Skip to main content

2017 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

2. UK: The Merits and Shortcomings of a Voluntary Approach

verfasst von : Elena Doldor

Erschienen in: Gender Diversity in the Boardroom

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This chapter examines the situation of women on boards in the UK. The chapter begins by providing an overview of the country’s political and economic context, outlining gender equality trends and the nature of workplace equality and diversity policies in the UK. Second, the chapter discusses the UK corporate governance system and its landmark ‘comply or explain’ approach. Third, the chapter outlines trends in gender representation on FTSE boards, analyzing national-level policy on women on boards over almost two decades, with an emphasis on the relatively successful Davies Review (2011–2015). The achievements and limitations of this voluntary approach are then critically discussed, drawing particular attention to the effectiveness of a multi-stakeholder approach, but also to the fragility of change secured through voluntary measures.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Arcot, S., Bruno, V., & Faure-Grimaud, A. (2010). Corporate governance in the UK: Is the comply or explain approach working? International Review of Law and Economics, 30(2), 193–201.CrossRef Arcot, S., Bruno, V., & Faure-Grimaud, A. (2010). Corporate governance in the UK: Is the comply or explain approach working? International Review of Law and Economics, 30(2), 193–201.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Azmat, G. (2015). Gender Gaps in the UK Labour Market: Jobs, pay and family-friendly policies. London: Centre for Economic Performance, London School of Economics. Azmat, G. (2015). Gender Gaps in the UK Labour Market: Jobs, pay and family-friendly policies. London: Centre for Economic Performance, London School of Economics.
Zurück zum Zitat Coverdill, J. E., & Finlay, W. (1998). Fit and skill in employee selection: Insights from a study of headhunters. Qualitative Sociology, 21(2), 105–127.CrossRef Coverdill, J. E., & Finlay, W. (1998). Fit and skill in employee selection: Insights from a study of headhunters. Qualitative Sociology, 21(2), 105–127.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Davies, M. (2011). Women on boards—The Davies report, No. URN 11/745. London: GEO/BIS. Davies, M. (2011). Women on boards—The Davies report, No. URN 11/745. London: GEO/BIS.
Zurück zum Zitat Davies, M. (2015). Improving the gender balance on British Boards—Women on boards review five-year summary. London: GEO/BIS. Davies, M. (2015). Improving the gender balance on British Boards—Women on boards review five-year summary. London: GEO/BIS.
Zurück zum Zitat Doldor, E. (2013). Gender diversity on boards in the UK: State of play and prospects for change. Brussels: European Parliament, Policy Department for Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs. Doldor, E. (2013). Gender diversity on boards in the UK: State of play and prospects for change. Brussels: European Parliament, Policy Department for Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs.
Zurück zum Zitat Doldor, E., Vinnicombe, S., Gaughan, M., & Sealy, R. (2012). Gender diversity on boards: The appointment process and the role of executive search firms. Equality and Human Rights Commission. Doldor, E., Vinnicombe, S., Gaughan, M., & Sealy, R. (2012). Gender diversity on boards: The appointment process and the role of executive search firms. Equality and Human Rights Commission.
Zurück zum Zitat Doldor, E., Vinnicombe, S., & Sealy, R. (2016). Accidental activists: Headhunters as marginal diversity actors in institutional change towards more women on boards. Human Resource Management Journal, 26(3), 285–303.CrossRef Doldor, E., Vinnicombe, S., & Sealy, R. (2016). Accidental activists: Headhunters as marginal diversity actors in institutional change towards more women on boards. Human Resource Management Journal, 26(3), 285–303.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Faulconbridge, J. R., Beaverstock, J. V., Hall, S., & Hewitson, A. (2009). The ‘war for talent’: The gatekeeper role of executive search firms in elite labour markets. Geoforum, 40(5), 800–808.CrossRef Faulconbridge, J. R., Beaverstock, J. V., Hall, S., & Hewitson, A. (2009). The ‘war for talent’: The gatekeeper role of executive search firms in elite labour markets. Geoforum, 40(5), 800–808.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Glassdoor. (2016). Which countries in Europe have the best gender equality in the workplace? California: Glassdoor Llewellyn Consulting. Glassdoor. (2016). Which countries in Europe have the best gender equality in the workplace? California: Glassdoor Llewellyn Consulting.
Zurück zum Zitat Hamori, M. (2010). Who gets headhunted and who gets ahead? The impact of search firms on executive careers. Academy of Management Perspectives, 24(4), 46–59. Hamori, M. (2010). Who gets headhunted and who gets ahead? The impact of search firms on executive careers. Academy of Management Perspectives, 24(4), 46–59.
