Weitere Kapitel dieses Buchs durch Wischen aufrufen
British governments use governing networks in English urban regeneration policy as a strategy for tackling persistent unemployment in disadvantaged neighbourhoods. Networks govern in the sense that network participants steer financial incentives to meet specific regeneration goals and influence problem perceptions. This chapter considers why billions of regeneration aid over decades has left thousands of unemployed people no better off than before, and still with few employment prospects. First, it explores the scope of urban regeneration, and considers why regeneration may not acquiesce with the unemployment policy. Then it identifies eight governing network trends supporting political change from 1945. Thereafter, it discusses centralising networks since 1997. The chapter draws on wide-ranging theoretical frameworks, including power elites, pluralism, Marxism, New Right perspectives, growth coalitions, urban regimes, and policy network analysis and neighbourhood governance.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
Atkinson, R., & Moon, G. (1994). Urban policy in Britain. Basingstoke: Macmillan. CrossRef
Bache, I. (2000). Government within governance: Network steering in Yorkshire and the humber. Public Administration, 78(3), 575–592. CrossRef
Bache, I., & Catney, P. (2008). Embryonic Associationalism: New labour and urban governance. Public Administration, 86(2), 411–428. CrossRef
Bailey, N., Barker, A., & MacDonald, K. (1995). Partnership agencies in British urban policy. London: UCL Press. CrossRef
Ball, R. M. (1995). Local authorities and regional policy in the UK: Attitudes, representations and the local economy. London: Paul Chapman.
Bassett, K. (1996). Partnerships, business elites and urban politics: New forms of governance in an English city? Urban Studies, 33(3), 539–555. CrossRef
Burns, D., Hambleton, R., & Hoggett, P. (1994). The politics of decentralisation. Basingstoke: The Macmillan Press. CrossRef
Business, Innovation and Skills Committee (BISC) (2011). The new local enterprise partnerships: An initial assessment: Government response to the committee’s first report of session 2010–11, House of commons. London: The Stationery Office.
Cabinet Office (2000). Reaching out: The role of central government at regional and local level. London: Performance and Innovation Unit, Cabinet Office.
Cabinet Office (2011). Unlocking growth in cities. London: Cabinet Office.
Cameron, D. (2010). Big society speech. 19th July 2010 [online]. Transcript retrieved from http://www.number10.gov.uk/news/big-society-speech/
Catney, P. (2009). New labour and joined-up urban governance. Public Policy and Administration, 24(1), 47–66. CrossRef
Committee of Public Accounts (CoPA). (2014). Promoting economic growth locally, sixtieth report of session 2013–14. HC 1110. London: The Stationery Office.
Communities and Local Government Committee (CLGC). (2012). Government response to the house of commons communities and local government committee report of session 2010–12: Regeneration. Cm8264. London: The Stationery Office.
Conservative Party. (2009). Control shift: Returning power to local communities. Responsibility Agenda, Policy Green Paper No. 9. London: The Conservative Party.
Cope, S., & Goodship, J. (1999). Regulating collaborative government: Towards joined-up government? Public Policy and Administration, 14(2), 3–16. CrossRef
Craig, G., Mayo, M., Popple, K., Shaw, M., & Taylor, M. (Eds.). (2011). The community development reader: History, themes and issues. Bristol: The Policy Press.
Crisp, R., Gore, T., Pearson, S., & Tyler, P. with Clapham, D., Muir, J., & Robertson, D. (2014, July). Regeneration and poverty: Evidence and policy review. CRESR, Sheffield Hallam University.
Davies, J. S. (1999). Urban regime theory in critical perspective: A comparative study of public-private partnerships in UK local governance. Doctoral Thesis, York: York University.
Davies, J. S. (2001). Partnerships and regimes: The politics of urban regeneration in the UK. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Davies, J. S. (2003). Partnerships versus regimes: Why regime theory cannot explain urban coalitions in the UK. Journal of Urban Affairs, 25(3), 253–269. CrossRef
Davies, J. S. (2005). The social exclusion debate: Strategies, controversies and dilemmas. Policy Studies, 26(1), 3–27. CrossRef
Davies, J. S., & Pill, M. (2012). Hollowing out neighbourhood governance? Rescaling revitalisation in Baltimore and Bristol. Urban Studies, 49(10), 2199–2217. CrossRef
DCLG, & DWP (2007). The working neighbourhood funds. London: DCLG.
