Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen
The purpose of this paper is to investigate the nature of rhetoric and rhetorical strategies that are implicit in the standalone sustainability reporting of the top 24 companies of the Fortune 500 Global. We adopt Bormann’s (Q J Speech 58(4):396–407, 1972) SCT framework to study the rhetorical situation and how corporate sustainability reporting (CSR) messages can be communicated to the audience (public). The SCT concepts in the sustainability reporting’s communication are subject to different types of legitimacy strategies that are used by corporations as a validity and legitimacy claim in the reports. A content analysis has been conducted and structural coding schemes have been developed based on the literature. The schemes are applied to the SCT model which recognizes the symbolic convergent processes of fantasy among communicators in a Society. The study reveals that most of the sample companies communicate fantasy type and rhetorical vision in their corporate sustainability reporting. However, the disclosure or messages are different across locations and other taxonomies of the SCT framework. This study contributes to the current CSR literature about how symbolic or fantasy understandings can be interpreted by the users. It also discusses the persuasion styles that are adopted by the companies for communication purposes. This study is the theoretical extension of the SCT. Researchers may be interested in further investigating other online communication paths, such as human rights reports and director’s reports.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
Abizadeh, A. (2002). The passions of the wise: “Phronêsis”, rhetoric, and Aristotle’s passionate practical deliberation. The Review of Metaphysics, 56, 267–296.
Aerts, W. (1994). On the use of accounting logic as an explanatory category in narrative accounting disclosures. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 19(4–5), 337–353. CrossRef
Aerts, W. (2001). Inertia in the attributional content of annual accounting narratives. European Accounting Review, 10(1), 3–32. CrossRef
Aldrich, H. E., & Fiol, C. M. (1994). Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation. Academy of Management Review, 19(4), 645–670. CrossRef
Alvesson, M. (1993). Organizations as rhetoric: Knowledge-intensive firms and the struggle with ambiguity. Journal of Management Studies, 30(6), 997–1015. CrossRef
Amernic, J. H. (1996). The rhetoric versus the reality, or is the reality “mere” rhetoric? a case study of public accounting firms’ responses to a company’s invitation for alternative opinions on an accounting matter. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 7(1), 57–75. CrossRef
Aristotle. (1991). The art of rhetoric. New York, NY: Penguin Books.
Arrington, C. E., & Schweiker, W. (1992). The rhetoric and rationality of accounting research. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 17(6), 511–533. CrossRef
Arvidsson, S. (2009). Non-financial information and the annual report. Working paper, Department of Business Administration, Lund University, Lund.
Ashforth, B. E., & Gibbs, B. W. (1990). The double-edge of organizational legitimation. Organization Science, 1(2), 177–194. CrossRef
Banerjee, S. B. (2008). Corporate social responsibility: The good, the bad and the ugly. Critical Sociology, 34(1), 51–79. CrossRef
Bazerman, C. (1989). Shaping written knowledge. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
Bazerman, C. (1994a). Constructing experience. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
Bazerman, C. (1994b). Systems of genres and the enactment of social intentions. In Genre and the new rhetoric (pp. 79–101).
Berg, B. (2004). Qualitative research methods for the social science. Toronto: Allyn and Bacon.
Bhatia, V. K. (1993). Analysing genre: Language use in professional settings. London: Longman.
Bhatia, V. K. (2004). Worlds of written discourse: A genre-based view. London: Continuum.
Billig, M. (1987). Arguing and thinking: A rhetorical approach to social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Blumer, H. (1954). What is wrong with social theory? American Sociological Review, 18, 3–10. CrossRef
Böhling, K., Murguía, D. I., & Godfrid, J. (2017). Sustainability reporting in the mining sector: Exploring its symbolic nature. Business & Society, 25(1), 271–313.
Bormann, E. G. (1972). Fantasy and rhetorical vision: The rhetorical criticism of social reality. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 58(4), 396–407. CrossRef
Bormann, E. G. (1980). Communication theory. New York: Holt, Rhinehart and Winston.
