Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Journal of Science Education and Technology
Erschienen in: Journal of Science Education and Technology 2-3/2015

01.04.2015

Understanding Co-development of Conceptual and Epistemic Understanding through Modeling Practices with Mobile Internet

verfasst von: Suna Ryu, Yuhwha Han, Seoung-Hey Paik

Erschienen in: Journal of Science Education and Technology | Ausgabe 2-3/2015

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The present study explores how engaging in modeling practice, along with argumentation, leverages students’ epistemic and conceptual understanding in an afterschool science/math class of 16 tenth graders. The study also explores how students used mobile Internet phones (smart phones) productively to support modeling practices. As the modeling practices became more challenging, student discussion occurred more often, from what to model to providing explanations for the phenomenon. Students came to argue about evidence that supported their model and how the model could explain target and related phenomena. This finding adds to the literature that modeling practice can help students improve conceptual understanding of subject knowledge as well as epistemic understanding.
Vorheriger Artikel A Framework for Model-Based Inquiry Through Agent-Based Programming
Nächster Artikel Analyzing Students’ Learning Progressions Throughout a Teaching Sequence on Acoustic Properties of Materials with a Model-Based Inquiry Approach

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Fußnoten
1
KiN is a popular question–answer community. A user (questioner) posts a question under a relevant topic category and the question remains open to receive answers. Any user can answer the question. However, because answerers are given a degree of expertise that is derived from questioners’ votes for the best answerer, questioners tend to prefer high-ranked answerers. EBS provides a number of educational resources related to school sciences, math, and English, and the forums play a similar role to KiN. While BRIC serves as a resource center for biology scientists, it has also been recently perceived as an expert resource for adults and secondary students.
 
