nach oben

Erschienen in:

2020 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

5. Two Useful Models of Knowing

verfasst von : Raghav Rajagopalan

Erschienen in: Immersive Systemic Knowing

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Two epistemological models are described in detail to show how they commensurate with the suggested systemic ontology. First, the four ways of knowing framework from Heron and Reason (1997) is elaborated—this model corresponds to the mode of being-abiding. Next, the praxis learning cycle Hodgson (2013a), another epistemological model, is described: this corresponds to the mode of becoming-striving. The advantage to systemic understanding from the incorporation of these two epistemological models is elaborated. Testimony of their universal relevance is offered from an awarded case study.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel An Ontology for Systemic Knowing

Nächstes Kapitel Innovative Knowing Methods and Wisdom Practices: What We Can Learn from Allied Disciplines and Further from Other Ages and Cultures

This case evaluates the pedagogy deployed in a traditional production system for handicrafts in India by applying the four ways of knowing framework. It was presented in detail in a paper at the annual conference of the International Society of Systems Sciences in 2014 that was awarded the Margaret Mead Memorial Award.

Cooperative inquiry is an action research method that incorporates postconceptual ways of knowing, backed with the active corresponding theory called the four ways of knowing framework. The framework is described in this chapter, and the practice of the method of cooperative inquiry is described in the next chapter, Chap. 6.

Chapter 6 strengthens the case regarding how to apply the extended epistemology, with an exposition of several methods.

Barone, T., & Eisner, E. (1997). Arts-based educational research. In R. M. Jaeger (Ed.), Complementary methods for research in education. Washington, DC: American Education Research Association.

Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind (with a new foreword by Mary Catherine Bateson). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (1999 edition).

Boyd, A., Brown, M., & Midgley, G. (2004). Systemic intervention for community OR: Developing services with young people (under 16) living on the streets. In G. Midgley & A. E. Ochoa-Arias (Eds.), Community operational research: OR and systems thinking for community development. New York: Kluwer/Plenum.

Bradbury, H., & Reason, P. (Eds.). (2006). Handbook of action research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Churchman, C. W. (1970). Operations research as a profession. Management Science, 17(B), 37–53.CrossRef

Churchman, C. W. (1979). The systems approach and its enemies. New York: Basic Books.

Crawford, M. (2009). The case for working with your hands. London: Viking (an imprint of Penguin).

Denzin, N. K. (1989). Interpretive interactionism. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Finley, S. (2005). Arts-based inquiry: Performing revolutionary pedagogy. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Flood, R. L. (1989). Six scenarios for the future of systems ‘problem solving’, part 1. Systems Practice, 2, 75–99.CrossRef

Freire, P. (1972). Pedagogy of the oppressed (M. B. Ramos, Trans.). New York: Herder & Herder.

Garman, N., & Piantinada, M. (1996). Criteria of quality for judging qualitative research. In P. Willis & B. Neville (Eds.), Qualitative research practice in adult education. Melbourne, VIC: David Lovell Publishing.

Goulding, C., Kelemen, M., & Kiyomiya, T. (2018). Community based response to the Japanese tsunami: A bottom-up approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 268(3), 887–903.CrossRef

Greenwood, D. J., & Levin, M. (1998). Introduction to action research: Social research for social change. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. (2nd ed.; 2007).

Heron, J. (1992). Feeling and personhood: Psychology in another key. New Delhi: Sage.

Heron, J. (1996). Co-operative inquiry: Research into the human condition. London: Sage.

Heron, J., & Reason, P. (1997). A participative enquiry paradigm. Qualitative Inquiry, 3(3), 274–294.CrossRef

Herrigel, E. (1953). Zen in the art of archery. London: Arkana. (1985 edition).

Hesse-Biber, S. N., & Leavy, P. (2006). Emergent methods in social research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.CrossRef

Hodgson, A. (2013a). The praxis learning cycle. Technical Paper for the H3 University, confidential document, privately circulated.

Hodgson, A. (2013b). Towards an ontology of the present moment. On the Horizon, 21(1), 24–38.CrossRef

Irwin, R. L., & de Cosson, A. F. (Eds.). (2004). A/r/tography: Rendering self through arts-based living enquiry. Vancouver, BC: Pacific Educational Press.

Jackson, M. C. (1987). In M. C. Jackson & P. Keys (Eds.), New directions in management science (pp. 133–164). Aldershot: Gower.

Knowles, J. G., & Cole, A. L. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of arts in research: Perspectives, methodologies, examples and issues. London: Sage Publications.

Liamputtong, P., & Rumbold, J. (2008). Knowing differently – Arts based and collaborative research methods. New York: Nova Science Publishers.

Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). The phenomenology of perception. London: Routledge. (2002 edition, translated by Colin Smith).

Midgley, G. (1992a). The sacred and the profane in critical systems thinking. Systems Practice, 5(1), 5–16.CrossRef

Midgley, G. (2000). Systemic intervention: Philosophy, methodology, and practice. New York: Kluwer/Plenum.CrossRef

Midgley, G. (2011). Theoretical pluralism in systemic action research. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 24, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-010-9176-2CrossRef

Midgley, G., Ahuriri-Driscoll, A., Baker, V., Foote, J., Hepi, M., Taimona, H., et al. (2007). Practitioner identity in systemic intervention: Reflections on the promotion of environmental health through Māori community development. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 24(2), 233–247.CrossRef

Minkler, M., & Wallenstein, N. (2003). Community-based participatory research for health. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Reason, P. (1988). Experience, action and metaphor as dimensions of post-positivist inquiry. Research in Organizational Change and Development, 2, 195–233.

Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (Eds.). (2006). Handbook of action research (paperback). London: Sage.

Reason, P., & Hawkins, P. (1988). Storytelling as inquiry. In P. Reason (Ed.), Human inquiry in action (pp. 79–101). London: Sage.

Satchidananda, S. S. (2012). Integral yoga: The yoga sutras of Patanjali (2nd ed.). Buckingham, VA: Integral Yoga Publications.

Seeley, C., & Reason, P. (2008). Expression of energy: An epistemology of presentational knowing. In P. Liamputtong & J. Rumbold (Eds.), Knowing differently: Arts-based and collaborative research methods. New York: Nova Science Publishers.

Sennett, R. (2008). The craftsman. Paperback: Yale University Press.

Smith, L. T. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. London: Zed Books.

Torbert, W. R. (1987). Managing the corporate dream: Restructuring for long-term success. Homewood, IL: Dow Jones-Irwin.

Torbert, W. R. (1991). The power of balance: Transforming self, society and scientific inquiry. London: Sage.

Ulrich, W. (1983). Critical heuristics of social planning: A new approach to practical philosophy. Bern: Haupt.

Ulrich, W. (1993). Some difficulties of ecological thinking, considered from a critical systems perspective: A plea for critical holism. Systems Practice, 6, 583–611.CrossRef

Ulrich, W. (2001). The quest for competence in systemic research and practice. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 18, 3–28.CrossRef

Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (1993 first paperback edition).CrossRef

Titel: Two Useful Models of Knowing
verfasst von: Raghav Rajagopalan
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: Immersive Systemic Knowing
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-49134-5

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-49135-2

Copyright-Jahr: 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49135-2_5

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"