Bormann, E. G. (1982). I. Fantasy and rhetorical vision: Ten years later. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 68(3), 288–305. CrossRef
Bormann, E. G. (1983). Symbolic convergence: Organizational communication and culture. In L. L. Putnam & M. E. Pacanowsky (Eds.), Communication and organizations: An interpretive approach (pp. 99–122). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Bormann, E. G. (1985a). Symbolic convergence theory: A communication formulation. Journal of Communication, 35(4), 128–138. CrossRef
Bormann, E. G. (1985b). The force of fantasy: Restoring the America dream. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
Bormann, E. G., Cragan, J. F., & Shields, D. C. (2001). Three decades of developing, grounding, and using symbolic convergence theory (SCT). Annals of the International Communication Association, 25(1), 271–313. CrossRef
Bormann, E. G., Knutson, R. L., & Musolf, K. (1997). Why do people share fantasies? An empirical investigation of a basic tenet of the symbolic convergence communication theory. Communication Studies, 48(3), 254–276. CrossRef
Bostdorff, D. M. (1992). “The decision is yours” campaign: Planned parenthood’s characteristic argument of moral virtue. In E. L. Toth & R. L. Heath (Eds.), Rhetorical and critical approaches to public relations (pp. 301–314). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Bostdorff, D., & Vibbert, S. L. (1994). Values advocacy: Enhancing organizational images, deflecting public criticism, and grounding future arguments. Public Relations Review, 20, 141–158. CrossRef
Braet, A. C. (1992). Ethos, pathos and logos in Aristotle’s Rhetoric: A re-examination. Argumentation, 6(3), 307–320. CrossRef
Brennan, N., & Gray, S. J. (2000). Rhetoric and argument in financial reporting. The Association of Chartered Certified Accountants. ACCA Occasional Research Papers; No. 31. http://www2.accaglobal.com/pubs/general/activities/research/research_archive/orp-031-001.pdf.
Brennan, M. N., & Merkl-Davies, D. M. (2014). Rhetoric and argument in social and environmental reporting: The Dirty Laundry case. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 27(4), 602–633. CrossRef
Brønn, P. S., & Vidaver-Cohen, D. (2009). Corporate motives for social initiative: Legitimacy, sustainability, or the bottom line? Journal of Business Ethics, 87, 91–109. CrossRef
Bullis, C. (1997). Business communication and the natural environment: Using traditional and contemporary perspectives to understand the connections. The Journal of Business Communication (1973), 34(4), 455–477. CrossRef
Burke, K. (1969). A rhetoric of motives (Vol. 111). Oakland: University of California Press.
Burke, R. J. (1982). Politics as rhetoric. Ethics, 93(1), 45–55. CrossRef
Burr, V. (1995). An introduction to social constructionism. London: Routledge. CrossRef
Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497–505. CrossRef
Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39–48. CrossRef
Carroll, A. B. (1998). The four faces of corporate citizenship. Business and Society Review, 100(1), 1–7. CrossRef
Chalaby, J. (1996). Beyond the prison-house of language: Discourse as a sociological concept. The British Journal of Sociology, 47(4), 684–698. CrossRef
Charmaz, K. (2003). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Strategies for qualitative inquiry (2nd ed., pp. 249–291). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Chen, J., Huang, Q., Peng, H., & Zhong, H. (2015). Research report on corporate social responsibility of China. Berlin: Springer. CrossRef
Cheney, G., Christensen, L. T., Conrad, C., & Lair, D. J. (2004). Corporate rhetoric as organizational discourse. In The Sage handbook of organizational discourse (pp. 79–103).
Clatworthy, M. A., & Jones, M. J. (2006). Differential patterns of textual characteristics and company performance in the chairman’s statement. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 19(4), 493–511. CrossRef
Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37–46. CrossRef
Coombs, W. T., & Holladay, S. J. (2013). The pseudo-panopticon: The illusion created by CSR-related transparency and the internet. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 18(2), 212–227. CrossRef
Cox, R. (2012). Environmental communication and the public sphere. London: Sage publications.
