Skip to main content

2018 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Understanding Uncertainty of Software Requirements Engineering: A Systematic Literature Review Protocol

verfasst von : Ahmad M. Salih, Mazni Omar, Azman Yasin

Erschienen in: Requirements Engineering for Internet of Things

Verlag: Springer Singapore

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Requirements engineering uncertainty is considered as one of the main problems in software industry. It can complicate early decisions on requirements and architecture and might expose the software project to significant risks. Continuous effort by researchers has resulted in a largely grown body of work on uncertainty in software requirements. In this paper, a systematic literature review protocol is presented to investigate the research literature on approaches deals with uncertainty in software requirements engineering. Requirements management was widely studied on the uncertainty in software requirement engineering. Results showed that review and analyses approach are most widely approaches dealt with requirements uncertainty and some were briefly explained. Further research is required on the identification of prominent causes of software requirements uncertainty and the solution to cope with such causes.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Perini, A., Susi, A., Ricca, F., Bazzanella, C.: An empirical study to compare the accuracy of AHP and CBRanking techniques for requirements prioritization. In: Fifth International Workshop on 2007 Comparative Evaluation in Requirements Engineering CERE 2007, pp. 23–35 (2007) Perini, A., Susi, A., Ricca, F., Bazzanella, C.: An empirical study to compare the accuracy of AHP and CBRanking techniques for requirements prioritization. In: Fifth International Workshop on 2007 Comparative Evaluation in Requirements Engineering CERE 2007, pp. 23–35 (2007)
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Ziv, H., Richardson, D., Klösch, R.: The uncertainty principle in software engineering. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Software Engineering ICSE 1997 (1997) Ziv, H., Richardson, D., Klösch, R.: The uncertainty principle in software engineering. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Software Engineering ICSE 1997 (1997)
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Letier, E., Stefan, D., Barr, E.T.: Uncertainty, risk, and information value in software requirements and architecture. In: Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 883–894 (2014) Letier, E., Stefan, D., Barr, E.T.: Uncertainty, risk, and information value in software requirements and architecture. In: Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 883–894 (2014)
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Salay, R., Chechik, M., Horkoff, J., Di Sandro, A.: Managing requirements uncertainty with partial models. Requirements Eng. 18, 107–128 (2013)CrossRef Salay, R., Chechik, M., Horkoff, J., Di Sandro, A.: Managing requirements uncertainty with partial models. Requirements Eng. 18, 107–128 (2013)CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Saha, S.K., Selvi, M., Buyukcan, G., Mohymen, M.: A systematic review on creativity techniques for requirements engineering. In: 2012 International Conference on Informatics, Electronics & Vision (ICIEV), pp. 34–39 (2012) Saha, S.K., Selvi, M., Buyukcan, G., Mohymen, M.: A systematic review on creativity techniques for requirements engineering. In: 2012 International Conference on Informatics, Electronics & Vision (ICIEV), pp. 34–39 (2012)
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Ebert, C., De Man, J.: Requirements uncertainty: influencing factors and concrete improvements. In: Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 553–560 (2005) Ebert, C., De Man, J.: Requirements uncertainty: influencing factors and concrete improvements. In: Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 553–560 (2005)
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Voola, P., Babu, A.V.: Requirements uncertainty prioritization approach: a novel approach for requirements prioritization. Softw. Eng. Int. J. (SEIJ) 2, 37–49 (2012) Voola, P., Babu, A.V.: Requirements uncertainty prioritization approach: a novel approach for requirements prioritization. Softw. Eng. Int. J. (SEIJ) 2, 37–49 (2012)
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Keele, S.: Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. Technical report, Ver. 2.3 EBSE Technical report. EBSE, ed. (2007) Keele, S.: Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. Technical report, Ver. 2.3 EBSE Technical report. EBSE, ed. (2007)
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Kitchenham, B.: Procedures for performing systematic reviews, Keele University, Keele, UK, vol. 33, pp. 1–26 (2004) Kitchenham, B.: Procedures for performing systematic reviews, Keele University, Keele, UK, vol. 33, pp. 1–26 (2004)
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Brereton, P., Kitchenham, B.A., Budgen, D., Turner, M., Khalil, M.: Lessons from applying the systematic literature review process within the software engineering domain. J. Syst. Softw. 80, 571–583 (2007)CrossRef Brereton, P., Kitchenham, B.A., Budgen, D., Turner, M., Khalil, M.: Lessons from applying the systematic literature review process within the software engineering domain. J. Syst. Softw. 80, 571–583 (2007)CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Kitchenham, B., Pretorius, R., Budgen, D., Brereton, O.P., Turner, M., Niazi, M., Linkman, S.: Systematic literature reviews in software engineering–a tertiary study. Inf. Softw. Technol. 52, 792–805 (2010)CrossRef Kitchenham, B., Pretorius, R., Budgen, D., Brereton, O.P., Turner, M., Niazi, M., Linkman, S.: Systematic literature reviews in software engineering–a tertiary study. Inf. Softw. Technol. 52, 792–805 (2010)CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Dybä, T., Kitchenham, B., Jorgensen, M.: Evidence-based software engineering for practitioners. Softw. IEEE 22, 58–65 (2005)CrossRef Dybä, T., Kitchenham, B., Jorgensen, M.: Evidence-based software engineering for practitioners. Softw. IEEE 22, 58–65 (2005)CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Walia, G.S., Carver, J.C.: A systematic literature review to identify and classify software requirement errors. Inf. Softw. Technol. 51, 1087–1109 (2009)CrossRef Walia, G.S., Carver, J.C.: A systematic literature review to identify and classify software requirement errors. Inf. Softw. Technol. 51, 1087–1109 (2009)CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Understanding Uncertainty of Software Requirements Engineering: A Systematic Literature Review Protocol
verfasst von
Ahmad M. Salih
Mazni Omar
Azman Yasin
Copyright-Jahr
2018
Verlag
Springer Singapore
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7796-8_13