nach oben

Erschienen in:

2021 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

12. Uncertainty Modeling in Operation of Multi-carrier Energy Networks

verfasst von : Mohammad Salehimaleh, Adel Akbarimajd, Khalil Valipour, Abdolmajid Dejamkhooy

Erschienen in: Planning and Operation of Multi-Carrier Energy Networks

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

With the expanding and increasing researches about modeling and scheduling of multi-carrier energy systems (MCES) in recent years, the scope of the concept of energy hub as an appropriate solution is increased in order to provide the sufficiency and safety of consumer energy demand. The optimal management of the energy hub requires precise modeling, and the accurate and close-to-reality modeling that is possible just by considering the uncertainties in systems. There are various sources of uncertainty in multi-energy system (MES) which we will discuss in the following. Due to the flexibility of energy hub, appropriate modeling of uncertainty in operation and planning of them enhance these systems’ profitability for various decision makers (customers, producers, operators, etc.). Different modeling methods of these uncertainties have different accuracy, computational burden, and responsibility speed. The goal of this study is to review these uncertain parameters and their modeling techniques in the optimal operation of multi-carrier energy systems (MCES) on the concept of energy hub in order to address the research gap for future works.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Risk-Constrained Generation and Network Expansion Planning of Multi-carrier Energy Systems

Nächstes Kapitel Network Expansion Planning of Multi-carrier Energy Systems

Ben-Haim Y (2006) Info-gap decision theory: decisions under severe uncertainty, 2nd edn. Academic Press, Oxford

Edenhofer O, Lessmann K, Kemfert C, Grubb M, Köhler J (2006) Induced technological change: exploring its implication for the economics of atmospheric stabilization. Energy J:57–107. https://doi.org/10.2307/23297057

Uusitalo L, Lehikoinen A, Helle I, Myrberg K (2015) An overview of methods to evaluate uncertainty of deterministic models in decision support. Environ Model Softw 63:24e31CrossRef

Mohammadi M, Noorollahi Y, Mohammadi-Ivatloo B, Yousefi H, Jalilinasabady S (2017) Optimal scheduling of energy hubs in the presence of uncertainty-a review. J Energy Manage Technol. https://doi.org/10.22109/JEMT.2017.49432

Mirakyan A, De Guio R (2015) Modelling and uncertainties in integrated energy planning. Renew Sust Energ Rev 46:62–69CrossRef

Soroudi A, Amraee T (2013) Decision making under uncertainty in energy systems: state of the art. Renew Sust Energ Rev 28:376–384CrossRef

Aien M, Hajebrahimi A, Fotuhi-Firuzabad M (2016) A comprehensive review on uncertainty modeling techniques in power system studies. Renew Sust Energ Rev 57:1077–1089CrossRef

Aien M, Rashidinejad M, Fotuhi-Firuzabad M (2014) On possibilistic and probabilistic uncertainty assessment of power flow problem: a review and a new approach. Renew Sust Energ Rev 37:883–895CrossRef

Basil M, Jamieson A (1999) Uncertainty of complex systems by Monte Carlo simulation. Meas Contr 32:16–20CrossRef

10.

Dymowa L (2011) Soft computing in economics and finance. Springer. ISRL: 6, pp 41–105

11.

Yue X, Pye S, Decarolis J, Li FGN, Rogan F, Gallachoir BO (2018) A review of approaches to uncertainty assessment in energy system optimization models. Energ Strat Rev 21:204–217CrossRef

12.

Baudrit C, Dubois D, Guyonnet D (2006) Joint propagation and exploitation of probabilistic and possibilistic information in risk assessment. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 14:593–608CrossRef

13.

Jco M, Pereira MVF, Leite da Silva A (1994) Evaluation of reliability worth in composite systems based on pseudo-sequential Monte Carlo simulation. IEEE Trans Power Syst 9:1318–1326CrossRef

14.

Yu H, Chung C, Wong K, Lee H, Zhang J (2009) Probabilistic load flow evaluation with hybrid Latin hypercube sampling and Cholesky decomposition. IEEE Trans Power Syst 24(2):661–667CrossRef

15.

