Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen
The United Nations Global Compact (UNGC) was created in 2000 to leverage UN prestige and induce corporations to embrace 10 principles incorporating values of environmental sustainability, protection of human rights, fair treatment of workers, and elimination of bribery and corruption. We review and analyze the GC’s activities and impact in enhancing corporate social responsibility since inception. First, we propose an analytical framework which allows us to assess the qualities of the UNGC and its principles in the context of external and internal elements that influence code effectiveness and implementation. Second, we analyze UNGC performance in encouraging companies to become signatory members and bring about demonstrable change in corporate CSR-sustainability activities. In its 10-year report, UNGC has proclaimed growth in both membership and program activity. However, all credible and publicly available data and documentation conclusively demonstrate that the UNGC has failed to induce its signatory companies to enhance their CSR efforts and integrate the 10 principles in their policies and operations. The result has been a loss of public trust and support of UNGC from important constituencies among civil society organizations, and those individuals and groups adversely impacted by corporate activities and resultant negative externalities. This diminished credibility has also made UNGC largely dependent on the corporate sector for its very survival. We conclude that this dependence has in turn impaired and would continue to hinder UNGC’s ability to fulfill its mission. Such an outcome raises serious questions as to the viability, usefulness, and continued existence of UNGC.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
Andreoni, J., & McGuire, M. C. (1993). Identifying the free riders. Journal of Public Economics, 51(3), 447. CrossRef
Bruno, K., & Karliner, J. (2000). Tangled up in blue: Corporate partnerships at the United Nations. Corpwatch.
Casement, A. (2008). Ethical governance. British Journal of Psychotherapy, 24(4), 407–428. CrossRef
Cattaui, M. L. (2000, July 26). Yes to Annan’s ‘Global Compact’ if it isn’t a license to meddle . International Herald Tribune.
Conlon, J. R., & Pecorino, P. (2004). Policy reform and the free-rider problem. Public Choice, 120(1/2), 123–142. CrossRef
Cragg, W. (2005). Ethics codes, corporations and the challenge of globalization. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Fall, P. L. (2009). Corporate sponsoring in the United Nations system: Principles and guidelines. Geneva: United Nations.
Fall, P. L., & Zahran, M. M. (2010). United Nations corporate partnerships: The role and functioning of the Global Compact. Geneva: United Nations.
Florini, A. (1998). The end of secrecy. Foreign Policy, 111, 50–63. CrossRef
Frost, A. (2003). Restoring faith in government: Transparency reform in the United States and the European Union. European Public Law, 9(1), 87–104.
Gilbert, D. U. (2010). The United Nations Global Compact as a network of networks. In A. Rasche & G. Kell (Eds.), The United Nations Global Compact: Achievements, trends, and challenges (pp. 340–354). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
Hale, T. N. (2008). Transparency, accountability, and global governance. Global Governance, 14(1), 73–94.
Hall, C. (2010). United Nations Global Compact annual review—Anniversary edition. New York: The United Nations Global Compact.
Inderst, R. (2005). Matching markets with adverse selection. Journal of Economic Theory, 121(2), 145–166. CrossRef
Kapstein, E. B. (2001). The corporate ethics crusade. Foreign Affairs, 80(5), 105–119. CrossRef
Kell, G. (2003). The Global Compact: Origins, operations, progress, challenges. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 11(Autumn), 35–49. CrossRef
Kell, G. (2005). The Global Compact: Selected experiences and reflections. Journal of Business Ethics, 59(1), 69–79. CrossRef
Kell, G., & Levin, D. (2003). The Global Compact network: An historic experiment in learning and action. Business and Society Review, 108(2), 151–181. CrossRef
Kell, G., & Ruggie, J. G. (1999). Global markets and social legitimacy: The case of the ‘Global Compact’. Transnational Corporations, 8(3), 101–120.
King, A. A., & Lenox, M. J. (2000). Industry self-regulation without sanctions: The chemical industry’s Responsible Care Program. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 698–716. CrossRef
Kolk, A., & van Tulder, R. (2005). Setting new global rules? TNCs and codes of conduct. Transnational Corporations, 14(3), 1–27.
Laufer, W. (2006). Corporate bodies and guilty minds: The failure of corporate criminal liability. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. CrossRef
Lenox, M. J., & Nash, J. (2003). Industry self-regulation and adverse selection: A comparison across four trade association programs. Business Strategy & the Environment (Wiley), 12(6), 343–356. CrossRef
Making sense of CSR- S reports. (2010). New York: International Center for Corporate Accountability.
Morrison, J., & Schulte, P. (2009). Water disclosure 2.0: Assessment of current and emerging practice in corporate water reporting. Oakland: Pacific Institute.
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
Rasche, A. (2009). “A necessary supplement”: What the United Nations Global Compact is and is not. Business & Society, 48(4), 511–537. CrossRef
Rodrik, D. (1997). Has globalization gone too far?. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.
Ruggie, J. G. (2001). Global_governance.net: The Global Compact as learning network. Global Governance, 7, 371–378.
Ruggie, J. G. (2002). The theory and practice of learning networks: Corporate social responsibility and the Global Compact. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 5(Spring), 27–36. CrossRef
Schepers, D. (2010). Challenges to legitimacy at the Forest Stewardship Council. Journal of Business Ethics, 92(2), 279–290. CrossRef
Schepers, D. H. (2011). The Equator Principles: A promise in progress? Corporate Governance, 11(1), 90–106. CrossRef
Sethi, S. P. (2003a). Globalization and the good corporation: A need for proactive co-existence. Journal of Business Ethics, 43(1/2), 21–31. CrossRef
Sethi, S. P. (2003b). Setting global standards: Guidelines for creating codes of conduct in multinational corporations. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Sethi, S. P. (2011). Globalization and self-regulation: The crucial role that corporate codes of conduct play in global business. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan. CrossRef
Sethi, S., Lowry, D., Veral, E., Shapiro, H., & Emelianova, O. (2011a). Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold, Inc.: An innovative voluntary code of conduct to protect human rights, create employment opportunities, and economic development of the indigenous people. Journal of Business Ethics, 103(1), 1–30. CrossRef
Sethi, S. P., Veral, E., Shapiro, H., & Emelianova, O. (2011b). Mattel, Inc.: Global Manufacturing Principles (GMP)—A life-cycle analysis of a company-based code of conduct in the toy industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 99, 483–517. CrossRef
Utting, P., & Zammit, A. (2006). Beyond pragmatism: Appraising UN- business partnerships (No. UNRISD/PPMBR1/06/1). Geneva: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development.
Whelan, T., & Dwinnells, E. (2011). The role of certification in protecting the world’s forests. In S. P. Sethi (Ed.), Globalization and self-regulation: The crucial role that corporate codes of conduct play in global business (pp. 191–210). New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.
Williams, O. F. (2004). The UN Global Compact: The challenge and the promise. Business Ethics Quarterly, 14(4), 755–774. CrossRef
Wilson, C. (1980). The nature of equilibrium in markets with adverse selection. Bell Journal of Economics, 11(1), 108–130. CrossRef
Zammit, A. (2003). Development at risk: Re-thinking UN-business partnerships. Geneva: South Centre and UNRISD.
- United Nations Global Compact: The Promise–Performance Gap
S. Prakash Sethi
Donald H. Schepers
- Springer Netherlands
Neuer Inhalt/© Stellmach, Neuer Inhalt/© Maturus, Pluta Logo/© Pluta