nach oben

Erschienen in:

2020 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

5. Urteilen und Entscheiden im Sport

verfasst von : Geoffrey Schweizer, Henning Plessner

Erschienen in: Sportpsychologie

Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Zusammenfassung

Psychologische Theorien erklären Urteile und Entscheidungen und spezifizieren die ihnen zugrundeliegenden Prozesse. So können Urteile und Entscheidungen viele oder wenige Informationen berücksichtigen, schnell oder langsam sein und auf bewusstem Nachdenken oder auf Routinen beruhen. Verschiedene Faktoren können unerwünschte Einflüsse auf Urteile und Entscheidungen ausüben. Dazu gehören Vorwissen, Zuschauerlärm und die Urteile und Entscheidungen anderer. So legen sportpsychologische Studien nahe, dass frühere Entscheidungen von Unparteiischen spätere Entscheidungen beeinflussen, dass Unparteiische strenger urteilen, wenn Zuschauer und Zuschauerinnen lauter sind und dass Mitglieder von Kampfgerichten sich von den Urteilen der anderen Mitglieder beeinflussen lassen. Urteile und Entscheidungen im Sport können durch Interventionen verbessert werden. Dazu ist ein grundlagenwissenschaftliches Verständnis des jeweiligen Urteils- oder Entscheidungsvorgangs hilfreich.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Neurokognition und Bewegung

Nächstes Kapitel Embodied Cognition

Anderson, K. J., & Pierce, D. A. (2009). Officiating bias: The effect of foul differential on foul calls in NCAA basketball. Journal of Sports Sciences, 27, 686–694.CrossRef

Baldo, M. V. C., Ranvaud, R. D., & Morya, E. (2002). Flag errors in soccer games: The flash-lag effect brought to real life. Perception, 31, 1205–1210.CrossRefPubMed

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.

Bar-Eli, M., Avugos, S., & Raab, M. (2006). Twenty years of „hot hand“ research. The hot hand phenomenon: Review and critique. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 7, 525–553.CrossRef

Baron, J. (2000). Thinking and deciding (3. Aufl.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bennis, W. M., & Pachur, T. (2006). Fast and frugal heuristic in sports. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 7, 611–629.CrossRef

Betsch, T. (2008). The nature of intuition and its neglect in research on judgment and decision making. In H. Plessner, C. Betsch, & T. Betsch (Hrsg.), Intuition in judgment and decision making (S. 3–22). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Betsch, T., Funke, J., & Plessner, H. (2011). Denken – Urteilen, Entscheiden, Problemlösen. Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRef

Boen, F., Vanden Auweele, Y., Claes, E., Feys, J., & De Cuyper, B. (2006). The impact of open feedback on conformity among judges in rope skipping. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 7, 577–590.CrossRef

Boen, F., Van Hoye, K., Vanden Auweele, Y., Feys, J., & Smits, T. (2008). Open feedback in gymnastic judging causes conformity bias based on informational influencing. Journal of Sports Sciences, 26, 621–628.CrossRefPubMed

Brunswik, E. (1952). The conceptual framework of psychology. (Int. Encycl. unified Sci., v. 1, no. 10.). Oxford: University of Chicago Press.

Campell, D., & Kenny, D. (1999). A primer on regression artifacts. New York, NY: Guilford.

Cooksey, R. W. (1996). The methodology of social judgment theory. Thinking and Reasoning, 2, 141–173.CrossRef

Damisch, L., Mussweiler, T., & Plessner, H. (2006). Olympic medals as fruits of comparison? Assimilation and contrast in sequential performance judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 12, 166–178.PubMed

Darwin, C. R. (1838). This is the Question Marry Not Marry [Memorandum on marriage]. (7.1838) CUL-DAR210.8.2. http://darwin-online.org.uk/content/frameset?viewtype=side&itemID=CUL-DAR210.8.2&pageseq=1.

Darwin, E. (1882). Reminiscences of Charles Darwin’s last years. CUL-DAR210.9. http://darwin-online.org.uk/content/frameset?viewtype=side&itemID=CUL-DAR210.9&pageseq=16.

Dawes, R. M. (1998). Behavioral decision making and judgment. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Hrsg.), The handbook of social psychology (4. Aufl., S. 497–548). Boston: McGraw-Hill.