Janssen H (2013) Monte-Carlo based uncertainty analysis: sampling efficiency and sampling convergence. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 109:123–132CrossRef

16.

Zhaohong B, Xifan W (2002) Studies on variance reduction technique of Monte Carlo simulation in composite system reliability evaluation. Electr Power Syst Res 63(1):59–64CrossRef

17.

Julier SJ, Uhlmann JK (2004) Unscented filtering and nonlinear estimation. Proc IEEE 92:401–422CrossRef

18.

Allan RN, Leite da Silva AM, Burchett RC (1981) Evaluation methods and accuracy in probabilistic load flow solutions. IEEE Trans Power Appar Syst:2539–2546

19.

Coroiu F, Bucatariu I, Baloi A (2012) Using the Gram–Charlier expansion in power systems reliability. In: Proceedings of 7th IEEE international symposium on applied computational intelligence and advanced informatics SACI: p. 59–62

20.

Schellenberg A, Rosehart W, Aguado J (2005) Cumulant-based probabilistic optimal power flow (P-OPF) with Gaussian and gamma distributions. IEEE Trans Power Syst 20:773–781CrossRef

21.

Morrow D, Gan L (1993) Comparison of methods for building a capacity model in generation capacity adequacy studies. Communications, computers and power in the modern. Environment conference proceedings. IEEE WESCANEX 93:143–149

22.

Stuart A, Ord K (2010) Kendall’s advanced theory of statistics, distribution theory, 1st edn. Wiley, Chichester, West Sussex

23.

Zubo RHA, Mokryani G, Rajamani H-S, Aghaei J, Niknam T, Pillai P (2017) Operation and planning of distribution networks with integration of renewable distributed generators considering uncertainties: A review. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 72:1177CrossRef

24.

Huang W, Sridhar N (2016) Fatigue failure risk assessment for a maintained stiffener-frame welded structure with multiple site cracks. Int J Appl Mech 8:1650024CrossRef

25.

Elishakoff I, van Manen S, Vermeulen PG, Arbocz J (1987) First-order second-moment analysis of the buckling of shells with random imperfections. AIAA J 25(8):1113–1117CrossRef

26.

Hong HP (1998) An efficient point estimate method for probabilistic analysis. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 59(3):261–267CrossRef

27.

Rabiee A, Nikkhah S, Soroudi A, Hooshmand E (2017) Information gap decision theory for voltage stability constrained OPF considering the uncertainty of multiple wind farms. IET Renewable Power Gener 11(5):585–592. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-rpg.2016.0509CrossRef

28.

Soroudi A, Ehsan M (2011) A possibilistic–probabilistic tool for evaluating the impact of stochastic renewable and controllable power generation on energy losses in distribution networks—a case study. Renew Sust Energ Rev 15:794–800CrossRef

29.

Julier S, Uhlmann J, Durrant-Whyte HF (2000) A new method for the nonlinear transformation of means and covariances in filters and estimators. IEEE Trans Autom Control 45:477–482MathSciNetMATHCrossRef

30.

Aien M, Fotuhi-Firuzabad M, Aminifar F (2012) Probabilistic load flow in correlated uncertain environment using unscented transformation. IEEE Trans Power Syst 27:2233–2241CrossRef

31.

Morales J, Pineda S, Conejo A, Carrion M (2009) Scenario reduction for futures market trading in electricity markets. IEEE Trans Power Syst 24(2):878–888CrossRef

32.

Alharbi W, Raahemifar K (2015) Probabilistic coordination of micro-grid energy resources operation considering uncertainties. Electr Power Syst Res 128:1–10CrossRef

33.

Damavandi MY, Neyestani N, Chicco G, Shafie-khah M, Catalao JP (2017) Aggregation of distributed energy resources under the concept of multi-energy players in local energy system. IEEE Trans Sustainable Energy 8:1679CrossRef

34.