Cragan, J. F., & Shields, D. C. (1977). Foreign policy communication dramas: How mediated rhetoric played in Peoria in campaign’76. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 63(3), 274–289. CrossRef
Cragan, J. F., & Shields, D. C. (1981). Applied communication research: A dramatistic approach. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
Cragan, J. F., & Shields, D. C. (1992). The use of symbolic convergence theory in corporate strategic planning: A case study. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 20(2), 199–218. CrossRef
Cragan, J. F., & Shields, D. C. (1995). Symbolic theories in applied communication research: Bormann, Burke, and Fisher. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
Crane, A., & Glozer, S. (2016). Researching corporate social responsibility communication: Themes, opportunities and challenges. Journal of Management Studies, 53(7), 1223–1252. CrossRef
Cross, M. (1991). Aristotle and business writing: Why we need to teach persuasion. The Bulletin of the Association for Business Communication, 54(1), 3–6. CrossRef
Crossan, M. M., Lane, H. W., & White, R. E. (1999). An organizational learning framework: From intuition to institution. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 522–537. CrossRef
CVS Health. (2015). Sustainability report. https://cvshealth.com/social-responsibility/corporate-social-responsibility/annual-corporate-social-responsibility-reports.
Davison, J. (2014). Visual rhetoric and the case of intellectual capital. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 39(1), 20–37. CrossRef
Deegan, C., Rankin, M., & Tobin, J. (2002). An examination of the corporate social and environmental disclosures of BHP from 1983–1997: A test of legitimacy theory. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(3), 312–343. CrossRef
den Hoonard, Van, & Will, C. (1997). Working with sensitizing concepts: Analytical field research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Devin, B. L., & Lane, A. B. (2014). Communicating engagement in corporate social responsibility: A meta-level construal of engagement. Journal of Public Relations Research, 26(5), 436–454. CrossRef
Dey, C. (2007). Social accounting at Traidcraft plc: A struggle for the meaning of fair trade. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 20(3), 423–445. CrossRef
Díez-Martín, F., Prado-Roman, C., & Blanco-González, A. (2013). Beyond legitimacy: Legitimacy types and organizational success. Management Decision, 51(10), 1954–1969. CrossRef
Dong, S., & Xu, L. (2016). The impact of explicit CSR regulation: Evidence from China’s mining firms. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 17(2), 237–258. CrossRef
Drumheller, K. (2005). Millennial dogma: A fantasy theme analysis of the millennial generation’s uses and gratifications of religious content media. Journal of Communication & Religion, 28, 47–70.
Du, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2010). Maximizing business returns to corporate social responsibility (CSR): The role of CSR communication. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 8–19. CrossRef
Duffy, M. E. (2003). Web of hate: A fantasy theme analysis of the rhetorical vision of hate groups online. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 27(3), 291–312. CrossRef
Endres, T. G. (1994). Co-existing master analogues in symbolic convergence theory: The Knights of Columbus quincentennial campaign. Communication Studies, 45(3–4), 294–308. CrossRef
Estava, D. J. (2012). Lope de Aguirre, the tyrant, and the prince: Convergence and divergence in postcolonial collective memory. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 5(4), 291–308. CrossRef
Finnemore, M. (1996). Norms, culture, and world politics: Insights from sociology’s institutionalism. International Organization, 50(2), 325–347. CrossRef
Finnemore, M., & Sikkink, K. (1998). International norm dynamics and political change. International Organization, 52(4), 887–917. CrossRef
Foss, S. K. (1989). Generic criticism. In S. K. Foss (Ed.), Rhetorical criticism: Exploration and practice. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland.
Gamson, W. A., & Modigliani, A. (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology, 95(1), 1–37. CrossRef
Garver, E. (1994). Aristotle’s rhetoric: An art of character. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Glaser, B. G. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). (2016). Consolidated set of GRI sustainability reporting standards 2016. Accessed 7 December https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/gri-standards-download-center/.
