Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research 10/2019

28.05.2019

Type of clinical outcomes used by healthcare professionals to evaluate health-related quality of life domains to inform clinical decision making for chronic pain management

verfasst von: Diana Zidarov, Regina Visca, Sara Ahmed

Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research | Ausgabe 10/2019

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) domains currently assessed by healthcare professionals (HCPs) in secondary and tertiary hospital-based chronic pain clinics and the type of clinical outcomes (CO) used.

Methods

Electronic cross-sectional survey (May to September 2016) based on domains of HRQoL included in the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) framework.

Results

HCPs response rate was 53% (36/68). Their mean clinical experience was 14.8 years (± 11.1), and their mean experience treating chronic pain (CP) population was 10.2 years (± 7.8). All PROMIS-HRQoL domains were assessed by HCPs (range 28–97%, mean = 64%) with a preponderance of domains related to physical health (mean = 82%). Standardized outcome measures (OMs) including performance outcomes and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were not frequently used (mean 0.5% and 3%, respectively) for assessing HRQoL domains compared to clinician reported outcomes (patient interviews, patient observation) (mean = 87%). Forty different OMs for assessing HRQoL domains were reported, and 30% of OMs were used by more than one HCP. HCPs expressed a need (range from 2.3 to 26.3%) for using more than one type of CO for assessing most domains of HRQoL (range from 2.3 to 26.3%) with a preference of using more PROs combined with CROs.

