Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations
The aim of this study was to better understand how students use online forums and Twitter in undergraduate learning. Students completed an anonymous online survey (N = 50, 54% completion rate) to assess their general approach to these tools, the types of interaction experienced and specific uses. Students were also asked to relate their use to categories of learning outcomes and rate the importance of different factors in using each tool. The study demonstrates more students use forums than Twitter but that both tools provide support for learning outcomes aimed at increasing knowledge and understanding and key skills. Furthermore, they do this differently; Twitter provides access to news media and those outside their programme whilst forums support discussion with peers. Different factors predicted how highly each tool was rated but in most cases, a key factor was whether students felt that use of a tool would increase their grade, indicating that assessment outcomes are strongly linked to use of both tools, despite them differing in terms of interactions and specific uses. The study has several limitations including a relatively small sample size and lack of detail about exact types of resources accessed and forum structures used.
Biggs, J., & Collis, K. (1982). The psychological structure of creative writing. Australian Journal of Education, 26(1), 59–70. CrossRef
Chawinga, W. D. (2017). Taking social media to a university classroom: Teaching and learning using Twitter and blogs. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), 3. CrossRef
Conole, G., & Alevizou, P. (2010). A literature review of the use of Web 2.0 tools in Higher Education. A report commissioned by the Higher Education Academy.
Dawson, S. (2010). ‘Seeing’the learning community: An exploration of the development of a resource for monitoring online student networking. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(5), 736-752.
Dhir, A., Buragga, K., & Boreqqah, A. A. (2013). Tweeters on campus: Twitter a learning tool in classroom? Journal of Universal Computer Science, 19(5), 672–691.
Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics: Sage.
Gao, F., Luo, T., & Zhang, K. (2012). Tweeting for learning: A critical analysis of research on microblogging in education published in 2008–2011. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(5), 783–801. CrossRef
Hammond, M. (2005). A review of recent papers on online discussion in teaching and learning in higher education. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 9(3), 9–23.
Hew, K. F. (2016). Promoting engagement in online courses: What strategies can we learn from three highly rated MOOCS. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(2), 320–341. CrossRef
Ito, M., Gutiérrez, K., Livingstone, S., Penuel, B., Rhodes, J., Salen, K., . . . Watkins, S. C. (2013). Connected learning: An agenda for research and design: BookBaby.
Jonassen, D. H. (1994). Technology as cognitive tools: Learners as designers. ITForum Paper, 1, 67–80.
Junco, R., Heiberger, G., & Loken, E. (2011). The effect of twitter on college student engagement and grades. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(2), 119–132. CrossRef
Kimmons, R., Veletsianos, G., & Woodward, S. (2017). Institutional uses of Twitter in US higher education. Innovative Higher Education, 42(2), 97–111. CrossRef
Laurillard, D. (1999). A conversational framework for individual learning applied to the ‘learning organisation’and the ‘learning society’. Systems Research and Behavioral Science: The Official Journal of the International Federation for Systems Research, 16(2), 113–122. CrossRef
Macdonald, J., & Twining, P. (2002). Assessing activity–based learning for a networked course. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33(5), 603–618. CrossRef
Macfadyen, L. P., & Dawson, S. (2010). Mining LMS data to develop an “early warning system” for educators: A proof of concept. Computers & Education, 54(2), 588–599. CrossRef
Markel, S. L. (2001). Technology and education online discussion forums. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 4.
Morris, L. V., Finnegan, C., & Wu, S. (2005). Tracking student behavior, persistence, and achievement in online courses. Internet and Higher Education, 8(3), 221–231.
Nichols, M. (2003). A theory for eLearning. Educational Technology & Society, 6(2), 1–10.
Norman, S. (2016). 15 Ways to use twitter in education (for students and teachers alike). Elearning industry . Retrieved from https://elearningindustry.com/15-ways-Twitter-in-education-students-teachers
Pilotti, M., Anderson, S., Hardy, P., Murphy, P., & Vincent, P. (2017). Factors related to cognitive, emotional, and behavioral engagement in the online asynchronous classroom. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 29(1), 145–153.
Prestridge, S. (2014). A focus on students’ use of Twitter–their interactions with each other, content and interface. Active Learning in Higher Education, 15(2), 101–115. CrossRef
Ricoy, M.-C., & Feliz, T. (2016). Twitter as a learning community in higher education. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 19(1), 237.
Sclater, N., Peasgood, A., & Mullan, J. (2016). Learning analytics in higher education. London: Jisc Accessed February, 8, 2017.
Seely Brown, J., & Adler, R. (2008). Open education, the long tail, and learning 2.0. Educause Review, 43(1), 16–20.
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics: Allyn & Bacon/Pearson Education.
Thomas, M. J. (2002). Learning within incoherent structures: The space of online discussion forums. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18(3), 351–366. CrossRef
- Understanding student use of twitter and online forums in higher education
Eleanor J. Dommett
- Springer US
Neuer Inhalt/© ITandMEDIA