Department for Business Innovation and Skills (DBIS). (2010a, June 29). Letter re proposals for local enterprise partnerships. From the Secretary of State for BIS and the Secretary of State for DCLG.
Department for Business Innovation and Skills (DBIS). (2010b). Local growth: Realising every place’ s potential. Cm 7961. Norwich: The Stationery Office.
Department for Business Innovation and Skills (DBIS). (2011). Do it your way – Deputy Prime Minister launches new ‘City Deals’. Press release, 8 December 2011. Retrieved from http://www.gov.uk/government/news/do-it-your-way-deputy-prime-ministerlaunches-city-deals
Department of the Environment (DoE). (1977). Policy for the inner cities. Cmnd 6845. London: HMSO.
Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions (DETR) (1998). Housing and regeneration policy. A statement by the Deputy Prime Minister. London: DETR.
Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions (DETR). (2000). Joining it up locally. Policy Action Team 17 Report. London: DETR.
Department for Transport, Local Government and the Regions (DTLR). (2002). Neighbourhood regeneration: Lessons and evaluation evidence from ten single regeneration budget case studies. Urban Research Summary, No. 1. London: DTLR.
Edwards, J., & Batley, R. (1978). The politics of positive discrimination: An evaluation of the urban programme 1967–77. London: Tavistock.
Evans, G. (2005). Measure for measure: Evaluating the evidence of culture’s contribution to regeneration. Urban Studies, 42(5/6), 1–25.
Geddes, M. (2000). Tackling social exclusion in the European Union? The limits to the new orthodoxy of local partnership. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 24(4), 782–800. CrossRef
Gilchrist, A. (2004). The well-connected community. A networking approach to community development. Bristol: The Policy Press.
Goldsmith, S., & Eggers, W. D. (2004). Governing by network. The new shape of the public sector. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution Press.
Harrison, J. (2011). Local Enterprise Partnerships. Loughborough: Loughborough University.
Hasluck, C. (1987). Urban unemployment. Harlow: Longman Group UK.
Hastings, A. (1996). Unravelling the process of ‘Partnership’ in Urban Regeneration Policy. Urban Studies, 33(2), 253–268. CrossRef
Haughton, G., Lloyd, P., & Meegan, R. (1999). The re-emergence of community economic development in Britain: The European dimension to grassroots involvement in local regeneration. In G. Haughton (Ed.), Community economic development (pp. 209–224). London: The Stationery Office with the Regional Studies Association.
HM Treasury. (2007). Increasing employment opportunity for all. In The budget (pp. 57–73). London: The Stationery Office.
Hood, C. (1998). The art of the state, culture, rhetoric and public management. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
House of Commons Library. (2014, June 27). Local Enterprise Partnerships, Standard Note SN/EP/5651.
Jenkins, K., Caines, K., & Jackson, A. (1988). Improving management in government: The next steps, report to the Prime Minister. London: HMSO.
Jones, P., & Evans, J. (2013). Urban regeneration in the UK (2nd ed.). London: Sage. CrossRef
Jones, M. R., & Ward, K. G. (1997). Crisis and disorder in British local economic governance: Business link and the single regeneration budget. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 5(3), 154–165. CrossRef
Judge, D., & Dickson, T. (1991). The British state, governments and manufacturing decline. In G. Esland (ed.), Education, training and employment, volume 1: Educated labour – The changing basis of industrial demand. Wokingham: Addison-Wesley in association with The Open University.
Kitson, M., & Michie, J. (1994). Depression and recovery: Lessons from the interwar period. In J. Michie & J. Grieve Smith (Eds.), Unemployment in Europe (pp. 75–96). London: Academic Press.
Lane, J.-E. (2000). New public management. London: Routledge.
Lawless, P. (1989). Britain’s inner cities (2nd ed.). London: Paul Chapman.