Soroudi A, Mohammadi-Ivatloo B, Rabiee A (2014) Energy hub management with intermittent wind power. In large scale renewable power generation. Springer, pp 413–438

35.

Arriagada E, López E, López M, Blasco-Gimenez R, Roa C, Poloujadoff M (2015) A probabilistic economic dispatch model and methodology considering renewable energy, demand and generator uncertainties. Electr Power Syst Res 121:325332CrossRef

36.

Kienzle F, Ahcin P, Andersson G (2011) Valuing investments in multi-energy conversion, storage, and demand-side management systems under uncertainty. IEEE Trans Sustainable Energy 2(2):194–202CrossRef

37.

Vahid-Pakdel MJ, Nojavan S, Mohammadi-ivatloo B, Zare K (2017) Stochastic optimization of energy hub operation with consideration of thermal energy market and demand response. Energy Convers Manag 145:117–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2017.04.074CrossRef

38.

Ross TJ (2011) Fuzzy logic with engineering applications, 3rd ed. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data, WILEY

39.

Hu BQ, Wang CY (2014) On type-2 fuzzy relations and interval-valued type-2 fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst 236:1–32MathSciNetMATHCrossRef

40.

Jin L, Huang G, Cong D, Fan Y (2014) A robust inexact joint-optimal a cut interval type-2 fuzzy boundary linear programming (rij-it2fblp) for energy systems planning under uncertainty. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 56:19–32CrossRef

41.

Jin L, Huang G, Fan Y, Wang L, Wu T (2015) A pseudo-optimal inexact stochastic interval t2 fuzzy sets approach for energy and environmental systems planning under uncertainty: a case study for Xiamen city of China. Appl Energy 138:71–90CrossRef

42.

Hegazy YG, Salama MMA, Chikhani AY (2003) Adequacy assessment of distributed generation systems using Monte Carlo simulation. IEEE Trans Power Syst 18(1):48–52CrossRef

43.

Ding Y, Wang P, Goel L, Loh PC, Wu Q (2011) Long-term reserve expansion of power systems with high wind power penetration using universal generating function methods. IEEE Trans Power Syst 26(2):766–774CrossRef

44.

Massim Y, Zeblah A, Benguediab M, Ghouraf A, Meziane R (2006) Reliability evaluation of electrical power systems including multi-state considerations. Electr Eng 88(2):109–116MATHCrossRef

45.

Veliz FFC, Borges CLT, Rei AM (2010) A comparison of load models for composite reliability evaluation by nonsequential Monte Carlo simulation. IEEE Trans Power Syst 25(2):649–656CrossRef

46.

Atwa YM, El-Saadany EF, Salama MMA, Seethapathy R (2010) Optimal renewable resources mix for distribution system energy loss minimization. IEEE Trans Power Syst 25(1):360370CrossRef

47.

Conti S, Raiti S (2007) Probabilistic load flow using Monte Carlo techniques for distribution networks with photovoltaic generators. Sol Energy 81:1473–1481CrossRef

48.

Billinton R, Gao Y, Karki R (2009) Composite system adequacy assessment incorporating large-scale wind energy conversion systems considering wind speed correlation. IEEE Trans Power Syst 24(3):1375–1382CrossRef

49.

Hong YY, Pen KL (2010) Optimal VAR planning considering intermittent wind power using Markov model and quantum evolutionary algorithm. IEEE Trans Power Delivery 25(4):2987–2996CrossRef

50.

Rose J, Hiskens IA (2008) Estimating wind turbine parameters and quantifying their effects on dynamic behavior. Proceedings of Power and Energy Society General Meeting 1–7

51.

Soroudi A (2012) Possibilistic-scenario model for DG impact assessment on distribution networks in an uncertain environment. IEEE Trans Power Syst 27(3):1283–1293CrossRef

52.

Kang B, Wei D, Li Y, Deng Y (2012) Decision making using Z-numbers under uncertain environment. J Comput Inf Syst 8(7):2807–2814

53.

Ben-Tal A, Ghaoui LE, Nemirovski A (2009) Robust optimization. Princeton University Press, PrincetonMATHCrossRef

54.