Literatur
Berland LK, McNeill KL (2010) A learning progression for scientific argumentation: understanding student work and designing supportive instructional contexts. Sci Educ 94:765–793. doi:10.​1002/​sce.​20402 CrossRef
Chen Y-S, Kao T-C, Yu G-J, Sheu J-P (2004) A mobile butterfly-watching learning system for supporting independent learning. In: Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE international workshop on paper presented at the wireless and mobile technologies in education, 2004
Clark DB, Sampson V, Weinberger A, Erkens G (2007) Analytic frameworks for assessing dialogic argumentation in online learning environments. Educ Psychol Rev 19(3):343–374CrossRef
Cobb P, McClain K, Gravemeijer K (2003) Learning about statistical covariation. Cogn Instruct 21(1):1–78CrossRef
Colella V (2000) Participatory simulations: building collaborative understanding through immersive dynamic modeling. J Learn Sci 9(4):471–500CrossRef
Common Core State Standards Initiative (2010) Common core state standards for mathematics. National Governors Association Center for Best Practices and the Council of Chief State School Officers, Washington, DC
Corbin JM, Strauss A (1990) Grounded theory research: procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology 13:3–21CrossRef
Duschl RA (2008) Science education in three-part harmony: balancing conceptual, epistemic, and social learning goals. Rev Res Educ 32(1):268–291CrossRef
Engle RA, Conant FR (2002) Guiding principles for fostering productive disciplinary engagement: explaining an emergent argument in a community of learners classroom. Cogn Instruct 20(4):399–483CrossRef
Erduran S, Simon S, Osborne J (2004) Tapping into argumentation: developments in the application of toulmin's argument pattern for studying science discourse. Sci Educ 88:915–933
Glaser BG, Strauss AL (2009) The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Transaction Publishers
Grosslight L, Unger C, Jay E, Smith CL (1991) Understanding models and their use in science: conceptions of middle and high school students and experts. J Res Sci Teach 28(9):799–822. doi:10.​1002/​tea.​3660280907 CrossRef
Jimenez-Aleixandre MP, Erduran S (2007) Argumentation in science education: perspectives from classroom-based research. Springer
Klopfer E, Squire K, Jenkins H (2002) Environmental detectives: Pdas as a window into a virtual simulated world. In: Proceedings of IEEE international workshop on paper presented at the wireless and mobile technologies in education, 2002
Kuhn TS (1977) The essential tension. Selected studies in scientific tradition and change. Philos Sci 1
Kuhn D (1993) Science as argument: implications for teaching and learning scientific thinking. Sci Educ 77(3):319–337CrossRef
Lederman NG, Abd-El-Khalick F, Bell RL, Schwartz RS (2002) Views of nature of science questionnaire: toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners’ conceptions of nature of science. J Res Sci Teach 39(6):497–521. doi:10.​1002/​tea.​10034 CrossRef
Lehrer R, Schauble L (2006) Cultivating model-based reasoning in science education. In: Sawyer RK (ed) Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 371–388
Luchini K, Quintana C, Curtis M, Murphy R, Krajcik J, Soloway E, Suthers D (2002) Using handhelds to support collaborative learning. Paper presented at the proceedings of the conference on computer support for Collaborative Learning: Foundations for a CSCL Community
McNeill KL, Krajcik J (2008) Scientific explanations: characterizing and evaluating the effects of teachers’ instructional practices on student learning. J Res Sci Teach 45(1):53–78CrossRef
National Research Council (2007) Taking science to school: learning and teaching in grades K-8. National Research Council, Washington, DC
National Research Council (2011) A framework for K-12 science education: practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Committee on a Conceptual Framework for New K-12 Science Education Standards. Board on Science Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Washington, DC
National Research Council (2012) Education for life and work: developing transferable knowledge and skills in the 21st century. Committee on Defining Deeper Learning and 21st skills. Board on Testing and Assessment and Board on Science Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Washington, DC
Nicolaidou I, Kyza EA, Terzian F, Hadjichambis A, Kafouris D (2011) A framework for scaffolding students’ assessment of the credibility of evidence. J Res Sci Teach 48(7):711–744. doi:10.​1002/​tea.​20420 CrossRef
Nussbaum EM, Edwards OV (2011) Critical questions and argument stratagems: a framework for enhancing and analyzing students’ reasoning practices. J Learn Sci 20:443–488CrossRef
Osborne J, Erduran S, Simon S (2004) Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science. J Res Sci Teach 41:994-1020. doi:10.​1002/​tea.​20035
Ryu S, Lombardi D (in press) Coding classroom interactions for collective and individual engagement. Educ Psychol
Ryu S, Sandoval WA (2012) Improvements to elementary children's epistemic understanding from sustained argumentation. Sci Educ 96(3):488–526
Scheuer O, Loll F, Pinkwart N, McLaren BM (2010) Computer-supported argumentation: a review of the state of the art. Intern J Comput-Support Collab Learn 5(1):43–102
Schwarz CV, Meyer J, Sharma A (2007) Technology, pedagogy, and epistemology: opportunities and challenges of using computer modeling and simulation tools in elementary science methods. J Sci Teach Educ 18(2):243–269CrossRef
Schwarz CV, Reiser BJ, Davis EA, Kenyon L, Achér A, Fortus D, Krajcik J (2009) Developing a learning progression for scientific modeling: making scientific modeling accessible and meaningful for learners. J Res Sci Teach 46(6):632–654CrossRef
Sharples M, Arnedillo-Sánchez I, Milrad M, Vavoula G (2009) Mobile learning. Springer, Berlin
Soloway E, Norris C, Blumenfeld P, Fishman B, Krajcik J, Marx R (2001) Log on education: handheld devices are ready-at-hand. Commun ACM 44(6):15–20CrossRef
Songer NB, Kelcey B, Gotwals AW (2009) How and when does complex reasoning occur? Empirically driven development of a learning progression focused on complex reasoning about biodiversity. J Res Sci Teach 46(6):610–631CrossRef
Stewart J, Cartier JL, Passmore CM (2005) Developing understanding through model-based inquiry. In: Donovan S, BransfordT J (eds) How students learn. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, pp 515–565
Tinker RF, Krajcik JS (2001) Portable technologies: science learning in context. ERIC, Innovations in science education and technologyCrossRef
Windschitl M, Thompson J, Braaten M (2008) How novice science teachers appropriate epistemic discourses around model-based inquiry for use in classrooms. Cogn Instruct 26:310–378. doi:10.​1080/​0737000080217719​3 CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Understanding Co-development of Conceptual and Epistemic Understanding through Modeling Practices with Mobile Internet
verfasst von
Suna Ryu
Yuhwha Han
Seoung-Hey Paik
Publikationsdatum
01.04.2015
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Journal of Science Education and Technology / Ausgabe 2-3/2015
Print ISSN: 1059-0145
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-1839
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-014-9545-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2-3/2015

Journal of Science Education and Technology 2-3/2015 Zur Ausgabe

OriginalPaper

Key Characteristics of Successful Science Learning: The Promise of Learning by Modelling

OriginalPaper

Combining High-Speed Cameras and Stop-Motion Animation Software to Support Students’ Modeling of Human Body Movement

OriginalPaper

Constructing Scientific Arguments Using Evidence from Dynamic Computational Climate Models

OriginalPaper

Navigating Tensions Between Conceptual and Metaconceptual Goals in the Use of Models

OriginalPaper

The Influence of Curriculum, Instruction, Technology, and Social Interactions on Two Fifth-Grade Students’ Epistemologies in Modeling Throughout a Model-Based Curriculum Unit

OriginalPaper

Analyzing Students’ Learning Progressions Throughout a Teaching Sequence on Acoustic Properties of Materials with a Model-Based Inquiry Approach

Premium Partner

    Marktübersichten

    Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen. 

    Zur Marktübersicht
    Bildnachweise