Doherty, M. E., & Kurz, E. M. (1996). Social judgment theory. Thinking and Reasoning, 2, 109–140.

Deutsch, M., & Gerard, H. B. (1955). A study of normative and informational influence upon individual judgement. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51, 629–636.CrossRef

Edwards, W. (1954). The theory of decision making. Psychological Bulletin, 51, 380–417.CrossRefPubMed

Evans, J. St. B. T. (2010). Intuition and reasoning: A dual-process perspective. Psychological Inquiry, 21, 313–326.CrossRef

Evans, J. St. B. T., & Stanovich, K. E. (2013). Dual-process theories of higher cognition: Advancing the debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 223–241.

Fasold, F., Memmert, D., & Unkelbach, C. (2015). A theory-based intervention to prevent calibration effects in serial sport performance evaluations. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 18, 47–52.CrossRef

Furley, P., & Memmert, D. (2012). Working memory capacity as controlled attention in tactical decision making. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 34, 322–344.CrossRefPubMed

Furley, P., & Memmert, D. (2015). Creativity and working memory capacity in sports: working memory capacity is not a limiting factor in creative decision making amongst skilled performers. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 115.PubMedPubMedCentral

Furley, P., Schweizer, G., & Bertrams, A. (2015). The two modes of an athlete: Dual-process theories in the field of sport. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 8, 106–124.CrossRef

Gigerenzer, G., & Goldstein, D. G. (1996). Reasoning the fast and frugal way: Models of bounded rationality. Psychological Review, 103, 650–669.CrossRefPubMed

Gigerenzer, G, & Goldstein, D. G. (1999). Betting on one good reason. The take the best heuristic. In G. Gigerenzer, P. M. Todd, & the ABC Research Group, Simple heuristics that make us smart (S. 75–95). New York: Oxford University Press.

Gigerenzer, G. Todd, P. M., & the ABC Research Group. (1999). Simple heuristics that make us smart. New York: Oxford University Press.

Gigerenzer, G., & Selten, R. (Hrsg.). (2001). Bounded rationality: The adaptive toolbox. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Gilovich, T., Vallone, R., & Tversky, A. (1985). The hot hand in basketball: On the misperception of random sequences. Cognitive Psychology, 17, 295–314.CrossRef

Glöckner, A., & Betsch, T. (2008). Multiple-reason decision making based on automatic processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 1055–1075.

Goldstein, W. M. (2004). Social judgment theory: Applying and extending Brunswik’s probabilistic functionalism. In D. Koehler & N. Harvey (Hrsg.), Blackwell handbook of judgment and decision making (S. 37–61). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.

Helsen, W., & Bultynck, J. B. (2004). Physical and perceptual-cognitive demands of top-class refereeing in association football. Journal of Sports Sciences, 22, 179–189.CrossRefPubMed

Helsen, W., Gilis, B., & Weston, M. (2006). Errors in judging „offside“ in football: Test of the optical error versus the perceptual flash-lag hypothesis. Journal of Sports Sciences, 24, 512–528.CrossRef

Johnson, J. G., & Raab, M. (2003). Take the first: Option-generation and resulting choices. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 91, 215–229.CrossRef

Jones, M. V., Paul, G. C., & Erskine, J. (2002). The impact of a team’s reputation on the decisions of association football referees. Journal of Sports Sciences, 20, 991–1000.CrossRefPubMed

Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (Hrsg.). (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263–291.

Mascarenhas, D. R. D., Collins, D., & Mortimer, P. W. (2002). The art of reason versus the exactness of science in elite refereeing: comments on Plessner and Betsch (2001). Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 24, 328–333.CrossRefPubMed

McCord, J. (2003). Cures that harm: unanticipated outcomes of crime prevention programs. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences, 587, 7–30.CrossRef

Memmert, D. (2013). Tactical creativity. In T. McGarry, P. O’Donoghue, & J. Sampaio (Hrsg.), Routledge handbook of sports performance analysis (S. 297–308). Abingdon: Routledge.

Miller, J. B., & Sanjurjo, A. (2015). A cold shower for the hot hand fallacy. IGIER Working Paper No. 518.