Zurück zum Zitat Jewson, N., & Mason, D. (1986). The theory and practice of equal opportunity policies: Liberal and radical approaches. Sociological Review, 34(2), 307–334.CrossRef Jewson, N., & Mason, D. (1986). The theory and practice of equal opportunity policies: Liberal and radical approaches. Sociological Review, 34(2), 307–334.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Khurana, R. (2002). Searching for a corporate savior: The irrational quest for charismatic CEOs. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRef Khurana, R. (2002). Searching for a corporate savior: The irrational quest for charismatic CEOs. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kirton, G., Greene, A. M., & Dean, D. (2007). British diversity professionals as change agents– Radicals, tempered radicals or liberal reformers? The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18(11), 1979–1994.CrossRef Kirton, G., Greene, A. M., & Dean, D. (2007). British diversity professionals as change agents– Radicals, tempered radicals or liberal reformers? The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18(11), 1979–1994.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Olchawski, J. (2016). Sex equality: State of the Nation 2016. London: Fawcett Society. Olchawski, J. (2016). Sex equality: State of the Nation 2016. London: Fawcett Society.
Zurück zum Zitat Oswick, C., & Noon, M. (2014). Discourses of diversity, equality and inclusion: trenchant formulations or transient fashions? British Journal of Management, 25(1), 23–39.CrossRef Oswick, C., & Noon, M. (2014). Discourses of diversity, equality and inclusion: trenchant formulations or transient fashions? British Journal of Management, 25(1), 23–39.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Özbilgin, M. F., & Tatli, A. (2011). Mapping out the field of equality and diversity:Rise of individualism and voluntarism. Human Relations, 64(9), 1229–1253.CrossRef Özbilgin, M. F., & Tatli, A. (2011). Mapping out the field of equality and diversity:Rise of individualism and voluntarism. Human Relations, 64(9), 1229–1253.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sealy, R., Doldor, E., & Vinnicombe, S. (2016a). The Female FTSE Board Report: Taking stock of where we are. City University, Queen Mary University of London & Cranfield University. Sealy, R., Doldor, E., & Vinnicombe, S. (2016a). The Female FTSE Board Report: Taking stock of where we are. City University, Queen Mary University of London & Cranfield University.
Zurück zum Zitat Sealy, R., Doldor, E., Terjesen, S., Vinnicombe, S., Anderson, D., & Atewologun, D. (2016b). Expanding the notion of dialogic trading zones for impactful research: The case of women on boards research. British Journal of Management, 28(1), 64–83.CrossRef Sealy, R., Doldor, E., Terjesen, S., Vinnicombe, S., Anderson, D., & Atewologun, D. (2016b). Expanding the notion of dialogic trading zones for impactful research: The case of women on boards research. British Journal of Management, 28(1), 64–83.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Seierstad, C. (2016). Beyond the business case: The need for both utility and justice rationales for increasing the share of women on boards. Corporate Governance an International Review, 24(4), 390–405.CrossRef Seierstad, C. (2016). Beyond the business case: The need for both utility and justice rationales for increasing the share of women on boards. Corporate Governance an International Review, 24(4), 390–405.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Seierstad, C., Warner-Søderholm, G., Torchia, M., & Huse, M. (2015). Increasing the number of women on boards: the role of actors and processes. Journal of Business Ethics, 1–27. doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2715-0 Seierstad, C., Warner-Søderholm, G., Torchia, M., & Huse, M. (2015). Increasing the number of women on boards: the role of actors and processes. Journal of Business Ethics, 1–27. doi:10.​1007/​s10551-015-2715-0
Zurück zum Zitat Singh, V., & Vinnicombe, S. (2005). The Female FTSE Board Report. Cranfield University. Singh, V., & Vinnicombe, S. (2005). The Female FTSE Board Report. Cranfield University.
Zurück zum Zitat Singh, V., Terjesen, S., & Vinnicombe, S. (2008). Newly appointed directors in the boardroom: How do men and women differ? European Management Journal, 26(1), 48–58.CrossRef Singh, V., Terjesen, S., & Vinnicombe, S. (2008). Newly appointed directors in the boardroom: How do men and women differ? European Management Journal, 26(1), 48–58.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Tienari, J., Meriläinen, S., Holgersson, C., & Bendl, R. (2013). And then there are none: On the exclusion of women in processes of executive search. Gender in Management, 28(1), 43–62.CrossRef Tienari, J., Meriläinen, S., Holgersson, C., & Bendl, R. (2013). And then there are none: On the exclusion of women in processes of executive search. Gender in Management, 28(1), 43–62.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Vinnicombe, S., Doldor, E., Sealy, R., Pryce, P., & Turner, C. (2015). The Female FTSE Board Report: Putting UK progress into a global perspective. Cranfield University. Vinnicombe, S., Doldor, E., Sealy, R., Pryce, P., & Turner, C. (2015). The Female FTSE Board Report: Putting UK progress into a global perspective. Cranfield University.
Zurück zum Zitat World Economic Forum. (2016). The global gender gap report 2016. Geneva: The World Economic Forum. World Economic Forum. (2016). The global gender gap report 2016. Geneva: The World Economic Forum.
Metadaten
Titel
UK: The Merits and Shortcomings of a Voluntary Approach
verfasst von
Elena Doldor
Copyright-Jahr
2017
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57273-4_2