Goetz, J., & LeCompte, M. (1984). Ethnography and qualitative designs in educational research. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Golob, U., & Podnar, K. (2014). Critical points of CSR-related stakeholder dialogue in practice. Business Ethics: A European Review, 23(3), 248–257. CrossRef
Gray, R., Kouhy, R., & Lavers, S. (1995). Corporate social and environmental reporting: A review of the literature and a longitudinal study of UK disclosure. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 8(2), 47–77. CrossRef
Gray, R., Owen, D., & Adams, C. (1996). Accounting and accountability: Changes and challenges in corporate social and environmental reporting. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
Griffin, J. J., & Mahon, J. F. (1997). The corporate social performance and corporate financial performance debate: Twenty-five years of incomparable research. Business and Society, 36(1), 5–31. CrossRef
Guthrie, J., Petty, R., Yongvanich, K., & Ricceri, F. (2004). Using content analysis as a research method to inquire into intellectual capital reporting. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 5(2), 282–293. CrossRef
Gyimóthy, S. (2013). Symbolic convergence and tourism social media. In A. M. Munar, S. Gyimóthy, & L. Cai (Eds.), Tourism social media: Transformations in identity, community and culture (pp. 55–71). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited. CrossRef
Hartman, L. P., Rubin, R. S., & Dhanda, K. K. (2007). The communication of corporate social responsibility: United States and European Union multinational corporations. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(4), 373–389. CrossRef
Hayes, A. F., & Krippendorff, K. (2007). Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data. Communication Methods and Measures, 1(1), 77–89. CrossRef
Heath, R. L. (1993). A rhetorical approach to zones of meaning and organizational prerogatives. Public Relations Review, 19(2), 141–155. CrossRef
Heath, R. L. (2001). Chapter 2: A rhetorical enactment rationale for public relations: The good organization communicating well. In R. L. Heath (Ed.), Handbook of public relations (pp. 31–50). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. CrossRef
Heath, R. L., & Ryan, M. (1989). Public relations’ role in defining corporate social responsibility. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 4(1), 21–38. CrossRef
Higgins, C., & Robyn, W. (2012). Ethos, logos, pathos: Strategies of persuasion in social/environmental reports. Accounting Forum, 36(3), 194–208. CrossRef
Hooper, K., & Pratt, M. (1995). Discourse and rhetoric: The case of the New Zealand Native Land Company. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 8(1), 10–37. CrossRef
Hopkins, L. (2011). Symbolic convergence theory. Retrieved October 14, 2014 from http://www.leehopkins.net/2011/05/31/symbolic-convergence-theory/.
Ihlen, Ø. (2008). Mapping the environment for corporate social responsibility: Stakeholders, publics and the public sphere. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 13(2), 135–146. CrossRef
Ihlen, Ø. (2009). Business and climate change: The climate response of the world’s 30 largest corporations. Environmental Communication, 3(2), 244–262. CrossRef
Ihlen, Ø. (2011). Rhetoric and corporate social responsibility. In J. Bartlett, O. Ihlen, & S. May (Eds.), Handbook of communication and corporate social responsibility (pp. 147–166). Hoboken: Wiley. CrossRef
Ihlen, Ø., Bartlett, J., & May, S. (Eds.). (2011). The handbook of communication and corporate social responsibility. Hoboken: Wiley.
Ihlen, Ø., Van Ruler, B., & Fredriksson, M. (Eds.). (2009). Public relations and social theory: Key figures and concepts. Abington: Routledge.
