nach oben

Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications

Erschienen in:

11.01.2021

Trust estimation in peer-to-peer network using BLUE

verfasst von: Ruchir Gupta, Yatindra Nath Singh, Antriksh Goswami

Erschienen in: Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications | Ausgabe 2/2021

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Free-riding is a major problem in peer to peer networks. One of the ways to resolve this problem is by using a reputation management system. Each node provides resources to nodes with higher reputation, as he himself gains in reputation in proportion to the receiver’s reputation. So, free-riding becomes a non-optimal strategy as there is no resulting reputation gain, and hence no available resources over time. An efficient and accurate trust estimation method in the reputation management system is needed for effectiveness of this strategy. The existing trust estimation methods generally do not consider the uncertainties in the inputs. In this paper, we propose a new trust estimation method using BLUE (Best Linear Unbiased Estimator) that also takes into account the uncertainties in the input variables. The results show that using the proposed estimation method, effective trust estimation is achieved in the peer-to-peer resource sharing systems. Thus the free-riding can be countered more effectively.

Vorheriger Artikel A reliable tree-based data aggregation method in wireless sensor networks

Nächster Artikel A secure three-factor anonymous roaming authentication protocol using ECC for space information networks

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Osborne MJ (2009) Introduction to game theory: International edition. Oxford University Press, Oxford. http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oxp:obooks:9780195322484

Tang Y, Wang H, Dou W (2004) Trust based incentive in p2p network. In: Proceedings of the e-commerce technology for dynamic e-business, IEEE International Conference, CEC-EAST ’04. https://doi.org/10.1109/CEC-EAST.2004.71. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, pp 302–305

Adar E, Huberman BA (2000) Free riding on gnutella. First Monday 5:2000CrossRef

Kay SM (1993) Fundamentals of statistical signal processing: estimation theory. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle RiverMATH

Buragohain C, Agrawal D, Suri S (2003) A game theoretic framework for incentives in p2p systems.. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on peer-to-peer computing, P2P ’03. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=942805.943825. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, p 48

Wang W, Li B (2003) To play or to control: a game-based control-theoretic approach to peer-to-peer incentive engineering. In: Proceedings of the 11th international conference on quality of service, IWQoS’03. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1784037.1784050. Springer, Berlin, pp 174–192

Sherwood R, Lee S, Bhattacharjee B (2006) Cooperative peer groups in nice. Comput Netw 50(4):523–544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2005.07.012CrossRef

Lian Q, Peng Y, Yang M, Zhang Z, Dai Y, Li X (2008) Robust incentives via multi-level tit-for-tat. Concurr Comput Pract Exper 20(2):167. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpe.v20:2CrossRef

Dutta D, Goel A, Govindan R, Zhang H (2003) The design of a distributed rating scheme for peer-to-peer systems. In: Workshop on economics of peer-to-peer systems

10.

Papaioannou TG, Stamoulis GD (2006) Reputation-based policies that provide the right incentives in peer-to-peer environments. Comput Netw 50(4):563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2005.07.024CrossRef

11.

Marti S, Garcia-Molina H (2004) Limited reputation sharing in p2p systems. In: Proceedings of the 5th ACM conference on electronic commerce, EC ’04. https://doi.org/10.1145/988772.988787. ACM, New York, pp 91–101

12.

Kamvar SD, Schlosser MT, Garcia-Molina H (2003) The eigentrust algorithm for reputation management in p2p networks. In: Proceedings of the 12th international conference on world wide web, WWW ’03. https://doi.org/10.1145/775152.775242. ACM, New York, pp 640–651

13.

Xiong L, Liu L (2004) Peertrust: Supporting reputation-based trust for peer-to-peer electronic communities. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 16(7):843. https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2004.1318566CrossRef

14.

Zhou R, Hwang K (2007) Powertrust: A robust and scalable reputation system for trusted peer-to-peer computing. IEEE Trans Parallel Distrib Syst 18(4):460. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPDS.2007.1021CrossRef

15.

Zhou R, Hwang K, Cai M (2008) Gossiptrust for fast reputation aggregation in peer-to-peer networks. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 20(9):1282. http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/TKDE.2008.48CrossRef

16.

Andrade N, Brasileiro F, Cirne W, Mowbray M (2004) Discouraging free riding in a peer-to-peer cpu-sharing grid. In: Proceedings of the 13th IEEE international symposium on high performance distributed computing, HPDC ’04. https://doi.org/10.1109/HPDC.2004.9. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, pp 129–137

17.

Yan Y, El-atawy A, Al-shaer E (2007) Ranking-based optimal resource allocation in peer-to-peer networks.. In: 26th annual IEEE international conference on computer communications (INFOCOM)

18.