Ling, T. (2002). Delivering joined-up government in the UK: Dimensions, issues and problems. Public Administration, 80(4), 615–642. CrossRef
Lowe, R. (2011). The official history of the British civil service. Abingdon: Routledge.
Lowndes, V., & Sullivan, H. (2008). How low can you go? Rationales and challenges for neighbourhood governance. Public Administration, 86(1), 53–74. CrossRef
MacKay, R. R. (1998). Unemployment as exclusion: Unemployment as choice. In P. Lawless, R. Martin, & S. Hardy (Eds.), Unemployment and social exclusion (pp. 49–68). Oxon: Jessica Kingsley.
Mahoney, W., Smith, G., & Stoker, G. (2000). Social capital and urban governance: Adding a more contextualized ‘top-down’ perspective. Political Studies, 48(4), 802–820. CrossRef
Mandell, M. P., & Keast, R. (2008). Voluntary and community sector partnerships, current inter-organizational relations and future challenges. In S. Cropper, M. Cropper, C. Huxham, & P. Ring (Eds.), The Oxford book of inter-organizational relations (pp. 175–202). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Marsh, D. (1983). Pressure politics. London: Junction Books.
Marsh, D., & Locksley, G. (1983). Capital: The neglected face of power? In D. Marsh (Ed.), Pressure politics (pp. 21–52). London: Junction Books.
Mawson, J., & Hall, S. (2000). Joining it up locally? Area regeneration and holistic government in England. Regional Studies, 34(1), 67–79. CrossRef
McCarthy, M. (1983). Child poverty action group: Poor and powerless? In D. Marsh (Ed.), Pressure politics (pp. 212–233). London: Junction Books.
McGregor, A., Glass, A., Higgins, K., Macdougall, L., & Sutherland, V. (2003). Developing people – Regenerating place: Achieving greater integration for local area regeneration. York: The Policy Press and the Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
Moore, M. (2000). Competition within and between organizations. In D. Robinson, T. Hewitt, & J. Harriss (Eds.), Managing development: Understanding inter-organizational relationships (pp. 89–113). London: Sage in Association with the Open University.
Moore, C., Richardson, J. J., & Moon, J. (1989). Local partnership and the unemployment crisis in Britain. London: Unwin Hyman.
National Audit Commission (NAO). (1989). Urban regeneration and economic development: The local government dimension. London: The Stationery Office.
National Audit Commission (NAO). (2013). Funding and structures for local economic growth. HC 542. London: The Stationery Office.
National Audit Commission (NAO). (2016). Local enterprise partnerships. HC 887. London: The Stationery Office.
Pacione, M. (1997). Urban restructuring and the reproduction of inequality in Britain’s cities: An overview. In M. Pacione (Ed.), Britain’s cities: Geographies of division in Urban Britain (pp. 7–60). London: Routledge. CrossRef
Page, S. (2004). Measuring accountability for results in interagency collaboratives. Public Administration Review, 64(5), 591–606. CrossRef
Painter, C., Isaac-Henry, K., & Rouse, J. (1997). Local authorities and non-elected agencies: Strategic responses and organizational networks. Public Administration, 75(2), 225–245. CrossRef
Papadopoulos, Y. (2007). Problems of democratic accountability in network and multilevel governance. European Law Journal, 13(4), 469–486. CrossRef
Parkinson, M., & Wilks, S. (1986). The politics of inner city partnerships. In M. Goldsmith (Ed.), New research in central-local relations (pp. 290–307). Aldershot: Gower.
Perri 6 (2004). Joined-up government in the western world in comparative perspective: A preliminary literature review and exploration. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14(1), 103–138. CrossRef
Peters, B. G. (1999). Institutional theory in political science: The ‘new institutionalism’. London: Continuum.
Pollitt, C. (2003). The essential public manager. Maidenhead and Philadelphia: Open University Press/McGraw Hill.
Power, A. (2001). Social exclusion and urban sprawl: Is the rescue of cities possible? Regional Studies, 35(8), 731–742. CrossRef
Pugalis, L., & McGuiness, D. (2013). From a framework to a toolkit: Urban regeneration in an age of austerity. Journal of Urban Regeneration and Renewal, 6(4), 339–353.