Johansen, T. S., & Nielsen, A. E. (2011). Strategic stakeholder dialogues: A discursive perspective on relationship building. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 16(3), 204–217. CrossRef
Jonker, J. (2005). CSR Wonderland: Navigating between movement, community and organisation. The Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 20, 19–22. CrossRef
Kartikawangi, D. (2017). Symbolic convergence of local wisdom in cross–cultural collaborative social responsibility: Indonesian case. Public Relations Review, 43(1), 35–45. CrossRef
Kennedy, G. A. (1991). Aristotle on rhetoric: A theory of civic discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Khan, M., Serafeim, G., & Yoon, A. (2016). Corporate sustainability: First evidence on materiality. The Accounting Review, 91(6), 1697–1724. CrossRef
Kiliç, M. (2016). Online corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure in the banking industry: Evidence from Turkey. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 34(4), 550–569. CrossRef
Klotz, A. (1999). Norms in international relations: The struggle against apartheid. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Krippendorff, K. (1980). Content analysis (Vol. 7, pp. 1–84). Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
Laine, M. (2009). Ensuring legitimacy through rhetorical changes? A longitudinal interpretation of the environmental disclosures of a leading Finnish chemical company. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 22(7), 1029–1054. CrossRef
Laine, M. (2010). Towards sustaining the status quo: Business talk of sustainability in Finnish corporate disclosures 1987–2005. European Accounting Review, 19(2), 247–274. CrossRef
Levina, N., & Orlikowski, W. J. (2009). Understanding shifting power relations within and across organizations: A critical genre analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 52(4), 672–703. CrossRef
Lewis, S. (2003). Reputation and corporate responsibility. Journal of Communication Management, 7(4), 356–366. CrossRef
Livesey, S. M. (2002). The discourse of the middle ground: Citizen Shell commits to sustainable development. Management Communication Quarterly, 15(3), 313–349. CrossRef
Livesey, S. M., & Graham, J. (2007). Greening of corporations? Eco-talk and the emerging social imaginary. In S. K. May, G. Cheney, & J. Roper (Eds.), The debate over corporate social responsibility (pp. 336–350). New York: Oxford University Press.
Llewellyn, J. (1990). The rhetoric of corporate legitimation: Public relations and philanthropy as social responsibility. Austin, TX: The University of Texas at Austin.
Maignan, I., & Ferrell, O. C. (2001). Corporate citizenship as a marketing instrument—Concepts, evidence and research directions. European Journal of Marketing, 35(3/4), 457–484. CrossRef
Mäkelä, H., & Laine, M. (2011). A CEO with many messages: Comparing the ideological representations provided by different corporate reports. Accounting Forum, 35(4), 217–231. CrossRef
Manetti, G., & Bellucci, M. (2016). The use of social media for engaging stakeholders in sustainability reporting. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 29(6), 985–1011. CrossRef
Marais, M. (2012). CEO rhetorical strategies for corporate social responsibility (CSR). Society and Business Review, 7(3), 223–243. CrossRef
Masocha, W., & Weetman, P. (2007). Rhetoric in standard setting: The case of the going-concern audit. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 20(1), 74–100. CrossRef
Mason, M., & Mason, R. D. (2012). Communicating a green corporate perspective: Ideological persuasion in the corporate environmental report. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 26(4), 479–506. CrossRef
Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). “Implicit” and “explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 404–424. CrossRef
May, S. K., & Zorn, T. E. (2003). Forum introduction. Management Communication Quarterly, 16(4), 595–598. CrossRef
McCloskey, D. N. (1998). The rhetoric of economics. USA: University of Wisconsin Press.
Merkl-Davies, D. M., Merkl-Davies, D. M., Brennan, N. M., & Brennan, N. M. (2017). A theoretical framework of external accounting communication: Research perspectives, traditions, and theories. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 30(2), 433–469. CrossRef
Mezias, S. J. (1990). An institutional model of organizational practice: Financial reporting at the Fortune 200. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 431–457. CrossRef
Milne, M. J., Kearins, K., & Walton, S. (2006). Creating adventures in wonderland: The journey metaphor and environmental sustainability. Organization, 13(6), 801–839. CrossRef
Morhardt, J. E. (2010). Corporate social responsibility and sustainability reporting on the internet. Business Strategy and the Environment, 19(7), 436–452.
Neilsen, E. H., & Rao, M. H. (1987). The strategy-legitimacy nexus: A thick description. Academy of Management Review, 12(3), 523–533. CrossRef
Neumann, W. (2003). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Nichols, M. P. (1987). Aristotle’s defense of rhetoric. The Journal of Politics, 49(3), 657–677. CrossRef
Nyberg, D., & Wright, C. (2012). Justifying business responses to climate change: Discursive strategies of similarity and difference. Environment and Planning A, 44(8), 1819–1835. CrossRef
O’Connor, A., & Shumate, M. (2010). An economic industry and institutional level of analysis of corporate social responsibility communication. Management Communication Quarterly, 24(4), 529–551. CrossRef
Onkila, T. J. (2009). Corporate argumentation for acceptability: Reflections of environmental values and stakeholder relations in corporate environmental statements. Journal of Business Ethics, 87(2), 285–298. CrossRef
Padgett, D. K. (2004). Coming of age: Theoretical thinking, social responsibility, and a global perspective on qualitative research. In D. K. Padgett (Ed.), The qualitative research experience (pp. 297–315). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thompson Learning.
