., Johnson, W., & Subramaniyan, K. (2014). A distributed framework for detecting selfish nodes in MANET using Record-and Trust-Based Detection (RTBD) technique. EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, 2014(1), 205.CrossRef
12.
Sengathir, J., & Manoharan, R. (2015). Exponential reliability coefficient based reputation mechanism for isolating selfish nodes in MANETs. Egyptian Informatics Journal, 16(2), 231–241.CrossRef
13.
Kargl, F., Klenk, A., Schlott, S., & Weber, M. (2004). Advanced detection of selfish or malicious nodes in ad hoc networks. In European Workshop on Security in Ad hoc and Sensor Networks (pp. 152–165). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
14.
Yoo, Y., Ahn, S., & Agrawal, D. P. (2005). A credit-payment scheme for packet forwarding fairness in mobile ad hoc networks. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC 2005) (Vol. 5, pp. 3005–3009). IEEE.
15.
Yoo, Y., & Agrawal, D. P. (2006). Why does it pay to be selfish in a MANET? IEEE Wireless Communications, 13(6), 87–97.CrossRef
16.
Toh, C. K., Kim, D., Oh, S., & Yoo, H. (2010). The controversy of selfish nodes in ad hoc networks. In Proceedings of 12th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology (ICACT) (Vol. 2, pp. 1087–1092). IEEE.
17.
Gupta, S., Nagpal, C. K., & Singla, C. (2011). Impact of selfish node concentration in manets. International Journal of Wireless & Mobile Networks (IJWMN), 3(2), 29–37.CrossRef
18.
Marti, S., Giuli, T. J., Lai, K., & Baker, M. (2000). Mitigating routing misbehavior in mobile ad hoc networks. In Proceedings of the 6th ACM annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking (pp. 255–265). ACM.
19.
Hernández-Orallo, E., Olmos, M. D. S., Cano, J. C., Calafate, C. T., & Manzoni, P. (2014). A fast model for evaluating the detection of selfish nodes using a collaborative approach in MANETs. Wireless Personal Communications, 74(3), 1099–1116.CrossRef
20.
Ferraz, L. H. G., Velloso, P. B., & Duarte, O. C. M. (2014). An accurate and precise malicious node exclusion mechanism for ad hoc networks. Ad Hoc Networks, 19, 142–155.CrossRef
21.
Shakshuki, E. M., Kang, N., & Sheltami, T. R. (2013). EAACK—A secure intrusion-detection system for MANETs. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 60(3), 1089–1098.CrossRef
22.
Djenouri, D., Ouali, N., Mahmoudi, A., & Badache, N. (2005). Random feedbacks for selfish nodes detection in mobile ad hoc networks. In T. Magedanz, E. R. M. Madeira, & P. Dini (Eds.), Operations and Management in IP-Based Networks. IPOM 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Vol. 3751, pp. 68–75). Springer, Berlin.
23.
Miranda, H., & Rodrigues, L. (2003). Friends and foes: Preventing selfishness in open mobile ad hoc networks. In Proceedings of 23rd IEEE international conference on distributed computing systems workshops (pp. 440–445). IEEE.
24.
Das, V. V. (2007). IP-based credit mobile ad-hoc networks. In Proceedings of IEEE international conference on computational intelligence and multimedia applications (ICCIMA 2007) (Vol. 4, pp. 453–457). IEEE.
25.
Demir, C., & Comaniciu, C. (2007). An auction based AODV protocol for mobile ad hoc networks with selfish nodes. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC’07) (pp. 3351–3356). IEEE.
26.
Wang, Y., Giruka, V. C., & Singhal, M. (2008). Truthful multipath routing for ad hoc networks with selfish nodes. Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing, 68(6), 778–789.MATHCrossRef
27.
Soltanali, S., Pirahesh, S., Niksefat, S., & Sabaei, M. (2007). An efficient scheme to motivate cooperation in mobile ad hoc networks. In Proceedings of IEEE Third International Conference on Networking and Services (ICNS ‘07) (pp. 98–103). IEEE.
28.
Kumar, J. M. S. P. J., Kathirvel, A., Kirubakaran, N., Sivaraman, P., & Subramaniam, M. (2015). A unified approach for detecting and eliminating selfish nodes in MANETs using TBUT. EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, 2015(1), 143.
29.
Sengathir, J., & Manoharan, R. (2015). Semi-markov Process Based Cooperation Enforcement Mechanism for MANETs. In L. Jain, H. Behera, J. Mandal & D. Mohapatra (Eds.), Computational Intelligence in Data Mining — Volume 2. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies (Vol 32, pp. 683–693). Springer: New Delhi.
30.
Sengathir, J., & Manoharan, R. (2015). A futuristic trust coefficient-based semi-Markov prediction model for mitigating selfish nodes in MANETs. EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, 2015(1), 158.CrossRef
31.
Kaliappan, M., & Paramasivan, B. (2015). Enhancing secure routing in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks using a Dynamic Bayesian Signalling Game model. Computers & Electrical Engineering, 41, 301–313.CrossRef
32.
Mao, Y., & Zhu, P. (2015). A game theoretical model for energy-aware DTN routing in Manets with nodes’ selfishness. Mobile Networks and Applications, 20(5), 593–603.CrossRef
33.
Das, D., Majumder, K., & Dasgupta, A. (2015). Selfish node detection and low cost data transmission in MANET using game theory. Procedia Computer Science, 54, 92–101.CrossRef
34.
Zhao, D. (2006). Access control in ad hoc networks with selfish nodes. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 6(6), 761–772.CrossRef