Rhodes, R. A. W. (1988). Beyond Westminster and Whitehall. London: Unwin Hyman.
Rhodes, R. A. W. (1997). Understanding governance: Policy networks, governance, reflexivity and accountability. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Rhodes, J., Tyler, P., & Brennan, A. (2003). New developments in area-based initiatives in England: The experience of the single regeneration budget. Urban Studies, 40(8), 1399–1426. CrossRef
Richards, D. (2008). New labour and the civil service: Reconstituting the Westminster Model. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossRef
Richards, D., & Smith, M. J. (2002). Governance and public policy in the UK. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rose, N., & Miller, P. (1992). Political power beyond the state: Problematics of government. The British Journal of Sociology, 43(2), 173–205. CrossRef
Rydin, Y. (2011). The purpose of planning: Creating sustainable towns and cities. Bristol: The Policy Press.
Skelcher, C. (2004). The new governance of communities. In G. Stoker & D. Wilson (Eds.), British local government into the 21st century (pp. 25–42). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossRef
Smith, M. J. (1993). Pressure, power and policy: State autonomy and policy networks in Britain and the United States. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Smith, M., & Beazley, M. (2000). Progressive regimes, partnerships and the involvement of local communities: A framework for evaluation. Public Administration, 78(4), 885–878. CrossRef
Social Exclusion Unit (SEU). (1998). Bringing Britain together: A national strategy for neighbourhood renewal. CM 4045. London: Cabinet Office.
Social Exclusion Unit (SEU). (2001, January) A new commitment to neighbourhood renewal: National strategy action plan (London: Cabinet Office).
Stewart, M., Goss, S., Gillanders, G., Clarke, R., Rowe, J., & Shaftoe, H. (1999). Cross-cutting issues affecting local government. London: DETR.
Stoker, G. (1991). The politics of local government (2nd ed.). Basingstoke: Macmillan. CrossRef
Stoker, G. (2004). Transforming local governance. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossRef
Sullivan, H. (2004). Community governance and local government: A shoe that fits or the emperor’s new clothes. In G. Stoker & D. Wilson (Eds.), British local government into the 21st century (pp. 182–198). Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossRef
Sullivan, H., & Skelcher, C. (2002). Working across boundaries: Collaboration in public services. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossRef
Tallon, A. (2013) Urban regeneration (2nd ed.). Abingdon: Routledge.
Taylor, M. (2000a). Top down meets bottom up: Neighbourhood management. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
Taylor, M. (2007). Community participation in the real world: Opportunities and pitfalls in new governance spaces. Urban Studies, 44(2), 297–317. CrossRef
Tofarides, M. (2003). Urban policy in the European Union: A multi-level gatekeeper system. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Tomaney, J. (2004). Regionalism and the challenge for local authorities. In G. Stoker & D. Wilson (Eds.), British local government into the 21st century (pp. 167–181). Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossRef
Turok, I., & Robson, B. (2007). Linking neighbourhood regeneration to city-region growth; Why and how? Journal of Urban Regeneration and Renewal, 1(1), 44–54.
Tyler, P., Warnock, C., Provins, A., & Lanz, B. (2013). Valuing the benefits of urban regeneration. Urban Studies, 50(1), 169–190. CrossRef
Ward, H., & John, P. (2008). A spatial model of competitive bidding for government grants: Why efficiency gains are limited. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 20(1), 47–66. CrossRef
Wilson, D. (1992). Cooperation and competition in the voluntary sector: The strategic challenges of the 1990s and beyond. In J. Batsleer, C. Cornforth, & R. Paton (Eds.), Issues in voluntary and non-profit management (pp. 169–180). Wokingham: Addison-Wesley in Association with the Open University.
- Urban Regeneration Policy and Governing Networks
J. M. Hurst
- Palgrave Macmillan UK
- Chapter 4
Entwicklung einer Supply-Strategie bei der Atotech Deutschland GmbH am Standort Feucht