Soyster AL (1973) Convex programming with set-inclusive constraints and applications to inexact linear programming. J Oper Res 21(2):1154–1157MathSciNetMATHCrossRef

55.

Bertimas D, Sim M (2004) The price of robustness. J Oper Res 52(1):35–53MathSciNetCrossRef

56.

Parisio A, Del Vecchio C and Velotto G. (2011) Robust Optimization of Operations in Energy Hub. 50th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control and European Control Conference (CDC-ECC) Orlando, FL, USA, 12–15.

57.

Parisio A, Del Vecchio C, Vaccaro A (2012) A robust optimization approach to energy hub management. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 42(1):98–104CrossRef

58.

Akbari K, Nasiri MM, Jolai F, Ghaderi SF (2014) Optimal investment and unit sizing of distributed energy systems under uncertainty: a robust optimization approach. Energ Buildings 85:275–286CrossRef

59.

Yan M, Zhang N, Ai X, Shahidehpour M, Kang C, Wen J (2019) Robust two-stage regional-district scheduling of multi-carrier energy systems with a large penetration of wind power. IEEE Trans Sustain Energy 10(3). https://doi.org/10.1109/TSTE.2018.2864296

60.

Najafi-Ghalelou A, Nojavan S, Zare K, Mohammadi-Ivatloo B (2019) Robust scheduling of thermal, cooling and electrical hub energy system under market price uncertainty. Appl Therm Eng 149:862–880CrossRef

61.

Labriet M, Nicolas C, Tchung-Ming S, Kanudia A, Loulou R. (2015) Energy decisions in an uncertain climate and technology outlook: how stochastic and robust methodologies can assist policy-makers, informing energy clim. Policies Using Energy Syst. Model, Springer International Publishing: pp. 69–91. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16540-04.

62.

Khojasteh M, Jadid S (2015) Decision-making framework for supplying electricity from distributed generation-owning retailers to price-sensitive customers. Utilities Policy, 1e12.

63.

Moeini-Aghtaie M, Dehghanian P, Fotuhi-Firuzabad M, Abbaspour A (2013) Multiagent genetic algorithm: an online probabilistic view on economic dispatch of energy hubs constrained by wind availability. IEEE Trans Sustainable Energy 5(2):699–708CrossRef

64.

Pazouki S, Haghifam M-R, Moser A (2014) Uncertainty modeling in optimal operation of energy hub in presence of wind, storage and demand response. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 61:335–345CrossRef

65.

Moeini-Aghtaie M, Abbaspour A, Fotuhi-Firuzabad M, Dehghanian P (2014) Optimized probabilistic PHEVs demand management in the context of energy hubs. IEEE Trans Power Delivery 30:996CrossRef

66.

Bozchalui MC, Cañizares CA, Bhattacharya K (2014) Optimal energy management of greenhouses in smart grids. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 6:827CrossRef

67.

Rastegar M, Fotuhi-Firuzabad M, Zareipour H, Moeini-Aghtaie M (2015) A probabilistic energy management scheme for renewable-based residential energy hubs. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 8(5):2217CrossRef

68.

Soroudi A and Keane A (2015) Risk averse energy hub management considering plug-in electric vehicles using information gap decision theory. In Plug In Electric Vehicles in Smart Grids, pp. 107–127.

69.

Neyestani N, Damavandi M, Shafie-khah M, Catalão J, and Chicco G. (2015) Uncertainty characterization of carrier-based demand response in smart multi-energy systems,” in Power Engineering, Energy and Electrical Drives (POWERENG), 2015 IEEE 5th International Conference on, pp. 366–371

70.

Zarif M, Khaleghi S, Javidi MH (2015) Assessment of electricity price uncertainty impact on the operation of multi-carrier energy systems. IET Gener Transm Distrib 9(16):2586–2592CrossRef

71.

Vaccaro A, Pisani C, Zobaa AF (2015) Affine arithmetic-based methodology for energy hub operation-scheduling in the presence of data uncertainty. IET Gener Transm Distrib 9(13):1544–1552CrossRef

72.