Xia Y, Song G, Zheng Y, Zhu M (2008) R2p: A peer-to-peer transfer system based on role and reputation.. In: Proceedings of the first international workshop on knowledge discovery and data mining, WKDD ’08. https://doi.org/10.1109/WKDD.2008.28. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, pp 136–141

19.

Satsiou A, Tassiulas L (2010) Reputation-based resource allocation in p2p systems of rational users. IEEE Trans Parallel Distrib Syst 21(4):466. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPDS.2009.80CrossRef

20.

Huang MC (2019) A peer-to-peer reputation evaluation system. In: Proceedings of 28th international conference, vol 64, pp 11–20

21.

Meng X (2018) Suretrust: a super peer-aware trust model for 2-level p2p networks. Peer-to-Peer Netw Appl 11(3):619CrossRef

22.

Mengshu H, Xianliang L, Xu Z, Chuan Z (2005) A trust model of p2p system based on confirmation theory. SIGOPS Oper Syst Rev 39(1):56. https://doi.org/10.1145/1044552.1044558CrossRef

23.

Liang Z, Shi W (2005) Pet: A personalized trust model with reputation and risk evaluation for p2p resource sharing. In: Proceedings of the 38th annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences, HICSS ’05. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2005.493, vol 07. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, p 201.2

24.

Banerjee D, Saha S, Sen S, Dasgupta P (2005) Reciprocal resource sharing in p2p environments.. In: Proceedings of the fourth international joint conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems, AAMAS ’05. https://doi.org/10.1145/1082473.1082603. ACM, New York, pp 853–859

25.

Song S, Hwang K, Zhou R, Kwok YK (2005) Trusted p2p transactions with fuzzy reputation aggregation. IEEE Internet Comput 9(6):24. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIC.2005.136CrossRef

26.

Selcuk AA, Uzun E, Pariente MR (2004) A reputation-based trust management system for p2p networks.. In: Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE international symposium on cluster computing and the grid, CCGRID ’04. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1111683.1111799. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, pp 251–258

27.

Xu J, Du X, Cai W, Zhu C, Chen Y (2019) An online personalized reputation estimation model for service-oriented systems. In: 2019 IEEE international conference on services computing (SCC). IEEE, pp 116–120

28.

Malik Z, Medjahed B, Rezgui A (2016) Scare: Reputation estimation for uncertain web services. In: ACM Trans Internet Technol. https://doi.org/10.1145/2792979, vol 16

29.

Lee Y, Lee KM, Lee SH (2020) Blockchain-based reputation management for custom manufacturing service in the peer-to-peer networking environment. Peer-to-Peer Netw Appl 13(2):671CrossRef

30.

Zhao Y, Li Y, Mu Q, Yang B, Yu Y (2018) Secure pub-sub: Blockchain-based fair payment with reputation for reliable cyber physical systems. IEEE Access 6:12295CrossRef

31.

Zhuang Q, Liu Y, Chen L, Ai Z (2019) Proof of reputation: A reputation-based consensus protocol for blockchain based systems. In: Proceedings of the 2019 international electronics communication conference, IECC ’19. https://doi.org/10.1145/3343147.3343169. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, pp 131–138

32.

Awasthi SK, Singh Y (2020) Absolutetrust: Algorithm for aggregation of trust in peer-to-peer networks. IEEE Trans Depend Sec Comput: 1–1

33.

Livan G, Caccioli F, Aste T (2017) Excess reciprocity distorts reputation in online social networks. Sci Rep 7(1):1CrossRef

34.

Singha N, Singh YN, Gupta R (2020) Adaptive capacity partitioning in cooperative computing to maximize received resources. IEEE Access 8:3551. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2926805CrossRef

35.

Padhye J, Firoiu V, Towsley D, Kurose J (1998) Modeling tcp throughput: a simple model and its empirical validation. SIGCOMM Comput Commun Rev 28(4):303. https://doi.org/10.1145/285243.285291CrossRef

36.

Gupta R, Singha N, Singh YN (2016) . Peer Peer Netw Appl 9 (6):1101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12083-015-0389-0CrossRef

Titel: Trust estimation in peer-to-peer network using BLUE
verfasst von: Ruchir Gupta
Yatindra Nath Singh
Antriksh Goswami
Publikationsdatum: 11.01.2021
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications / Ausgabe 2/2021
Print ISSN: 1936-6442
Elektronische ISSN: 1936-6450
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12083-020-01049-3

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2021

Privacy preserving using multi-hop dynamic clustering routing protocol and elliptic curve cryptosystem for WSN in IoT environment

Task scheduling in cloud-fog computing systems

SAES: A self-checking authentication scheme with higher efficiency and security for VANET

A secure three-factor anonymous roaming authentication protocol using ECC for space information networks

A secure vehicle theft detection framework using Blockchain and smart contract

A novel energy-efficient balanced multi-hop routing scheme (EBMRS) for wireless sensor networks