Palenchar, M. J., & Heath, R. L. (2002). Another part of the risk communication model: Analysis of communication processes and message content. Journal of Public Relations Research, 14(2), 127–158. CrossRef
Park, J., Lee, H., & Hong, H. (2016). The Analysis of Self-Presentation of Fortune 500 Corporations in Corporate Web Sites. Business and Society, 55(5), 706–737. CrossRef
Parsons, T. (1960). Structure and process in modern societies. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Payne, R. A. (2001). Persuasion, frames and norm construction. European Journal of International Relations, 7(1), 37–61. CrossRef
Perelman, C. (1982). The realm of rhetoric. Notre Dame: The University of Notre dame Press.
Phillips, N., & Hardy, C. (2002). Discourse analysis: Investigating processes of social construction. Sage University papers series on qualitative research methods (Vol. 50). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. CrossRef
Pinto, I., & Picoto, W. N. (2016). Configurational analysis of firms’ performance: Understanding the role of Internet financial reporting. Journal of Business Research, 69(11), 5360–5365. CrossRef
Potter, J. (1996). Representing reality: Discourse, rhetoric and social construction. Thousand Oaks: Sage. CrossRef
Prentice, S. J. (2006). A symbolic convergence theory approach to graduate recruiting. Master of Arts thesis, Texas Tech University, USA.
Preuss, L. (2005). Rhetoric and reality of corporate greening: A view from the supply chain management function. Business Strategy and the Environment, 14(2), 123–139. CrossRef
Putnam, L. (2004). Dialectical and rhetorical tropes in negotiations. Organization Studies, 25, 35–53. CrossRef
Putnam, L. L., & Nicotera, A. M. (Eds.). (2009). Building theories of organization: The constitutive role of communication. London: Routledge.
Putnam, L., & Pacanowsky, M. E. (1983). Communication and organizations, an interpretive approach (Vol. 65). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Inc.
Reynolds, M., & Yuthas, K. (2008). Moral discourse and corporate social responsibility reporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 78(1–2), 47–64. CrossRef
Roberts, R. W. (1992). Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure: An application of stakeholder theory. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 17(6), 595–612. CrossRef
Robinson, D. N. (2006). Rhetoric and character in Aristotle. The Review of Metaphysics, 60, 3–15.
Rodríguez Bolívar, M. P. (2009). Evaluating corporate environmental reporting on the internet: The utility and resource industries in Spain. Business and Society, 48(2), 179–205. CrossRef
Rolland, D., & O’Keefe Bazzoni, J. (2009). Greening corporate identity: CSR online corporate identity reporting. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 14(3), 249–263. CrossRef
Ruebottom, T. (2013). The microstructures of rhetorical strategy in social entrepreneurship: Building legitimacy through heroes and villains. Journal of Business Venturing, 28(1), 98–116. CrossRef
Scott, W. A. (1955). Reliability of content analysis: The case of nominal scale coding. Public Opinion Quarterly, 19, 321–325. CrossRef
Self, L. S. (1979). Rhetoric and phronesis: The Aristotelian ideal. Philosophy & Rhetoric, 12, 130–145.
Shell. (2015). Sustainability report. https://reports.shell.com/sustainability-report/2015/.
Shields, D. C. (2000). Symbolic convergence and special communication theories: Sensing and examining dis/enchantment with the theoretical robustness of critical auto ethnography. Communications Monographs, 67(4), 392–421. CrossRef
Shields, D. C., & Preston, C. T. (1985). Fantasy theme analysis in competitive rhetorical criticism. National Forensic Journal, 3(2), 102–115.