Yazdani-Damavandi M, Moghaddam MP, Haghifam M-R, Shafıe-khah M, Catalão JPS (2016) Modeling Operational Behavior of Plug-in Electric Vehicles’ Parking Lot in Multienergy Systems. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SMART GRID. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSG.2015.2404892

73.

Moeini-Aghtaie M, Farzin H, Fotuhi-Firuzabad M, Amrollahi R (2016) Generalized analytical approach to assess reliability of renewable-based energy hubs. IEEE Trans Power Syst 32:368CrossRef

74.

Rastegar M, Fotuhi-Firuzabad M, Zareipour H, Moeini-Aghtaie M (2016) A probabilistic energy management scheme for renewable-based residential energy hubs. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 88:2217

75.

Alipour M, Zare K, Abapour M (2017) MINLP probabilistic scheduling model for demand response programs integrated energy hubs. IEEE Trans Ind Inf 14:79CrossRef

76.

Javadi MS, Anvari-Moghaddam A, Guerrero JM (2017) Robust energy hub management using information gap decision theory. IEEE Conf. https://doi.org/10.1109/IECON.2017.8216073

77.

Dolatabadi A, Mohammadi-Ivatloo B (2017) Stochastic risk-constrained scheduling of smart energy hub in the presence of wind power and demand response. Appl Therm Eng 123:40–49CrossRef

78.

Roustai M, Rayati M, Sheikhi A, Ranjbar AM (2018) A scenario-based optimization of smart energy hub operation in a stochastic environment using conditional-value-at-risk. Sustain Cities Soc 39:309–316CrossRef

79.

Wang Y, Cheng J, Zhang N, Kang C (2018) Automatic and linearized modeling of energy hub and its flexibility analysis. 211:705–714

80.

Liu W, Zhan J, Chung CY, Li Y (2019) Day-Ahead Optimal Operation for Multi-Energy Residential Systems with Renewables. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSTE.2018.2876387

81.

Najafi-Ghalelou A, Nojavan S, Zare K (2018) Heating and power hub models for robust performance of smart building using information gap decision theory. Electr Power Energy Syst 98:23–35CrossRef

82.

Ghasemi A, Banejad M, Rahimiyan M (2018) Integrated energy scheduling under uncertainty in a micro energy grid. IET Gener. Transm. Distrib 12(12):2887–2896CrossRef

83.

Majidi M, Zare K (2018) Integration of smart energy hubs in distribution networks under uncertainties and demand response concept. IEEE Trans Power Syst 34:566CrossRef

84.

Massrur HR, Niknam T, FotuhiFiruzabad M (2018) Investigation of carrier demand response uncertainty on energy flow of renewable-based integrated electricity-gas-heat systems. IEEE Trans Ind Inf 14:5133CrossRef

85.

Zhang Y, He Y, Yan M, Guo C, Ding Y (2018) Linearized stochastic scheduling of interconnected energy hubs considering integrated demand response and wind uncertainty. Energies 11:2448. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11092448CrossRef

86.

Davatgaran V, Saniei M, Mortazavi SS (2018) Optimal bidding strategy for an energy hub in energy market. Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.01.174

87.

Thang VV, Zhang Y, Ha T, Liu S (2018) Optimal operation of energy hub in competitive electricity market considering uncertainties. Int J Energy Environ Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40095-018-0274-8

88.

Ezzati SM, Faghihi F, Shourkaei HM, Mozafari SB, Soleymani S (2018) Optimum operation of multi-energy carriers in the context of an energy hub considering a wind generator based on linear programming. J Renewable Sustainable Energy 10:014702. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4991984CrossRef

89.

Shams MH, Shahabi M, Khodayar ME (2018) Risk-averse optimal operation of multiple-energy carrier systems considering network constraints. Electr Power Syst Res 164:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2018.07.022CrossRef

90.

Shams MH, Shahabi M, Khodayar ME (2018) Stochastic day-ahead scheduling of multiple energy carrier microgrids with demand response. Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.04.190

91.