Conclusions

All domains of HRQoL are assessed by at least some HCPs for chronic pain management. Standardized OMs including performance-based measures and PROs were not frequently used, and there was no consistent use of the same OM across HCPs. A consensus among different stakeholders in chronic pain management on core domains of HRQoL and their associated OMs to promote a more evidence-based assessment is needed.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Institute of Medicine. (2011). Relieving pain in America: A blueprint for transforming prevention, care, education, and research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Institute of Medicine. (2011). Relieving pain in America: A blueprint for transforming prevention, care, education, and research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat van Hecke, O., Torranc, N., & Smith, B. H. (2013). Chronic pain epidemiology and its clinical relevance. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 111(1), 13–18.PubMedCrossRef van Hecke, O., Torranc, N., & Smith, B. H. (2013). Chronic pain epidemiology and its clinical relevance. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 111(1), 13–18.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Jackson, T. P., Stabile, V. S., & McQueen, K. K. (2014). The global burden of chronic pain. ASA Newsletter., 78(6), 24–27. Jackson, T. P., Stabile, V. S., & McQueen, K. K. (2014). The global burden of chronic pain. ASA Newsletter., 78(6), 24–27.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Ospina, M., Harstall C. (2002). Prevalence of chronic pain: An overview. Edmonton, AB: Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research. AHFMR Report - HTA 29. Ospina, M., Harstall C. (2002). Prevalence of chronic pain: An overview. Edmonton, AB: Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research. AHFMR Report - HTA 29.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Woolf, A. D., & Pfleger, B. (2003). Burden of major musculoskeletal conditions. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 81, 646–656.PubMedPubMedCentral Woolf, A. D., & Pfleger, B. (2003). Burden of major musculoskeletal conditions. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 81, 646–656.PubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Breivik, H., et al. (2006). Survey of chronic pain in Europe: Prevalence, impact on daily life, and treatment. European Journal of Pain, 10, 287–333.PubMedCrossRef Breivik, H., et al. (2006). Survey of chronic pain in Europe: Prevalence, impact on daily life, and treatment. European Journal of Pain, 10, 287–333.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Ojala, T., et al. (2015). Chronic pain affects the whole person—A phenomenological study. Disability and Rehabilitation, 37(4), 363–371.PubMedCrossRef Ojala, T., et al. (2015). Chronic pain affects the whole person—A phenomenological study. Disability and Rehabilitation, 37(4), 363–371.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat McWilliams, I. A., Goodwin, R. D., & Cox, B. J. (2004). Depression and anxiety associated with three pain conditions: Results from a nationally representative sample. Pain, 111, 77–83.PubMedCrossRef McWilliams, I. A., Goodwin, R. D., & Cox, B. J. (2004). Depression and anxiety associated with three pain conditions: Results from a nationally representative sample. Pain, 111, 77–83.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Racine, M. (2017). Chronic pain and suicide risk: A comprehensive review. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry, 87(1), 269–280. Racine, M. (2017). Chronic pain and suicide risk: A comprehensive review. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry, 87(1), 269–280.
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Bunzli, S., et al. (2013). Lives on hold: A qualitative synthesis exploring the experience of chronic low-back pain. Clinical Journal of Pain, 29, 907–916.PubMedCrossRef Bunzli, S., et al. (2013). Lives on hold: A qualitative synthesis exploring the experience of chronic low-back pain. Clinical Journal of Pain, 29, 907–916.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Ospina, M., & Harstall, C. (2003). Multidisciplinary pain programs for chronic pain: Evidence from systematic reviews. In HTA 30: Series A Health Technology Assessment (p. 48). Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research. Ospina, M., & Harstall, C. (2003). Multidisciplinary pain programs for chronic pain: Evidence from systematic reviews. In HTA 30: Series A Health Technology Assessment (p. 48). Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research.
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Hague, M., & Shenker, N. (2014). How to investigate: Chronic pain. Best Practice & Research Clinical Rheumatology, 28(6), 860–874.CrossRef Hague, M., & Shenker, N. (2014). How to investigate: Chronic pain. Best Practice & Research Clinical Rheumatology, 28(6), 860–874.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Stanos, S., et al. (2016). Rethinking chronic pain in a primary care setting. Postgraduate Medicine, 128(5), 502–515.PubMedCrossRef Stanos, S., et al. (2016). Rethinking chronic pain in a primary care setting. Postgraduate Medicine, 128(5), 502–515.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Fillingim, R. B., et al. (2016). Assessment of chronic pain: Domains, methods, and mechanisms. Journal of Pain, 17(9 Suppl), T10–T20.PubMedCrossRef Fillingim, R. B., et al. (2016). Assessment of chronic pain: Domains, methods, and mechanisms. Journal of Pain, 17(9 Suppl), T10–T20.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Turk, D. C., et al. (2016). Assessment of psychosocial and functional impact of chronic pain. Journal of Pain, 17(9 Suppl), T21–T49.PubMedCrossRef Turk, D. C., et al. (2016). Assessment of psychosocial and functional impact of chronic pain. Journal of Pain, 17(9 Suppl), T21–T49.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Mayo, N. E., et al. (2017). Montreal accord on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) use series—Paper 2: Terminology proposed to measure what matters in health. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 89, 119–124.PubMedCrossRef Mayo, N. E., et al. (2017). Montreal accord on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) use series—Paper 2: Terminology proposed to measure what matters in health. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 89, 119–124.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Walton, M. K., et al. (2015). Clinical outcome assessments: A conceptual foundation—Report of the ISPOR clinical outcomes assessment emerging good practices task force. Value Health, 18, 741–752.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Walton, M. K., et al. (2015). Clinical outcome assessments: A conceptual foundation—Report of the ISPOR clinical outcomes assessment emerging good practices task force. Value Health, 18, 741–752.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Turk, D. C., et al. (2006). Developing patient-reported outcome measures for pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. Pain, 125(3), 208–215.PubMedCrossRef Turk, D. C., et al. (2006). Developing patient-reported outcome measures for pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. Pain, 125(3), 208–215.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Turk, D. C., & Melzack, R. (2011). The measurement of pain and the assessment of people experiencing pain. In D. C. Turk & R. Melzack (Eds.), Handbook of pain assessment (pp. 3–16). New York: Guilford Publications. Turk, D. C., & Melzack, R. (2011). The measurement of pain and the assessment of people experiencing pain. In D. C. Turk & R. Melzack (Eds.), Handbook of pain assessment (pp. 3–16). New York: Guilford Publications.
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Cella, D., et al. (2007). The patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS): Progress of an NIH Roadmap Cooperative Group during its first two years. Medical Care, 45(5 Suppl 1), S3–S11.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Cella, D., et al. (2007). The patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS): Progress of an NIH Roadmap Cooperative Group during its first two years. Medical Care, 45(5 Suppl 1), S3–S11.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Dworkin, R. H., et al. (2005). Core outcome measures for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. Pain, 113(1–2), 9–19.PubMedCrossRef Dworkin, R. H., et al. (2005). Core outcome measures for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. Pain, 113(1–2), 9–19.PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Hinton, P. M., et al. (2010). Outcome measures and their everyday use in chiropractic practice. The Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association, 54(2), 118–131.PubMedPubMedCentral Hinton, P. M., et al. (2010). Outcome measures and their everyday use in chiropractic practice. The Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association, 54(2), 118–131.PubMedPubMedCentral
24.
Zurück zum Zitat MacDermid, J. C., et al. (2013). Use of outcome measures in managing neck pain: An international multidisciplinary survey. The Open Orthopaedics Journal, 7, 506–520.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef MacDermid, J. C., et al. (2013). Use of outcome measures in managing neck pain: An international multidisciplinary survey. The Open Orthopaedics Journal, 7, 506–520.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Duncan, E. A. S., & Murray, J. (2012). The barriers and facilitators to routine outcome measurement by allied health professionals in practice: A systematic review. BMC Health Services Research, 12(1), 96.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Duncan, E. A. S., & Murray, J. (2012). The barriers and facilitators to routine outcome measurement by allied health professionals in practice: A systematic review. BMC Health Services Research, 12(1), 96.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Powers, J. H., et al. (2017). Clinician-reported outcome assessments of treatment benefit: Report of the ISPOR clinical outcome assessment emerging good practices task force. Value in Health: The Journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, 20(1), 2–14.CrossRef Powers, J. H., et al. (2017). Clinician-reported outcome assessments of treatment benefit: Report of the ISPOR clinical outcome assessment emerging good practices task force. Value in Health: The Journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, 20(1), 2–14.CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat U. S. Department of Health Human Services, F.D.A.C.f.D.E.R., F.D.A.C.f.B.E.R. U. S. Department of Health Human Services, and F.D.A.C.f.D.R.H. U. S. Department of Health Human Services. (2006). Guidance for industry: patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims: draft guidance. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 4, 79.CrossRef U. S. Department of Health Human Services, F.D.A.C.f.D.E.R., F.D.A.C.f.B.E.R. U. S. Department of Health Human Services, and F.D.A.C.f.D.R.H. U. S. Department of Health Human Services. (2006). Guidance for industry: patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims: draft guidance. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 4, 79.CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Melzack, R. (2003). Introduction: The pain revolution. In R. Melzack & P. D. Wall (Eds.), Handbook of pain management (pp. 3–6). Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone. Melzack, R. (2003). Introduction: The pain revolution. In R. Melzack & P. D. Wall (Eds.), Handbook of pain management (pp. 3–6). Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Chapman, J. R., et al. (2011). Evaluating common outcomes for measuring treatment success for chronic low back pain. Spine, 36(21 Suppl), S54–S68.PubMedCrossRef Chapman, J. R., et al. (2011). Evaluating common outcomes for measuring treatment success for chronic low back pain. Spine, 36(21 Suppl), S54–S68.PubMedCrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Chiarotto, A., Terwee, C. B., & Ostelo, R. W. (2016). Choosing the right outcome measurement instruments for patients with low back pain. Best Practice & Research Clinical Rheumatology, 30(6), 1003–1020.CrossRef Chiarotto, A., Terwee, C. B., & Ostelo, R. W. (2016). Choosing the right outcome measurement instruments for patients with low back pain. Best Practice & Research Clinical Rheumatology, 30(6), 1003–1020.CrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Deyo, R. A., et al. (1998). Outcome measures for low back pain research. A proposal for standardized use. Spine, 23(18), 2003–2013.PubMedCrossRef Deyo, R. A., et al. (1998). Outcome measures for low back pain research. A proposal for standardized use. Spine, 23(18), 2003–2013.PubMedCrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Greenhalgh, J. (2009). The applications of PROs in clinical practice: What are they, do they work, and why? Quality of Life Research, 18(1), 115–123.PubMedCrossRef Greenhalgh, J. (2009). The applications of PROs in clinical practice: What are they, do they work, and why? Quality of Life Research, 18(1), 115–123.PubMedCrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Santana, M. J., & Feeny, D. (2014). Framework to assess the effects of using patient-reported outcome measures in chronic care management. Quality of Life Research, 23(5), 1505–1513.PubMedCrossRef Santana, M. J., & Feeny, D. (2014). Framework to assess the effects of using patient-reported outcome measures in chronic care management. Quality of Life Research, 23(5), 1505–1513.PubMedCrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Clarke, J. L., et al. (2017). An innovative approach to health care delivery for patients with chronic conditions. Popul Health Manag., 20(1), 23–30.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Clarke, J. L., et al. (2017). An innovative approach to health care delivery for patients with chronic conditions. Popul Health Manag., 20(1), 23–30.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Martínez-González, N. A., et al. (2014). Integrated care programmes for adults with chronic conditions: A meta-review. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 26(5), 561–570.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Martínez-González, N. A., et al. (2014). Integrated care programmes for adults with chronic conditions: A meta-review. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 26(5), 561–570.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Deckert, S., et al. (2016). A systematic review of the outcomes reported in multimodal pain therapy for chronic pain. European Journal of Pain, 20(1), 51–63.PubMedCrossRef Deckert, S., et al. (2016). A systematic review of the outcomes reported in multimodal pain therapy for chronic pain. European Journal of Pain, 20(1), 51–63.PubMedCrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Kaiser, U., et al. (2016). Core outcome sets and multidimensional assessment tools for harmonizing outcome measure in chronic pain and back pain. Healthcare, 4(3), 63.PubMedCentralCrossRef Kaiser, U., et al. (2016). Core outcome sets and multidimensional assessment tools for harmonizing outcome measure in chronic pain and back pain. Healthcare, 4(3), 63.PubMedCentralCrossRef
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Hung, M., et al. (2014). Computerized adaptive testing using the PROMIS physical function item bank reduces test burden with less ceiling effects compared with the short musculoskeletal function assessment in orthopaedic trauma patients. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 28(8), 439–443.PubMedCrossRef Hung, M., et al. (2014). Computerized adaptive testing using the PROMIS physical function item bank reduces test burden with less ceiling effects compared with the short musculoskeletal function assessment in orthopaedic trauma patients. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 28(8), 439–443.PubMedCrossRef
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Broderick, J. E., et al. (2013). Validity and reliability of patient-reported outcomes measurement information system instruments in osteoarthritis. Arthritis Care Res, 65(10), 1625–1633. Broderick, J. E., et al. (2013). Validity and reliability of patient-reported outcomes measurement information system instruments in osteoarthritis. Arthritis Care Res, 65(10), 1625–1633.
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Oude Voshaar, M. A., et al. (2015). Validity and measurement precision of the PROMIS physical function item bank and a content validity-driven 20-item short form in rheumatoid arthritis compared with traditional measures. Rheumatology, 54(12), 2221–2229.PubMed Oude Voshaar, M. A., et al. (2015). Validity and measurement precision of the PROMIS physical function item bank and a content validity-driven 20-item short form in rheumatoid arthritis compared with traditional measures. Rheumatology, 54(12), 2221–2229.PubMed
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Proctor, E., et al. (2011). Outcomes for implementation research: Conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Administration and Policy In Mental Health, 38(2), 65–76.PubMedCrossRef Proctor, E., et al. (2011). Outcomes for implementation research: Conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Administration and Policy In Mental Health, 38(2), 65–76.PubMedCrossRef
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Eilayyan, O., et al. (2018). Identifying domains of health-related quality of life: Individuals with Low back pain’s perspective. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 12, 106. Eilayyan, O., et al. (2018). Identifying domains of health-related quality of life: Individuals with Low back pain’s perspective. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 12, 106.
Metadaten
Titel
Type of clinical outcomes used by healthcare professionals to evaluate health-related quality of life domains to inform clinical decision making for chronic pain management
verfasst von
Diana Zidarov
Regina Visca
Sara Ahmed
Publikationsdatum
28.05.2019
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Quality of Life Research / Ausgabe 10/2019
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-019-02215-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2019

Quality of Life Research 10/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Responses to "Advancing quality‑of‑life research by deepening our understanding of response shift" by Bruce D. Rapkin & Carolyn E. Schwartz

Relating response shift and cognitive appraisal to measurement validation

Responses to “Advancing quality‑of‑life research by deepening our understanding of response shift” by Bruce D. Rapkin & Carolyn E. Schwartz

Appraisal as a unifying theory of response shift: continuing the conversation