Sörensson, A., & Jansson, A. M. (2016). Sustainability reporting among Swedish tourism service providers: Information differences between them. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, 201, 103–113. CrossRef
Sovacool, B. K., & Ramana, M. V. (2015). Back to the future: Small modular reactors, nuclear fantasies, and symbolic convergence. Science, Technology and Human Values, 40(1), 96–125. CrossRef
Spence, L. J. (2007). CSR and small business in a European policy context: The five “C” s of CSR and small business research agenda 2007. Business and Society Review, 112(4), 533–552. CrossRef
Spence, C. (2009). Social accounting’s emancipatory potential: A Gramscian critique. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 20(2), 205–227. CrossRef
Spence, C., & Thomson, I. (2009). Resonance tropes in corporate philanthropy discourse. Business Ethics: A European Review, 18(4), 372–388. CrossRef
Stallworth Williams, L. (2008). The mission statement: A corporate reporting tool with a past, present, and future. The Journal of Business Communication (1973), 45(2), 94–119. CrossRef
Stone, J. F. (2002). Using symbolic convergence theory to discern and segment motives for enrolling in professional master’s degree programs. Communication Quarterly, 50(2), 227–243. CrossRef
Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610. CrossRef
Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Swales, J. M., & Rogers, P. S. (1995). Discourse and the projection of corporate culture: The mission statement. Discourse & Society, 6(2), 223–242. CrossRef
Sweeney, L., & Coughlan, J. (2008). Do different industries report corporate social responsibility differently? An investigation through the lens of stakeholder theory. Journal of Marketing Communications, 14(2), 113–124. CrossRef
Taylor, J. R., & Van Every, E. J. (2000). The emergent organization. Communication as its site and surface. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Tregidga, H., & Milne, M. J. (2006). From sustainable management to sustainable development: A longitudinal analysis of a leading New Zealand environmental reporter. Business Strategy and the Environment, 15(4), 219–241. CrossRef
Tregidga, H., Kearins, K., & Milne, M. (2013). The politics of knowing “organizational sustainable development”. Organization & Environment, 26(1), 102–129. CrossRef
Tregidga, H., Milne, M., & Kearins, K. (2014). (Re) presenting ‘sustainable organizations’. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 39(6), 477–494. CrossRef
Trittin, H., & Schoeneborn, D. (2017). Diversity as polyphony: Reconceptualizing diversity Management from a communication-centered perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 144(2), 305–322. CrossRef
Unerman, J. (2000). Methodological issues-Reflections on quantification in corporate social reporting content analysis. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 13(5), 667–681. CrossRef
Verizon. (2015). Corporate responsibility supplement. http://www.verizon.com/about/sites/default/files/annual/verizon-annual-2015/downloads/2015_Verizon_Corporate_Responsibility_Supplement.pdf.
Wæraas, A., & Ihlen, Ø. (2009). Green legitimation: The construction of an environmental ethos. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 17(2), 84–102. CrossRef
Walmart. (2015). Global responsibility report. https://cdn.corporate.walmart.com/c0/24/2383f0674d27823dcf7083e6fbc6/2015-global-responsibility-report.pdf.
Warnock, K. (1992). Structure and argument in accounting standards. Accounting and Business Research, 22(86), 179–188. CrossRef
Watson, T. J. (1995). Rhetoric, discourse and argument in organizational sense making: A reflexive tale. Organization Studies, 16, 805–821. CrossRef
Weick, K. E. (1979). Cognitive processes in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 1(1), 41–74.
Wood, D. J. (1991). Corporate social performance revisited. Academy of Management Review, 16(4), 691–718. CrossRef
Young, J. J. (2003). Constructing, persuading and silencing: The rhetoric of accounting standards. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28(6), 621–638. CrossRef
Young, R. O. (2016). Persuasive communication: How audiences decide. London: Routledge. CrossRef
Zanin, A. C., Hoelscher, C. S., & Kramer, M. W. (2016). Extending Symbolic Convergence Theory: A Shared Identity Perspective of a Team’s Culture. Small Group Research, 47(4), 438–472. CrossRef
- Understanding Communication of Sustainability Reporting: Application of Symbolic Convergence Theory (SCT)
Md. Tarikul Islam
Mahmood Ahmed Momin
Md. Samsul Alam
- Springer Netherlands
Neuer Inhalt/© Stellmach, Neuer Inhalt/© Maturus, Pluta Logo/© Pluta