Dolatabadi A, Jadidbonab M, Mohammadi-ivatloo B (2019) Short-term Scheduling Strategy for Wind-based Energy Hub: A Hybrid Stochastic/IGDT Approach. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSTE.2017.2788086.

92.

Jadidbonab M, Babaei E, Mohammadi-ivatloo B (2019) CVaR-constrained scheduling strategy for smart multi carrier energy hub considering demand response and compressed air energy storage. Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.02.048

93.

Rakipour D, Barati H (2019) Probabilistic optimization in operation of energy hub with participation of renewable energy resources and demand response. Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.02.021

94.

Jadidbonab M, Vahid-Pakdel MJ, Seyedi H, Behnam M-i (2019) Stochastic assessment and enhancement of voltage stability in multi carrier energy systems considering wind power. Electr Power Energy Syst 106:572–584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2018.10.028CrossRef

95.

Dini A, Pirouzi S, Norouzi M, Lehtonen M (2019) Grid-connected energy hubs in the coordinated multi-energy management based on day-ahead market framework. Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.116055

96.

Moghaddas-Tafreshi SM, Jafari M, Mohseni S, Kelly S (2019) Optimal operation of an energy hub considering the uncertainty associated with the power consumption of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles using information gap decision theory. Electr Power Energy Syst 112:92–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2019.04.040CrossRef

97.

Huo D, Gu C, Ma K, Wei W, Xiang Y, Le Blond S (2019) Chance-constrained optimization for multi energy hub systems in a smart city. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 66(2). https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2018.2863197

98.

Chen J, Yu Q, Li Q, Lin Z, Li C (2019) Probabilistic energy flow analysis of MCE system considering various coupling units and the uncertainty of distribution generators. IEEE Access:7. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2931398

99.

Lu Q, Lü S, Leng Y, Zhang Z (2020) Optimal household energy management based on smart residential energy hub considering uncertain behaviors. Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.117052

100.

Jamalzadeh F, Mirzahosseini AH, Faghihi F, Panahi M (2020) Optimal operation of energy hub system using hybrid stochastic-interval optimization approach. Sustain Cities Soc 54:101998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101998CrossRef

101.

Heidari A, Mortazavi SS, Bansal RC (2020) Stochastic effects of ice storage on improvement of an energy hub optimal operation including demand response and renewable energies. Appl Energy 261:114393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114393CrossRef

102.

Kazemi M, Mohammadi-Ivatloo B, Ehsan M (2014) Risk-based bidding of large electric utilities using information gap decision theory considering demand response. Electr Power Syst Res 114:86–92CrossRef

103.

Rabiee A, Soroudi A, Keane A (2015) Information gap decision theory based OPF with HVDC connected wind farms. EEE Trans Power Syst 30:6. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6985688

104.

Moore R (1966) Interval analysis. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliff, NJMATH

105.

Moore RE, Kearfott RB, Cloud MJ (2009) Introduction to interval analysis, 1st edn. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, PAMATHCrossRef

106.

Bai L, Li F, Cui H, Jiang T, Sun H, Zhu J (2016) Interval optimization based operating strategy for gas-electricity integrated energy systems considering demand response and wind uncertainty. Appl Energy 167:270–279CrossRef

107.

Zhu Y, Huang G, He L, Zhang L (2012) An interval full infinite programming approach for energy systems planning under multiple uncertainties. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 43(1):375–383CrossRef

108.

Salehimaleh M, Akbarimajd A, Valipour K, Dejamkhooy A (2018) Generalized modeling and optimal management of energy hub based electricity, heat and cooling demands. Energy 159:669e685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.06.122CrossRef

Titel: Uncertainty Modeling in Operation of Multi-carrier Energy Networks
verfasst von: Mohammad Salehimaleh
Adel Akbarimajd
Khalil Valipour
Abdolmajid Dejamkhooy
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: Planning and Operation of Multi-Carrier Energy Networks
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-60085-3

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-60086-0

Copyright-Jahr: 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60086-0_12