Miller, J. B., & Sanjurjo, A. (2016). Surprised by the gambler’s and hot hand fallacies? A truth in the law of small numbers. IGIER Working Paper No. 552.

Mussweiler, T. (2003). Comparison processes in social judgment: Mechanisms and consequences. Psychological Review, 110, 472–489.CrossRefPubMed

Nevill, A. M., Balmer, N. J., & Williams, A. M. (1999). Crowd influence on decisions in association football. Lancet, 353, 1416–1416.CrossRefPubMed

Oudejans, R. R. D., Verheijen, R., Bakker, F. C., Gerrits, J. C., Steinbrücken, M., & Beek, P. J. (2000). Errors in judging „offside“ in football. Nature, 404, 33.CrossRefPubMed

Oudejans, R. R. D., Bakker, F. C., Verheijen, R., Steinbrückner, M., Gerrits, J. C., & Beek, P. J. (2005). How position and motion of expert assistant referees in soccer relate to the quality of their offside judgements during actual match play. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 36, 3–21.

Plessner, H. (1999). Expectation biases in gymnastics judging. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 21, 131–144.CrossRef

Plessner, H., & Betsch, T. (2001). Sequential effects in important referee decisions: The case of penalties in soccer. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 23, 254–259.CrossRef

Plessner, H., & Betsch, T. (2002). Refereeing in sports is supposed to be a craft, not an art. Response to Mascarenhas, Collins, and Mortimer (2002). Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 24, 334–337.CrossRef

Plessner, H., Schweizer, G., Brand, R., & O’Hare, D. (2009). A multiple-cue learning approach as the basis for understanding and improving soccer referees’ decision making. In M. Raab, J. Johnson, & H. Heekeren (Hrsg.), Progress in brain research: Mind and motion: The bidirectional link between thought and action (S. 151–158). Amsterdam: Elsevier Press.CrossRef

Raab, M., Gula, B., & Gigerenzer, G. (2012). The hot hand exists in Volleyball and is used for allocation decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 18, 81–94.PubMed

Roth, K. (2003). Spielintelligenz. In P. Röthig & R. Prohl (Hrsg.), Sportwissenschaftliches Lexikon (7. Aufl., S. 487–488). Schorndorf: Hofmann.

Schmidt-Atzert, L., & Amelang, M. (2012). Psychologische Diagnostik (5., vollst. überarbeitete u. erweiterte Aufl.). Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRef

Schwarz, W. (2011). Compensating tendencies in penalty kick decisions of referees in professional football: Evidence from the German Bundesliga 1963–2006. Journal of Sports Sciences, 29, 441–447.CrossRefPubMed

Schweizer, G., Plessner, H., & Brand, R. (2013). Establishing standards for basketball elite referees’ decisions. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 25, 370–375.CrossRef

Simon, H. A. (1982). Models of bounded rationality. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124–1131.CrossRefPubMed

Unkelbach, C., & Memmert, D. (2008). Game management, context effects, and calibration: The case of yellow cards in soccer. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 30, 95–109.CrossRef

Unkelbach, C., & Memmert, D. (2010). Crowd noise as a cue in referee decisions contributes to the home advantage. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 32, 483–498.CrossRef

Unkelbach, C., & Memmert, D. (2014). Serial position effects in evaluative judgments. Current Directions in Psychology Science, 23, 195–200.CrossRef

Unkelbach, C., Ostheimer, V., Fasold, F., & Memmert, D. (2012). A calibration explanation of serial position effects in evaluative judgments. Organizational Behavior and Human Decisions, 119, 103–113.CrossRef

Vanden Auweele, Y., Boen, F., De Geest, A., & Feys, F. (2004). Judging bias in synchronized swimming: Open feedback leads to non-performance-based conformity. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 26, 561–571.CrossRef

Wigton, R. S. (1996). Social judgement theory and medical judgment. Thinking and Reasoning, 2, 175–190.CrossRef

Titel: Urteilen und Entscheiden im Sport
verfasst von: Geoffrey Schweizer
Henning Plessner
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Buch: Sportpsychologie
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-56801-9

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-662-56802-6

Copyright-Jahr: 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-56802-6_5