35.
Yan, L., & Hailes, S. (2008). Designing incentive packet relaying strategies for wireless ad hoc networks with game theory. In A. Miri (Ed.), Wireless Sensor and Actor Networks II. IFIP — The International Federation for Information Processing II (Vol 264, pp. 137–148). Springer: Boston.
36.
Komali, R. S., MacKenzie, A. B., & Gilles, R. P. (2008). Effect of selfish node behavior on efficient topology design. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 7(9), 1057–1070.CrossRef
37.
Refaei, M. T., Srivastava, V., DaSilva, L., & Eltoweissy, M. (2005). A reputation-based mechanism for isolating selfish nodes in ad hoc networks. In Proceedings of 2nd IEEE annual international conference on mobile and ubiquitous systems: Networking and services (MobiQuitous 2005) (pp. 3–11). IEEE.
38.
He, Q., Wu, D., & Khosla, P. (2004). SORI: a secure and objective reputation-based incentive scheme for ad-hoc networks. In Proceedings of IEEE wireless communications and networking conference (WCNC. 2004), (IEEE Cat. No.04TH8733) (Vol. 2, pp. 825–830). IEEE.
39.
Cho, J. H., & Chen, R. (2013). On the tradeoff between altruism and selfishness in MANET trust management. Ad Hoc Networks, 11(8), 2217–2234.CrossRef
40.
Thorat, S. A., & Kulkarni, P. J. (2015). Opportunistic routing in presence of selfish nodes for MANET. Wireless Personal Communications, 82(2), 689–708.CrossRef
41.
Chakrabarti, C., Banerjee, A., Chakrabarti, S., & Chakraborty, A. (2015). A novel approach for non-cooperative node detection and avoidance using reputation-based scheme in mobile ad hoc network. In K. Maharatna, G. Dalapati, P. Banerjee, A. Mallick, M. Mukherjee (Eds.), Computational Advancement in Communication Circuits and Systems. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering (Vol 335, pp. 279–289). New Delhi: Springer.
42.
Velloso, P. B., Laufer, R. P., Cunha, D. D. O., Duarte, O. C. M., & Pujolle, G. (2010). Trust management in mobile ad hoc networks using a scalable maturity-based model. IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management, 7(3), 172–185.CrossRef
43.
McGibney, J., & Botvich, D. (2007). Establishing trust between mail servers to improve spam filtering. In B. Xiao, L. T. Yang, J. Ma, C. Muller-Schloer, Y. Hua (Eds.), Autonomic and Trusted Computing. ATC 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science,  (Vol 4610, pp. 146–155). Springer.
44.
Wang, B., Chen, X., & Chang, W. (2014). A light-weight trust-based QoS routing algorithm for ad hoc networks. Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 13, 164–180.CrossRef
45.
Velloso, P. B. B., Laufer, R. P. P., Duarte, O. C. M., & Pujolle, G. (2008). A trust model robust to slander attacks in ad hoc networks. In Proceedings of 17th IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks (ICCCN’08) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
46.
Kansal, A., Ramamoorthy, A., Srivastava, M. B., & Pottie, G. J. (2005). On sensor network lifetime and data distortion. In Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT 2005) (pp. 6–10). IEEE.
47.
Basu, P., & Redi, J. (2004). Effect of overhearing transmissions on energy efficiency in dense sensor networks. In Proceedings of ACM 3rd international symposium on Information processing in sensor networks—IPSN’04 (pp. 196–204). ACM.
48.
49.
Hua, C., & Yum, T. S. P. (2008). Optimal routing and data aggregation for maximizing lifetime of wireless sensor networks. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking (TON), 16(4), 892–903.CrossRef
50.
Chen, C. L., Lee, J. W., Lin, C. Z., Chen, Y. T., Ker, J. S., & Kuo, Y. H. (2007). Generic energy-efficient geographic routing for ad-hoc wireless networks. In M. K. Denko et al. (Eds.), Emerging Directions in Embedded and Ubiquitous Computing. EUC 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Vol 4809, pp. 321–332). Springer.
Metadaten
Titel
Trust Based Intrusion Detection Technique to Detect Selfish Nodes in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks
verfasst von
Sunil Kumar
Kamlesh Dutta
Publikationsdatum
18.05.2018
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Wireless Personal Communications / Ausgabe 4/2018
Print ISSN: 0929-6212
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-834X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-018-5804-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2018

Wireless Personal Communications 4/2018 Zur Ausgabe

OriginalPaper

New Channel Estimation Method Using Singular Spectrum Analysis for OFDM Systems

OriginalPaper

A Joint Use of Both PAPR Reduction and Neural Network Predistortion Approaches to Compensate the HPA Non-Linearity Impact on FBMC/OQAM Signals

OriginalPaper

Performance Analysis of Joint Relay and Transmit–Receive Antenna Selection for Low Density Parity Check-Asynchronous Distributed Space Time Block Coded Cooperative Diversity System

OriginalPaper

A Resource Allocation Scheme with Fractional Frequency Reuse in Multi-cell OFDMA Systems

OriginalPaper

On Signal Detection for OSTBC-Based Amplify-and-Forward Cooperative Relaying System Over Time Selective Channel

OriginalPaper

An Efficient Image Forgery Detection Using Biorthogonal Wavelet Transform and Improved Relevance Vector Machine

Neuer Inhalt

    Bildnachweise